Internet-based interventions for disordered gamblers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of online self-directed cognitive-behavioural motivational therapy

BMC Public Health

John A Cunningham³  Robert Murray²  Gordon H Fick⁴  David C Hodgins¹ 

[1] Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada;Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada;Department of Psychology and the Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada;Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

关键词: Trial protocol;    Online intervention;    Gambling disorders;    Brief intervention;    Clinical trial;   

Others  :  1162669
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-13-10

 received in 2012-12-16, accepted in 2013-01-07,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Gambling disorders affect about one percent of adults. Effective treatments are available but only a small proportion of affected individuals will choose to attend formal treatment. As a result, self-directed treatments have also been developed and found effective. Self-directed treatments provide individuals with information and support to initiate a recovery program without attending formal treatment. In previous research we developed an telephone-based intervention package that helps people to be motivated to tackle their gambling problem and to use basic behavioral and cognitive change strategies. The present study will investigate the efficacy of this self-directed intervention offered as a free online resource. The Internet is an excellent modality in which to offer self-directed treatment for gambling problems. The Internet is increasingly accessible to members of the public and is frequently used to access health-related information. Online gambling sites are also becoming more popular gambling platforms.

Method/Design

A randomized clinical trial (N=180) will be conducted in which individuals with gambling problems who are not interested in attending formal treatment are randomly assigned to have access to an online self-directed intervention or to a comparison condition. The comparison condition will be an alternative website that offers a self-assessment of gambling involvement and gambling-related problems. The participant’s use of the resources and their gambling involvement (days of gambling, dollars loss) and their gambling problems will be tracked for a twelve month follow-up period.

Discussion

The results of this research will be important for informing policy-makers who are developing treatment systems.

