Strategies to reduce safety violations for working from heights in construction companies: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BMC Public Health

Monique HW Frings-Dresen²  Henk F van der Molen¹ 

[1] Arbouw, P.O. Box 213, Harderwijk 3840 AE, the Netherlands;Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, Amsterdam 1100 DD, the Netherlands

关键词: Construction industry;    Safety behavior;    Working from heights;    Safety hazards;   

Others  :  1129926
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-14-541

 received in 2014-04-25, accepted in 2014-05-21,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Safety measures should be applied to reduce work-related fatal and non-fatal fall injuries. However, according to the labor inspectorate, more than 80% of Dutch construction sites violate safety regulations for working from heights. To increase compliance with safety regulations, employers and workers have to select, implement and monitor safety measures. To facilitate this behavioral change, stimulating knowledge awareness and personalized feedback are frequently advocated behavior change techniques. For this study, two behavior change strategies have been developed in addition to the announcement of safety inspections by the labor inspectorate. These strategies consist of 1) face-to-face contacts with safety consultants and 2) direct mail with access to internet facilities. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of these two strategies on the safety violations for working from heights, the process and the cost measures.

Methods/Design

This study is a block randomized intervention trial in 27 cities to establish the effects of the face-to-face guidance strategy (N = 9), a direct mailing strategy (N = 9) and a control condition of no guidance (N = 9) on safety violations to record by labor inspectors after three months. A process evaluation for both strategies will be performed to determine program implementation (reach, dose delivered and dose received), satisfaction, knowledge and perceived safety behavior. A cost analysis will be performed to establish the financial costs for both strategies. The present study is in accordance with the CONSORT statement.

Discussion

This study increases insight into performing practice-based randomized controlled trials. The outcome will help to evaluate the effect of two guidance strategies on safety violations. If these strategies are effective, implementation of these strategies through the national institute of safety and health or labor inspectorate can take place to guide construction companies in complying with safety regulations.

Trial registration

NTR 4298 on 29-nov-2013.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 van der Molen and Frings-Dresen; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Arndt V, Rothenbacher D, Daniel U, Zschenderlein B, Schuberth S, Brenner H: Construction work and risk of occupational disability: a ten year follow-up of 14,474 male workers. Occup Environ Med 2005, 62:559-566.
• [2]Van der Molen HF, Kuijer PPFM, Smits PBA, Schop A, Moeijes F, Spreeuwers D, Frings-Dresen MHW: Annual incidence of occupational diseases in economic sectors in the Netherlands. Occup Environ Med 2012, 69:519-521.
• [3]Hsiao H, Stout N: Occupational Injury Prevention Research. NIOSH Saf Health Work 2010, 1:107-111.
• [4]Verbeek J, Morata TC, Ruotsalainen J, Vainio H: Prevention of occupational diseases: implementing the evidence [editorial]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013., 4ED000056. dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.ED000056
• [5]Stocks SJ, McNamee R, Turner S, Carder M, Agius RM: Assessing the impact of national level interventions on workplace respiratory disease in the UK: part 1–changes in workplace exposure legislation and market forces. Occup Environ Med 2013, 70:476-82.
• [6]Stocks SJ, McNamee R, Turner S, Carder M, Agius RM: Assessing the impact of national level interventions on workplace respiratory disease in the UK: part 2–regulatory activity by the Health and Safety Executive. Occup Environ Med 2013, 70:483-90.
• [7]Rivara FP, Thompson DC: Systematic reviews of injury-prevention strategies for occupational injuries: an overview. Am J Prev Med 2000, 18(suppl 4):1-130.
• [8]Van der Molen HF, Lehtola MM, Lappalainen J, Hoonakker PL, Hsiao H, Haslam R, Hale AR, Frings-Dresen MH, Verbeek JH: Interventions to prevent injuries in construction workers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012., 12doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006251
• [9]Arbouw: Atlas of workers health surveillance data in construction industry of 2012. http://www.arbouw.nl/werkgever/tools/bedrijfstakatlas-2012/ webcite [Accessed on 10th March 2014]
• [10]Prochaska JO, Velicer WF: The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot 1997, 12:38-48.
• [11]Leeman J, Baernholdt M, Sandelowski M: Developing a theory-based taxonomy of methods for implementing change in practice. J Adv Nurs 2007, 58:191-200.
• [12]Diclemente CC, Marinilli AS, Singh M, Bellino LE: The Role of Feedback in the Process of Health Behavior Change. AM J Health Behav 2001, 25:217-227.
• [13]Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D: CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010, 340:698-702.
• [14]CCMO (Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects): Your research: does it fall under the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO). http://www.ccmo.nl/en/your-research-does-it-fall-under-the-wmo webcite [Accessed on 10th March 2014]
• [15]Linnan L, Steckler A: Process Evaluation for Public Health Interventions and Research. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass; 2002.
• [16]Murta SG, Sanderson K, Oldenburg B: Process evaluation in occupational stress management programs: a systemic review. Am J Health Promot 2007, 21:248-254.
• [17]Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, Cofta-Woerpel L, Linnan L, Weiner D, Bakken S, Kaplan CP, Squiers L, Fabrizio C, Fernandez M: How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med 2009, 36:452-457.
• [18]Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T: Complex interventions: how ‘out of control’ can a randomised controlled trial be? BMJ 2004, 328:1561-1563.
• [19]Macpherson H: Pragmatic clinical trials. Complement Ther Med 2004, 12:136-140.
• [20]Van der Molen HF, Sluiter JK, Hulshof CTJ, Vink P, van Duivenbooden CJ, Frings-Dresen MHW: Conceptual framework for the implementation of interventions in the construction industry. Scand J Work Environ Health 2005, 31(Suppl 2):96-103.