期刊论文详细信息
BMC Genomics
Cross-species transcriptomic analysis elucidates constitutive aryl hydrocarbon receptor activity
Paul C Boutros1  Raimo Pohjanvirta3  Allan B Okey4  Christine P'ng2  Jere Lindén5  Sanna Lensu6  Ivy D Moffat4  John D Watson2  Stephenie D Prokopec2  Kathleen E Houlahan2  Trent T Simmons2  Lauren C Chong2  Ren X Sun2 
[1]MaRS Centre, 661 University Avenue, Suite 510, Toronto M5G 0A3 Ontario, Canada
[2]Informatics and Bio-computing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
[3]Department of Food Hygiene and Environmental Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
[4]Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
[5]Department of Veterinary Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
[6]Department of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
关键词: Core-gene battery;    TCDD-induced toxicity;    Constitutive gene expression;    AHR endogenous ligands;    Aryl hydrocarbon receptor;   
Others  :  1089972
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2164-15-1053
 received in 2014-08-19, accepted in 2014-11-19,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Research on the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) has largely focused on variations in toxic outcomes resulting from its activation by halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons. But the AHR also plays key roles in regulating pathways critical for development, and after decades of research the mechanisms underlying physiological regulation by the AHR remain poorly characterized. Previous studies identified several core genes that respond to xenobiotic AHR ligands across a broad range of species and tissues. However, only limited inferences have been made regarding its role in regulating constitutive gene activity, i.e. in the absence of exogenous ligands. To address this, we profiled transcriptomic variations between AHR-active and AHR-less-active animals in the absence of an exogenous agonist across five tissues, three of which came from rats (hypothalamus, white adipose and liver) and two of which came from mice (kidney and liver). Because AHR status alone has been shown sufficient to alter transcriptomic responses, we reason that by contrasting profiles amongst AHR-variant animals, we may elucidate effects of the AHR on constitutive mRNA abundances.

Results

We found significantly more overlap in constitutive mRNA abundances amongst tissues within the same species than from tissues between species and identified 13 genes (Agt, Car3, Creg1, Ctsc, E2f6, Enpp1, Gatm, Gstm4, Kcnj8, Me1, Pdk1, Slc35a3, and Sqrdl) that are affected by AHR-status in four of five tissues. One gene, Creg1, was significantly up-regulated in all AHR-less-active animals. We also find greater overlap between tissues at the pathway level than at the gene level, suggesting coherency to the AHR signalling response within these processes. Analysis of regulatory motifs suggests that the AHR mostly mediates transcriptional regulation via direct binding to response elements.

Conclusions

These findings, though preliminary, present a platform for further evaluating the role of the AHR in regulation of constitutive mRNA levels and physiologic function.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Sun et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150128153246217.pdf 1782KB PDF download
Figure 5. 94KB Image download
Figure 4. 86KB Image download
Figure 3. 235KB Image download
Figure 1. 82KB Image download
Figure 1. 86KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Hahn ME, Karchner SI, Shapiro MA, Perera SA: Molecular evolution of two vertebrate aryl hydrocarbon (dioxin) receptors (AHR1 and AHR2) and the PAS family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997, 94:13743-13748.
  • [2]Gu YZ, Hogenesch JB, Bradfield CA: The PAS superfamily: sensors of environmental and developmental signals. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2000, 40:519-561.
  • [3]Fernandez-Salguero P, Pineau T, Hilbert DM, McPhail T, Lee SS, Kimura S, Nebert DW, Rudikoff S, Ward JM, Gonzalez FJ: Immune system impairment and hepatic fibrosis in mice lacking the dioxin-binding Ah receptor. Science 1995, 268:722-726.
  • [4]Fernandez-Salguero PM, Ward JM, Sundberg JP, Gonzalez FJ: Lesions of aryl-hydrocarbon receptor-deficient mice. Vet Pathol 1997, 34:605-614.
  • [5]Bunger MK, Glover E, Moran SM, Walisser JA, Lahvis GP, Hsu EL, Bradfield CA: Abnormal liver development and resistance to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin toxicity in mice carrying a mutation in the DNA-binding domain of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Toxicol Sci Off J Soc Toxicol 2008, 106:83-92.
  • [6]Bunger MK, Moran SM, Glover E, Thomae TL, Lahvis GP, Lin BC, Bradfield CA: Resistance to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin toxicity and abnormal liver development in mice carrying a mutation in the nuclear localization sequence of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. J Biol Chem 2003, 278:17767-17774.