Trial registration

ISRCTN06220098

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Hodgins et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Text Revision. 4th edition. Washington, D.C: sAmerican Psychiatric Association; 2000.
• [2]Wardle H, Sproston K, Orford J, Erens B, Griffiths M, Constantine R, et al.: British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2007. London: National Center for Social Research; 2007.
• [3]Hodgins DC, Stea JN, Grant JE: Gambling disorders. Lancet 2011, 378:1874-1884.
• [4]Stephens R: Gambling prevalence- Canada. [http://www.abgamblinginstitute.ualberta.ca/LibraryResources/ReferenceSources/PrevalenceCanada.aspx webcite]
• [5]Lorains FK, Cowlishaw S, Thomas SA: Prevalence of comorbid disorders in problem and pathological gambling: Systematic review and meta-analysis of population surveys. Addiction 2011, 106:490-498.
• [6]Petry NM, Stinson FS, Grant BF: Comorbidity of DSM-IV pathological gambling and other psychiatric disorders: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. J Clin Psychiatry 2005, 66:564-574.
• [7]Cunningham JA: Little use of treatment among problem gamblers. Psychiatr Serv 2005, 56:1024-1025.
• [8]Slutske WS, Blaszczynski A, Martin NG: Sex differences in the rates of recovery, treatment-seeking, and natural recovery in pathological gambling: results from an Australian community-based twin survey. Twin Res Hum Genet 2009, 12:425-432.
• [9]Hodgins DC, El-Guebaly N: Natural and treatment-assisted recovery from gambling problems: a comparison of resolved and active gamblers. Addiction 2000, 95:777-789.
• [10]Pulford J, Bellringer M, Abbott M, Clarke D, Hodgins D, Williams J: Barriers to help-seeking for a gambling problem: the experiences of gamblers who have sought specialist assistance and the perceptions of those who have not. J Gambl Stud 2009, 25:33-48.
• [11]Rockloff MJ, Schofield G: Factor analysis of barriers to treatment for problem gambling. J Gambl Stud 2004, 20:121-126.
• [12]Suurvali H, Hodgins DC, Toneatto T, Cunningham JA: Hesitation to seek gambling-related treatment among Ontario problem gamblers. J Addict Med 2012, 6:39-49.
• [13]Hodgins DC, Currie SR, el-Guebaly N: Motivational enhancement and self-help treatments for problem gambling. J Consult Clin Psychol 2001, 69:50-57.
• [14]Hodgins DC, Currie SR, el-Guebaly N, Peden N: Brief motivational treatment for problem gambling: a 24-month follow-up. Psychol Addict Behav 2004, 18:293-296.
• [15]Hodgins DC, Currie SR, Currie G, Fick GH: A randomized clinical trial of brief motivational treatments for pathological gamblers: More is not necessarily better. J Consult Clin Psychol 2009, 77:950-960.
• [16]Dowling N, Smith D, Thomas T: A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling. Behav Res Ther 2007, 45:2192-2202.
• [17]Echeburua E, Baez C, Fernandez-Montalvo J: Comparative effectiveness of three therapeutic modalities in the psychological treatment of pathological gambling: long-term outcome. Behav Cogn Psychother 1996, 24:51-72.
• [18]Ladouceur R, Sylvain C, Boutin C, Lachance S, Doucet C, Leblond J, et al.: Cognitive treatment of pathological gambling. J Nerv Ment Dis 2001, 189:774-780.
• [19]Petry NM, Ammerman Y, Bohl J, Doersch A, Gay H, Kadden R, et al.: Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers. J Consult Clin Psychol 2006, 74:555-567.
• [20]Wulfert E, Blanchard EB, Freidenberg B, Martell R: Retaining pathological gamblers in cognitive-behavioral therapy through motivational enhancement. Behav Modif 2006, 30:315-340.
• [21]Carlbring P, Jonsson J, Josephson H, Forsberg L: Motivational interviewing versus cognitive behavioral group therapy in the treatment of problem and pathological gambling: a randomized controlled trial. Cogn Behav Ther 2010, 39:92-103.
• [22]Hodgins DC, Holub A: Treatment of problem gambling. In Research and Measurement Issues in Gambling Studies. Edited by Smith G, Hodgins DC, Williams R. New York: Elsevier; 2007:372-391.
• [23]Raylu N, Oei TPS, Loo J: The current status and future direction of self-help treatments for problem gamblers. Clin Psychol Rev 2008, 28:1372-1385.
• [24]Hodgins DC, Makarchuk K: Becoming a winner. Defeating problem gambling. Edmonton: AADAC; 2002.
• [25]Hodgins DC: Workbooks for individuals with gambling problems: Promoting the natural recovery process through brief intervention. In Using workbooks in mental health: Resources in prevention, psychotherapy, and rehabilitation for clinicians and researchers. Edited by L’Abate L. Bingham, NY: The Haworth Reference Press; 2004:159-172.
• [26]Portnoy DB, Scott-Sheldon LA, Johnson BT, Carey MB: Computer-delivered interventions for health promotion and behavioral risk reduction: a meta-analysis of 75 randomized controlled trials, 1988–2007. Prev Med 2008, 47:3-16.
• [27]Carlbring P, Smit F: Randomized trial of Internet-delivered self-help with telephone support for pathological gamblers. J Consult Clin Psychol 2008, 76:1090-1094.
• [28]Cooper G: Exploring and understanding online assistance for problem gamblers: the pathways disclosure model. eCommunity: Int J Ment Health and Addiction 2004, 1:32-38.
