Screen-based media use clusters are related to other activity behaviours and health indicators in adolescents

BMC Public Health

Rebecca Abbott³  Tim Olds²  Beth Hands¹  Anne Smith³  Leon Straker³ 

[1] Institute for Health and Rehabilitation Research, The University of Notre Dame, PO Box 1225, Fremantle 6959, WA, Australia;Health and Use of Time (HUT) Group, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide 5001, South Australia, Australia;School of Physiotherapy, Health Sciences, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth 6845, WA, Australia

关键词: Latent class analysis;    Physical activity;    Electronic games;    Computers;    Sedentary behaviour;   

Others  :  1161450
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-13-1174

 received in 2013-05-08, accepted in 2013-12-05,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Screen-based media (SBM) occupy a considerable portion of young peoples’ discretionary leisure time. The aim of this paper was to investigate whether distinct clusters of SBM use exist, and if so, to examine the relationship of any identified clusters with other activity/sedentary behaviours and physical and mental health indicators.

Methods

The data for this study come from 643 adolescents, aged 14 years, who were participating in the longitudinal Western Australian Pregnancy Cohort (Raine) Study through May 2003 to June 2006. Time spent on SBM, phone use and reading was assessed using the Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adults. Height, weight, muscle strength were measured at a clinic visit and the adolescents also completed questionnaires on their physical activity and psychosocial health. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to analyse groupings of SBM use.

Results

Three clusters of SBM use were found; C1 ‘instrumental computer users’ (high email use, general computer use), C2 ‘multi-modal e-gamers’ (both high console and computer game use) and C3 ‘computer e-gamers’ (high computer game use only). Television viewing was moderately high amongst all the clusters. C2 males took fewer steps than their male peers in C1 and C3 (-13,787/week, 95% CI: -4619 to -22957, p = 0.003 and -14,806, 95% CI: -5,306 to -24,305, p = 0.002) and recorded less MVPA than the C1 males (-3.5 h, 95% CI: -1.0 to -5.9, p = 0.005). There was no difference in activity levels between females in clusters C1 and C3.