  • [7]Schmidt JV, Su GH, Reddy JK, Simon MC, Bradfield CA: Characterization of a murine Ahr null allele: involvement of the Ah receptor in hepatic growth and development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996, 93:6731-6736.
  • [8]Abbott BD, Schmid JE, Pitt JA, Buckalew AR, Wood CR, Held GA, Diliberto JJ: Adverse reproductive outcomes in the transgenic Ah receptor-deficient mouse. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1999, 155:62-70.
  • [9]Chevallier A, Mialot A, Petit J-M, Fernandez-Salguero P, Barouki R, Coumoul X, Beraneck M: Oculomotor deficits in aryl hydrocarbon receptor null mouse. PloS One 2013, 8:e53520.
  • [10]Bock KW, Köhle C: Ah receptor- and TCDD-mediated liver tumor promotion: clonal selection and expansion of cells evading growth arrest and apoptosis. Biochem Pharmacol 2005, 69:1403-1408.
  • [11]Elizondo G, Fernandez-Salguero P, Sheikh MS, Kim GY, Fornace AJ, Lee KS, Gonzalez FJ: Altered cell cycle control at the G(2)/M phases in aryl hydrocarbon receptor-null embryo fibroblast. Mol Pharmacol 2000, 57:1056-1063.
  • [12]Ohtake F, Takeyama K, Matsumoto T, Kitagawa H, Yamamoto Y, Nohara K, Tohyama C, Krust A, Mimura J, Chambon P, Yanagisawa J, Fujii-Kuriyama Y, Kato S: Modulation of oestrogen receptor signalling by association with the activated dioxin receptor. Nature 2003, 423:545-550.
  • [13]Quintana FJ, Basso AS, Iglesias AH, Korn T, Farez MF, Bettelli E, Caccamo M, Oukka M, Weiner HL: Control of T(reg) and T(H)17 cell differentiation by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Nature 2008, 453:65-71.
  • [14]Sekine H, Mimura J, Oshima M, Okawa H, Kanno J, Igarashi K, Gonzalez FJ, Ikuta T, Kawajiri K, Fujii-Kuriyama Y: Hypersensitivity of aryl hydrocarbon receptor-deficient mice to lipopolysaccharide-induced septic shock. Mol Cell Biol 2009, 29:6391-6400.
  • [15]Vogel CFA, Khan EM, Leung PSC, Gershwin ME, Chang WLW, Wu D, Haarmann-Stemmann T, Hoffmann A, Denison MS: Cross-talk between aryl hydrocarbon receptor and the inflammatory response: a role for nuclear factor-κB. J Biol Chem 2014, 289:1866-1875.
  • [16]Gunton JE, Kulkarni RN, Yim S, Okada T, Hawthorne WJ, Tseng Y-H, Roberson RS, Ricordi C, O’Connell PJ, Gonzalez FJ, Kahn CR: Loss of ARNT/HIF1beta mediates altered gene expression and pancreatic-islet dysfunction in human type 2 diabetes. Cell 2005, 122:337-349.
  • [17]Nebert DW, Dalton TP, Okey AB, Gonzalez FJ: Role of aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated induction of the CYP1 enzymes in environmental toxicity and cancer. J Biol Chem 2004, 279:23847-23850.
  • [18]Kurita H, Yoshioka W, Nishimura N, Kubota N, Kadowaki T, Tohyama C: Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in mice. J Appl Toxicol JAT 2009, 29:689-694.
  • [19]Lund AK, Agbor LN, Zhang N, Baker A, Zhao H, Fink GD, Kanagy NL, Walker MK: Loss of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor induces hypoxemia, endothelin-1, and systemic hypertension at modest altitude. Hypertension 2008, 51:803-809.
  • [20]Crews ST: Control of cell lineage-specific development and transcription by bHLH-PAS proteins. Genes Dev 1998, 12:607-620.
  • [21]Watson JD, Prokopec SD, Smith AB, Okey AB, Pohjanvirta R, Boutros PC: TCDD dysregulation of 13 AHR-target genes in rat liver. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2014, 274:445-454.
  • [22]Whitlock JP: Induction of cytochrome P4501A1. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1999, 39:103-125.
  • [23]Okey AB: An aryl hydrocarbon receptor odyssey to the shores of toxicology: the Deichmann Lecture, International Congress of Toxicology-XI. Toxicol Sci Off J Soc Toxicol 2007, 98:5-38.
  • [24]Abbott BD, Perdew GH, Birnbaum LS: Ah receptor in embryonic mouse palate and effects of TCDD on receptor expression. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1994, 126:16-25.
