The Fukushima nuclear accident and the pale grass blue butterfly: evaluating biological effects of long-term low-dose exposures

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Joji M Otaki¹  Masaki Iwata¹  Seira Kinjo¹  Wataru Taira¹  Chiyo Nohara¹  Atsuki Hiyama¹ 

[1] The BCPH Unit of Molecular Physiology, Department of Chemistry, Biology and Marine Science, Faculty of Science, University of the Ryukyus, 1 Senbaru, Nishihara, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan

关键词: Zizeeria maha;    Pale grass blue butterfly;    Long-term low-dose radiation exposure;    Fukushima nuclear accident;    Colour pattern;    Artificial radionuclides;    Abnormality rate;   

Others  :  1126910
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2148-13-168

 received in 2013-01-23, accepted in 2013-07-08,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

On August 9th 2012, we published an original research article in Scientific Reports, concluding that artificial radionuclides released from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant exerted genetically and physiologically adverse effects on the pale grass blue butterfly Zizeeria maha in the Fukushima area. Immediately following publication, many questions and comments were generated from all over the world. Here, we have clarified points made in the original paper and answered questions posed by the readers.

Results

The following points were clarified. (1) There are many advantages to using the pale grass blue butterfly as an indicator species. (2) The forewings of the individuals collected in Fukushima were significantly smaller than in the northern and southern localities. (3) We observed growth retardation in the butterflies from the Fukushima area. (4) The aberrant colour patterns in the butterflies obtained in the Fukushima area were different from the colour patterns induced by temperature and sibling crosses but similar to those induced by external and internal exposures to the artificial radionuclides and by a chemical mutagen, suggesting that genetic mutations caused the aberrations. (5) This species of butterfly has been plentiful in Fukushima area for at least half a century. We here present specimens collected from Fukushima Prefecture before the accident. (6) Mutation accumulation was detected by the increase in the abnormality rates from May 2011 to September 2011. (7) The abnormal traits were heritable. (8) Our sampling localities were not affected by the tsunami. (9) We used a high enough number of samples to obtain statistically significant results. (10) The standard rearing method was followed, producing normal adults in the control groups. (11) The exposure experiments successfully reproduced the results of the field work. This species of butterfly is vulnerable to long-term low-dose internal and external exposures; however, insect cells are known to be resistant to short-term high-dose irradiation. This discrepancy is reconcilable based on the differences in the experimental conditions.

Conclusions

We are just beginning to understand the biological effects of long-term low-dose exposures in animals. Further research is necessary to accurately assess the possible biological effects of the accident.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Hiyama et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

Figure 12.

Figure 13.

Figure 14.

