A comparison of physical and psychological features of responders and non-responders to cervical facet blocks in chronic whiplash

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Michele Sterling²  Robert Allen Hooper³  Bevan Frizzell³  Geoff Schneider³  Gwendolen Jull¹  Ashley Dean Smith⁴ 

[1] Division of Physiotherapy, NHMRC Centre of Clinical Excellence Spinal Pain, Injury and Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia;Centre of National Research on Disability and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia;Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada;Evidence Sport and Spinal Therapy, C/- The Advanced Spinal Care Centre (EFW Radiology), 201, 2000 Veteran’s Place NW, Calgary, AB T3B 4N2, Canada

关键词: Neck pain;    Psychological distress;    Post traumatic stress;    Central hyperexcitability;    Sensory hypersensitivity;    Facet joint injections;    Whiplash;   

Others  :  1129238
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2474-14-313

 received in 2013-04-04, accepted in 2013-10-11,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Cervical facet block (FB) procedures are often used as a diagnostic precursor to radiofrequency neurotomies (RFN) in the management of chronic whiplash associated disorders (WAD). Some individuals will respond to the FB procedures and others will not respond. Such responders and non-responders provided a sample of convenience to question whether there were differences in their physical and psychological features. This information may inform future predictive studies and ultimately the clinical selection of patients for FB procedures.

Methods

This cross-sectional study involved 58 individuals with chronic WAD who responded to cervical FB procedures (WAD_R); 32 who did not respond (WAD_NR) and 30 Healthy Controls (HC)s. Measures included: quantitative sensory tests (pressure; thermal pain thresholds; brachial plexus provocation test); nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR); motor function (cervical range of movement (ROM); activity of the superficial neck flexors during the cranio-cervical flexion test (CCFT). Self-reported measures were gained from the following questionnaires: neuropathic pain (s-LANSS); psychological distress (General Health Questionnaire-28), post-traumatic stress (PDS) and pain catastrophization (PCS). Individuals with chronic whiplash attended the laboratory once the effects of the blocks had abated and symptoms had returned.