  • [25]Singh SS, Hord NG, Perdew GH: Characterization of the activated form of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in the nucleus of HeLa cells in the absence of exogenous ligand. Arch Biochem Biophys 1996, 329:47-55.
  • [26]Bjeldanes LF, Kim JY, Grose KR, Bartholomew JC, Bradfield CA: Aromatic hydrocarbon responsiveness-receptor agonists generated from indole-3-carbinol in vitro and in vivo: comparisons with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991, 88:9543-9547.
  • [27]Perdew GH, Babbs CF: Production of Ah receptor ligands in rat fecal suspensions containing tryptophan or indole-3-carbinol. Nutr Cancer 1991, 16:209-218.
  • [28]Lowe MM, Mold JE, Kanwar B, Huang Y, Louie A, Pollastri MP, Wang C, Patel G, Franks DG, Schlezinger J, Sherr DH, Silverstone AE, Hahn ME, McCune JM: Identification of cinnabarinic acid as a novel endogenous aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand that drives IL-22 production. PloS One 2014, 9:e87877.
  • [29]Opitz CA, Litzenburger UM, Sahm F, Ott M, Tritschler I, Trump S, Schumacher T, Jestaedt L, Schrenk D, Weller M, Jugold M, Guillemin GJ, Miller CL, Lutz C, Radlwimmer B, Lehmann I, von Deimling A, Wick W, Platten M: An endogenous tumour-promoting ligand of the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Nature 2011, 478:197-203.
  • [30]Shiizaki K, Ohsako S, Kawanishi M, Yagi T: Identification of amino acid residues in the ligand-binding domain of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor causing the species-specific response to omeprazole: possible determinants for binding putative endogenous ligands. Mol Pharmacol 2014, 85:279-289.
  • [31]Vikström Bergander L, Cai W, Klocke B, Seifert M, Pongratz I: Tryptamine serves as a proligand of the AhR transcriptional pathway whose activation is dependent of monoamine oxidases. Mol Endocrinol Baltim Md 2012, 26:1542-1551.
  • [32]Wincent E, Bengtsson J, Mohammadi Bardbori A, Alsberg T, Luecke S, Rannug U, Rannug A: Inhibition of cytochrome P4501-dependent clearance of the endogenous agonist FICZ as a mechanism for activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:4479-4484.
  • [33]Gradelet S, Astorg P, Pineau T, Canivenc MC, Siess MH, Leclerc J, Lesca P: Ah receptor-dependent CYP1A induction by two carotenoids, canthaxanthin and beta-apo-8’-carotenal, with no affinity for the TCDD binding site. Biochem Pharmacol 1997, 54:307-315.
  • [34]Pohjanvirta R, Tuomisto J: Short-term toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in laboratory animals: effects, mechanisms, and animal models. Pharmacol Rev 1994, 46:483-549.
  • [35]Boutros PC, Yan R, Moffat ID, Pohjanvirta R, Okey AB: Transcriptomic responses to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in liver: comparison of rat and mouse. BMC Genomics 2008, 9:419. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [36]Boutros PC, Moffat ID, Okey AB, Pohjanvirta R: mRNA levels in control rat liver display strain-specific, hereditary, and AHR-dependent components. PloS One 2011, 6:e18337.
  • [37]Boutros PC, Yao CQ, Watson JD, Wu AH, Moffat ID, Prokopec SD, Smith AB, Okey AB, Pohjanvirta R: Hepatic transcriptomic responses to TCDD in dioxin-sensitive and dioxin-resistant rats during the onset of toxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2011, 251:119-129.
  • [38]Boverhof DR, Burgoon LD, Tashiro C, Chittim B, Harkema JR, Jump DB, Zacharewski TR: Temporal and dose-dependent hepatic gene expression patterns in mice provide new insights into TCDD-Mediated hepatotoxicity. Toxicol Sci Off J Soc Toxicol 2005, 85:1048-1063.
  • [39]Boverhof DR, Burgoon LD, Tashiro C, Sharratt B, Chittim B, Harkema JR, Mendrick DL, Zacharewski TR: Comparative toxicogenomic analysis of the hepatotoxic effects of TCDD in Sprague Dawley rats and C57BL/6 mice. Toxicol Sci Off J Soc Toxicol 2006, 94:398-416.
  • [40]Fletcher N, Wahlström D, Lundberg R, Nilsson CB, Nilsson KC, Stockling K, Hellmold H, Håkansson H: 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) alters the mRNA expression of critical genes associated with cholesterol metabolism, bile acid biosynthesis, and bile transport in rat liver: a microarray study. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2005, 207:1-24.
