Assessing the resistance and bioremediation ability of selected bacterial and protozoan species to heavy metals in metal-rich industrial wastewater

BMC Microbiology

Maggy NB Momba¹  Ilunga Kamika¹ 

[1] Department of Environmental, Water and Earth Sciences, Faculty of Science, Tshwane University of Technology, Arcadia Campus, Private Bag X680, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa

关键词: Metal-resistance;    Pollution;    Metal toxicity;    Protozoa;    Bacteria;    Bioremediation;    Heavy metal;    Industrial wastewater;   

Others  :  1144466
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2180-13-28

 received in 2012-11-08, accepted in 2013-01-31,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Heavy-metals exert considerable stress on the environment worldwide. This study assessed the resistance to and bioremediation of heavy-metals by selected protozoan and bacterial species in highly polluted industrial-wastewater. Specific variables (i.e. chemical oxygen demand, pH, dissolved oxygen) and the growth/die-off-rates of test organisms were measured using standard methods. Heavy-metal removals were determined in biomass and supernatant by the Inductively Couple Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometer. A parallel experiment was performed with dead microbial cells to assess the biosorption ability of test isolates.

Results

The results revealed that the industrial-wastewater samples were highly polluted with heavy-metal concentrations exceeding by far the maximum limits (in mg/l) of 0.05-Co, 0.2-Ni, 0.1-Mn, 0.1-V, 0.01-Pb, 0.01-Cu, 0.1-Zn and 0.005-Cd, prescribed by the UN-FAO. Industrial-wastewater had no major effects on Pseudomonas putida, Bacillus licheniformis and Peranema sp. (growth rates up to 1.81, 1.45 and 1.43 d^-1, respectively) compared to other test isolates. This was also revealed with significant COD increases (p < 0.05) in culture media inoculated with living bacterial isolates (over 100%) compared to protozoan isolates (up to 24% increase). Living Pseudomonas putida demonstrated the highest removal rates of heavy metals (Co-71%, Ni-51%, Mn-45%, V-83%, Pb-96%, Ti-100% and Cu-49%) followed by Bacillus licheniformis (Al-23% and Zn-53%) and Peranema sp. (Cd-42%). None of the dead cells were able to remove more than 25% of the heavy metals. Bacterial isolates contained the genes copC, chrB, cnrA3 and nccA encoding the resistance to Cu, Cr, Co-Ni and Cd-Ni-Co, respectively. Protozoan isolates contained only the genes encoding Cu and Cr resistance (copC and chrB genes). Peranema sp. was the only protozoan isolate which had an additional resistant gene cnrA3 encoding Co-Ni resistance.