Figure 15.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Hiyama A, Nohara C, Kinjo S, Taira W, Gima S, Tanahara A, Otaki JM: The biological impacts of the Fukushima nuclear accident on the pale grass blue butterfly. Sci Rep 2012, 2:570.
• [2]Hiyama A, Iwata M, Otaki JM: Rearing the pale grass blue Zizeeria maha (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae): toward the establishment of a lycaenid model system for butterfly physiology and genetics. Entomol Sci 2010, 13:293-302.
• [3]Otaki JM, Hiyama A, Iwata M, Kudo T: Phenotypic plasticity in the range-margin population of the lycaenid butterfly Zizeeria maha. BMC Evol Biol 2010, 10:252. BioMed Central Full Text
• [4]Buckley J, Bridle JR, Pomiankowski A: Novel variation associated with species range expansion. BMC Evol Biol 2010, 10:382. BioMed Central Full Text
• [5]Hiyama A, Taira W, Otaki JM: Colour-pattern evolution in response to environmental stress in butterflies. Front Genet 2012, 3:15.
• [6]Shirai Y, Takahashi M: Effects of transgenic Bt corn pollen on a non-target lycaenid butterfly, Pseudozizeeria maha. Applied Entomol Zool 2005, 40:151-159.
• [7]Wolt JD, Conlan CA, Majima K: An ecological risk assessment of Cry1F maize pollen impact to pale grass blue butterfly. Environ Biosafety Res 2005, 4:243-251.
• [8]Shirôzu T: The Standard of Butterflies in Japan. Tokyo: Gakken; 2006. (in Japanese)
• [9]Kudo T: The pale grass blue in Aomori prefecture: its status in October 2000. Celastrina 2001, 36:2-19. (in Japanese)
• [10]Tsunoda I: Butterflies of Fukushima Prefecture. Aizu-Wakamatsu, Fukushima: Rekishi-Shunju-Sha; 1982. (in Japanese)
• [11]Oda H, Kitazoe N: Observation Encyclopedia of Lycaenid Butterflies. Tokyo: Kaisei-sha; 2002. (in Japanese)
• [12]Nagata N, Iiduka H, Kitahara M: Diversity and structure of butterfly communities in the suburban mountainous areas of Iwaki City, Fukushima Prefecture. Jpn J Environ Entomol Zool 2006, 17(4):153-165. (in Japanese)
• [13]Ohtani T: Insects—Mimics that cannot be large. Shizuoka: OM Publications; 2005. (in Japanese)
• [14]Nishikai M: Mechanism of seasonal morphs in Zizeeria maha. Chouken Field 1999, 14(3):23-28. (in Japanese)
• [15]Angilletta MJ Jr, Dunham AE: The temperture-size rule in ectotherms: simple evolutionary explanations may not be general. Am Nat 2003, 162:332-342.
• [16]Atkinson D: Temperature and organism size: a biological law for ectotherms. Adv Ecol Res 1994, 25:1-58.
• [17]Partridge L, Barrie B, Fowler K, French V: Evolution and development of body size and cell size in Drosophila melanogaster in response to temperature. Evolution 1994, 48:1269-1276.
• [18]Nijhout HF: The control of body size in insects. Dev Biol 2003, 216:1-9.
• [19]Powell JR: Temperature related genetic divergence in Drosophila body size. J Hered 1974, 65:257-258.
• [20]Partdidge L, Barrie B, Fowler K, French V: Evolution and development of body size and cell size in Drosophila melanogaster in response to temperature. Evolution 1994, 48:1269-1276.
• [21]de Moed GH, de Jong G, Scharloo W: Environmental effects on body size variation in Drosophila manalogaster and its cellular basis. Genet Res 1997, 70:35-43.
• [22]Azevedo RBR, French V, Partridge L: Temperature modulates epidermal cell size in Drosophila melanogaster. J Insect Physiol 2002, 48:231-237.
• [23]Gilchrist GW, Huey RB, Serra L: Rapid evolution of wing size clines in Drosophila subobscura. Genetica 2001, 112–113:273-286.
• [24]Huey RB, Gilchrist GW, Carlson ML, Berrigan D, Serra L: Rapid evolution of a geographic cline in size in an introduced fly. Science 2000, 287:308-309.
• [25]Mousseau TA: Ectotherms follow the converse to Bergmann’s rule. Evolution 1997, 51:630-632.
• [26]Mousseau TA, Roff DA: Adaptation to seasonality in a cricket: Patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation in body size and diapause expression along a cline in season length. Evolution 1989, 43:1483-1496.
