期刊论文详细信息
BMC Nephrology
Clinical features and outcomes of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis pathologic variants in Korean adult patients
Tae-Hyun Yoo1  Hyeon Joo Jeong4  Beom Jin Lim4  Kyu Hun Choi1  Shin-Wook Kang1  Ea Wha Kang2  Tae Ik Chang2  Jung Tak Park1  Hyung Jung Oh1  Ah Young Leem1  Ki Heon Nam1  Kyoung Sook Park1  Yung Ly Kim1  Seong Yeong An1  Jeong Hae Kie3  Seung Hyeok Han1  Young Eun Kwon1 
[1] Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul 120-752, Korea;Department of Internal Medicine, NHIS Medical Center Ilsan Hospital, Goyang-shi, Gyeonggi-do, Korea;Department of Pathology, NHIS Medical Center Ilsan Hospital, Goyang-shi, Gyeonggi-do, Korea;Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
关键词: Outcome;    Pathology;    Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis;   
Others  :  1082708
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2369-15-52
 received in 2013-10-30, accepted in 2014-03-20,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Many studies have shown that clinical characteristics and outcomes differ depending on pathologic variants of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). However, these are not well defined in Asian populations.

Methods

This retrospective study evaluated clinical features and outcomes of pathologic FSGS variants in 111 adult patients between January 2004 and December 2012. Primary outcome was the composite of doubling of baseline serum creatinine concentrations (D-SCr) or onset of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Secondary outcome included complete (CR) or partial remission (PR).

Results

There were 70 (63.1%), 20 (18.0%), 17 (15.3%), 3 (2.7%), and 1 (0.9%) patients with not-otherwise specified (NOS), tip, perihilar, cellular, and collapsing variants, respectively. At presentation, nephrotic-range proteinuria occurred more commonly in tip lesion than in other variants. The overall 5-year renal survival rate was 76.8%. During a median follow-up of 34.5 months, only 1 (5.0%) patient with a tip lesion reached the composite end point compared to 2 (11.8%) and 12 (17.1%) patients in perihilar and NOS variants, but this difference was not statistically significant in an adjusted Cox model. However, tip lesion was associated with a significantly increased probability of achieving CR (P = 0.044).

Conclusion

Similar to other populations, Korean adult patients with FSGS have distinct clinical features with the exception of a rare frequency of cellular and collapsing variants. Although pathologic variants were not associated with overall outcome, the tip variant exhibited favorable outcome in terms of achieving remission. Further studies are required to delineate long-term outcome and response to treatment of the pathologic variants.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Kwon et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20141224175201941.pdf 373KB PDF download
Figure 3. 42KB Image download
Figure 2. 31KB Image download
Figure 1. 29KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Korbet SM: Treatment of primary FSGS in adults. J Am Soc Nephrol 2012, 23(11):1769-1776.
  • [2]Kitiyakara C, Kopp JB, Eggers P: Trends in the epidemiology of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Semin Nephrol 2003, 23(2):172-182.
  • [3]Chang JH, Kim DK, Kim HW, Park SY, Yoo T-H, Kim BS, Kang S-W, Choi KH, Han D-S, Jeong HJ, Lee HY: Changing prevalence of glomerular diseases in Korean adults: a review of 20 years of experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009, 24(8):2406-2410.
  • [4]D’Agati VD: The spectrum of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: new insights. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2008, 17(3):271-281.
  • [5]D’Agati VD, Fogo AB, Bruijn JA, Jennette JC: Pathologic classification of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: a working proposal. Am J Kidney Dis 2004, 43(2):368-382.
  • [6]Barisoni L, Schnaper HW, Kopp JB: A proposed taxonomy for the podocytopathies: a reassessment of the primary nephrotic diseases. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007, 2(3):529-542.
  • [7]D’Agati VD, Kaskel FJ, Falk RJ: Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. N Engl J Med 2011, 365(25):2398-2411.
  • [8]D’Agati V: Pathologic classification of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Semin Nephrol 2003, 23(2):117-134.
  • [9]Thomas DB, Franceschini N, Hogan SL, Ten Holder S, Jennette CE, Falk RJ, Jennette JL: Clinical and pathologic characteristics of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis pathologic variants. Kidney Int 2006, 69(5):920-926.
  • [10]D’Agati VD, Alster JM, Jennette JC, Thomas DB, Pullman J, Savino DA, Cohen AH, Gipson DS, Gassman JJ, Radeva MK, Moxey-Mims MM, Friedman AL, Kaskel FJ, Trachtman H, Alpers CE, Fogo AB, Greene TH, Nast CC: Association of histologic variants in FSGS clinical trial with presenting features and outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2013, 8(3):399-406.
  • [11]Nada R, Kharbanda JK, Bhatti A, Minz RW, Sakhuja V, Joshi K: Primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in adults: is the Indian cohort different? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009, 24(12):3701-3707.
  • [12]Deegens JK, Steenbergen EJ, Borm GF, Wetzels JF: Pathological variants of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in an adult Dutch population—epidemiology and outcome. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008, 23(1):186-192.
  • [13]Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF III, Feldman HI, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van Lente F, Greene T, Coresh J, CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration): A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 2009, 150(9):604-612.
  • [14]Chun MJ, Korbet SM, Schwartz MM, Lewis EJ: Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in nephrotic adults: presentation, prognosis, and response to therapy of the histologic variants. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004, 15(8):2169-2177.
  • [15]Stokes MB, Markowitz GS, Lin J, Valeri AM, D’Agati VD: Glomerular tip lesion: a distinct entity within the minimal change disease/focal segmental glomerulosclerosis spectrum. Kidney Int 2004, 65(5):1690-1702.
  • [16]Howie AJ, Pankhurst T, Sarioglu S, Turhan N, Adu D: Evolution of nephrotic-associated focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and relation to the glomerular tip lesion. Kidney Int 2005, 67(3):987-1001.
  • [17]Stokes MB, Valeri AM, Markowitz GS, D’Agati VD: Cellular focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: clinical and pathologic features. Kidney Int 2006, 70(10):1783-1792.
  • [18]Shi SF, Wang SX, Zhang YK, Zhao MH, Zou WZ: Clinicopathologic study of different variants of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi 2007, 36(1):11-14.
  • [19]Tang X, Xu F, Chen DM, Zeng CH, Liu ZH: The clinical course and long-term outcome of primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in Chinese adults. Clin Nephrol 2013, 80(2):130-139.
  • [20]Arias LF, Franco-Alzate C, Rojas SL: Tip variant of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: outcome and comparison to ‘not otherwise specified’variant. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011, 26(7):2215-2221.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:24次 浏览次数:3次