Utility of qualitative C- reactive protein assay and white blood cells counts in the diagnosis of neonatal septicaemia at Bugando Medical Centre, Tanzania

BMC Pediatrics

Stephen E Mshana²  Benson R Kidenya¹  Antke Zuechner³  Neema Kayange³  Martha F Mushi²  Mariam M Mirambo²  Flora Chacha³ 

[1] Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Weill Bugando School of Medicine, Mwanza, Tanzania;Department of Microbiology/Immunology Weill Bugando School of Medicine, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences (CUHAS), P.O. BOX 1464, Mwanza, Tanzania;Department of Pediatric and child Health Weill Bugando School of Medicine, Mwanza, Tanzania

关键词: WBC;    Neonatal sepsis;    C-reactive protein;   

Others  :  1121256
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2431-14-248

 received in 2014-08-04, accepted in 2014-09-29,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Neonatal septicaemia diagnosis based on clinical features alone is non-specific leading to the initiation of unnecessary antibiotic treatment posing a danger of increased antibiotic resistance. In the present study the utility of serial qualitative C-reactive protein (CRP) assay and white blood cells count (WBC) in the diagnosis of neonatal septicaemia was investigated using blood culture as gold standard.

Methods

A total of 305 neonates admitted at Bugando Medical Centre (BMC) neonatal units between September 2013 and April 2014 were enrolled. Demographic and clinical data were collected using standardized data collection tool. Blood specimens were collected for blood culture, WBC count and qualitative CRP assay.

Results

Of 305 neonates; 224 (73.4%) were ≤ 72 hrs of age and 91(29.8%) had low birth weight. The positive CRP assay was observed in 67 (22.0%), 80 (26.2%) and 88 (28.9%) of neonates on day 1, 2 and 3 respectively; with any CRP positive occurred in 104 (34.1%) of neonates. The sensitivities of CRP assay in the diagnosis of septicaemia using culture as gold standard on day 1, 2, 3 and any positive were 40.4%, 53.2%, 54.8% and 62.9% respectively. While specificities were 82.7%, 80.7%, 77.8% and 73.3% respectively. Higher sensitivity of 75% was observed when CRP was used to diagnose gram negative septicaemia compared to 50% that was observed in the diagnosis of gram positive septicaemia. WBC count of ≥13 × 10⁹ /L had sensitivity and specificity of 64.5% and 66.7% respectively with area under the curve of 0.694. When the any positive CRP and WBC of ≥13 × 10⁹ /L were used the sensitivity increased to 90.3% with specificity of 50%. Neonates with septicaemia due to gram negative bacteria were significantly found to have higher rates of positive CRP than neonates with gram positive septicaemia and with negative culture (p < 0.001, OR 8.2, 95 CI; 2.9-26).