Conclusion

SBM use by adolescents did cluster and these clusters related differently to activity/sedentary behaviours and both physical and psychosocial health indicators. It is clear that SBM use is not a single construct and future research needs to take consideration of this if it intends to understand the impact SBM has on health.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Straker et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]WHO: Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2010.
• [2]Sedentary Behaviour Research Network: Standardised use of the terms ‘sedentary’ and ‘sedentary behaviors’. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2012, 37:543-545.
• [3]Tremblay MS, LeBlanc AG, Kho ME, Saunders TJ, Larouche R, Colley RC, Goldfield G, Gorber SC: Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011, 8:98.
• [4]Jago R, Fox KR, Page AS, Brockman R, Thompson JL: Physical activity and sedentary behaviour typologies of 10–11 year olds. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010, 7:59.
• [5]Hands BP, Chivers PT, Parker HE, Beilin L, Kendall G, Larkin D: The associations between physical activity, screen time and weight from 6 to 14 yrs: the Raine Study. J Sci Med Sport 2011, 14:397-403.
• [6]Liu J, Kim J, Colabianchi N, Ortaglia A, Pate RR: Co-varying patterns of physical activity and sedentary behaviors and their long-term maintenance among adolescents. J Phys Act Health 2010, 7:465-474.
• [7]Wang MC, Crawford PB, Hudes M, Van Loan M, Siemering K, Bachrach LK: Diet in midpuberty and sedentary activity in prepuberty predict peak bone mass. Am J Clin Nutr 2003, 77:495-503.
• [8]Gortmaker SL, Dietz WH Jr, Cheung LW: Inactivity, diet, and the fattening of America. J Am Diet Assoc 1990, 90:1247-1252. 1255
• [9]Rideout VJ, Foehr UG, Roberts DF: Generation of M2 media in the lives of 8–18 year olds: a Kaiser family foundation study. Menlo Park, Ca: Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation; 2010.
• [10]Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation: 2007 Australian National Children’s Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey. Canberra: Australian Department of Health and Aging; 2008.
• [11]Hakala PT, Rimpela AH, Saarni LA, Salminen JJ: Frequent computer-related activities increase the risk of neck-shoulder and low back pain in adolescents. Eur J Public Health 2006, 16:536-541.
• [12]Gopinath B, Baur LA, Hardy LL, Kifley A, Rose KA, Wong TY, Mitchell P: Relationship between a range of sedentary behaviours and blood pressure during early adolescence. J Hum Hypertens 2012, 26:350-356.
• [13]Russ SA, Larson K, Franke TM, Halfon N: Associations between media use and health in US children. Acad Pediatr 2009, 9:300-306.
• [14]Babey SH, Hastert TA, Wolstein J: Adolescent sedentary behaviors: correlates differ for television viewing and computer use. J Adol Health 2013, 52:70-76.
• [15]Olds TS, Maher CA, Ridley K, Kittel DM: Descriptive epidemiology of screen and non-screen sedentary time in adolescents: a cross sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010, 7:92.
• [16]Mossle T, Kleimann M, Rehbein F, Pfeiffer C: Media use and school achievement–boys at risk? Br J Dev Psychol 2010, 28:699-725.
• [17]Fuchs T, Wossmann L: Computers and student learning; bivariate and multivariate evidence on the availability and use of computers at home and at school. Brussels Economic Review 2004, 47:359-386.
• [18]Mathers M, Canterford L, Olds T, Hesketh K, Ridley K, Wake M: Electronic media use and adolescent health and well-being: cross-sectional community study. Acad Pediatr 2009, 9:307-314.
• [19]Summerbell CD, Moore HJ, Vogele C, Kreichauf S, Wildgruber A, Manios Y, Douthwaite W, Nixon CA, Gibson EL: Evidence-based recommendations for the development of obesity prevention programs targeted at preschool children. Obes Rev 2012, 13(Suppl 1):129-132.
• [20]Schmidt ME, Haines J, O’Brien A, McDonald J, Price S, Sherry B, Taveras EM: Systematic review of effective strategies for reducing screen time among young children. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2012, 20:1338-1354.
• [21]Huh J, Riggs NR, Spruijt-Metz D, Chou CP, Huang Z, Pentz M: Identifying patterns of eating and physical activity in children: a latent class analysis of obesity risk. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2011, 19:652-658.
• [22]Patnode CD, Lytle LA, Erickson DJ, Sirard JR, Barr-Anderson DJ, Story M: Physical activity and sedentary activity patterns among children and adolescents: a latent class analysis approach. J Phys Act Health 2011, 8:457-467.
• [23]Olds T, Dollman J, Ridley K, Boshoff K, Hartshorne S, Kennaugh S: Children and sport in South Australia. Belconnen (South Australia): Australian Sports Commission; 2004.
• [24]Nelson MC, Gordon-Larsen P, Adair LS, Popkin BM: Adolescent physical activity and sedentary behavior: patterning and long-term maintenance. Am J Prev Med 2005, 28:259-266.
• [25]Ferrar KE, Chang C, Li M, Olds T: Adolescent time use clusters: a systematic review. J Adol Health 2013, 52:259-270.
• [26]Muthen B, Muthen LK: Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2000, 24:882-891.
• [27]de Vries H, van ’t Riet J, Spigt M, Metsemakers J, van den Akker M, Vermunt JK, Kremers S: Clusters of lifestyle behaviors: results from the Dutch SMILE study. Prev Med 2008, 46:203-208.
• [28]Ridley K, Olds TS, Hill A: The Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adolescents (MARCA): development and evaluation. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2006, 3:10.
