Genes with a large intronic burden show greater evolutionary conservation on the protein level

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Ivan Gorlov²  Christopher Amos³  Christopher Logothetis¹  Alexey Fedorov⁴  Olga Gorlova³ 

[1] Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030, TX, USA;Center for Genomic Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, 46 Centerra Parkway, Suite 330, Lebanon 03766, NH, USA;Department of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon 03766, NH, USA;University of Toledo, Toledo 43606, OH, USA

关键词: Evolutionary conservation;    Intronic burden;    Exon/intron structure;   

Others  :  857759
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2148-14-50

 received in 2013-07-30, accepted in 2014-03-11,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

The existence of introns in eukaryotic genes is believed to provide an evolutionary advantage by increasing protein diversity through exon shuffling and alternative splicing. However, this eukaryotic feature is associated with the necessity of exclusion of intronic sequences, which requires considerable energy expenditure and can lead to splicing errors. The relationship between intronic burden and evolution is poorly understood. The goal of this study was to analyze the relationship between the intronic burden and the level of evolutionary conservation of the gene.

Results

We found a positive correlation between the level of evolutionary conservation of a gene and its intronic burden. The level of evolutionary conservation was estimated using the conservation index (CI). The CI value was determined on the basis of the most distant ortholog of the human protein sequence and ranged from 0 (the gene was unique to the human genome) to 9 (an ortholog of the human gene was detected in plants). In multivariable model, both the number of introns and total intron size remained significant predictors of CI. We also found that the number of alternative splice variants was positively correlated with CI.

The expression level of a gene was negatively correlated with the number of introns and total size of intronic region. Genes with a greater intronic burden had lower density of missense and nonsense mutations in the coding regions of the gene, which suggests that they are under a stronger pressure from purifying selection.

