Evolution of socioeconomic inequalities in smoking: results from the Portuguese national health interview surveys

BMC Public Health

Julian Perelman¹  Anton E Kunst²  Joana Alves¹ 

[1] Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Avenida Padre Cruz, Lisbon, 1600-560, Portugal;Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Room J2-207, Amsterdam, 1100 DD, The Netherlands

关键词: Portugal;    Smoking;    Inequalities;    Socioeconomic status;   

Others  :  1170956
DOI  :  10.1186/s12889-015-1664-y

 received in 2014-10-22, accepted in 2015-03-19,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Southern European countries were traditionally characterized by a higher prevalence of smoking among high socioeconomic groups. Though, recent studies show a reversal of inequalities in Italy and Spain, for example. We investigated whether this evolution also applied to Portugal by describing the evolution of socioeconomic inequalities in smoking between 1987 and 2006.

Methods

We used data from the four Portuguese national health interview surveys (N = 120,140) carried out so far. Socioeconomic status was measured by the educational and income levels of respondents. Socioeconomic inequalities were measured through Odds Ratios (OR), Relative Inequality Indexes (RII), and Concentration Indexes (CI) on being current, ever, and former smoker, adjusting for sex and age. Analyses were performed separately for men and women, and for different birth cohorts.

Results

Among men, smoking was initially more concentrated in high-socioeconomic status individuals (RII = 0.84, 95% Confidence Intervals [95% CI] 0.76-0.93, 1987) but this pattern reversed in the last survey (RII = 1.49, 95% CI 1.34-1.65, 2005/6). Indeed, higher cessation rates were observed among high-socioeconomic groups among all respondents (RII = 0.89, 95% CI 0.84-0.95), coupled with higher initiation rates among the worse-off in younger cohorts (RII = 1.18, 95% CI 1.05-1.31, for youngest generation, 2005/6). Among women, the richer and more educated smoked more in all surveys (RII = 0.21, 95% CI 0.16-0.27, 2005/6), despite being also more likely to quit (RII = 0.41, 95% CI 0.30-0.55). The pattern among women evolved towards a reduction of inequality, which however remained favourable to the worse-off.