Conclusion

Significant differences (p < 0.05) observed between dead and living microbial cells for metal-removal and the presence of certain metal-resistant genes indicated that the selected microbial isolates used both passive (biosorptive) and active (bioaccumulation) mechanisms to remove heavy metals from industrial wastewater. This study advocates the use of Peranema sp. as a potential candidate for the bioremediation of heavy-metals in wastewater treatment, in addition to Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus licheniformis.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Kamika and Momba; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Savenije HHG, Van der Zaag P: Conceptual framework for the management of shared river basins; with special reference to the SADC and EU. Water Policy 2000, 2:9-45.
• [2]Van Vuuren L: The state of water in South Africa – Are we heading for a crisis? The Water Wheel 2009, 8(5):31-33.
• [3]Momba MNB, Sibewu M: Survival of somatic and F-RNA coliphages in treated wastewater effluents and their impact on viral quality of the receiving water bodies in the Eastern Cape Province. J Biol Sci 2009, 9(7):648-654.
• [4]Jern WNG: Industrial wastewater treatment. Singapore: Imperial College Press; 2006.
• [5]Diels L, Van der Lelie N, Bastiaens L: New development in treatment of heavy metal contaminated soils. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 2002, 1:75-82.
• [6]Gikas P: Single and combined effects of nickel (Ni(II)) and cobalt (Co(II)) ions on activated sludge and on other aerobic microorganisms: a review. J Hazard Mater 2008, 159(2–3):187-203.
• [7]Fatta-Kassinos D, Kalavrouziotis IK, Koukoulakis PH, Vasquez MI: The risks associated with wastewater reuse and xenobiotics in the agroecological environment. Sci Total Environ 2011, 408(19):3555-3563.
• [8]Madoni P, Davoli D, Gorbi G, Vescovi L: Toxic effect of heavy metals on the activated sludge protozoan community. Water Res 1996, 30(1):135-141.
• [9]Adeniji A: Bioremediation of arsenic, chromium, lead and mercury. Washington: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Technology Innovation Office; 2004.
• [10]Canovas D, Cases I, De Lorenzo V: Heavy metal tolerance and metal homeostasis in Pseudomonas putida as revealed by complete genome analysis. Environ Microbiol 2003, 5(12):1242-1256.
• [11]Leedjarv A, Ivask A, Virta M: Interplay of different transporters in the mediation of divalent heavy metal resistance in Pseudomonas putida KT2440. J Bacteriol 1996, 2680-2689.
• [12]Nies DH: Efflux mediated heavy metal resistance in prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2003, 27(2–3):313-339.
• [13]Gutiérrez JC, Amaro F, Martin-Gonzalez A: From heavy metal-binders to biosensors: ciliate metallothioneins discussed. Bioessays 2009, 31:805-816.
• [14]Diaz S, Martin-Gonzalez A, Gutierrez JC: Evaluation of heavy metal acute toxicity and bioaccumulation in soil ciliated protozoa. Environ Int 2006, 32(6):711-717.
• [15]Martin-Gonzalez A, Diaz S, Borniquel S, Gallego A, Guitiérrez JC: Cytotoxicity and bioaccumulation of heavy metals by ciliated protozoa isolated from urban wastewater treatment plants. Res Microbiol 2006, 157(2):108-118.
• [16]Rajbanshi A: Study on heavy metal resistant bacteria in Guheswori sewage treatment plant. Our Nature 2008, 6:52-57.
• [17]Henebry MS, Cairns J: Monitoring of stream pollution using protozoan communities on artificial substrates. Trans Amer Micros Soc 1980, 99(2):151-160.
• [18]Weeks BS: Alcamo’s microbes and society. 3rd edition. USA: Jones and Barlett Learning LLC; 2012.
• [19]Xu J: Microbial ecology in the age of genomics and metagenomics: concepts, tools, and recent advances. Mol Ecol 2006, 15:1713-1731.
• [20]Clausen C: Isolating metal-tolerant bacteria capable of removing copper, chromium, and arsenic from treated wood. Waste Manag Res 2000, 18:264-268.
• [21]Kamika I, Momba MNB: Comparing the tolerance limits of selected bacterial and protozoan species to nickel in wastewater systems. Sci Total Environ 2011, 440:172-181.
• [22]Kamika I, Momba MNB: Comparing the tolerance limits of selected bacterial and protozoan species to vanadium in wastewater systems. Water Air Soil Pollut 2012, 223(5):2525-2539.
• [23]Shirdam R, Khanafari A, Tabatabaee A: Cadmium, nickel and vanadium accumulation by three of marine bacteria. Iran J Biotechnol 2006, 4(3):180-187.
• [24]Choopan A, Nakbud K, Dawveerakul K, Chawawisit K, Lertcanawanichakul M: Anti-methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus activity of Brevibacillus laterosporus strain SA14. Walailak J Sci Tech 2008, 5(1):47-56.
• [25]Emptage CD, Knox RJ, Danson MJ, Hough DW: Nitroreductase from Bacillus licheniformis: a stable enzyme for prodrug activation. Biochem Pharmacol 2009, 77:21-29.
• [26]APHA: Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20th edition. Washington D.C: American Public Health Association (APHA); 2001.
• [27]Akpor OB, Momba MNB, Okonkwo JO, Coetzee MA: Nutrient removal from activated sludge mixed liquor by protozoa in a laboratory scale batch reactor. Int J Environ Sci Technol 2008, 5(4):463-470.
• [28]Fonseca P, Moreno R, Rojo F: Growth of Pseudomonas putida at low temperature: global transcriptomic and proteomic analyses. Environ Microbiol Rep 2011, 3:329-339.
• [29]Peng X, Murphy T, Holden NM: Evaluation of the effect of temperature on the die-off rate for Cryptosporidium parvum oocycts in water, soils, and feces. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008, 74(23):7101-7107.
• [30]Farrier-Pagès C, Rassoulzadegan F: N Mineralization in planktonic protozoa. Limnol Oceanogr 1994, 39(2):411-419.
