Testing the inhibitory cascade model in Mesozoic and Cenozoic mammaliaforms

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Anjali Goswami²  Thomas JD Halliday¹ 

[1] Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK;Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK

关键词: Fossils;    Teeth;    Developmental constraints;    Mammalia;   

Others  :  1126988
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2148-13-79

 received in 2013-02-12, accepted in 2013-03-27,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Much of the current research in the growing field of evolutionary development concerns relating developmental pathways to large-scale patterns of morphological evolution, with developmental constraints on variation, and hence diversity, a field of particular interest. Tooth morphology offers an excellent model system for such ‘evo-devo’ studies, because teeth are well preserved in the fossil record, and are commonly used in phylogenetic analyses and as ecological proxies. Moreover, tooth development is relatively well studied, and has provided several testable hypotheses of developmental influences on macroevolutionary patterns. The recently-described Inhibitory Cascade (IC) Model provides just such a hypothesis for mammalian lower molar evolution. Derived from experimental data, the IC Model suggests that a balance between mesenchymal activators and molar-derived inhibitors determines the size of the immediately posterior molar, predicting firstly that molars either decrease in size along the tooth row, or increase in size, or are all of equal size, and secondly that the second lower molar should occupy one third of lower molar area. Here, we tested the IC Model in a large selection of taxa from diverse extant and fossil mammalian groups, ranging from the Middle Jurassic (~176 to 161 Ma) to the Recent.

Results

Results show that most taxa (~65%) fell within the predicted areas of the Inhibitory Cascade Model. However, members of several extinct groups fell into the regions where m2 was largest, or rarely, smallest, including the majority of the polyphyletic “condylarths”. Most Mesozoic mammals fell near the centre of the space with equality of size in all three molars. The distribution of taxa was significantly clustered by diet and by phylogenetic group.