  • [41]Hayes KR, Zastrow GM, Nukaya M, Pande K, Glover E, Maufort JP, Liss AL, Liu Y, Moran SM, Vollrath AL, Bradfield CA: Hepatic transcriptional networks induced by exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Chem Res Toxicol 2007, 20:1573-1581.
  • [42]Ovando BJ, Vezina CM, McGarrigle BP, Olson JR: Hepatic gene downregulation following acute and subchronic exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Toxicol Sci Off J Soc Toxicol 2006, 94:428-438.
  • [43]Slatter JG, Cheng O, Cornwell PD, de Souza A, Rockett J, Rushmore T, Hartley D, Evers R, He Y, Dai X, Hu R, Caguyong M, Roberts CJ, Castle J, Ulrich RG: Microarray-based compendium of hepatic gene expression profiles for prototypical ADME gene-inducing compounds in rats and mice in vivo. Xenobiotica Fate Foreign Compd Biol Syst 2006, 36:902-937.
  • [44]Tijet N, Boutros PC, Moffat ID, Okey AB, Tuomisto J, Pohjanvirta R: Aryl hydrocarbon receptor regulates distinct dioxin-dependent and dioxin-independent gene batteries. Mol Pharmacol 2006, 69:140-153.
  • [45]Vezina CM, Walker NJ, Olson JR: Subchronic exposure to TCDD, PeCDF, PCB126, and PCB153: effect on hepatic gene expression. Environ Health Perspect 2004, 112:1636-1644.
  • [46]Boutros PC, Bielefeld KA, Pohjanvirta R, Harper PA: Dioxin-dependent and dioxin-independent gene batteries: comparison of liver and kidney in AHR-null mice. Toxicol Sci Off J Soc Toxicol 2009, 112:245-256.
  • [47]Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG: Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol 2010, 8:e1000412.
  • [48]Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S, Ellis B, Gautier L, Ge Y, Gentry J, Hornik K, Hothorn T, Huber W, Iacus S, Irizarry R, Leisch F, Li C, Maechler M, Rossini AJ, Sawitzki G, Smith C, Smyth G, Tierney L, Yang JYH, Zhang J: Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 2004, 5:R80. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [49]Dai M, Wang P, Boyd AD, Kostov G, Athey B, Jones EG, Bunney WE, Myers RM, Speed TP, Akil H, Watson SJ, Meng F: Evolving gene/transcript definitions significantly alter the interpretation of GeneChip data. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33:e175.
  • [50]Chen H, Boutros PC: VennDiagram: a package for the generation of highly-customizable Venn and Euler diagrams in R. BMC Bioinformatics 2011, 12:35. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [51]Smyth GK: Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2004, 3:Article3.
  • [52]Storey JD, Tibshirani R: Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100:9440-9445.
  • [53]Denison MS, Whitlock JP: Xenobiotic-inducible transcription of cytochrome P450 genes. J Biol Chem 1995, 270:18175-18178.
  • [54]Sogawa K, Numayama-Tsuruta K, Takahashi T, Matsushita N, Miura C, Nikawa J, Gotoh O, Kikuchi Y, Fujii-Kuriyama Y: A novel induction mechanism of the rat CYP1A2 gene mediated by Ah receptor-Arnt heterodimer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004, 318:746-755.
  • [55]Karolchik D, Baertsch R, Diekhans M, Furey TS, Hinrichs A, Lu YT, Roskin KM, Schwartz M, Sugnet CW, Thomas DJ, Weber RJ, Haussler D, Kent WJ, University of California Santa Cruz: The UCSC Genome Browser Database. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:51-54.
  • [56]Siepel A, Haussler D: Combining phylogenetic and hidden Markov models in biosequence analysis. J Comput Biol J Comput Mol Cell Biol 2004, 11:413-428.
  • [57]Sartor MA, Schnekenburger M, Marlowe JL, Reichard JF, Wang Y, Fan Y, Ma C, Karyala S, Halbleib D, Liu X, Medvedovic M, Puga A: Genomewide analysis of aryl hydrocarbon receptor binding targets reveals an extensive array of gene clusters that control morphogenetic and developmental programs. Environ Health Perspect 2009, 117:1139-1146.
  • [58]Ji H, Jiang H, Ma W, Johnson DS, Myers RM, Wong WH: An integrated software system for analyzing ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq data. Nat Biotechnol 2008, 26:1293-1300.