• [27]Riemann JG, Flint HM: Irradiation effects on midguts and testes of the adult boll weevils Anthonomus grandis, determined by histological and shielding studies. Ann Entmol Soc Am 1967, 60:289-308.
• [28]Chino M, Nakayama H, Nagai H, Terada H, Katata G, Yamazawa H: Preliminary estimation of release amount of 131I and 137Cs accidentally discharged from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant into the atmosphere. J Nucl Sci Technol 2011, 48:1129-1134.
• [29]Otaki JM, Yamamoto H: Colour-pattern modifications and speciation in lycaenid butterflies. Trans Lepidopterol Soc Jpn 2003, 2003(54):197-205.
• [30]Otaki JM, Yamamoto H: Species-specific colour-pattern modifications of butterfly wings. Dev Growth Differ 2004, 46:1-14.
• [31]Otaki JM: Physiologically induced colour-pattern changes in butterfly wings: mechanistic and evolutionary implications. J Insect Physiol 2008, 54:1099-1112.
• [32]Otaki JM: Stress-induced color-pattern modifications and evolution of the painted lady butterflies Vanessa cardui and Vanessa kershawi. Zool Sci 2007, 24:811-819.
• [33]Otaki JM: Phenotypic plasticity of wing color patterns revealed by temperature and chemical applications in a nymphalid butterfly Vanessa indica. J Therm Biol 2008, 33:128-139.
• [34]Pfennig DW, Wund MA, Snell-Rood EC, Cruickshank T, Schlichting CD, Moczek AP: Phenotypic plasticity’s impacts on diversification and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 2010, 25:459-467.
• [35]Epler JL: Ethyl methanesulfonate induced lethals in Drosophila, frequency-dose relations and multiple mosaicism. Genetics 1966, 54:31-36.
• [36]Jenkins JB: Mutagenesis at a complex locus in Drosophila with the monofunctional alkylating agent, ethyl methanesulfonate. Genetics 1967, 57:783-793.
• [37]Mizota K: The past, present and future of entomological studies in Kinkazan Island, northeastern Japan. Res Bull Environ Edu Center Miyagi Univ Edu 2001, 4:4-18. (in Japanese)
• [38]Mizota K: A check list of insects in Kinkazan Island, Miyagi Pref., northeastern Japan: a bibliographical survey. Res Bull Environ Edu Center Miyagi Univ Edu 2002, 5:69-78. (in Japanese)
• [39]Møller AP: Morphology and sexual selection in the bran swallow Hirundo rustica in Chernobyl, Ukraine. Proc. R. Soc. B 1993, 252:51-57.
• [40]Lachance LE, Graham CK: Insect radiosensitivity: Dose curves and dose-fractionation studies of dominant lethal mutations in the mature sperm of 4 insect species. Mutat Res 1984, 127:49-59.
• [41]Bakri A, Heather N, Hendrichs J, Ferris I: Fifty years of radiation biology in entomology: Lessons learned from IDIDAS. Ann Entomol Soc Am 2005, 98:1-12.
• [42]Mastrangelo T, Walder J: Use of radiation and isotopes in insects. In Radioisotopes – Applications in Bio-Medical Science. Edited by Singh N. Rijeka, Croatia: In Tech; 2011:67-92.
• [43]Kaplan HS: Cellular effects of ionizing radiation. Bull N Y Acad Med 1960, 36:649-661.
• [44]Bergonié J, Tribondeau L: Interprétation de quelques résultats de la radiothérapie et essai de fixation d’une technique rationnelle. C R Acad Sci 1956, 143:983-985. (in French)
• [45]Kato Y: Growth and development. In Biology of Butterflies. Edited by Honda K, Kato Y. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press; 2005:174-206. Chapter 7
• [46]Nijhout HF: The Development and Evolution of Butterfly Wing Patterns. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1991.
• [47]Dantchenko A, Emmel TC, Sourakov A: Nuclear pollution and gynandromorphic butterflies in southern Russia. Holarctic Lepidoptera 1995, 2(2):77-79.
• [48]Little JB: Radiation carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 2000, 21:397-404.
• [49]Kalinich JF, Catravas GN, Snyder SL: The effect of gamma radiation on DNA methylation. Radiat Res 1989, 117:185-197.