• [29]Foley LS, Maddison R, Rush E, Olds TS, Ridley K, Jiang Y: Doubly labeled water validation of a computerized use-of-time recall in active young people. Metabolism 2013, 62:163-169.
• [30]Tudor-Locke C, Williams JE, Reis JP, Pluto D: Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity: convergent validity. Sports Med 2002, 32:795-808.
• [31]Tudor-Locke C, Williams JE, Reis JP, Pluto D: Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity: construct validity. Sports Med 2004, 34:281-291.
• [32]Bassett DR Jr, Ainsworth BE, Leggett SR, Mathien CA, Main JA, Hunter DC, Duncan GE: Accuracy of five electronic pedometers for measuring distance walked. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996, 28:1071-1077.
• [33]Biering-Sorenson F: Physical measurements as risk indicators for low back trouble over a one year period. Spine 1984, 9:106-119.
• [34]Moreland J, Finch E, Stratford P, Balsor B, Gill C: Interrater reliability of six tests of trunk muscle function and endurance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1997, 26:200-208.
• [35]Lattika P, Battie MC, Videman T, Gibbons LE: Correlations of isokinetic and psychophysical back lift and static back extensor endurance tests in men. Clin Biomech 1995, 10:325-330.
• [36]Ropponen A, Gibbons LE, Videman T, Battie MC: Isometric back extension endurance testing: reasons for test termination. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2005, 35:437-442.
• [37]Campbell AC, Briggs AM, O’Sullivan PB, Smith AJ, Burnett AF, Moss P, Straker LM: An exploration of the relationship between back muscle endurance and familial, physical, lifestyle, and psychosocial factors in adolescents and young adults. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2011, 41:486-495.
• [38]Perry M, Smith AJ, Straker LM, Coleman J, O’Sullivan P: Reliability of sagittal photographic spinal posture assessment in adolescents. Adv Physiother 2008, 10:66-75.
• [39]Smith AJ, O’Sullivan P, Straker LM: Classification of sagittal thoraco-lumbo-pelvic alignment of the adolescent spine in standing and its relationship to low back pain. Spine 2008, 33:2101-2107.
• [40]Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, Vinterberg H, Biering-Sorensen F, Andersson G, Jorgensen K: Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon 1987, 18:233-237.
• [41]Cowen EL, Work WC, Hightower AD, Wyman PA, Parker GA, Lotyczewski BS: Toward the development of a measure of perceived self-efficacy in children. J Clin Child Psychol 1991, 20:169-178.
• [42]Hoeljte CO, Silburn SR, Garton AF, Zubrick SR: Generalised self-efficacy: family and adjustment correlates. J Clin Child Psychol 1996, 25:446-453.
• [43]Beck JS, Beck AT, Jolly J: Beck youth inventories of emotional and social impairment. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 2001.
• [44]Achenbach TM: Manual for the youth self-report and the 1991 profile. Burlinton, VT: University of Vermont; 1991.
• [45]Achenbach TM: Integrative Guide for the 1991 CBCL 4–18, YSR and TRF Profiles. Burlingotn: University of Burlington; 1991.
• [46]Walker AE, Becker NG: Health inequalities across socio-economic groups: comparing geographic-area-based and individual-based indicators. Public Health 2005, 119:1097-1104.
• [47]Vermunt JK, Magidson J: Technical Guide for Latent GOLD 4.0: Basic and Advanced. Belmont Massachusets: Statistical Innovations Inc; 2005.
• [48]Sterne JA, Davey Smith G: Sifting the evidence-what’s wrong with significance tests? BMJ 2001, 322:226-231.
• [49]Gorely T, Marshall SJ, Biddle SJ, Cameron N: Patterns of sedentary behaviour and physical activity among adolescents in the United Kingdom: project STIL. J Behav Med 2007, 30:521-531.
• [50]Ferrar KE, Olds TS, Walters JL: All the stereotypes confirmed: differences in how Australian boys and girls use their time. Health Educ Behav 2012, 39:589-595.
• [51]Straker L, Burgess-Limerick R, Pollock C, Coleman J, Skoss R, Maslen B: Children’s posture and muscle activity at different computer display heights and during paper information technology use. Hum Factors 2008, 50:49-61.
• [52]Auvinen J, Tammelin T, Taimela S, Zitting P, Karppinen J: Neck and shoulder pains in relation to physical activity and sedentary activities in adolescence. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007, 32:1038-1044.
• [53]Straker L, Smith AJ, Bear N, O’Sullivan P, de Klerk N: Neck/shoulder pain, habitual spinal posture and computer use in adolescents: the importance of gender. Ergonomics 2011, 54:539-546.
• [54]Straker L, Burgess-Limerick R, Pollock C, Maslen B: The influence of desk and display design on posture and muscle activity variability whilst performing information technology tasks. Appl Ergon 2009, 40:852-859.
• [55]Schunk DH, Meece JL: Self-efficacy development in adolescence. In Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Edited by Pajares F, Urdan T. Greenwich, Connecticut: Information Age Publishing; 2006:72-96.
• [56]Livingstone S: Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society 2008, 10:393-411.
• [57]Graham DJ, Bauer KW, Friend S, Barr-Anderson DJ, Nuemark-Sztainer D: Personal, behavioral, and socio-environmental correlates of physical activity among adolescent girls: cross-sectional and longitudinal associations. J Phys Act Health 2012. [Epud ahead of print]
• [58]Harris C, Straker L, Pollock C: The influence of age, gender and other information technology use on young people’s computer use at school and home. Work 2013, 44:61-71.