期刊论文详细信息
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Immigrant and non-immigrant women’s experiences of maternity care: a systematic and comparative review of studies in five countries
Anita Gagnon4  Christine McCourt2  Maureen Heaman3  Dineke Korfker5  Touran Shafiei6  Manjri Raval6  Carolyn Roth1  Rhonda Small6 
[1] Clinical Education Centre, Keele University, Newcastle Road, Staffordshire ST4 6QG, UK;School of Health Sciences, City University London, Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7QN, UK;Faculty of Nursing, Helen Glass Centre for Nursing, 89 Curry Place, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada;McGill, Ingram School of Nursing & Department Ob/Gyn, MUHC Prog.Ob/Gyn, 3506 rue University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7, Canada;TNO Institute, Wassenaarseweg, Leiden CE 56 2301, Netherlands;Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, 215 Franklin Street, Melbourne VIC 3000, Australia
关键词: Communication;    Experiences of care;    Immigrant women;    Maternity care;   
Others  :  1127385
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2393-14-152
 received in 2013-12-13, accepted in 2014-04-09,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Understanding immigrant women’s experiences of maternity care is critical if receiving country care systems are to respond appropriately to increasing global migration. This systematic review aimed to compare what we know about immigrant and non-immigrant women’s experiences of maternity care.

Methods

Medline, CINAHL, Health Star, Embase and PsychInfo were searched for the period 1989–2012. First, we retrieved population-based studies of women’s experiences of maternity care (n = 12). For countries with identified population studies, studies focused specifically on immigrant women’s experiences of care were also retrieved (n = 22). For all included studies, we extracted available data on experiences of care and undertook a descriptive comparison.

Results

What immigrant and non-immigrant women want from maternity care proved similar: safe, high quality, attentive and individualised care, with adequate information and support. Immigrant women were less positive about their care than non-immigrant women. Communication problems and lack of familiarity with care systems impacted negatively on immigrant women’s experiences, as did perceptions of discrimination and care which was not kind or respectful.