Results

Following FB procedures, both WAD groups demonstrated generalized hypersensitivity to all sensory tests, decreased neck ROM and increased superficial muscle activity with the CCFT compared to controls (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between WAD groups (all p > 0.05). Both WAD groups demonstrated psychological distress (GHQ-28; p < 0.05), moderate post-traumatic stress symptoms and pain catastrophization. The WAD_NR group also demonstrated increased medication intake and elevated PCS scores compared to the WAD_R group (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Chronic WAD responders and non-responders to FB procedures demonstrate a similar presentation of sensory disturbance, motor dysfunction and psychological distress. Higher levels of pain catastrophization and greater medication intake were the only factors found to differentiate these groups.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Smith et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, Cassidy JD, Duranceau J, Suissa S, Zeiss E: Scientific monograph of the Quebec task force on whiplash-associated disorders: redefining “whiplash” and its management. Spine 1995, 20(8):1S-73S.
• [2]Blincoe L, Seay A, Zaloshnja E, Miller T, Romano E, Luchter S, Spicer R: The economic impact of motor vehicle crashes 2000. DOT HS; 2002. [Transportation WDDo] http://www.cita-vehicleinspection.org/Portals/cita/autofore_study/LinkedDocuments/literature/NHTSA%20the%20economic%20impact%20of%20motor%20vehicle%20crashes%202000%20USA%202002.pdf webcite
• [3]Joslin CC, Khan SN, Bannister GC: Long-term disability after neck injury. a comparative study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004, 86(7):1032-1034.
• [4]Suissa S, Harder S, Veilleux M: The relation between initial symptoms and signs and the prognosis of whiplash. Eur Spine J 2001, 10(1):44-49.
• [5]Carroll LJ, Holm LW, Hogg-Johnson S, Cote P, Cassidy JD, Haldeman S, Nordin M, Hurwitz EL, Carragee EJ, van der Velde G, Peloso PM, Guzman J: Course and prognostic factors for neck pain in whiplash-associated disorders (WAD): results of the bone and joint decade 2000–2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders. Spine 2008, 33(4):S83-S92.
• [6]Curatolo M, Petersen-Felix S, Arendt-Nielsen L, Giani C, Zbinden AM, Radanov BP: Central hypersensitivity in chronic pain after whiplash injury. Clin J Pain 2001, 17(4):306-315.
• [7]Koelbaek Johansen M, Graven-Nielsen T, Schou Olesen A, Arendt-Nielsen L: Generalised muscular hyperalgesia in chronic whiplash syndrome. Pain 1999, 83(2):229-234.
• [8]Sterling M, Jull G, Vicenzino B, Kenardy J: Sensory hypersensitivity occurs soon after whiplash injury and is associated with poor recovery. Pain 2003, 104(3):509-517.
• [9]Banic B, Petersen-Felix S, Andersen OK, Radanov BP, Villiger PM, Arendt-Nielsen L, Curatolo M: Evidence for spinal cord hypersensitivity in chronic pain after whiplash injury and in fibromyalgia. Pain 2004, 107(1–2):7-15.
• [10]Sterling M, Hodkinson E, Pettiford C, Souvlis T, Curatolo M: Psychologic factors are related to some sensory pain thresholds but not nociceptive flexion reflex threshold in chronic whiplash. Clin J Pain 2008, 24(2):124-130.
• [11]Jull G, Kristjansson E, Dall’Alba P: Impairment in the cervical flexors: a comparison of whiplash and insidious onset neck pain patients. Man Ther 2004, 9(2):89-94.
• [12]Tjell C, Tenenbaum A, Sandstrom S: Smooth pursuit neck torsion test – a specific test for whiplash associated disorders? Journal of Whiplash & Related Disorders 2002, 1(2):9-24.
• [13]Treleaven J, Jull G, LowChoy N: The relationship of cervical joint position error to balance and eye movement disturbances in persistent whiplash. Man Ther 2006, 11(2):99-106.
• [14]Drottning M, Staff P, Levin L, Malt U: Acute emotional response to common whiplash predicts subsequent pain complaints: a prospective study of 107 subjects sustaining whiplash injury. Nord J Psychiatry 1995, 49:293-299.
• [15]Sterling M, Kenardy J, Jull G, Vicenzino B: The development of psychological changes following whiplash injury. Pain 2003, 106(3):481-489.
• [16]Williamson E, Williams M, Gates S, Lamb SE: A systematic literature review of psychological factors and the development of late whiplash syndrome. Pain 2008, 135(1–2):20-30.
• [17]Lord SM, Barnsley L, Wallis BJ, Bogduk N: Chronic cervical zygapophysial joint pain after whiplash: a placebo-controlled prevalence study. Spine 1996, 21(15):1737-1744. discussion 1744–1735
• [18]Barnsley L, Lord SM, Wallis BJ, Bogduk N: The prevalence of chronic cervical zygapophysial joint pain after whiplash. Spine 1995, 20(1):20-25. discussion 26
• [19]Gibson T, Bogduk N, Macpherson J, McIntosh A: Crash characteristics of whiplash associated chronic neck pain. J Musculoskelet Pain 2000, 8:87-95.
• [20]Barnsley L, Lord S, Bogduk N: Comparative local anaesthetic blocks in the diagnosis of cervical zygapophysial joint pain. Pain 1993, 55(1):99-106.