Conclusions

We identified a positive association between intronic burden and CI. One of the possible explanations of this is the idea of a cost-benefits balance. Evolutionarily conserved (functionally important) genes can “afford” the negative consequences of maintaining multiple introns because these consequences are outweighed by the benefit of maintaining the gene. Evolutionarily conserved and functionally important genes may use introns to create novel splice variants to tune the gene function to developmental stage and tissue type.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Gorlova et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Lynch M, Conery JS: The origins of genome complexity. Science 2003, 302(5649):1401-1404.
• [2]Koonin EV, Csuros M, Rogozin IB: Whence genes in pieces: reconstruction of the exon-intron gene structures of the last eukaryotic common ancestor and other ancestral eukaryotes. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 2013, 4(1):93-105.
• [3]Rogozin IB, Carmel L, Csuros M, Koonin EV: Origin and evolution of spliceosomal introns. Biol Direct 2012, 7:11. BioMed Central Full Text
• [4]Fedorova L, Fedorov A: Introns in gene evolution. Genetica 2003, 118(2–3):123-131.
• [5]Roy SW, Gilbert W: The evolution of spliceosomal introns: patterns, puzzles and progress. Nat Rev Genet 2006, 7(3):211-221.
• [6]Koralewski TE, Krutovsky KV: Evolution of exon-intron structure and alternative splicing. PLoS One 2011, 6(3):e18055.
• [7]Rogozin IB, Sverdlov AV, Babenko VN, Koonin EV: Analysis of evolution of exon-intron structure of eukaryotic genes. Brief Bioinform 2005, 6(2):118-134.
• [8]Roy M, Kim N, Xing Y, Lee C: The effect of intron length on exon creation ratios during the evolution of mammalian genomes. Rna 2008, 14(11):2261-2273.
• [9]Zhang C, Li WH, Krainer AR, Zhang MQ: RNA landscape of evolution for optimal exon and intron discrimination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105(15):5797-5802.
• [10]Castillo-Davis CI, Mekhedov SL, Hartl DL, Koonin EV, Kondrashov FA: Selection for short introns in highly expressed genes. Nat Genet 2002, 31(4):415-418.
• [11]Carmel L, Rogozin IB, Wolf YI, Koonin EV: Evolutionarily conserved genes preferentially accumulate introns. Genome Res 2007, 17(7):1045-1050.
• [12]Louhichi A, Fourati A, Rebai A: IGD: a resource for intronless genes in the human genome. Gene 2011, 488(1–2):35-40.
• [13]Wagner AK, Soumerai SB, Zhang F, Ross-Degnan D: Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research. J Clin Pharm Ther 2002, 27(4):299-309.
• [14]Krupp M, Marquardt JU, Sahin U, Galle PR, Castle J, Teufel A: RNA-Seq Atlas–a reference database for gene expression profiling in normal tissue by next-generation sequencing. Bioinformatics 2012, 28(8):1184-1185.
• [15]Lehninger AL, Nelson DL, Cox MM: Principles of Biochemistry. New York: Worth; 1982.
• [16]Hsu SN, Hertel KJ: Spliceosomes walk the line: splicing errors and their impact on cellular function. RNA Biol 2009, 6(5):526-530.
• [17]Hertel KJ: Combinatorial control of exon recognition. J Biol Chem 2008, 283(3):1211-1215.
• [18]Kandul NP, Noor MA: Large introns in relation to alternative splicing and gene evolution: a case study of Drosophila bruno-3. BMC Genet 2009, 10:67.
• [19]Schena M: The evolutionary conservation of eukaryotic gene transcription. Experientia 1989, 45(10):972-983.
• [20]Yuan J: Evolutionary conservation of a genetic pathway of programmed cell death. J Cell Biochem 1996, 60(1):4-11.
• [21]Akashi H, Osada N, Ohta T: Weak selection and protein evolution. Genetics 2012, 192(1):15-31.
• [22]Sleator RD: An overview of the processes shaping protein evolution. Sci Prog 2010, 93(Pt 1):1-6.
• [23]Wang ET, Sandberg R, Luo S, Khrebtukova I, Zhang L, Mayr C, Kingsmore SF, Schroth GP, Burge CB: Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes. Nature 2008, 456(7221):470-476.
• [24]Irimia M, Blencowe BJ: Alternative splicing: decoding an expansive regulatory layer. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2012, 24(3):323-332.
• [25]Kelemen O, Convertini P, Zhang Z, Wen Y, Shen M, Falaleeva M, Stamm S: Function of alternative splicing. Gene 2012, 514(1):1-30.
• [26]Sanchez SE, Petrillo E, Kornblihtt AR, Yanovsky MJ: Alternative splicing at the right time. RNA Biol 2011, 8(6):954-959.
• [27]Cho YJ, Hitchcock-DeGregori SE: Relationship between alternatively spliced exons and functional domains in tropomyosin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991, 88(22):10153-10157.
• [28]Schmidt EE, Davies CJ: The origins of polypeptide domains. Bioessays 2007, 29(3):262-270.
• [29]Krylov DM, Wolf YI, Rogozin IB, Koonin EV: Gene loss, protein sequence divergence, gene dispensability, expression level, and interactivity are correlated in eukaryotic evolution. Genome Res 2003, 13(10):2229-2235.
• [30]Sayers EW, Barrett T, Benson DA, Bolton E, Bryant SH, Canese K, Chetvernin V, Church DM, Dicuccio M, Federhen S, Feolo M, Fingerman IM, Geer LY, Helmberg W, Kapustin Y, Krasnov S, Landsman D, Lipman DJ, Lu Z, Madden TL, Madej T, Maglott DR, Marchler-Bauer A, Miller V, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Ostell J, Panchenko A, Phan L, Pruitt KD, Schuler GD, et al.: Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 40(Database issue):D13-D25.
• [31]Kumar S, Filipski A, Swarna V, Walker A, Hedges SB: Placing confidence limits on the molecular age of the human-chimpanzee divergence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102(52):18842-18847.
• [32]Domazet-Loso T, Tautz D: An ancient evolutionary origin of genes associated with human genetic diseases. Mol Biol Evol 2008, 25(12):2699-2707.
• [33]Gibney G, Baxevanis AD: Searching NCBI databases using entrez. Curr Protoc Hum Genet 2011, Chapter 6:Unit6 10.
• [34]Kumar S, Hedges SB: A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution. Nature 1998, 392(6679):917-920.
• [35]Chernikova D, Motamedi S, Csuros M, Koonin EV, Rogozin IB: A late origin of the extant eukaryotic diversity: divergence time estimates using rare genomic changes. Biol Direct 2011, 6:26. BioMed Central Full Text
• [36]Shepelev V, Fedorov A: Advances in the Exon-Intron Database (EID). Brief Bioinform 2006, 7(2):178-185.