  • [59]Zeeberg BR, Feng W, Wang G, Wang MD, Fojo AT, Sunshine M, Narasimhan S, Kane DW, Reinhold WC, Lababidi S, Bussey KJ, Riss J, Barrett JC, Weinstein JN: GoMiner: a resource for biological interpretation of genomic and proteomic data. Genome Biol 2003, 4:R28. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [60]Seefeld MD, Corbett SW, Keesey RE, Peterson RE: Characterization of the wasting syndrome in rats treated with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1984, 73:311-322.
  • [61]Lindén J, Lensu S, Tuomisto J, Pohjanvirta R: Dioxins, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and the central regulation of energy balance. Front Neuroendocrinol 2010, 31:452-478.
  • [62]Nebert DW, Puga A, Vasiliou V: Role of the Ah receptor and the dioxin-inducible [Ah] gene battery in toxicity, cancer, and signal transduction. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1993, 685:624-640.
  • [63]Nebert DW, Roe AL, Dieter MZ, Solis WA, Yang Y, Dalton TP: Role of the aromatic hydrocarbon receptor and [Ah] gene battery in the oxidative stress response, cell cycle control, and apoptosis. Biochem Pharmacol 2000, 59:65-85.
  • [64]Yeager RL, Reisman SA, Aleksunes LM, Klaassen CD: Introducing the “TCDD-inducible AhR-Nrf2 gene battery.”. Toxicol Sci Off J Soc Toxicol 2009, 111:238-246.
  • [65]Hahn ME: Aryl hydrocarbon receptors: diversity and evolution. Chem Biol Interact 2002, 141:131-160.
  • [66]Pongratz RL, Kibbey RG, Shulman GI, Cline GW: Cytosolic and mitochondrial malic enzyme isoforms differentially control insulin secretion. J Biol Chem 2007, 282:200-207.
  • [67]Yang X, Deignan JL, Qi H, Zhu J, Qian S, Zhong J, Torosyan G, Majid S, Falkard B, Kleinhanz RR, Karlsson J, Castellani LW, Mumick S, Wang K, Xie T, Coon M, Zhang C, Estrada-Smith D, Farber CR, Wang SS, van Nas A, Ghazalpour A, Zhang B, Macneil DJ, Lamb JR, Dipple KM, Reitman ML, Mehrabian M, Lum PY, Schadt EE, et al.: Validation of candidate causal genes for obesity that affect shared metabolic pathways and networks. Nat Genet 2009, 41:415-423.
  • [68]Zhong H, Beaulaurier J, Lum PY, Molony C, Yang X, Macneil DJ, Weingarth DT, Zhang B, Greenawalt D, Dobrin R, Hao K, Woo S, Fabre-Suver C, Qian S, Tota MR, Keller MP, Kendziorski CM, Yandell BS, Castro V, Attie AD, Kaplan LM, Schadt EE: Liver and adipose expression associated SNPs are enriched for association to type 2 diabetes. PLoS Genet 2010, 6:e1000932.
  • [69]Gudi R, Bowker-Kinley MM, Kedishvili NY, Zhao Y, Popov KM: Diversity of the pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase gene family in humans. J Biol Chem 1995, 270:28989-28994.
  • [70]Wyss M, Kaddurah-Daouk R: Creatine and creatinine metabolism. Physiol Rev 2000, 80:1107-1213.
  • [71]Jeunemaitre X, Soubrier F, Kotelevtsev YV, Lifton RP, Williams CS, Charru A, Hunt SC, Hopkins PN, Williams RR, Lalouel JM: Molecular basis of human hypertension: role of angiotensinogen. Cell 1992, 71:169-180.
  • [72]Gribouval O, Gonzales M, Neuhaus T, Aziza J, Bieth E, Laurent N, Bouton JM, Feuillet F, Makni S, Ben Amar H, Laube G, Delezoide A-L, Bouvier R, Dijoud F, Ollagnon-Roman E, Roume J, Joubert M, Antignac C, Gubler MC: Mutations in genes in the renin-angiotensin system are associated with autosomal recessive renal tubular dysgenesis. Nat Genet 2005, 37:964-968.
  • [73]Okubo S, Niimura F, Matsusaka T, Fogo A, Hogan BL, Ichikawa I: Angiotensinogen gene null-mutant mice lack homeostatic regulation of glomerular filtration and tubular reabsorption. Kidney Int 1998, 53:617-625.