Conclusions

Overall, the IC Model was supported as a plesiomorphic developmental system for Mammalia, suggesting that mammal tooth size has been subjected to this developmental constraint at least since the divergence of australosphenidans and boreosphenidans approximately 180 Ma. Although exceptions exist, including many ‘condylarths’, these are most likely to be secondarily derived states, rather than alternative ancestral developmental models for Mammalia.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Halliday and Goswami; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Bergqvist LP: The Role of Teeth in Mammal History. Braz J Oral Sci 2003, 2(6):249-257.
• [2]Müller GB: Evo-devo: extending the evolutionary synthesis. Nat Rev Genet 2007, 8(12):943-949.
• [3]Polly PD: Development and phenotypic correlations: the evolution of tooth shape in Sorex araneus. Evol Dev 2005, 7(1):29-41.
• [4]Salazar-Ciudad I, Jernvall J: A computational model of teeth and the developmental origins of morphological variation. Nature 2010, 464(7288):583-586.
• [5]Sanchez MR: Embryos in Deep Time: The Rock Record of Biological Development. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press; 2012.
• [6]Butler PM: Studies of the mammalian dentition. Differentiation of the post-canine dentition. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London Series B-Systematic and Morphological 1939, 109:1-36.
• [7]Gaunt WA: An Analysis of Growth of Cheek Teeth of the Mouse. Acta Anat 1963, 54(3):220-259.
• [8]Kavanagh KD, Evans AR, Jernvall J: Predicting evolutionary patterns of mammalian teeth from development. Nature 2007, 449:427-432.
• [9]Bown TM, Kraus MJ: Vertebrate fossil-bearing paleosol units (Willwood Formation, Lower Eocene, Northwest Wyoming, U.S.A.): Implications for Taphonomoy, Biostratigraphy, and Assemblage Analysis. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 1981, 34:31-56.
• [10]Polly PD: Evolutionary biology - Development with a bite. Nature 2007, 449(7161):413-415.
• [11]Asahara M: Unique inhibitory cascade pattern of molars in canids contributing to their potential to evolutionary plasticity of diet. Ecol and Evolut 2013, 3(2):278-285. n/a-n/a
• [12]Labonne G, Laffont R, Renvoisé E, Jebrane A, Labruere C, Chateau-Smith C, Navarro N, Montuire S: When less means more: evolutionary and developmental hypotheses in rodent molars. J Evol Biol 2012, 25(10):2102-2111.
• [13]Wilson LAB, Madden RH, Kay RF, Sanchez-Villagra MR: Testing a developmental model in the fossil record: molar proportions in South American ungulates. Paleobiology 2012, 38(2):308-321.
• [14]Renvoise E, Evans AR, Jebrane A, Labruere C, Laffont R, Montuire S: Evolution of Mammal Tooth Patterns: New Insights from a Developmental Prediction Model. Evolution 2009, 63(5):1327-1340.
• [15]Luo ZX, Cifelli RL, Kielan-Jaworowska Z: Dual origin of tribosphenic mammals. Nature 2001, 409(6816):53-57.
• [16]Kielan-Jaworowska Z, Cifelli RL, Luo Z-X: Mammals from the Age of Dinosaurs: Origin, Evolutions, and Structure. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press; 2004.
• [17]Zheng J: Notoungulata from the Paleocene of Jiangsu, South China. In Mesozoic and Cenozoic Red Beds of South China, Selected Papers from the "Cretaceous-Tertiary Workshop", Nanxiong, Guangdong Province. Edited by Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology P, Paleontology NIo. Marrickville, New South Wales, Australia: Science Press; 1979:387-394.
• [18]Missiaen P, Smith T, Guo D-Y, Bloch JI, Gingerich PD: Asian gliriform origin for arctostylopid mammals. Naturwissenschaften 2006, 93(8):407-411.
• [19]Billet G: Phylogeny of the Notoungulata (Mammalia) based on cranial and dental characters. J Syst Palaeontology 2011, 9(4):481-497.
• [20]Billet G: New Observations on the Skull of Pyrotherium (Pyrotheria, Mammalia) and New Phylogenetic Hypotheses on South American Ungulates. J Mamm Evol 2010, 17(1):21-59.
• [21]Agnolin FL, Chimento NR: Afrotherian affinities for endemic South American “ungulates”. Mammalian Biology – Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 2011, 76:101-108.
• [22]Lopatin AV: Early Paleogene insectivore mammals of Asia and establishment of the major groups of Insectivora. Paleontological J 2006, 40:S205-S405.
• [23]Rose KD, Von Koenigswald W: An exceptionally complete skeleton of Palaeosinopa (Mammalia, Cimolesta, Pantolestidae) from the Green River Formation, and other postcranial elements of the pantolestidae from the Eocene of Wyoming (USA). Palaeontographica Abteilung a-Palaozoologie-Stratigraphie 2005, 273(3–6):55-96.
• [24]Wible JR, Rougier GW, Novacek MJ, Asher RJ: Cretaceous eutherians and Laurasian origin for placental mammals near the K/T boundary. Nature 2007, 447(7147):1003-1006.
