Prevalence of health-risk behaviours among Canadian post-secondary students: descriptive results from the National College Health Assessment

BMC Public Health

John Cairney²  Kelly P Arbour-Nicitopoulos¹  Guy EJ Faulkner¹  Matthew YW Kwan² 

[1] Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada;Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 175 Longwood Road South Suite 201a, Hamilton, ON, L8P 0A1, Canada

关键词: University health;    University students;    Multiple health behaviours;   

Others  :  1162133
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-13-548

 received in 2012-09-26, accepted in 2013-05-29,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

It is important to understand health-risk behaviours among young adults, as modifications in this can enhance and lessen the risk of chronic illness later in life. The purpose of the current study was to determine the prevalence of a broad range of health-risk behaviours among post-secondary students from across Canada, and to determine whether institutional variability exists in the prevalence of these behaviours.

Methods

Data were collected from 8,182 undergraduate students enrolled in one of eight Canadian post-secondary institutions during the fall or spring of 2009, using the National College Health Assessment (NCHA). The NCHA consists of 60 questions, assessing student health status and engagement in various health behaviours.

Results

Findings show relatively low prevalence in smoking (13.1%) marijuana (17.5%) or other illicit drug use (3.5%), and risky sexual behaviour (12%). Binge drinking, however, was much higher, with nearly 60% of students consuming more than 5 alcoholic drinks in a single occasion during the past 15 days. Similarly, prevalence rates for physical inactivity (72.2%), inadequate sleep (75.6%) and low fruit and vegetable intake (88.0%) were all high among the student population. Results also found that students in smaller institutions exhibited higher rates of inactivity, binge drinking, and marijuana and illicit drug use compared to institutions having a larger student body.

Conclusion

Overall, findings point to the need for more concentrated health promotion campaigns, specifically targeting sleep, fruit and vegetables intake, and greater participation in physical activity. Given evidence of some institutional variability, future efforts are warranted in exploring how best to increase institutional commitment for collecting surveillance data on Canadian post-secondary students.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Kwan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Adlaf EM, Demers A, Gliksman L (Eds): Canadian campus survey 2004. Toronto, ON: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; 2005.
• [2]Dawson KA, Schneider MA, Fletcher PC, Bryden PJ: Examining gender differences in the health behaviours of Canadian university students. J R Soc Promote Health 2007, 127(1):38-44.
• [3]Poortinga W: Perceptions of the environment, physical inactivity and obesity. Soc Sci Med 2006, 63(11):2835-46.
• [4]Leslie E, Sparling PB, Owen N: University campus settings and the promotion of physical activity in young adults: lessons from research in Australia and the USA. Health Education 2001, 101(3):116-25.
• [5]Poortinga W: The prevalence and clustering of four major lifestyle risk factors in an English adult population. Prev Med 2007, 44(2):124-8.
• [6]Brooks JH, DuBois DL: Individual and environmental predictors of adjustment during the first year of college. J College Stud Dev 1995, 36:347-360.
• [7]Stewart-Brown S, Evans J, Patterson J, Petersen S, Doll H, Balding J, Regis D: The health of students in institutes of higher education: an important and neglected public health problem? J Public Health Med 2000, 22(4):492-9.
• [8]Wells J, Barlow J, Stewart-Brown S: A systematic review of universal approaches to mental health promotion in schools. Health Educ 2003, 103(4):197-220.
• [9]Johnston LD, Bachman JG, O’Malley PM, Schulenberg JE: The monitoring the future project after thirty-two years: design and procedure. (Monitoring the Future Occasional Paper No. 64). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research; 2006.
• [10]Wechsler H, Kuo M: College students define binge drinking and estimate its prevalence: Results of a national survey. J Am Coll Health 2000, 49(2):57-64.
• [11]Gliksman L, Adlaf EM, Demers A, Newton-Taylor B: Heavy drinking on Canadian campuses. Can J Public Health 2003, 94(1):17-21.
• [12]Schuit A, Van-Loon J, Tijhuis AJM, Ocké M: Clustering of lifestyle risk factors in a general adult population. Prev Med 2003, 35:219-24.
• [13]Rigotti NA, Lee JE, Wechsler H: US college students’ use of tobacco products: results of a national survey. JAMA 2000, 284:669-705.
• [14]American College Health Association (ACHA): Linthicum. MD: American College Health Association; 2009. [American College Health Association – National College Health Assessment II: Reference Group Executive Summary Fall 2009]
• [15]Cairney J, Lawrence KA: Smoking on campus: an examination of smoking behaviours among postsecondary students in Canada. Can J Public Health 2002, 93(4):313-6.
• [16]Bray SR, Born HA: Transition to university and vigorous physical activity: implications for health and well-being. J Am Coll Health 2004, 52(4):181-8.
• [17]Bray SR, Kwan MYW: Physical activity is associated with better health and psychological well-being during transition to university. J Am Coll Health 2006, 55(2):78-82.
• [18]Kwan MYW, Bray SR, Martin Ginis KA: Predicting physical activity during transition to first-year University: an application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. J Am Coll Health 2009, 58:45-52.
• [19]Kwan MYW, Arbour KP, Lowe D, Taman S, Faulkner G: Seeing may not believe: student reception, sources, and believability of health-related information. J Am Coll Health 2010, 58:555-62.
• [20]Arbour-Nicitopoulos KP, Kwan MYW, Taman S, Lowe D, Faulkner GEJ: Normative beliefs in health behavioural practices in a college population. J Am Coll Health 2010, 59:191-6.
• [21]American College Health Association: The American College Health Association National College Health Assessment (ACHA-NCHA), Spring 2005 Reference Group Data (Abridged). J Am Coll Health 2006, 55:5-16.
• [22]Laska MN, Pasch KE, Lust K, Story M, Ehlinger E: Latent class analysis of lifestyle characteristics and health risk behaviours among college youth. Prev Sci 2009, 10(4):376-86.
• [23]Health Canada: Eating Well with Canada's Food Guide. Ottawa: Queen's Printer; 2007. Available at: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/food-guide-aliment/gen_prin-eng.php webcite (Accessed on June 20, 2012)
• [24]Das P, Horton R: Rethinking our approach to physical activity. The Lancet 2012, 380(9838):189-90.
• [25]Johnston LD, Bachman JG, O’Malley PM, Schulenberg JE: Monitoring the Future Occasional Paper. 64th edition. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research; 2006. [The monitoring the future project after thirty-two years: design and procedure]
• [26]Brener N, Billy J, Grady W: Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health risk behaviour among adolescents: evidence from the scientific literature. J Adolescent Health 2003, 33(6):436-57.
• [27]Sloboda Z: Defining and measuring drug abusing behaviours. In Epidemiology of Drug Abuse. Edited by Sloboda Z. New York: Springer; 2005.