• [31]Williams PN, Raab A, Feldmann J, Meharg AA: High levels of arsenic in South Central US rice grain: consequences for human dietary exposure. Environ Sci Technol 2007, 41:2178-2183.
• [32]Ozutsumi Y, Tajima K, Takenaka A, Itabashi H: The effect of protozoa on the composition of rumen bacteria in cattle using 16S rRNA gene clone libraries. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2005, 69(3):499-506.
• [33]Hussein H, Farag-Ibrahim S, Kandeel K, Moawad H: Biosorption of heavy metals from waste water using Pseudomonas sp. Electron J Biotechnol 2005, 17(1):17-21.
• [34]Brunetti G, Farrag K, Soler-Rovira P, Ferrara M, Nigro F, Senesi N: The effect of compost and Bacillus licheniformis on the phytoextraction of Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn by three Brassicaceae species from contaminated soils in the Apulia region, Southern Italy. Geoderma 2012, 170:322-330.
• [35]Hu N, Zhao B: Key genes involved in heavy-metal resistance in Pseudomonas putida CD2. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2007, 267(1):17-22.
• [36]Wang J, Zhou G, Chen C, Yu H, Wang T, Ma Y, Jia G, Gao Y, Li B, Sun J, Li Y, Jiao F, Zhao Y, Chai Z: Acute toxicity and biodistribution of different sized titanium dioxide particles in mice after oral administration. Toxicol Lett 2007, 168(2):176-185.
• [37]National Water Act: Act No 36 of 1998. South Africa: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry; 1998.
• [38]FAO: Water quality for agriculture. Rome: Ayers ORS,Westcot DW. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29 (rev 1), Food and Agriculture Organisation; 1985.
• [39]South African Bureau of Standards (SABS): South African National Standard: Drinking Water. sixth edition. SANS 241, Pretoria; 2005.
• [40]Shakoori AR, Rehman A, Haq RU: Multiple metal resistances in the ciliate protozoan, Vorticella microstoma, isolated from industrial effluents and its potential in bioremediation of toxic wastes. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 2004, 72:1046-1051.
• [41]Mohseni S, Marzban A, Sepehr S, Hosseinkhani S, Karkhaneh M, Azimi A: Investigation of some heavy metals toxicity for indigenous Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans isolated from Sarcheshmeh copper mine. Jundishapur J Microbiol 2011, 4(3):159-166.
• [42]Nilsson JR: Effect of copper on phagocytosis in Tetrahymena. Protoplasma 1981, 109:359-370.
• [43]Cabrera G, Pérez R, Gomez JM, Abalos A, Cantero D: Toxic effects of dissolved metals on Desulfovibrio vulgaris and Desulfovibrio sp. strains. J Hazard Mater 2006, 135(1–3):40-46.
• [44]Slabbert JL, Grabow WOK: A rapid water toxicity screening test based on oxygen uptake of pseudomonas putida. Toxicity Assess 1986, 1(1):13-26.
• [45]Shuttleworth KL, Unz RF: Influence of metal speciation on the growth of filamentous bacteria. Water Res 1991, 25(10):1177-1186.
• [46]Mohapatra PK: Environmental microbiology. 1st edition. New Delhi: I.K. International Publishing House; 2008.
• [47]Ruthven JA, Cairns J: Response of fresh-water protozoan artificial communities to metals. J Protozool 1973, 20:127-135.
• [48]Bitton G: Wastewater microbiology. 2nd edition. Canada: Wiley-Liss; 1999.
• [49]Ledin M, Pedersen K, Allard B: Effects of pH and ionic strength on the adsorption of Cs, Sr, Eu, Zn, Cd and Hg by Pseudomonas putidia. Water Air Soil Pollut 1997, 93:367-381.
• [50]Leborans GF, Herrero OY, Novillo A: Toxicity and bioaccumulation of lead in marine protozoa communities. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 1998, 39:172-178.
• [51]Rehman A, Ashraf S, Qazi JI, Shakoori AR: Uptake of lead by a ciliate, Stylonychia mytilus, isolated from industrial effluents: Potential use in bioremediation of wastewater. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 2005, 75:290-296.
• [52]Rehman A, Shakoori FR, Shakoori AR: Resistance and uptake of heavy metals by Vorticella microstoma and its Potential use in industrial wastewater treatment. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 2010, 29(4):481-486.
• [53]El-Sheekh MM, El-Shouny WA, Osman MEH, El-Gammal WE: Growth and heavy metals removal efficiency of Nostoc muscorum and Anabaena subcylindrica in sewage and industrial wastewater effluents. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 2005, 19(2):357-365.
• [54]Jacob U, Walther H: Aquatic insect larvae as indicators of limiting minimal contents of dissolved oxygen. Aquatic Insects 1981, 3(4):219-224.
• [55]Gutierrez T, Shimmield T, Haidon C, Black K, Gree DH: Emulsifying and metal ion binding activity of a glycoprotein exopolymer produced by Pseudoalteromonas sp. strain TG12. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008, 74(15):4887-4876.
• [56]Pala AI, Sponza DT: Biological treatment of petrochemical wastewaters by Pseudomonas sp. qdded activated sludge culture. Environ Technol 1996, 17(7):673-685.
• [57]Musa NS, Ahmad WA: Chemical oxygen demand reduction in industrial wastewater using locally isolated bacteria. J Fund Sci 2010, 6(2):88-92.
• [58]Chen B, Utgikar VP, Harmon SM, Tabak HH, Bishop DF, Govind R: Studies on biosorption of zinc(II) and copper(II) on Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 2000, 46:11-18.
• [59]Beech IB, Cheung CWS: Interactions of exopolymers produced by sulfate-reducing bacteria with metal ions. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 1995, 35:59-72.
• [60]Jong T, Parry DL: Microbial sulfate reduction under sequentially acidic conditions in an upflow anaerobic packed bed bioreactor. Water Res 2006, 40(13):2561-2571.