• [21]Bogduk N, Marsland A: The cervical zygapophysial joints as a source of neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1988, 13(6):610-617.
• [22]Lord SM, Barnsley L, Wallis BJ, McDonald GJ, Bogduk N: Percutaneous radio-frequency neurotomy for chronic cervical zygapophyseal-joint pain. N Engl J Med 1996, 335(23):1721-1726.
• [23]Lord S, McDonald G, Bogduk N: Percutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy of the cervical medial branches: a validated treatment for cervical zygapophysial joint pain. Neurosurg Q 1998, 8(4):288-308.
• [24]Falco FJ, Datta S, Manchikanti L, Sehgal N, Geffert S, Singh V, Smith HS, Boswell MV: An updated review of the diagnostic utility of cervical facet joint injections. Pain Physician 2012, 15(6):E807-838.
• [25]Sehgal N, Shah RV, McKenzie-Brown AM, Everett CR: Diagnostic utility of facet (zygapophysial) joint injections in chronic spinal pain: a systematic review of evidence. Pain Physician 2007, 8(2):211-224.
• [26]Teasell RW, McClure JA, Walton D, Pretty J, Salter K, Meyer M, Sequeira K, Death B: A research synthesis of therapeutic interventions for whiplash-associated disorder (WAD): part 5 - surgical and injection-based interventions for chronic WAD. Pain Res Manag 2010, 15(5):323-334.
• [27]Wasan AD, Jamison RN, Pham L, Tipirneni N, Nedeljkovic SS, Katz JN: Psychopathology predicts the outcome of medial branch blocks with corticosteroid for chronic axial low back or cervical pain: a prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009, 10:22. BioMed Central Full Text
• [28]Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Cleland JA, Ortega-Santiago R, de-la-Llave-Rincon AI, Martinez-Perez A, Pareja JA: Central sensitization does not identify patients with carpal tunnel syndrome who are likely to achieve short-term success with physical therapy. Exp Brain Res 2010, 207(1–2):85-94.
• [29]Jull G, Sterling M, Kenardy J, Beller E: Does the presence of sensory hypersensitivity influence outcomes of physical rehabilitation for chronic whiplash?–a preliminary RCT. Pain 2007, 129(1–2):28-34.
• [30]Bouwense SA, Buscher HC, van Goor H, Wilder-Smith OH: Has central sensitization become independent of nociceptive input in chronic pancreatitis patients who fail thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy? Reg Anesth Pain Med 2011, 36(6):531-536.
• [31]Sullivan M, Bishop S, Pivik J: The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess 1995, 7:524-532.
• [32]Sullivan MJ, Neish N: The effects of disclosure on pain during dental hygiene treatment: the moderating role of catastrophizing. Pain 1999, 79(2–3):155-163.
• [33]Jacobsen PB, Butler RW: Relation of cognitive coping and catastrophizing to acute pain and analgesic use following breast cancer surgery. J Behav Med 1996, 19(1):17-29.
• [34]Otis JD, Keane TM, Kerns RD: An examination of the relationship between chronic pain and post-traumatic stress disorder. J Rehabil Res Dev 2003, 40(5):397-405.
• [35]Dall’Alba PT, Sterling MM, Treleaven JM, Edwards SL, Jull GA: Cervical range of motion discriminates between asymptomatic persons and those with whiplash. Spine 2001, 26(19):2090-2094.
• [36]Sterling M, Jull G, Vicenzino B, Kenardy J, Darnell R: Development of motor system dysfunction following whiplash injury. Pain 2003, 103(1–2):65-73.
• [37]Pearcy M, Hindle R: New method for the non-invasive three-dimensional measurement of human back movement. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1989, 4:73-79.
• [38]Falla D, Dall’Alba P, Rainoldi A, Merletti R, Jull G: Location of innervation zones of sternocleidomastoid and scalene muscles–a basis for clinical and research electromyography applications. Clin Neurophysiol 2002, 113(1):57-63.
• [39]Hurtig IM, Raak RI, Kendall SA, Gerdle B, Wahren LK: Quantitative sensory testing in fibromyalgia patients and in healthy subjects: identification of subgroups. Clin J Pain 2001, 17(4):316-322.
• [40]Elvey R: Brachial plexus tension test and the pathoanatomical origin of arm pain. In Aspects of manipulative therapy. Edited by Glasgow E, Twomey L. Melbourne: Lincoln Institute of Health Sciences; 1979:105-110.
• [41]Balster SM, Jull GA: Upper trapezius muscle activity during the brachial plexus tension test in asymptomatic subjects. Man Ther 1997, 2(3):144-149.
• [42]Sandrini G, Serrao M, Rossi P, Romaniello A, Cruccu G, Willer JC: The lower limb flexion reflex in humans. Prog Neurobiol 2005, 77(6):353-395.
• [43]Rhudy JL, France CR: Defining the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) threshold in human participants: a comparison of different scoring criteria. Pain 2007, 128(3):244-253.
• [44]French DJ, France CR, France JL, Arnott LF: The influence of acute anxiety on assessment of nociceptive flexion reflex thresholds in healthy young adults. Pain 2005, 114(3):358-363.
