Acute and preventive management of anaphylaxis in German primary school and kindergarten children

BMC Pediatrics

Christian Vogelberg²  Ursula Range¹  Magdalena Kilger² 

[1] Institute for Medical Informatics and Biometry (IMB), Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany;Pediatric Department, TU Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Dresden, Germany

关键词: School;    Kindergarten;    Emergency set;    Children;    Anaphylaxis;    Allergy;   

Others  :  1234556
DOI  :  10.1186/s12887-015-0477-6

 received in 2014-07-07, accepted in 2015-10-06,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Anaphylaxis is a severe, life-threatening situation. However, little is known about real-life anaphylactic management in children, especially in kindergarten and school settings, where a large number of anaphylaxes take place.

Methods

Parents, school teachers and child-care providers of 86 primary schools and kindergartens in the city of Dresden, Germany, received questionnaires to report their experience with anaphylaxis in children. The main foci of interest were symptoms, allergens, sites of occurrence, acute treatment and emergency sets.

Results

Out of 6352 returned questionnaires, 87 cases of anaphylaxis were identified. Prevalence was calculated at 1.5 %. Average age of the patients was 7 years, 58 % were boys. The majority of reactions occurred at home (67 %/58 children). Fourty seven percent (41 children) had recurrent episodes of anaphylaxis. Eighty two percent (71 children) showed cutaneous symptoms, 40 % (35 children) respiratory symptoms, 29 % (25 children) gastrointestinal symptoms, and 3.4 % (3 children) cardiovascular symptoms. Fourty seven percent were classified as mild reactions. Foods were the most common cause (60 %/52 cases). Out of these 52, tree-nuts (23 %/12 cases) and peanuts (16 %/8 cases) were the most frequent triggers. Sixty percent (52 cases) of reactions were treated by a physician, 35 % (30 cases) were treated by non-medical professionals only. Fifty one percent (44 children) received antihistamines, 37 % (32 children) corticosteroids, 1 % (1 child) intramuscular adrenaline. Sixty one percent of children (53 cases) received an emergency kit. Content were corticosteroids (70 %/37 cases) and antihistamines (62 %/33 cases). Adrenaline auto-injectors were prescribed to 26 % (14 cases). Concerning school and kindergarten-staff, 13 % of the child-care providers had no knowledge about the emergency kit’s content, compared to 34 % of teachers.

Conclusions

This study might support the impression of severe under-treatment of anaphylactic children in the use of adrenaline and prescription of incomplete equipped emergency sets. Knowledge of school and kindergarten staff must be improved through enhanced education.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Kilger et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Johansson SGO, Bieber T, Dahl R, Friedmann PS, Lanier BQ, Lockey RF et al.. Revised nomenclature for allergy for global use: report of the Nomenclature Review Committee of the World Allergy Organization, October 2003. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004; 113:832-836.
• [2]Sampson HA, Munoz-Furlong A, Bock SA, Schmitt C, Bass R, Chowdhury BA et al.. Symposium on the Definition and Management of Anaphylaxis: summary report. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005; 115:584-591.
• [3]Hompes S, Köhli A, Nemat K, Scherer K, Lange L, Rueff F et al.. Provoking allergens and treatment of anaphylaxis in children and adolescents - data from the anaphylaxis registry of German-speaking countries. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2011; 22:568-574.
• [4]Yocum MW, Butterfield JH, Klein JS, Volcheck GW, Schroeder DR, Silverstein MD. Epidemiology of anaphylaxis in Olmsted County: a population-based study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999; 104:452-456.
• [5]Mehl A, Wahn U, Niggemann B. Anaphylactic reactions in children – a questionnaire-based survey in Germany. Allergy. 2005; 60:1440-1445.
• [6]Gupta R, Sheikh A, Strachan DP, Anderson HR. Time trends in allergic disorders in the UK. Thorax. 2007; 62:91-96.
• [7]Gibbison B, Sheikh A, McShane P, Haddow C, Soar J. Anaphylaxis admissions to UK critical care units between 2005 and 2009. Anaesthesia. 2012; 67:833-839.
• [8]Sheikh A, Alves B. Hospital admissions for acute anaphylaxis: time trend study. BMJ. 2000; 320:1441.
• [9]Muraro A, Roberts G, Clark A, Eigenmann PA, Halken S, Lack G et al.. The management of anaphylaxis in childhood: position paper of the European academy of allergology and clinical immunology. Allergy. 2007; 62:857-871.
• [10]De Swert LF, Bullens D, Raes M, Dermaux AM. Anaphylaxis in referred pediatric patients: demographic and clinical features, triggers and therapeutic approach. Eur J Pediatr. 2008; 167:1251-1261.
• [11]Patel BM, Bansal PJ, Tobin MC. Management of anaphylaxis in child care centers: evaluation 6 and 12 months after an intervention program. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006; 97:813-815.
• [12]Joshi P, Katelaris CH, Frankum B. Adrenaline (epinephrine) autoinjector use in preschools. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009; 124:883-384.
• [13]Ercan H, Ozen A, Karatepe H, Berber M, Cengizlier R. Primary school teachers’ knowledge about and attitudes toward anaphylaxis. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2012; 23:428-432.
• [14]Krugman SD, Chiaramonte DR, Matsui EC. Diagnosis and management of food-induced anaphylaxis: a national survey of pediatricians. Pediatrics. 2006; 118:e554-60.
• [15]Grabenhenrich L, Hompes S, Gough H, Rueff F, Scherer K, Pfohler C et al.. Implementation of anaphylaxis management guidelines: a register-based study. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e35778.
• [16]Uguz A, Lack G, Pumphrey R, Ewan P, Warner J, Dick J et al.. Allergic reactions in the community: a questionnaire survey of members of the anaphylaxis campaign. Clin Exp Allergy. 2005; 35:746-750.
• [17]Neugut AI, Ghatak AT, Miller RL. Anaphylaxis in the United States: an investigation into its epidemiology. Arch Intern Med. 2001; 161:15-21.
• [18]Steinke M, Fiocchi A, Kirchlechner V, Ballmer-Weber B, Brockow K, Hischenhuber C et al.. Perceived food allergy in children in 10 European nations. A randomised telephone survey. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2007; 143:290-295.
• [19]Sicherer SH, Forman JA, Noone SA. Use assessment of self-administered epinephrine among food-allergic children and pediatricians. Pediatrics. 2000; 105:359-362.
• [20]Pulcini JM, Sease KK, Marshall GD. Disparity between the presence and absence of food allergy action plans in one school district. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2010; 31:141-146.
• [21]Muraro A, Clark A, Beyer K, Borrego LM, Borres M, Lodrup Carlsen KC et al.. The management of the allergic child at school: EAACI/GA2LEN Task Force on the allergic child at school. Allergy. 2010; 65:681-689.
• [22]Fleischer DM, Perry TT, Atkins D, Wood RA, Burks AW, Jones SM et al.. Allergic reactions to foods in preschool-aged children in a prospective observational food allergy study. Pediatrics. 2012; 130:e25-32.
• [23]Bansal PJ, Marsh R, Patel B, Tobin MC. Recognition, evaluation, and treatment of anaphylaxis in the child care setting. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005; 94:55-59.
• [24]Dhami S, Panesar SS, Rader T, Muraro A, Roberts G, Worm M et al.. The acute and long-term management of anaphylaxis: protocol for a systematic review. Clin Transl Allergy. 2013; 3:14. BioMed Central Full Text