“You cannot eat rights”: a qualitative study of views by Zambian HIV-vulnerable women, youth and MSM on human rights as public health tools

BMC International Health and Human Rights

Catherine Campbell¹  Elena Broaddus²  Choolwe Muzyamba³ 

[1] Department of Social Psychology, London School of Economics and Political Science, St Clement’s Building, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK;Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, USA;Independent Researcher, A9, Marshlands Village, Lusaka, Zambia

关键词: Zambia;    Key populations;    HIV-Prevention;    Human rights;   

Others  :  1228248
DOI  :  10.1186/s12914-015-0067-6

 received in 2014-10-09, accepted in 2015-09-30,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Human rights approaches now dominate the HIV prevention landscape across sub-Saharan Africa, yet little is known about how they are viewed by the populations they are designed to serve. Health interventions are most effective when they resonate with the worldviews and interests of target groups. This study examined local Zambian understandings of human rights approaches to HIV-prevention among three highly HIV-vulnerable groups: women, youth, and men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM).

Methods

Focus groups included 23 women, youth, and MSM who had participated in activities organized by local non-governmental organizations (NGOs) using rights-based approaches, and interviews included 10 Zambian employees of these NGOs. Topics included participants’ experiences and views of the utility of these activities. Thematic analysis mapped out diverse ways participants viewed the concept of human rights in relation to HIV-prevention.

Results

Whilst NGO workers noted the need for human rights programs to address the complex drivers of the HIV epidemic, they struggled to tailor them to the Zambian context due to donor stipulations. Women program beneficiaries noted that the concept of human rights helped challenge harmful sexual practices and domestic abuse, and youth described rights-based approaches as more participatory than previous HIV-prevention efforts. However, they criticized the approach for conflicting with traditional values such as respect for elders and ‘harmonious’ marital relationships. They also critiqued it for threatening the social structures and relationships that they relied on for material survival, and for failing to address issues like poverty and unemployment. In contrast, MSM embraced the rights approach, despite being critical of its overly confrontational implementation.

