A decision aid to assist decisions on disclosure of mental health status to an employer: protocol for the CORAL exploratory randomised controlled trial

BMC Psychiatry

Graham Thornicroft²  Mike Slade²  Caroline Murphy¹  Joanna Murray²  Oliver Schauman²  Francesca Lassman²  Paul Williams²  Sarah Clement²  Elaine Brohan²  Claire Henderson² 

[1] Department of Biostatistics, King's Clinical Trial Unit, King's College London, London, UK;Health Service and Population Research Department P029, David Goldberg Centre, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK

关键词: Randomised controlled trial;    Single blind;    Employment;    Disclosure of illness;    Decision aid;   

Others  :  1124298
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-244X-12-133

 received in 2012-05-14, accepted in 2012-08-07,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

The UK Equality Act 2010 makes it unlawful for employers to ask health questions before making an offer of employment except in certain circumstances. While the majority of employers would prefer applicants to disclose a mental illness at the application stage, many people either wait until they have accepted the job and then disclose to an occupational health professional, or do not do so at all due to the anticipation of discrimination or a wish for privacy. However, non disclosure precludes the ability to request reasonable adjustments in the workplace or to make a claim of direct discrimination. Disclosure to employers is therefore a difficult decision. A recent pilot study by our group of the CORAL decision aid showed that it helped mental health service users clarify their needs and values regarding disclosure and led to reduction in decisional conflict. The present proof of concept trial aims to determine whether a full scale randomised controlled trial (RCT) is justifiable and feasible, and to optimise its design.

Methods

In this single blind exploratory RCT in London, a total of 80 participants (inclusion criteria: age ≥18 years, on the caseload of a specialist employment adviser working with people with mental illness; referred to the adviser either from primary care via Improving Access to Psychological Therapies or secondary mental health service; currently seeking or interested in either paid or voluntary employment, and a Decisional Conflict Scale score of 37.5 or greater and stage of decision score 1–5) will be recruited from vocational advice services. After completing a baseline assessment, participants will be randomly assigned to one of two conditions (1) Use of the CORAL Decision Aid (DA) in addition to treatment as usual or (2) Treatment as usual. Those allocated to the DA condition will be given it to read and complete, and the researcher will be present to record the time taken and any content that causes confusion. Intervention participants may keep the decision aid but are discouraged from showing it to other service users to avoid contamination. Follow up interviews will be conducted at 3 months. Primary outcomes are: (i) stage of decision making score; (ii) decisional conflict scores and (iii) employment related outcomes. Secondary analyses will identify predictors of disclosure and qualitative analysis will explore the impact of the intervention.

Discussion

A reduction in decisional conflict regarding disclosure leading to more effective job seeking activity could have significant economic consequences for people with mental illness in terms of employment rates and productivity.

Trial registration number

NCT01379014 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier)