Conclusion

Few differences were found in what immigrant and non-immigrant women want from maternity care. The challenge for health systems is to address the barriers immigrant women face by improving communication, increasing women’s understanding of care provision and reducing discrimination.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Small et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150220125730446.pdf 369KB PDF download
Figure 1. 57KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Gagnon AJ, Zimbeck M, Zeitlin J, Gagnon AJ, Zimbeck M, Zeitlin J, Alexander S, Blondel B, Buitendijk S, Desmeules M, Di Lallo D, Gagnon A, Gissler M, Glazier R, Heaman M, Korfker D, Macfarlane A, Ng E, Roth C, Small R, Stewart D, Stray-Pederson B, Urquia M, Vangen S, Zeitlin J, Zimbeck M, ROAM Collaboration: Migration to western industrialised countries and perinatal health: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med 2009, 69:934-946.
  • [2]Small R, Yelland J, Lumley J, Rice PL: Cross-cultural research: trying to do it better. 1. Issues in study design. Aust N Z J Public Health 1999, 23:385-389.
  • [3]Small R, Yelland J, Lumley J, Rice PL, Cotronei V, Warren R: Cross-cultural research: trying to do it better. 2. Enhancing data quality. Aust N Z J Public Health 1999, 23:390-395.
  • [4]Brown S, Lumley J: Antenatal care: a case of the inverse care law? Aust J Public Health 1993, 17:95-103.
  • [5]Brown S, Lumley J: Satisfaction with care in labor and birth: a survey of 790 Australian women. Birth 1994, 21:4-13.
  • [6]Laslett A-M, Brown S, Lumley J: Women's views of different models of antenatal care in Victoria, Australia. Birth 1997, 24:81-89.
  • [7]Brown S, Lumley J: Changing childbirth: lessons from an Australian survey of 1336 women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998, 105:143-155.
  • [8]Bruinsma F, Brown S, Darcy MA: Having a baby in Victoria 1989–2000: women’s views of public and private models of care. Aust N Z J Public Health 2003, 27:20-26.
  • [9]Brown SJ, Bruinsma F: Future directions for Victoria’s public maternity services: is this “what women want?”. Aust Health Rev 2006, 30:56-64.
  • [10]Brown SJ, Davey M, Bruinsma FJ: Women’s views and experiences of postnatal hospital care in the Victorian survey of recent mothers 2000. Midwifery 2005, 21:109-126.
  • [11]Public Health Agency of Canada: What mothers say: the Canadian maternity experiences survey. Ottawa; 2009. Available from http://www.publichealth.gc.ca/mes webcite
  • [12]Kingston D, Heaman M, Chalmers B, Kaczorowski J, O’Brien B, Lee L, Dzakpasu S, O’Campo P: On behalf of the maternity experiences study group of the Canadian perinatal surveillance system, public health agency of Canada. Comparison of maternity care experiences of Canadian-born and recent and non-recent immigrant women: findings from the Canadian maternity experiences survey. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2011, 33:1105-1115.
  • [13]Hildingsson I, Radestad I: Swedish women’s satisfaction with medical and emotional aspects of antenatal care. J Adv Nurs 2005, 52:239-249.
  • [14]Rudman A, Waldenström U: Critical views on postpartum care expressed by new mothers. BMC Health Serv Res 2007, 7:178. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [15]Waldenström U, Rudman A, Hildingsson I: Intrapartum and postpartum care in Sweden: women’s opinions and risk factors for not being satisfied. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006, 85:551-560.
  • [16]Garcia J, Redshaw M, Fitzsimons B, Keene J: First class delivery: a national survey of women’s views of maternity care. London: Audit Commission; 1998.
  • [17]Redshaw M, Rowe R, Hockley C, Brocklehurst P: Recorded delivery: a national survey of women’s experience of maternity care 2006. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit; 2007.
  • [18]Commission H: Towards better births: a review of maternity services in England. London: Healthcare Commission; 2008.
  • [19]Redshaw M, Heikkila K: Delivered with care: a national survey of women’s experiences of maternity care 2010. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit; 2010.
  • [20]Declercq ER, Sakala C, Corry MP, Applebaum S, Risher P: Listening to mothers: report of the first national U.S. survey of women’s childbearing experiences. New York: Maternity Center Association; 2002.
  • [21]Maternity Center Association: Recommendations from listening to mothers: the first national US survey of women's childbearing experiences. Birth 2004, 31:61-65.
  • [22]Declercq ER, Sakala C, Corry MP, Applebaum S: Listening to mothers II: report of the second national US survey of women’s childbearing experiences. New York: Childbirth Connection; 2006.
  • [23]Sakala C, Corry MP: Listening to mothers II reveals maternity care quality chasm. J Midwifery Womens Health 2007, 52:183-185.
  • [24]Declercq ER, Sakala C, Corry MP, Applebaum S, Herrich A: Listening to mothers III: pregnancy and childbirth. New York: Childbirth Connection; 2013.
  • [25]Hundley V, Rennie AM, Fitzmaurice A, Graham W, van Teijlingen E, Penney G: A national survey of women’s views of their maternity care in Scotland. Midwifery 2000, 16:303-313.
  • [26]Rice PL, Naksook C: The experience of pregnancy, labour and birth of Thai women in Australia. Midwifery 1998, 14:74-84.
  • [27]Rice P, Naksook C, Watson L: The experiences of postpartum hospital stay and returning home among Thai mothers in Australia. Midwifery 1999, 15:47-57.
  • [28]Small R, Lumley J, Yelland J, Rice PL: Shared antenatal care fails to rate well with women of non-English-speaking backgrounds. Med J Aust 1998, 168:15-18.