• [45]Vernon H, Mior S: The neck disability index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1991, 14(7):409-415.
• [46]Macdermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, McAlpine C, Goldsmith CH: Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009, 39(5):400-417.
• [47]Bennett MI, Smith BH, Torrance N, Potter J: The S-LANSS score for identifying pain of predominantly neuropathic origin: validation for use in clinical and postal research. J Pain 2005, 6(3):149-158.
• [48]Chien A, Eliav E, Sterling M: Hypoaesthesia occurs with sensory hypersensitivity in chronic whiplash–further evidence of a neuropathic condition. Man Ther 2009, 14(2):138-146.
• [49]Goldberg D: Manual of the general health questionnaire. Windsor: NFER-Nelson; 1978.
• [50]Gargan M, Bannister G, Main C, Hollis S: The behavioural response to whiplash injury. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997, 79(4):523-526.
• [51]Foa EB, Riggs DS, Gershuny BS: Arousal, numbing, and intrusion: symptom structure of PTSD following assault. Am J Psychiatry 1995, 152(1):116-120.
• [52]Foa EB: Psychological processes related to recovery from a trauma and an effective treatment for PTSD. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1997, 821:410-424.
• [53]Foa EB, Meadows EA: Psychosocial treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder: a critical review. Annu Rev Psychol 1997, 48:449-480.
• [54]Sullivan M: The pain catastrophizing scale user manual. 2009, 36. http://sullivan-painresearch.mcgill.ca/pdf/pcs/PCSManual_English.pdf webcite
• [55]Cooper G, Bailey B, Bogduk N: Cervical zygapophysial joint pain maps. Pain Med 2007, 8(4):344-353.
• [56]Barnsley L: False-positive rates of cervical zygapophysial joint blocks. Clin J Pain 1993, 9:124-130.
• [57]Bogduk N: Diagnostic nerve blocks in chronic pain. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2002, 16(4):565-578.
• [58]Carragee E, Haldeman S, Hurwitz E: The pyrite standard: the midas touch in the diagnosis of axial pain syndromes. Spine J 2007, 7:27-31.
• [59]Schneider GM, Smith AD, Hooper A, Stratford P, Schneider KJ, Westaway MD, Frizzell B, Olson L: Minimizing the source of nociception and its concurrent effect on sensory hypersensitivity: an exploratory study in chronic whiplash patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010, 11:29. BioMed Central Full Text
• [60]Cohen SP, Bajwa ZH, Kraemer JJ, Dragovich A, Williams KA, Stream J, Sireci A, McKnight G, Hurley RW: Factors predicting success and failure for cervical facet radiofrequency denervation: a multi-center analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2007, 32(6):495-503.
• [61]Manchikanti L, Singh V: Diagnosis of facet joint pain and prediction of success and failure for cervical facet radiofrequency denervation. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009, 34(1):81-82. author reply 82–83
• [62]Falco FJ, Erhart S, Wargo BW, Bryce DA, Atluri S, Datta S, Hayek SM: Systematic review of diagnostic utility and therapeutic effectiveness of cervical facet joint interventions. Pain Physician 2009, 12(2):323-344.
• [63]Cohen SP, Dragovich A, Hurley RW, Bajwa ZH, Cohen SP, Dragovich A, Hurley RW, Bajwa ZH: Author reply to Dr. Manchikanti: diagnosis of facet joint pain and prediction of scucess and failure for cervical facet radiofrequency denervation. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009, 34(1):82-83.
• [64]Sterling M, Jull G, Vicenzino B, Kenardy J: Characterization of acute whiplash-associated disorders. Spine 2004, 29(2):182-188.
• [65]Portney L, Watkins M: Foundations of clinical research applications and practice. London: Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd; 1993.
• [66]Sterling M: A proposed new classification system for whiplash associated disorders–implications for assessment and management. Man Ther 2004, 9(2):60-70.
• [67]Sterling M, Kenardy J: Physical and psychological aspects of whiplash: important considerations for primary care assessment. Man Ther 2008, 13(2):93-102.
• [68]Barnsley L: Percutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy for chronic neck pain: outcomes in a series of consecutive patients. Pain Med 2005, 6(4):282-286.
• [69]Hogg-Johnson S, van der Velde G, Carroll LJ, Holm LW, Cassidy JD, Guzman J, Cote P, Haldeman S, Ammendolia C, Carragee E, Hurwitz E, Nordin M, Peloso P: The burden and determinants of neck pain in the general population: results of the bone and joint decade 2000–2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders. Spine 2008, 33(4):S39-S51.
• [70]Kasch H, Qerama E, Bach FW, Jensen TS: Reduced cold pressor pain tolerance in non-recovered whiplash patients: a 1-year prospective study. Eur J Pain 2005, 9(5):561-569.
• [71]Raak R, Wallin M: Thermal thresholds and catastrophizing in individuals with chronic pain after whiplash injury. Biol Res Nurs 2006, 8(2):138-146.