Conclusion

In place where blood culture is limited neonates having clinical features of neonatal sepsis with positive qualitative CRP assay and increased WBC should urgently be initiated on appropriate sepsis management in order to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with neonatal sepsis.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Chacha et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 5.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Vergnano S, Sharland M, Kazembe P, Mwansambo C, Heath P: Neonatal sepsis: an international perspective. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005, 90(3):F220-FF224.
• [2]Blencowe H, Cousens S: Review: addressing the challenge of neonatal mortality. Trop Med Int Health 2013, 18(3):303-312.
• [3]Kayange N, Kamugisha E, Mwizamholya DL, Jeremiah S, Mshana SE: Predictors of positive blood culture and deaths among neonates with suspected neonatal sepsis in a tertiary hospital, Mwanza-Tanzania. BMC Pediatr 2010, 10(1):39. BioMed Central Full Text
• [4]Lim DV, Morales W, Walsh A, Kazanis D: Reduction of morbidity and mortality rates for neonatal group B streptococcal disease through early diagnosis and chemoprophylaxis. J Clin Microbiol 1986, 23(3):489-492.
• [5]Paes BA, Modi A: Value of superficial cultures: diagnosing neonatal sepsis in a community hospital. Can Fam Physician 1992, 38:1796-1800.
• [6]Mshana SE, Hain T, Domann E, Lyamuya EF, Chakraborty T, Imirzalioglu C: Predominance of klebsiella pneumoniae ST14 carrying CTX-M-15 causing neonatal sepsis in Tanzania. BMC Infect Dis 2013, 13:466. BioMed Central Full Text
• [7]Volante E, Moretti S, Pisani F, Bevilacqua G: Early diagnosis of bacterial infection in the neonate. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004, 16(2):13-16.
• [8]Thaver D, Zaidi AK: Burden of neonatal infections in developing countries: a review of evidence from community-based studies. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2009, 28(1):S3-S9.
• [9]Chiesa C, Panero A, Osborn JF, Simonetti AF, Pacifico L: Diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a clinical and laboratory challenge. Clin Chem 2004, 50(2):279-287.
• [10]Hofer N, Zacharias E, Mueller W, Resch B: An update on the use of C-reactive protein in early-onset neonatal sepsis: current insights and new tasks. Neonatology 2012, 102(1):25-36.
• [11]Group WYIS: Clinical prediction of serious bacterial infections in young infants in developing countries. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999, 18(10):S23-S31.
• [12]Buderer NMF: Statistical methodology: I. Incorporating the prevalence of disease into the sample size calculation for sensitivity and specificity. Acad Emerg Med 1996, 3(9):895-900.
• [13]Christopher A, Mshana SE, Kidenya BR, Hokororo A, Morona D: Bacteremia and resistant gram-negative pathogens among under-fives in Tanzania. Ital J Pediatr 2013, 39(1):27. BioMed Central Full Text
• [14]Mshana S, Kamugisha E, Miramb M, Chalya P, Rambau P, Mahalu W, Lyamuya E: Prevalence of clindamycin inducible resistance among methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus at Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania. Tanzan J Health Res 2009, 11(2):59-64.
• [15]Wikler MA, Cockerill FR, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Eighteenth Informational Supplement. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2008.
• [16]Bhandari V, Wang C, Rinder C, Rinder H: Hematologic profile of sepsis in neonates: neutrophil CD64 as a diagnostic marker. Pediatrics 2008, 121(1):129-134.
• [17]Mugalu J, Nakakeeto MK, Kiguli S, Kaddu-Mulindwa DH: Aetiology, risk factors and immediate outcome of bacteriologically confirmed neonatal septicaemia in Mulago Hospital, Uganda. Afr Health Sci 2006, 6(2):120-126.
• [18]Mhada TV, Fredrick F, Matee MI, Massawe A: Neonatal sepsis at Muhimbili national hospital, Dar es salaam, Tanzania; aetiology, antimicrobial sensitivity pattern and clinical outcome. BMC Public Health 2012, 12(1):904. BioMed Central Full Text
• [19]West BA, Peterside O, Ugwu RO, Eneh AU: Prospective evaluation of the usefulness of C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis in a sub-Saharan African region. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2012, 1(1):22. BioMed Central Full Text
• [20]Nuntnarumit P, Pinkaew O, Kitiwanwanich S: Predictive values of serial C-reactive protein in neonatal sepsis. J Med Assoc Thai 2002, 85(Suppl 4):S1151-1158.
• [21]Khassawneh M, Hayajneh WA, Kofahi H, Khader Y, Amarin Z, Daoud A: Diagnostic markers for neonatal sepsis: comparing C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 and immunoglobulin M. Scand J Immunol 2007, 65(2):171-175.
• [22]Polin RA: Management of neonates with suspected or proven early-onset bacterial sepsis. Pediatrics 2012, 129(5):1006-1015.
• [23]Malik A, Hui CP, Pennie RA, Kirpalani H: Beyond the complete blood cell count and C-reactive protein: a systematic review of modern diagnostic tests for neonatal sepsis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2003, 157(6):511-516.
• [24]Alexandraki I, Palacio C: Gram-negative versus gram-positive bacteremia: what is more alarming. Crit Care 2010, 14:161. BioMed Central Full Text
• [25]Vallance H, Lockitch G: Rapid, semi-quantitative assay of C-reactive protein evaluated. Clin Chem 1991, 37(11):1981-1982.
• [26]Franz AR, Kron M, Pohlandt F, Steinbach G: Comparison of procalcitonin with interleukin 8, C-reactive protein and differential white blood cell count for the early diagnosis of bacterial infections in newborn infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999, 18(8):666-671.
• [27]Ohlsson A, Vearncombe M: Congenital and nosocomial sepsis in infants born in a regional perinatal unit: cause, outcome, and white blood cell response. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987, 156(2):407-413.
• [28]Yoon BH, Jun JK, Park KH, Syn HC, Gomez R, Romero R: Serum C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, and amniotic fluid white blood cell count in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol 1996, 88(6):1034-1040.
• [29]Du J, Li L, Dou Y, Li P, Chen R, Liu H: Diagnostic utility of neutrophil CD64 as a marker for early-onset sepsis in preterm neonates. PLoS One 2014, 9(7):e102647.