Conclusions

A rights-based approach seeks to tackle the symbolic drivers of HIV—its undeniable roots in cultural and religious systems of discrimination. Yet, it fails to resonate with youth and women’s own understandings of their needs and priorities due to its neglect of material drivers of HIV such as poverty and unemployment. MSM, who suffer extreme stigma and discrimination, have less to lose and much to gain from an approach that challenges inequitable social systems. Developing effective HIV-prevention strategies requires careful dialogue with vulnerable groups and greater flexibility for context-specific implementation rather than a one-size-fits-all conceptualization of human rights.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Muzyamba et al.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Kvasny L, Chong J. The ABC Approach and the Feminization of HIV/AIDS in the Sub-Saharan Africa. Encyclopedia of healthcare information systems. IGI Global Publication, Hershey; 2008.
• [2]Heslop J, Banda R. Moving beyond the “male perpetrator, female victim” discourse in addressing sex and relationships for HIV prevention: peer research in Eastern Zambia. Reprod Health Matters. 2013; 21(41):225-233.
• [3]Barr D, Amon JJ, Clayton M. Articulating a rights-based approach to HIV treatment and prevention interventions. Curr HIV Res. 2011; 9(6):396-404.
• [4]Amon J, Kasambala T. Structural barriers and human rights related to HIV prevention and treatment in Zimbabwe. Glob Public Health. 2009; 4(6):528-545.
• [5]Gupta GR, Parkhurst JO, Ogden JA, Aggleton P, Mahal A. Structural approaches to HIV prevention. The Lancet. 2008; 372(9640):764-775.
• [6]Zambia Demographic and Health Survey 2007. CSO and Macro International Inc, Calverton; 2009.
• [7]Kandala N-B, Brodish P, Buckner B, Foster S, Madise N. Millennium development goal 6 and HIV infection in Zambia: what can we learn from successive household surveys? AIDS (London, England). 2011; 25(1):95.
• [8]Kamocha S, Mulenga C, Mwakazanga D, Monze M, Nyoni I, Soud F, et al. P3. 205 Declining HIV Prevalence in Zambia: Sentinel Surveillance Programmatic Insight and the Need For HIV Incidence Data. Sex Transm Infect. 2013;89 Suppl 1:A212–2.
• [9]Zambia Country Report: Monitoring the Declaration of Commitment on HIV and AIDS and the Universal Access. United Nations General Assembly Special Session on HIV and AIDS, Lusaka; 2014.
• [10]Zambia. [http://data.worldbank.org/country/zambia]. 12-09-2014
• [11]GINI index. [http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI]. 12-09-2014
• [12]Zambia's Jobs Challenge: Realities on the Ground. Zambia Economic Brief. The World Bank, Washington; 2013.
• [13]Human Development Report 2013. United Nations Development Programme, New York; 2013.
• [14]Situation Analysis of Children and Women 2008. UNICEF, Lusaka; 2009.
• [15]Orlando P. In the Battle Ground: HIV/AIDS and the Human Rights of Women in Zambia1. Browning Institute Studies. 2007; 6(2):177-189.
• [16]Murray LK, Haworth A, Semrau K, Singh M, Aldrovandi GM, Sinkala M, et al. Violence and abuse among HIV-infected women and their children in Zambia: a qualitative study. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006;194(8):610.
• [17]Malhotra N, Yang J. Risky behaviour and HIV prevalence among Zambian men. J Biosoc Sci. 2011; 43(2):155.
• [18]Abdi AA, Ellis L. Education and Zambia’s Democratic Development: Reconstituting “Something” From the Predatory Project of Neoliberal Globalization. Alberta J Educ Res. 2007; 53(3):287-301.
• [19]Youth Map Zambia. 2014 Youth Map Assessment Report. International Youth Foundation, Baltimore; 2014.
• [20]Baral S, Trapence G, Motimedi F, Umar E, Iipinge S, Dausab F, et al. HIV prevalence, risks for HIV infection, and human rights among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Malawi, Namibia, and Botswana. PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e4997.
• [21]Millett GA, Peterson JL, Malebranche DJ, Lane T, Flores SA, Fenton KA, et al. Common roots: a contextual review of HIV epidemics in black men who have sex with men across the African diaspora. The Lancet. 2012;380(9839):411–23.
• [22]Zulu W. Men who have sex men (MSM)-a sidelined population in HIV/AIDS prevention Programs in Zambia. 5th IASA Conference on HIV Patogenesis, Treatment and prevention, International AIDS Society, Lusak a Zambia: 2009. 2009.
• [23]Van Klinken AS. Gay rights, the devil and the end times: public religion and the enchantment of the homosexuality debate in Zambia. Religion. 2013; 43(4):519-540.
• [24]Mburu G, Hodgson I, Teltschik A, Ram M, Haamujompa C, Bajpai D, et al. Rights-based services for adolescents living with HIV: adolescent self-efficacy and implications for health systems in Zambia. Reprod Health Matters. 2013;21(41):176–85.
• [25]Gage AJ. Know Your HIV-Prevention Response: Southern Province, Zambia. In Chart Book on Implementation of HIV-prevention Intervenions by Nongovernmental Organizations. USAID, PEPFAR, and MEASURE Evaluation: Chapel Hill; 2014
• [26]Zambia National AIDS Council. Zambia Country Report 2013. In Global AIDS Response Progress Reporting. Edited by UNAIDS: Washington, DC; 2014
• [27]Campbell C, Jovchelovitch S. Health, community and development: Towards a social psychology of participation. J Community App Soc Psychol. 2000; 10(4):255-270.
• [28]Campbell C, Scott K, Nhamo M, Nyamukapa C, Madanhire C, Skovdal M, et al. Social capital and HIV competent communities: the role of community groups in managing HIV/AIDS in rural Zimbabwe. AIDS Care. 2013;25(sup1):S114–22.
• [29]Campbell C, Cornish F. Towards a “fourth generation” of approaches to HIV/AIDS management: creating contexts for effective community mobilisation. AIDS Care. 2010; 22(S2):1569-1579.
• [30]Cornish F, Shukla A, Banerji R. Persuading, protesting and exchanging favours: strategies used by Indian sex workers to win local support for their HIV prevention programmes. AIDS Care. 2010; 22(S2):1670-1678.
• [31]Farmer P. Challenging orthodoxies: the road ahead for health and human rights. Health Hum Rights. 2008; 10(1):5-19.
• [32]Englund H. Prisoners of freedom: Human rights and the African poor. Cambridge Univ Press: Cambridge; 2006
• [33]Shivji IG. The concept of human rights in Africa. African Books Collective: Windhoek; 1989
• [34]Mutua MW. Savages, victims, and saviors: the metaphor of human rights. Harvard Int Law J. 2001; 42(1):201-245.
• [35]Jensen K, Gaie JB. African communalism and public health policies: the relevance ofindigenous concepts of personal identity to HIV/AIDS policies in Botswana. African J AIDS Res. 2010; 9(3):297-305.
• [36]Campbell C, Nair Y. From rhetoric to reality? Putting HIV and AIDS rights talk into practice in a South African rural community. Cult Health Sex. 2014; 16(10):1216-30.
• [37]Mannell J. Gender mainstreaming practice: considerations for HIV/AIDS community organisations. AIDS Care. 2010; 22(S2):1613-1619.
• [38]Moscovici. S. (1998) The history and actuality of social representations. In U. Flick (Ed) The psychology of the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• [39]Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006; 3(2):77-101.
• [40]Owen S. The practical, methodological and ethical dilemmas of conducting focus groups with vulnerable clients. J Adv Nurs. 2001; 36(5):652-658.
• [41]Hennink M. International Focus Group Research: A Handbook for the Health and Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press, New York; 2007.
• [42]Mabunda G. Ethical issues in HIV research in poor countries. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2001; 33(2):111-114.
• [43]Malungo JR. Sexual cleansing (Kusalazya) and levirate marriage (Kunjilila mung’anda) in the era of AIDS: changes in perceptions and practices in Zambia. Soc Sci Med. 2001; 53(3):371-382.
• [44]Campbell C. Letting them die: why HIV/AIDS intervention programmes fail. Indiana University Press: Bloomington; 2003
• [45]Burgess R, Campbell C. Creating social policy to support women's agency in coercive settings: a case study from Uganda. Glob Public Health. 2014, in press.
• [46]Mannell J. ‘It's just been such a horrible experience’. Perceptions of gender mainstreaming by practitioners in South African organisations. Gend. Dev. 2012; 20(3):423-434.