• [25]Goswami A, Prasad GVR, Upchurch P, Boyer DM, Seiffert ER, Verma O, Gheerbrant E, Flynn JJ: A radiation of arboreal basal eutherian mammals beginning in the Late Cretaceous of India. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011, 108(39):16333-16338.
• [26]Meehan TJ, Martin LD: New leptictids (Mammalia: lnsectivora) from the Early Oligocene of Nebraska, USA. Neues Jahrbuch Fur Geologie Und Palaontologie-Abhandlungen 2010, 256(1):99-107.
• [27]McKenna MC, Bell SK: Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level. New York, New York, USA: Columbia University Press; 1997.
• [28]Scott CS: New Cyriacotheriid Pantodonts (Mammalia, Pantodonta) from the Paleocene of Alberta, Canada, and the Relationships of Cyriacotheriidae. J Paleontology 2010, 84(2):197-215.
• [29]Bloch JI, Silcox MT, Boyer DM, Sargis EJ: New Paleocene skeletons and the relationship of plesiadapiforms to crown-clade primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104(4):1159-1164.
• [30]Kondrashov P, Agadjanian AK: A Nearly Complete Skeleton of Ernanodon (Mammalia, Palaeanodonta) from Mongolia: Morphofunctional Analysis. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 2012, 32(5):983-1001.
• [31]Flynn JJ, Wesley-Hunt GD: Phylogeny and early diversification of the Carnivora. In The rise of placental mammals: Origins and relationships of the major extant clades. Edited by Archibald JD, Rose K. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press; 2005.
• [32]Morlo M, Gunnell G, Polly PD: What, if not Nothing, is a Creodont? Phylogeny and Classification of Hyaenodontida and Other Former Creodonts. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 2009, 29:152A-152A.
• [33]Zack SP: Deciduous dentition of Didymictis (Carnivoramorpha: Viverravidae): implications for the first appearance of "Creodonta". J Mammal 2012, 93(3):808-817.
• [34]Archibald JD: Archaic ungulates (“Condylarthra”). In Evolution of Tertiary Mammals of North America Terrestrial Carnivores, Ungulates, and Ungulate-like Mammals. Edited by Janis CM, Scott KM, Jabobs LL. Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1998:292-331.
• [35]Penkrot TA, Zack SP, Rose KD, Bloch JI: Postcranial morphology of Apheliscus and Haplomylus (Condylarthra, Apheliscidae): Evidence for a Paleocene holarctic origin of Macroscelidea. In Mammalian Evolutionary Morphology: A Tribute to Frederick S Szalay. Edited by Sargis EJ, Dagosto M. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer; 2008:73-106. Po Box 17, 3300 Aa
• [36]Asher RJ: A web-database of mammalian morphology and a reanalysis of placental phylogeny. BMC Evol Biol 2007, 7:10. BioMed Central Full Text
• [37]Rose KD: On the origin of the order artiodactyla. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93(4):1705-1709.
• [38]Geisler JH: New morphological evidence for the phylogeny of Artiodactyla, Cetacea, and Mesonychidae. American Museum Novitates 2001, 3344:1-53.
• [39]Tabuce R, Coiffait B, Coiffait PE, Mahboubi M, Jaeger JJ: A new genus of Macroscelidea (Mammalia) from the Eocene of Algeria: A possible origin for elephant-shrews. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 2001, 21(3):535-546.
• [40]Zack SP, Penkrot TA, Bloch JI, Rose KD: Affinities of 'hyopsodontids' to elephant shrews and a Holarctic origin of Afrotheria. Nature 2005, 434(7032):497-501.
• [41]de Muizon C, Cifelli RL: The "condylarths" (archaic Ungulata, Mammalia) from the early Palaeocene of Tiupampa (Bolivia): implications on the origin of the South American ungulates. Geodiversitas 2000, 22:47-150.
• [42]Martin T, Rauhut OWM: Mandible and dentition of Asfaltomylos patagonicus (Australosphenida, Mammalia) and the evolution of tribosphenic teeth. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 2005, 25(2):414-425.
• [43]Rich TH, Flannery TF, Trusler P, Kool L: Evidence that monotremes and ausktribosphenids are not sistergroups. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 2002, 22(2):466-469.
• [44]Rasband WS: ImageJ. 145s edition. Bethesda, Maryland, USA: US National Institute of Health; http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/; webcite 1997–2012
• [45]R Development Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2010.
• [46]Dixon P: VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. J Vegetation Sci 2003, 14:927-930.
• [47]dos Reis M, Inoue J, Hasegawa M, Asher RJ, Donoghue PCJ, Yang Z: Phylogenomic datasets provide both precision and accuracy in estimating the timescale of placental mammal phylogeny. Proc R Soc B 2012, 279:3491-3500.
• [48]Asher RJ, Helgen KM: Nomenclature and placental mammal phylogeny. BMC Evol Biol 2010, 10:9. BioMed Central Full Text