• [50]Kidhim MA, Lorimore SA, Hepburn EG, Goodhead DT, Buckle VJ, Wright EG: α-particle-induced chromosomal instability in human bone marrow cells. Lancet 1994, 344:987-988.
• [51]Pogribny I, Koturbash I, Tryndyak V, Hudson D, Stevenson SM, Sedelnikova O, Bonner W, Kovalchuk O: Fractionated low-dose radiation exposure leads to accumulation of DNA damage and profound alterations in DNA and histone methylation in the murine thymus. Mol Cancer Res 2005, 22:553-561.
• [52]Li E, Bestor TH, Jaenisch R: Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality. Cell 1992, 69:915-926.
• [53]Kaplan MI, Limoli CL, Morgan WF: Perpetuating radiation-induced chromosomal instability. Radiat Oncol Investig 1997, 5:124-128.
• [54]Morgan WF: Non-targeted and delayed effects of exposure to ionizing radiation: I. Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects in vitro, clastogenic factors and transgenerational effects. Radiat Res 2003, 159:567-580.
• [55]Suzuki K, Ojima M, Kodama S, Watanabe M: Radiation-induced DNA damage and delayed induced genomic instability. Oncogene 2003, 22:6988-6993.
• [56]Kaup S, Grandjean V, Mukherjee R, Kappor A, Keyes E, Seymour CB, Mothersill CE, Schofield PN: Radiation-induced genomic instability is associated with DNA methylation changes in cultured human keratinocytes. Mutat Res 2006, 597:87-97.
• [57]Pampfer S, Streffer C: Increased chromosome aberration levels in cells from mouse fetuses after zygote X-irradiation. Int J Radiat Biol 1989, 55:85-92.
• [58]Shiraishi K, Shimura T, Taga M, Uematsu N, Gondo Y, Ohtaki M, Kominami R, Niwa O: Persistent induction of somatic reversions of the pink-eyed unstable mutation in F1 mice born to fathers irradiated at the spermatozoa stage. Radiat Res 2002, 157:661-667.
• [59]Dubrova YE: Radiation-induced transgenerational instability. Oncogene 2003, 22:7087-7093.
• [60]Morgan WF: Non-targeted and delayed effects of exposure to ionizing radiation: II. Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects in vivo, clastogenic factors and transgenerational effects. Radiat Res 2003, 159:581-596.
• [61]Dubrova YE: Genomic instability in the offspring of irradiated parents: Facts and interpretation. Genetika 2006, 42:1335-1347.
• [62]Barber R, Plumb MK, Boulton E, Roux I, Dubrova Y: Elevated mutation rates in the germ line of first- and second-generation offspring of irradiated male mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99:6877-6882.
• [63]Barber RC, Hickenbotham P, Hatch T, Kelly D, Topchiy N, Almeida GM, Jones GD, Johnson GE, Parry JM, Rothkamm K, Dubrova YE: Radiation-induced transgenerational alterations in genome stability and DNA damage. Oncogene 2006, 25:7336-7342.
• [64]Yauk CL: Advances in the application of germline tandem repeat instability for in situ monitoring. Mutat Res 2004, 566:169-182.
• [65]Baulch JE, Raabe OG: Gamma irradiation of Type B spermatogonia leads to heritable genomic instability in four generations of mice. Mutagenesis 2005, 20:337-343.
• [66]Yagi T: Have mutations occurred in the pale grass blue around the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant? Insect DNA Newslett 2012, 17:42-45. (in Japanese)
• [67]Hayashi K, Koyama J: Effects of gamma irradiation on external and internal morphological characters of the adult melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae COQUILLETT (Diptera : Tephritidae). Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 1981, 25:141-149.
• [68]Follett PA: Effect of irradiation on Mexican leafroller (Lepidoptera: tortricidae) development and reproduction. J Econ Entomol 2008, 101:710-715.
• [69]Hosseinzadeh A, Shayesteh N, Zolfagharieh HR, Babaei M, Zareshahi H, Mostafavi HA, Fatollahi H: Gamma radiation sensitivity of different stages of saw-toothed grain beetle Oryzaephilus surinamensis (L.) (Coleoptera: Silvanidae). J Plant Prot Res 2010, 50:250-255.