• [29]Wood RTA, Griffiths MD: Online guidance, advice, and support for problem gamblers and concerned relatives and friends: an evaluation of the Gam-Aid pilot service. Br J Guid Couns 2007, 35:373-389.
• [30]Wood RTA, Griffiths MD: An evaluation of two UK online support forums designed to help people with gambling issues. J Gambl Issues 2009, 23:5-30.
• [31]Cunningham JA, Hodgins DC, Toneatto T, Rai A, Cordingley J: Pilot study of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers. Behav Ther 2009, 40:219-224.
• [32]Cunningham JA, Hodgins DC, Toneatto T, Murphy M: A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers. PLoS One 2012, 7:e31586.
• [33]Cunningham JA, Hodgins DC, Toneatto T: Problem gamblers’ interest in self-help services. Psychiatr Serv 2008, 59:695-696.
• [34]Internet World Stats. Internet World Stats[http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats14.htm#north webcite]
• [35]Fox S: The engaged e-patient population: People turn to the internet for health information when the stakes are high and the connection fast. [http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Health_Aug08.pdf webcite]
• [36]Cunningham JA, Hodgins DC, Toneatto T, Cordingley J: Barriers to Treatment for Problem Gamblers in Ontario. Guelph, ON: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre; 2008.
• [37]MacKay T-L: Problem Gambling Risk Factors in Internet and Non-Internet Gamblers. Calgary: University of Calgary; 2011.
• [38]Williams RJ, Wood RT: Internet Gambling: A Comprehensive Review and Synthesis of the Literature. Guelph, ON: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre; 2007.
• [39]Project Match Research Group: Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project Match posttreatment drinking outcomes. J Stud Alcohol 1997, 58:7-29.
• [40]Curry SJ, Wagner EH, Grothaus LC: Evaluation of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation interventions with a self-help smoking cessation program. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991, 59:318-324.
• [41]Schoenbach VJ, Orleans CT, Wagner EH, Quade D: Characteristics of smokers who enroll and quit in self-help programs. Health Educ Res 1992, 7:369-380.
• [42]Danaher BG, Smolkowski K, Seeley JR, Severson HH: Mediators of a successful web-based smokeless tobacco cessation program. Addiction 2008, 103:1706-1712.
• [43]Strecher VJ, McClure JB, Alexander GL, Chakraborty B, Nair VN, Konkel JM, et al.: Web-based smoking-cessation programs: results of a randomized trial. Am J Prev Med 2008, 34:373-381.
• [44]Ferris J, Wynne H: The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Final Report. Ontario: Phase II final report to the Canadian Inter-Provincial Task Force on Problem Gambling, Ottawa; 2001.
• [45]Aickin M: A program for balancing the allocation of subjects to treatment in a clinical trial. Comput Biomed Res 1982, 15:519-524.
• [46]Diskin KM, Hodgins DC: A randomized controlled trial of a single session motivational intervention for concerned gamblers. Behav Res Ther 2009, 47:382-388.
• [47]Hodgins DC, Currie SR, el-Guebaly N, Diskin KM: Does providing extended relapse prevention bibliotherapy to problem gamblers improve outcome? J Gambl Stud 2007, 24:41-54.
• [48]Sobell LC, Sobell MB: Timeline Followback: A technique for assessing self-reported ethanol consumption. In Measuring Alcohol Consumption: Psychosocial and Biological Methods. Edited by Allen J, Litten RZ. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 1992:41-72.
• [49]Hodgins DC, Makarchuk K: Trusting problem gamblers: reliability and validity of self-reported gambling behavior. Psychol Addict Behav 2003, 17:244-248.
• [50]Gerstein D, Murphy S, Toce M, Hoffman J, Palmer A, Johnson R, et al.: Gambling impact and behaviour study: Report of the national gambling impact study commission. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center; 1999.
• [51]Wulfert E, Hartley J, Lee M, Wang N, Franco C, Sodano R: Gambling screens: does shortening the time frame affect their psychometric properties? J Gambl Stud 2005, 21:521-536.
• [52]Hodgins DC: Using the NORC DSM Screen for Gambling Problems (NODS) as an outcome measure for pathological gambling: Psychometric evaluation. Addict Behav 2004, 29:1685-1690.
• [53]Hodgins DC, Peden N, Makarchuk K: Self-efficacy in pathological gambling treatment outcome: development of a Gambling Abstinence Self-efficacy Scale (GASS). Int Gambl Stud 2004, 4:99-108.
• [54]Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SL, et al.: Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med 2002, 32:959-976.
• [55]Brooks RT, Beard J, Steel Z: Factor structure and interpretation of the K10. Psychol Assess 2006, 18:62-70.
• [56]Schmidt S, Muhlan H, Power M: The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: Psychometric results of a cross-cultural field study. Eur J Public Health 2006, 16:420-428.
• [57]Weinstock J, Whelan JP, Meyers AW: Behavioral assessment of gambling: an application of the timeline followback method. Psychol Assess 2004, 16:72-80.
• [58]Preacher KJ, Hayes AF: SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2004, 36:717-731.
• [59]Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A: G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007, 39:175-191.