Conclusions

Inequalities have been increasingly unfavourable to the worse-off in Portugal, although better-off women are still more likely to smoke. Worrisome inequality trends have been observed among the youngest generations, which call for the rapid implementation of equity-oriented tobacco control policies.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Alves et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Mackenbach JP, Kunst AE, Cavelaars AE, Groenhof F, Geurts JJ: Socioeconomic inequalities in morbidity and mortality in western Europe. Lancet 1997, 349:1655-1659.
• [2]Hernández-Quevedo C, Jones AM, Rice N: Persistence in health limitations: a European comparative analysis. J Heal Ec 2008, 27:1472-1488.
• [3]Mackenbach JP, Stirbu I, Roskam A-JR, Schaap MM, Menvielle G, Leinsalu M, Kunst AE: Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. N Engl J Med 2008, 358:2468-81.
• [4]Huisman M, Kunst AE, Mackenbach JP: Inequalities in the prevalence of smoking in the European Union: comparing education and income. Prev Med 2005, 40:756-64.
• [5]Lopez A, Collishaw N, Piha T: A descriptive model of the cigarette epidemic in developed countries. Tob Control 1994, 3:242.
• [6]Nagelhout GE, de Korte-de BD, Kunst AE, van der Meer RM, de Vries H, van Gelder BM, Willemsen MC: Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in smoking prevalence, consumption, initiation, and cessation between 2001 and 2008 in the Netherlands. Findings from a national population survey. BMC Public Health 2012, 12:303. BioMed Central Full Text
• [7]Paavola M, Vartiainen E, Haukkala A: Smoking from adolescence to adulthood: the effects of parental and own socioeconomic status. Eur J Public Heal 2004, 14:417-21.
• [8]Yang S, Lynch J, Schulenberg J, Diez Roux AV, Raghunathan T: Emergence of socioeconomic inequalities in smoking and overweight and obesity in early adulthood: the national longitudinal study of adolescent health. Am J Public Heal 2008, 98:468-77.
• [9]Giskes K, Kunst AE, Ariza C, Benach J, Borrell C, Helmert U, Judge K, Lahelma E, Moussa K, Ostergren PO, Patja K, Platt S, Prättälä R, Willemsen MC, Mackenbach JP: Applying an equity lens to tobacco-control policies and their uptake in six Western-European countries. J Public Heal Policy 2007, 28:261-80.
• [10]Cavelaars AE, Kunst AE, Geurts JJ, Crialesi R, Grötvedt L, Helmert U, Lahelma E, Lundberg O, Matheson J, Mielck A, Rasmussen NK, Regidor E, do Rosário-Giraldes M, Spuhler T, Mackenbach JP: Educational differences in smoking: international comparison. BMJ 2000, 320:1102-7.
• [11]Huisman M, Kunst AE, Mackenbach JP: Educational inequalities in smoking among men and women aged 16 years and older in 11 European countries. Tob Control 2005, 14:106-13.
• [12]Santos A-C, Barros H: Smoking patterns in a community sample of Portuguese adults, 1999–2000. Prev Med 2004, 38:114-9.
• [13]Precioso J, Calheiros J, Pereira D, Campos H, Antunes H, Rebelo L, Bonito J: Prevalence and smoking trends in Portugal and Europe. Acta Med Port 2009, 22:335-48.
• [14]Carreira H, Pereira M, Azevedo A, Lunet N: Trends in the prevalence of smoking in Portugal: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 2012, 12:958. BioMed Central Full Text
• [15]Federico B, Costa G, Kunst AE: Educational inequalities in initiation, cessation, and prevalence of smoking among 3 Italian birth cohorts. Am J Public Heal 2007, 97:838-45.
• [16]Instituto Nacional de Saúde I.P: Quarto Inquérito Nacional de Saúde à população portuguesa: nota metodológica. INE I.P./INSA I.P, Lisboa; 2008.
• [17]Van Doorslaer E, Koolman X: Explaining the differences in income-related health inequalities across European countries. Heal Econ 2004, 13:609-28.
• [18]Parker RN, Fenwick R: The Pareto Curve and Its Utility for Open-Ended Income Distributions in Survey Research. Soc Forces 1983, 61:872-885.
• [19]Federico B, Kunst AE, Vannoni F, Damiani G, Costa G: Trends in educational inequalities in smoking in northern, mid and southern Italy, 1980–2000. Prev Med 2004, 39:919-26.
• [20]Bacigalupe A, Esnaola S, Martín U, Borrell C: Two decades of inequalities in smoking prevalence, initiation and cessation in a southern European region: 1986–2007. Eur J Public Heal 2012, 23:552-558.
• [21]Thun M, Peto R, Boreham J, Lopez AD: Stages of the cigarette epidemic on entering its second century. Tob Control 2012, 21:96-101.
• [22]Bosdriesz JR, Mehmedovic S, Witvliet MI, Kunst AE: Socioeconomic inequalities in smoking in low and mid income countries: positive gradients among women? Int J Equity Heal 2014, 13:14. BioMed Central Full Text
• [23]Dias CM. 25 years of the National Health Survey in Portugal. Rev Port Saúde Pública. 2009, Suppl(2):51–60
• [24]Patrick DL, Cheadle A, Thompson DC, Diehr P, Koepsell T, Kinne S: The validity of self-reported smoking: a review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Heal 1994, 84:1086-93.
• [25]Vartiainen E: Validation of self reported smoking by serum cotinine measurement in a community-based study. J Epidemiol Community Heal 2002, 56:167-170.
• [26]Callinan JE, Clarke A, Doherty K, Kelleher C. Legislative smoking bans for reducing secondhand smoke exposure, smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010:CD005992.
• [27]Brown T, Platt S, Amos A: Equity impact of population-level interventions and policies to reduce smoking in adults: a systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend 2014, 138:7-16.
• [28]OCDE: Health at a Glance 2011. OECD Publishing, Paris; 2011.