• [70]Hosseinzadeh A, Shayesteh N, Zolfagharieh HR, Bernousi I, Babaei M, Zareshahi H, Mostafavi HA, Fatollahi H: Effect of gamma radiation on different stages of Indian meal moth Plodia interpunctella Hübner (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). African J Biotech 2011, 10:4259-4264.
• [71]Koval TM: Intrinsic resistance to the lethal effects of x-irradiation in insect and arachnid cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1983, 80:4752-4755.
• [72]Robinson AS: Mutations and their use in insect control. Mutat Res 2002, 511:113-132.
• [73]Vinson SB, Londono RL, Bartlett AC: Effect of gamma radiation on tissues of the tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens. Ann Entomol Soc Am 1969, 62:1340-1347.
• [74]El-Akhdar EAH, Afia YE: Functional ultrastructure of antenna, wings and their associated sensory receptors of peach fruit fly, Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) as influenced by the sterilizing dose of gamma irradiation. J Rad Res Appl Sci 2009, 2:797-817.
• [75]Marcu O, Locke M: A cuticular protein from the moulting stages of an insect. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 1998, 28:659-669.
• [76]Møller AP: Developmental selection against developmentally unstable offspring and sexual selection. J Theor Biol 1997, 185:415-422.
• [77]Badyaev AV: Stress-induced variation in evolution: from behavioural plasticity to genetic assimilation. Proc R Soc B 2005, 272:877-886.
• [78]Nagasawa H, Little JB: Induction of sister chromatid exchanges by extremely low doses of α-particles. Cancer Res 1992, 52:6394-6396.
• [79]Joiner MC, Lambin P, Malaise EP, Robson T, Arrand JE, Skov KA, Marples B: Hypersensitivity to very-low single radiation doses: Its relationship to the adaptive response and induced radioresistance. Mutat Res 1996, 358:171-183.
• [80]Skov KA: Radioresponsiveness at low doses: hyper-radiosensitivity and increased radioresistance in mammalian cells. Mutat Res 1999, 430:241-253.
• [81]Matsumoto H: Biological respondence to low-doses/dose rate radiation. The Hokuriku J Radioisotope Res 2005, 7:36-40. (in Japanese)
• [82]Suzuki K, Kodama S, Watanabe M: Low-dose radiation effects and intracellular signaling pathways. Yakugaku Zasshi 2006, 126:859-867. (in Japanese)
• [83]Thomas C, Fertil B, Foray N: Very low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity: impact for radiotherapy of micrometastases. Cancer Radiother 2007, 11:260-265. (in French)
• [84]Beam CA, Mortimer RK, Wolfe RG, Tobias CA: The relation of radioresistance to budding in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Arch Biochem Biophys 1954, 49:110-122.
• [85]Eriksson G: Induction of waxy mutants in maize by acute and chronic gamma irradiation. Hereditas 1963, 50:161-178.
• [86]Calkins J: An unusual form of response in x-irradiated protozoa and a hypothesis as to its origin. Int J Radiat Biol 1967, 12:297-301.
• [87]Hillova J, Drasil V: The inhibitory effect of iodoacetamide on recovery from sub-lethal damage in Chlamydomonas reinhardi. Int J Radiat Biol 1967, 12:201-208.
• [88]Horsley RJ, Pujara CM: Study of the inflexion of X-radiation survival curves for synchronized cell populations of the green alga (Oedogonium cardiacum). Radiat Res 1969, 40:440-449.
• [89]Hendry JH: Radioresistance induced in fern spores by prior irradiation. Radiat Res 1986, 106:396-400.
• [90]Marples B, Joiner MC: The response of Chinese hamster V79 cells to low radiation doses: Evidence of enhanced sensitivity of the whole cell population. Radiat Res 1993, 133:41-51.
• [91]Rakwal R, Agrawal GK, Shibato J, Imanaka T, Fukutani S, Tamogami S, Endo S, Sahoo SK, Masuo Y, Kimura S: Ultra low-dose radiation: stress responses and impacts using rice as a grass model. Int J Mol Sci 2009, 10:1215-1225.
