Validity of self-reported height and weight among adolescents: the importance of reporting capability

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Mogens Trab Damsgaard¹  Ole Melkevik²  Bjørn E Holstein¹  Mette Rasmussen¹ 

[1] National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Øster Farimagsgade 5A, Copenhagen K DK-1353, Denmark;Department of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 4404Nydalen, N-0403, Oslo, Norway

关键词: Adolescents;    Response capability;    Validity;    Self-reports;    Height/weight;   

Others  :  1092363
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2288-13-85

 received in 2012-06-13, accepted in 2013-06-12,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

This study proposes a new approach for investigating bias in self-reported data on height and weight among adolescents by studying the relevance of participants’ self-reported response capability. The objectives were 1) to estimate the prevalence of students with high and low self-reported response capability for weight and height in a self-administrated questionnaire survey among 11–15 year old Danish adolescents, 2) to estimate the proportion of missing values on self-reported height and weight in relation to capability for reporting height and weight, and 3) to investigate the extent to which adolescents’ response capability is of importance for the accuracy and precision of self-reported height and weight. Also, the study investigated the impact of students’ response capability on estimating prevalence rates of overweight.

Methods

Data was collected by a school-based cross-sectional questionnaire survey among students aged 11–15 years in 13 schools in Aarhus, Denmark, response rate =89%, n = 2100. Response capability was based on students’ reports of perceived ability to report weight/height and weighing/height measuring history. Direct measures of height and weight were collected by school health nurses.

Results

One third of the students had low response capability for weight and height, respectively, and every second student had low response capability for BMI. The proportion of missing values on self-reported weight and height was significantly higher among students who were not weighed and height measured recently and among students who reported low recall ability. Among both boys and girls the precision of self-reported height and weight tended to be lower than among students with low response capability. Low response capability was related to BMI (z-score) and overweight prevalence among girls. These findings were due to a larger systematic underestimation of weight among girls who were not weighed recently (−1.02 kg, p < 0.0001) and among girls with low recall ability for weight (−0.99 kg, p = 0.0024).