  • [29]Small R, Liamputtong P, Yelland J, Lumley J: Mothers in a New Country: the role of culture and communication in Vietnamese, Turkish and Filipino women’s experiences of giving birth in Australia. Women Health 1999, 28:77-101.
  • [30]Small R, Yelland J, Lumley J, Brown S, Liamputtong P: Immigrant women’s views about care during labor and birth: an Australian study of Vietnamese, Turkish, and Filipino women. Birth 2002, 29:266-277.
  • [31]Yelland J, Small R, Lumley J, Rice PL, Cotronei V, Warren R: Support, sensitivity, satisfaction: Vietnamese, Turkish and Filipino women’s experiences of the postnatal hospital stay. Midwifery 1998, 44:144-154.
  • [32]Tsianakas V, Liamputtong P: What women from an Islamic background in Australia say about care in pregnancy and prenatal testing. Midwifery 2002, 18:25-34.
  • [33]Tsianakas V, Liamputtong P: Prenatal testing: the perceptions and experiences of Muslim women in Australia. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2002, 20:7-24.
  • [34]Tran M, Young L, Phung H, Hillman K, Willcocks K: Quality of health services and early postpartum discharge: results from a sample of non-English-speaking women. J Qual Clin Pract 2001, 21:135-143.
  • [35]Liamputtong P, Watson L: The voices and concerns about prenatal testing of Cambodian, Lao and Vietnamese women in Australia. Midwifery 2002, 18:304-313.
  • [36]Liamputtong P, Watson L: The meanings and experiences of cesarean birth among Cambodian, Lao and Vietnamese immigrant women in Australia. Women Health 2006, 43:63-82.
  • [37]Chu CMY: Postnatal experience and health needs of Chinese migrant women in Brisbane, Australia. Ethn Health 2005, 10:33-56.
  • [38]Shafiei T, Small R, McLachlan H: Women’s views and experiences of maternity care: a study of immigrant Afghan women in Melbourne, Australia. Midwifery 2012, 28:198-203.
  • [39]Hoang HT, Le Q, Kilpatrick S: Having a baby in the new land: a qualitative exploration of the experiences of Asian migrants in rural Tasmania, Australia. Rural Remote Health 2009, 9:1084.
  • [40]Chalmers B, Omer HK: 432 Somali women’s birth experiences in Canada after earlier female genital mutilation. Birth 2000, 27:227-234.
  • [41]Grewal S, Bhagat R, Balneaves L: Perinatal beliefs and practices of immigrant Punjabi women living in Canada. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2008, 37:290-300.
  • [42]Reitmanova S, Gustafson D: “They can’t understand it”: maternity health and care needs of immigrant Muslim women in St. John’s Newfoundland. Matern Child Health J 2008, 12:101-111.
  • [43]Brar S, Tang S, Drummond N, Palacios-Derflingher L, Clark V, John M: Perinatal care for south Asian immigrant women and women born in Canada: telephone survey of users. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009, 31:708-716.
  • [44]Essén B, Johnsdotter S, Hovelius B, Gudmundsson S, Sjöberg NO, Friedman J, Ostergren PO: Qualitative study of pregnancy and childbirth experiences in Somalian women resident in Sweden. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000, 107:1507-1512.
  • [45]Berggren V, Bergstrom S, Edberg A-K: Being different and vulnerable: experiences of immigrant African women who have been circumcised and sought maternity care in Sweden. J Transcult Nurs 2006, 17:50-57.
  • [46]Woollett A, Dosanjh-Matwala N: Postnatal care: the attitudes and experiences of Asian women in east London. Midwifery 1990, 6:178-184.
  • [47]Woollett A, Dosanjh-Matwala N: Pregnancy and antenatal care: the attitudes and experiences of Asian women. Child Care Health Dev 1990, 16:63-78.
  • [48]McCourt C, Pearce A: Does continuity of carer matter to women from minority ethnic groups? Midwifery 2000, 16:145-154.
  • [49]Davies M, Bath P: The maternity information concerns of Somali women in the United Kingdom. J Adv Nurs 2001, 36:237-245.
  • [50]Harper Bulman K, McCourt C: Somali refugee women’s experiences of maternity care in west London: a case study. Critical Public Health 2002, 12:365-380.
  • [51]Jayaweera H, D'Souza L, Garcia J: A local study of childbearing Bangladeshi women in the UK. Midwifery 2005, 21:84-95.
  • [52]Herrel N, Olevitch L, DuBos DK, Terry P, Thorp D, Kind E, Said A: Somali refugee women speak out about their needs for care during pregnancy and delivery. J Midwifery Womens Health 2004, 49:345-349.
  • [53]Jambunathan J, Stewart S: Hmong women in Wisconsin: what are their concerns in pregnancy and childbirth? Birth 1995, 22:204-210.
  • [54]Lazarus ES, Philipson EH: A longitudinal study comparing the prenatal care of Puerto Rican and white women. Birth 1990, 17:6-11.
  • [55]Shaffer C: Factors influencing the access to prenatal care by Hispanic pregnant women. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2002, 14:93-96.
  • [56]Bowen G: Document analysis as a qualitative research method. J Qual Res 2009, 9:27-40.
  • [57]Balaam M-C, Akerjordet K, Lyberg A, Kaiser B, Schoening E, Fredriksen A-M, Ensel A, Gouni O, Severinsson E: A qualitative review of migrant women’s perceptions of their needs and experiences related to pregnancy and childbirth. J Adv Nurs 2013. doi:10.1111/jan.12139
  • [58]Wikberg A, Bondas T: A patient perspective in research on intercultural caring in maternity care. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2010, 8:5. doi:10.3402/qhw.v5i1.4648
  • [59]Office of Minority Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: National standards for culturally and linguistically appropriate services in health and health care: a blueprint for advancing and sustaining CLAS policy and practice. Washington, DC: Office of Minority Health; 2013.
  • [60]Bischoff A, Chiarenza A, Loutan L: “Migrant-friendly hospitals”: a European initiative in an age of increasing mobility. World Hosp Health Serv 2009, 45:7-9.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:14次 浏览次数:20次