• [72]Sterling M, Jull G, Kenardy J: Physical and psychological factors maintain long-term predictive capacity post-whiplash injury. Pain 2006, 122(1–2):102-108.
• [73]Ide M, Ide J, Yamaga M, Takagi K: Symptoms and signs of irritation of the brachial plexus in whiplash injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001, 83(2):226-229.
• [74]Sterling M, Treleaven J, Jull G: Responses to a clinical test of mechanical provocation of nerve tissue in whiplash associated disorder. Man Ther 2002, 7(2):89-94.
• [75]Prushansky T, Pevzner E, Gordon C, Dvir Z: Performance of cervical motion in chronic whiplash patients and healthy subjects: the case of atypical patients. Spine 2006, 31(1):37-43.
• [76]Jull G: Deep cervical flexor muscle dysfuntion in whiplash. Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain 2000, 8(1/2):143-154.
• [77]Rolke R, Baron R, Maier C, Tolle TR, Treede RD, Beyer A, Binder A, Birbaumer N, Birklein F, Botefur IC, Braune S, Flor H, Huge V, Klug R, Landwehrmeyer GB, Magerl W, Maihofner C, Rolko C, Schaub C, Scherens A, Sprenger T, Valet M, Wasserka B: Quantitative sensory testing in the German research network on neuropathic pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values. Pain 2006, 123(3):231-243.
• [78]Youdas JW, Garrett TR, Suman VJ, Bogard CL, Hallman HO, Carey JR: Normal range of motion of the cervical spine: an initial goniometric study. Phys Ther 1992, 72(11):770-780.
• [79]Kongsted A, Bendix T, Qerama E, Kasch H, Bach FW, Korsholm L, Jensen TS: Acute stress response and recovery after whiplash injuries. A one-year prospective study. Eur J Pain 2008, 12(4):455-463.
• [80]Buitenhuis J, de Jong PJ, Jaspers JP, Groothoff JW: Catastrophizing and causal beliefs in whiplash. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008, 33(22):2427-2433. discussion 2434
• [81]Curatolo M, Arendt-Nielsen L, Petersen-Felix S: Evidence, mechanisms, and clinical implications of central hypersensitivity in chronic pain after whiplash injury. Clin J Pain 2004, 20(6):469-476.
• [82]Sterling M: Differential development of sensory hypersensitivity and a measure of spinal cord hyperexcitability following whiplash injury. Pain 2010, 150(3):501-506.
• [83]Jull G, Amiri M, Bullock-Saxton J, Darnell R, Lander C: Cervical musculoskeletal impairment in frequent intermittent headache: part 1: subjects with single headaches. Cephalalgia 2007, 27(7):793-802.
• [84]McLean SA: The potential contribution of stress systems to the transition to chronic whiplash-associated disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012, 36(25):S226-S232.
• [85]Sterling M, Chadwick BJ: Psychologic processes in daily life with chronic whiplash: relations of posttraumatic stress symptoms and fear-of-pain to hourly pain and uptime. Clin J Pain 2010, 26(7):573-582.
• [86]Sterling M, Hendrikz J, Kenardy J: Similar factors predict disability and posttraumatic stress disorder trajectories after whiplash injury. Pain 2011, 152(6):1272-1278.
• [87]Sullivan MJ, Stanish W, Sullivan ME, Tripp D: Differential predictors of pain and disability in patients with whiplash injuries. Pain Res Manag 2002, 7(2):68-74.
• [88]Rhudy JL, France CR, Bartley EJ, Williams AE, McCabe KM, Russell JL: Does pain catastrophizing moderate the relationship between spinal nociceptive processes and pain sensitivity? J Pain 2009, 10(8):860-869.
• [89]Panjabi M, Ito S, Pearson A, Ivancic P: Injury mechanisms of the cervical intervertebral disc during simulated whiplash. Spine 2004, 29(11):1217-1225.
• [90]Stemper B, Yoganandan N, Gennarelli T, Pintar F: Localized cervical facet joint kinematics under physiological and whiplash loading. J Neurosurg Spine 2005, 3:471-476.
• [91]Taylor J, Taylor M: Cervical spine injuries: an autopsy study of 109 blunt injuries. J Musculoskelet Pain 1996, 4(4):61-79.
• [92]McLean SA, Clauw DJ, Abelson JL, Liberzon I: The development of persistent pain and psychological morbidity after motor vehicle collision: integrating the potential role of stress response systems into a biopsychosocial model. Psychosom Med 2005, 67(5):783-790.
• [93]Passatore M, Roatta S: Influence of sympathetic nervous system on sensorimotor function: whiplash associated disorders (WAD) as a model. Eur J Appl Physiol 2006, 98(5):423-449.
• [94]Sterling M, Kenardy J: The relationship between sensory and sympathetic nervous system changes and posttraumatic stress reaction following whiplash injury–a prospective study. J Psychosom Res 2006, 60(4):387-393.
• [95]Bogduk N: International spinal injection society guidelines for the performance of spinal injection procedures: 1. zygapophysial joint blocks. Clin J Pain 1997, 13:285-302.
• [96]Lord SM, Barnsley L, Bogduk N: The utility of comparative local anesthetic blocks versus placebo-controlled blocks for the diagnosis of cervical zygapophysial joint pain. Clin J Pain 1995, 11(3):208-213.