期刊论文详细信息
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Conditional cash transfer schemes in Nigeria: potential gains for maternal and child health service uptake in a national pilot programme
Ado Muhammad3  Chidimma Aigbe2  Muhammad A Pate1  Adetokunbo Oshin2  Laura Morris2  Ugo Okoli2 
[1] Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, USA;SURE-P MCH Project Implementation Unit, National Primary Health Care Development Agency, Abuja, Nigeria;National Primary Health Care Development Agency, Abuja, Nigeria
关键词: Social protection;    Skilled birth attendance;    Rural areas;    Nigeria;    Maternal newborn and child health;    Maternal health;    Health services;    Demand creation;    Conditional cash transfer;    Antenatal care;   
Others  :  1090919
DOI  :  10.1186/s12884-014-0408-9
 received in 2014-04-10, accepted in 2014-11-27,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

This paper describes use of a Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) programme to encourage use of critical MNCH services among rural women in Nigeria.

Methods

The CCT programme was first implemented as a pilot in 37 primary health care facilities (PHCs), in nine Nigerian states. The programme entitles women using these facilities up to N5,000 (approximately US$30) if they attend antenatal care (ANC), skilled delivery, and postnatal care. There are 88 other PHCs from these nine states included in this study, which implemented a standard package of supply upgrades without the CCT. Data on monthly service uptake throughout the continuum of care was collected at 124 facilities during quarterly monitoring visits. An interrupted time series using segmented linear regression was applied to estimate separately the effects of the CCT programme and supply package on service uptake.

Results

From April 2013-March 2014, 20,133 women enrolled in the CCT. Sixty-four percent of beneficiaries returned at least once after registration, and 80% of women delivering with skilled attendance returned after delivery. The CCT intervention is associated with a statistically significant increase in the monthly number of women attending four or more ANC visits (increase of 15.12 visits per 100,000 catchment population, p < 0.01; 95% confidence interval 7.38 to 22.85), despite a negative level effect immediately after the intervention began (-45.53/100,000 catchment population; p < 0.05; 95% CI −82.71 to −8.36). A statistically significant increase was also observed in the monthly number of women receiving two or more Tetanus toxoid doses during pregnancy (21.65/100,000 catchment population; p < 0.01; 95% CI 9.23 to 34.08). Changes for other outcomes with the CCT intervention (number of women attending first ANC visit; number of deliveries with skilled attendance; number of neonates receiving OPV at birth) were not found to be statistically significant.

Conclusions

The results show that the CCT intervention is capable of significant effects on service uptake, although results for several outcomes of interest were inconclusive. Key lessons learnt from the pilot phase of implementation include a need to track beneficiary retention throughout the continuum of care as closely as possible, and avert loss to follow-up.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Okoli et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150128164317574.pdf 590KB PDF download
59KB Image download
Figure 4. 37KB Image download
Figure 3. 38KB Image download
Figure 2. 33KB Image download
Figure 1. 50KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]National Population Commission [Nigeria], ICF International: Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2013. NPC and ICF International, Abuja, Nigeria and Rockville, Maryland, USA; 2014.
  • [2]World Bank: World Development Indicators 2014. World Bank, Washington, DC; 2014.
  • [3]WHO: Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2013 - WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank Estimates. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2014.
  • [4]Country Profile: Nigeria [http://www.countdown2015mnch.org/country-profiles/nigeria]
  • [5]Williams A: The Evolution of Programs Designed to Increase Utilization of Skilled Birth Attendance in Nigeria. In Science of Delivery Case Study. World Bank, Washington DC; 2014.
  • [6]Abimbola S, Okoli U, Olubajo O, Abdullahi MJ, Pate MA: The midwives service scheme in Nigeria. PLoS Med 2012, 9(5):e1001211.
  • [7]Ensor T, Cooper S: Overcoming barriers to health service access: influencing the demand side. Health Policy Plan 2004, 19(2):69-79.
  • [8]Fapohunda BM, Orobaton NG: When women deliver with no one present in nigeria: who, what, where and so what? PLoS One 2013, 8(7):e69569.
  • [9]Ensor T, Ronoh J: Effective financing of maternal health services: a review of the literature. Health Policy 2005, 75(1):49.
  • [10]Onwujekwe O, Uzochukwu B, Onoka C: Benefit incidence analysis of priority public health services and financing incidence analysis of household payments for healthcare in Enugu and Anambra states, Nigeria.(2011) 58 pp. http://r4d.dfid.gov.uk/Output/188977/.
  • [11]Doctor HV, Findley SE, Ager A, Cometto G, Afenyadu GY, Adamu F, Green C: Using community-based research to shape the design and delivery of maternal health services in Northern Nigeria. Reprod Health Matters 2012, 20(39):104-112.
  • [12]Fiszbein A, Schady N, Ferreira F, Grosh M, Keleher N, Olinto P, Skoufias E: Conditional cash transfers: reducing present and future poverty. World Bank, Washington DC; 2009.
  • [13]Garcia M, Moore C: The Cash Dividend: the Rise of Cash Transfer Programs in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank, Washington DC; 2012.
  • [14]Bhutta ZA, Ahmed T, Black RE, Cousens S, Dewey K, Giugliani E, Haider BA, Kirkwood B, Morris SS, Sachdev HPS, Shekar M: What works? interventions for maternal and child undernutrition and survival. Lancet 2008, 371(9610):417-440.
  • [15]Richard F, Witter S, de Brouwere V: Innovative approaches to reducing financial barriers to obstetric care in low-income countries. Am J Public Health 2010, 100(10):1845-1852.
  • [16]Lagarde M: How to do (or not to do)…assessing the impact of a policy change with routine longitudinal data. Health Policy Plan 2011, 27:76-83.
  • [17]The Partnership for Maternal Newborn and Child Health: Opportunities for Africa’s Newborns: Practical Data, Policy and Programmatic Support for Newborn Care in Africa. WHO on behalf of The Partnership for Maternal Newborn and Child Health, Geneva; 2006.
  • [18]Glassman A, Duran D, Fleisher L, Singer D, Sturke R, Angeles G, Charles J, Emrey B, Gleason J, Mwebsa W, Saldana K, Yarrow K, Koblinsky M: Impact of conditional cash transfers on maternal and newborn health. J Health Popul Nutr 2013, 31(4):S48-S66.
  • [19]Lagarde M, Haines A, Palmer N: Conditional cash transfers for improving uptake of health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. JAMA 2007, 298(16):1900-1910.
  • [20]Holmes R, Samson M, Magoronga W, Akinrimisi B, Morgan J: The Potential for Cash Transfers in Nigeria. ODI/UNICEF Nigeria, London; 2012.
  • [21]Gupta I, Joe W, Rudra S: Demand Side Financing in Health: How far can it address the issue of low utilization in developing countries? In World Health Report (2010) Background Paper, 27. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2010.
  • [22]Powell-Jackson T, Morrison J, Tiwari S, Neupane B, Costello A: The experiences of districts in implementing a national incentive programme to promote safe delivery in Nepal. BMC Health Serv Res 2009, 9(1):97. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [23]Gertler PJ, Martinez S, Premand P, Rawlings LB, Vermeersch CMJ: Impact Evaluation in Practice. Washington, DC, World Bank; 2011.
  • [24]SURE-P Maternal and Child Health Initiative [presentation] [http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTDEC/EXTDEVIMPEVAINI/0,,contentMDK:23431914~pagePK:64168445~piPK:64168309~theSitePK:3998212,00.html]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:83次 浏览次数:47次