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Henderson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Wahl OF: Mental health consumers' experience of stigma. Schizophr Bull 1999, 25(3):467-78.
• [2]Mental Health Foundation: Out at Work. A Survey of the Experiences of People with Mental Health Problems within the Workplace. Mental Health Foundation, London; 2002.
• [3]Thornicroft G, Brohan E, Rose D, Sartorius N, Leese M: Global pattern of experienced and anticipated discrimination against people with schizophrenia: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet 2009, 373:408-15.
• [4]Clement S, Brohan E, Jeffery D, Henderson C, Hatch S, Thornicroft G: Development and psychometric properties of the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation scale (BACE) related to people with mental ill health. BMC Psychiatry 2012, 12:36. BioMed Central Full Text
• [5]Little K, Henderson C, Brohan E, Thornicroft G: Employers' attitudes to people with mental health problems in the work place in Britain: changes between 2006 and 2009. Epidemiologica e Psichiatria Sociale; 2011. In press
• [6]Health and Safety at Work Act. 1974. Ref Type: Statute
• [7]Lockwood G, Henderson C: Thornicroft G. Equality Act 2010 and mental health. Br J Psychiatry 2011., aaIn press
• [8]Michalak EE, Yatham LN, Maxwell V, Hale S, Lam RW: The impact of bipolar disorder upon work functioning: a qualitative analysis. Bipolar Disorders 2007, 1–2(18):126-43.
• [9]Nithsdale V, Davies J, Croucher P: Psychosis and the experience of employment. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2008, 18(2):175-82.
• [10]O'Connor AM, Tugwell P, Wells GA, Elmslie T, Jolly E, Hollingworth G, et al.: A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation.[see comment]. Patient Education & Counseling 1998, 33(3):267-279.
• [11]O'Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V, Tetroe J, Entwistle V, Llewellyn-Thomas H, et al.: Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. British Medical Journal 1999, 319(7212):731-4.
• [12]Stacey D, Bennett C, Barry M, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, et al.: Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane database of Systematic Reviews 2012., 10
• [13]Brohan E: Disclosure of a mental health problem in the employment context: Measurement of stigma and discrimination and development of a decision aid tool. University of London. 2010.
• [14]Elwyn G, Frosch D, Volandes AE, Edwards A, Montori VM: Investing in deliberation: a definition and classification of decision support interventions for people facing difficult health decisions. Med Decis Making 2010, 30(6):701-11.
• [15]Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M: Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. Medical Research Council, London; 2008.
• [16]Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR: Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract 2004, 10(2):307-12.
• [17]Arain M, Campbell MJ, Cooper CL, Lancaster GA: What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010, 16(10):67-67.
• [18]O'Connor A: User Manual - Decisional Conflict Scale. 1993. www ohri ca/decisionaid 1993 [cited 9A.D. Aug 17
• [19]O'Connor A: User Manual - Stage of Decision Making. 2000. www ohri ca/decisionaid
• [20]Lerner D, Amick BC III, Rogers WH, Malspeis S, Bungay K, Cynn D: The Work Limitations Questionnaire. Med Care 2001, 39(1):72-85.
• [21]Ritsher JB, Otilingam PG, Grajales M: Internalized stigma of mental illness: Psychometric properties of a new measure. Psychiatry Research 2003, 121(1):31-49.
• [22]Link BG, Struening EL, Neese-Todd S, Asmussen S, Phelan JC: Stigma as a barrier to recovery: The consequences of stigma for the self-esteem of people with mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 2001, 52(12):1621-6.
• [23]Link BG: Understanding Labeling Effects in the area of mental disorders:An assessment of the effect of expectations of rejection. American Journal of Community Psychology 1987, 11:261-73.
• [24]Link BG, Mirotznik JD, Cullen FT: The effectiveness of stigma coping orientations: can negative consequences of mental illness labeling be avoided? J Heal Soc Behav 1991, 32:302-20.
• [25]Link BG, Cullen FT, Struening E, Shrout PE, Dohrenwend BP: A modified labeling theory approach to mental disorders: an empirical assessment. Am Sociol Rev 1989, 54(3):400-23.
• [26]Folkman S, Lazarus RS: Ways of Coping (revised). 1985. http://www.caps.ucsf.edu/tools/surveys/pdf/Ways%20of%20coping.pdf webcite
• [27]Lysaker PH, Johannesen JK, Lancaster RS, Davis LW, Zito W, Bell MD: Assessing coping in Schizophrenia. A rationally devised scoring scheme to assess coping in Schizophrenia:internal consistency and associations with work performance. International Journal of Psychosocial. Rehabilitation 2004, 8:74-84.
• [28]Banks BR, Novak J, Mank DM, Grossi T: Disclosure of a psychiatric disability in supported employment: an exploratory study. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation 2007, 11(1):69-84.
• [29]Derlega V, Metts S, Petronio S, Margulis S: Self-Disclosure. Sage Publications Ltd, London; 1993.