• [92]Short S, Mayes C, Woodcock M, Johns H, Joiner MC: Low dose hypersensitivity in the T98G human glioblastoma cell line. Int J Radiat Biol 1999, 75:847-855.
• [93]Koval TM: Multiphasic survival response of a radioresistant Lepidopteran insect cell line. Radiat Res 1984, 98:642-648.
• [94]Wouters BG, Sy AM, Skarsgard LD: Low-dose hypersensitivity and increased radioresistance in a panel of human tumor cell lines with different radiosensitivity. Radiat Res 1996, 146:399-413.
• [95]Joiner MC, Marples B, Lambin P, Short SC, Turesson I: Low-dose hypersensitivity: current status and possible mechanisms. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001, 49:379-389.
• [96]Kovalchuk O, Baulch JE: Epigenetic changes and nontargeted radiation effects – Is there a link? Environ Mol Mutat 2008, 49:16-25.
• [97]Little JB: Genomic instability and radiation. J Radiat Prot 2003, 23:173-181.
• [98]Lorimore SA, Coates PJ, Wright EG: Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects: Inter-related nontargeted effects of exposure to ionizing radiation. Oncogene 2003, 22:7058-7069.
• [99]Mothersill C, Seymour C: Radiation-induced bystander effects, carcinogenesis and models. Oncogene 2003, 22:7028-7033.
• [100]Mothersill C, Seymour C: Radiation-induced bystander effects – implications for cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2004, 4:158-164.
• [101]Mothersill C, Seymour C: Radiation-induced bystander effects and the DNA paradigm: An “out of field” perspective. Mutat Res 2006, 597:5-10.
• [102]Brooks AL: Evidence for ‘bystander effects’ in vivo. Hum Exp Toxicol 2004, 23:67-70.
• [103]Morgan WF, Sowa MB: Effects of ionizing radiation in nonirradiated cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102:14127-14128.
• [104]Morgan WF, Sowa MB: Non-targeted bystander effects induced by ionizing radiation. Mutat Res 2007, 616:159-164.
• [105]Sowa M, Arthurs BJ, Morgan WE: Effects of ionizing radiation on cellular structures, induced instability and carcinogenesis. EXS 2006, 96:293-301.
• [106]Prise KM, Folkard M, Michael BD: A review of the bystander effect and its implications for low-dose exposure. Rad Prot Dosim 2003, 104:347-355.
• [107]Kotani E, Furusawa T, Nagaoka S, Nojima K, Fujii H, Sugimura Y, Ichida M, Suzuki E, Nagamatsu A, Todo T, Ikenaga M: Somatic mutation in larvae of the silkworm, Bombyx mori, induced by heavy ion irradiation to diapauses eggs. J Radiat Res 2002, 43(Suppl):S193-S198.
• [108]Goncharova R, Riabokon N: Results of long-term genetic monitoring of animal populations chronically irradiated in the radiocontaminated areas. KUR Rep (KURRI-KR) 1998, 21:194-202.
• [109]Garnier-Laplace J, Geras’kin S, Della-Vedva C, Beaugelin-Seiller K, Hinton TG, Real A, Oudalova A: Are radiosensitivity data derived from natural field conditions consistent with data from controlled exposures? A case study of Chernobyl wildlife chronically exposed to low dose rates. J Environ Radioact 2012. in press
• [110]Møller AP, Hagiwara A, Matsui S, Kasahara S, Kawatsu K, Nishiumi I, Suzuki H, Ueda K, Mousseau TA: Abundance of birds in Fukushima as judged from Chernobyl. Environ Pollut 2012, 164:36-39.
• [111]Møller AP, Nishiumi I, Suzuki H, Ueda K, Mouseau TA: Differences in effects of radiation on abundance of animals in Fukushima and Chernobyl. Ecol Indicat 2012, 24:75-78.
• [112]Brumfiel G: Fallout forensics hike radiation toll. Nature 2011, 478:435-436.
• [113]Stohl A, Seibert P, Wotawa G, Arnold D, Burkhart JF, Eckhardt S, Tapia C, Vargas A, Yasunari TJ: Xenon-133 and caesium-137 releases into the atmosphere from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant: determination of the source term, atmospheric dispersion, and deposition. Atoms Chem Phys Discuss 2011, 11:28319-28394.