Conclusion

This study indicates that response capability may be relevant for the accuracy of girls’ self-reported measurements of weight and height. Consequently, by integrating items on response capability in survey instruments, participants with low capability can be identified. Similar analyses based on other and less selected populations are recommended.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Rasmussen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Roberts C, Freeman J, Samdal O, Schnohr CW, de Looze m, Nic Gabhainn S, Iannotti R, Rasmussen M, The International HBSC study group: The health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study: methodological developments and current tensions. Int J Public Health 2009, 54(Suppl 2):140-150.
• [2]te Velde SJ, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Thorsdottir I, Rasmussen M, Hagströmer M, Klepp KI, Brug J: Patterns in sedentary and exercise behaviors and associations with overweight in 9–14-year-old boys and girls–a cross-sectional study. BMC Publ Health 2007, 7:16. BioMed Central Full Text
• [3]Haug E, Rasmussen M, Samdal O, Iannotti R, Kelly C, Borraccino A, Vereecken C, Melkevik O, Lazzeri G, Giacchi M, Ercan O, Due P, Ravens-Sieberer U, Currie C, Morgan A, Ahluwalia N, the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Obesity Working Group: Overweight in school-aged children and its relationship with demographic and lifestyle factors: results from the WHO-collaborative health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study. Int J Public Health 2009, 54(Suppl 2):167-179.
• [4]Currie C, Zanotti C, Morgan A, Currie D, de Looze M, Roberts C, Samdal O, Smith ORF, Barnekow V: Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. Health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study: international report from the 2009/10 survey. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2012. Health Policy for Children and Adolescents, No. 6
• [5]Giacchi M, Mattei R, Rossi S: Correction of the self-reported BMI in a teenage population. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998, 22:673-677.
• [6]Rovira RF, Pons IF, Martínes IM, Sánchez RR: Self-reported versus measured height, weight and body mass index in Spanish Mediterranean teenagers: effect of gender, age and weight on perceptual measures of body image. Ann Nutr Metab 2002, 46:68-72.
• [7]Wang Z, Patterson CM, Hills AP: A comparison of self-reported and measured height, weight and BMI in Australian adolescents. Aust N Z J Public Health 2002, 26:473-478.
• [8]Brener ND, McManus T, Galuska DA, Lowry R, Wechsler H: Reliability and validity of self-reported height and weight among high school students. J Adolesc Health 2003, 32:281-287.
• [9]Elgar FJ, Roberts C, Tudor-Smith C, Moore L: Validity of self-reported height and weight and predictors of bias in adolescents. J Adolesc Health 2005, 37:371-375.
• [10]Himes JH, Hannan P, Wall M, Neumark-Sztainer D: Factors associated with errors in self-reports of stature, weight, and body mass index in Minnesota adolescents. Ann Epidemiol 2005, 15:272-278.
• [11]Janssen W, van de Looij-Jansen PM, Ferreira I, de Wilde EJ, Brug J: Differences in measured and self-reported height and weight in Dutch adolescents. Ann Nutr Metab 2006, 50:339-346.
• [12]Tokmakidis SP, Christodoulos AD, Mantzouranis NI: Validity of self-reported anthropometric values used to assess body mass index and estimate obesity in Greek school children. J Adolesc Health 2007, 40:305-310.
• [13]Brettschneider AK, Rosario AS, Ellert U: Validity and predictors of BMI derived from self-reported height and weight among 11- to 17-year-old German adolescents from the KiGGS study. BMC Res Notes 2011, 4:414. BioMed Central Full Text
• [14]Fonseca H, Silva AM, Matos MG, Esteves I, Costa P, Guerra A, Gomes-Pedro J: Validity of BMI based on self-reported weight and height in adolescents. Acta Paediatr 2010, 99:83-88.
• [15]De Vriendt T, Huybrechts I, Ottevaere C, Van Trimpont I, De Henauw S: Validity of self-reported weight and height of adolescents, its impact on classification into BMI-categories and the association with weighing behaviour. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2009, 6:2696-2711.
• [16]Hauck FR, White L, Cao G, Woolf N, Strauss K: Inaccuracy of self-reported weights and heights among American Indian adolescents. Ann Epidemiol 1995, 5:386-392.
• [17]Currie C, Nic Gabhainn S, Godeau E and the International HBSC Network Coordinating Committee: The health behaviour in school-aged children: WHO collaborative cross-national (HBSC) study: origins, concept, history and development 1982–2008. Int J Public Health 2009, 54(Suppl 2):131-139.
• [18]de Onis M, Onyango AW, Borghi E, Siyam A, Nishida C, Siekmann J: Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ 2007, 85(9):660-667.
• [19]Woodward M: Epidemiology: study design and data analysis. 2nd edition. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2004.
• [20]Brown H, Prescott R: Applied mixed models in medicine. 2nd edition. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2006.
• [21]Kurth BM, Ellert U: Estimated and measured BMI and self-perceived body image of adolescents in Germany: part 1 - general implications for correcting prevalence estimations of overweight and obesity. Obes Facts 2010, 3(3):181-190.
• [22]Strauss RS: Comparison of measured and self-reported weight and height in a cross-sectional sample of young adolescents. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999, 23(8):904-908.
• [23]Morrissey SL, Whetstone LM, Cummings DM, Owen LJ: Comparison of self-reported and measured height and weight in eighth-grade students. J Sch Health 2006, 76(10):512-515.
• [24]Tsigilis N: Can sedondary school students’ self-reported measures of height and weight be trusted? An effect size approach. Eur J Public Health 2006, 16(5):532-535.
• [25]Shannon B, Smiciklas-Wright H, Wang MQ: Inaccuracies in self-reported weights and heights of a sample of sixth-grade children. J Am Diet Assoc 1991, 91:675-678.
• [26]Goodman E, Hinden BR, Khandelwal S: Accuracy of teen and parental reports of obesity and body mass index. Pediatrics 2000, 106:52-58.
• [27]Abalkhail BA, Shawky S, Soliman NK: Validity of self-reported weight and height among Saudi school children and adolescents. Saudi Med J 2002, 23(7):831-837.
• [28]Fortenberry JD: Reliability of adolescents’ reports of height and weight. J Adolesc Health 1992, 13:114-117.