  • [74]Mimura J, Yamashita K, Nakamura K, Morita M, Takagi TN, Nakao K, Ema M, Sogawa K, Yasuda M, Katsuki M, Fujii-Kuriyama Y: Loss of teratogenic response to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in mice lacking the Ah (dioxin) receptor. Genes Cells Devoted Mol Cell Mech 1997, 2:645-654.
  • [75]Zhang N, Agbor LN, Scott JA, Zalobowski T, Elased KM, Trujillo A, Duke MS, Wolf V, Walsh MT, Born JL, Felton LA, Wang J, Wang W, Kanagy NL, Walker MK: An activated renin-angiotensin system maintains normal blood pressure in aryl hydrocarbon receptor heterozygous mice but not in null mice. Biochem Pharmacol 2010, 80:197-204.
  • [76]Miki T, Suzuki M, Shibasaki T, Uemura H, Sato T, Yamaguchi K, Koseki H, Iwanaga T, Nakaya H, Seino S: Mouse model of Prinzmetal angina by disruption of the inward rectifier Kir6.1. Nat Med 2002, 8:466-472.
  • [77]Rutsch F, Ruf N, Vaingankar S, Toliat MR, Suk A, Höhne W, Schauer G, Lehmann M, Roscioli T, Schnabel D, Epplen JT, Knisely A, Superti-Furga A, McGill J, Filippone M, Sinaiko AR, Vallance H, Hinrichs B, Smith W, Ferre M, Terkeltaub R, Nürnberg P: Mutations in ENPP1 are associated with “idiopathic” infantile arterial calcification. Nat Genet 2003, 34:379-381.
  • [78]Johnson CD, Balagurunathan Y, Tadesse MG, Falahatpisheh MH, Brun M, Walker MK, Dougherty ER, Ramos KS: Unraveling gene-gene interactions regulated by ligands of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Environ Health Perspect 2004, 112:403-412.
  • [79]Kerkvliet NI, Steppan LB, Vorachek W, Oda S, Farrer D, Wong CP, Pham D, Mourich DV: Activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor by TCDD prevents diabetes in NOD mice and increases Foxp3+ T cells in pancreatic lymph nodes. Immunotherapy 2009, 1:539-547.
  • [80]Lillie JW, Green M, Green MR: An adenovirus E1a protein region required for transformation and transcriptional repression. Cell 1986, 46:1043-1051.
  • [81]Stein RW, Corrigan M, Yaciuk P, Whelan J, Moran E: Analysis of E1A-mediated growth regulation functions: binding of the 300-kilodalton cellular product correlates with E1A enhancer repression function and DNA synthesis-inducing activity. J Virol 1990, 64:4421-4427.
  • [82]Cauchi S, Stücker I, Solas C, Laurent-Puig P, Cénée S, Hémon D, Jacquet M, Kremers P, Beaune P, Massaad-Massade L: Polymorphisms of human aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) gene in a French population: relationship with CYP1A1 inducibility and lung cancer. Carcinogenesis 2001, 22:1819-1824.
  • [83]Safe S: Molecular biology of the Ah receptor and its role in carcinogenesis. Toxicol Lett 2001, 120:1-7.
  • [84]Moennikes O, Loeppen S, Buchmann A, Andersson P, Ittrich C, Poellinger L, Schwarz M: A constitutively active dioxin/aryl hydrocarbon receptor promotes hepatocarcinogenesis in mice. Cancer Res 2004, 64:4707-4710.
  • [85]Steenland K, Bertazzi P, Baccarelli A, Kogevinas M: Dioxin revisited: developments since the, IARC classification of dioxin as a human carcinogen. Environ Health Perspect 1997, 2004(112):1265-1268.
  • [86]Long J-R, Egan KM, Dunning L, Shu X-O, Cai Q, Cai H, Dai Q, Holtzman J, Gao Y-T, Zheng W: Population-based case–control study of AhR (aryl hydrocarbon receptor) and CYP1A2 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2006, 16:237-243.
  • [87]Dietrich C, Kaina B: The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) in the regulation of cell-cell contact and tumor growth. Carcinogenesis 2010, 31:1319-1328.
  • [88]DiNatale BC, Schroeder JC, Perdew GH: Ah receptor antagonism inhibits constitutive and cytokine inducible IL6 production in head and neck tumor cell lines. Mol Carcinog 2011, 50:173-183.
  • [89]Dever DP, Opanashuk LA: The aryl hydrocarbon receptor contributes to the proliferation of human medulloblastoma cells. Mol Pharmacol 2012, 81:669-678.
  • [90]Shin JH, Zhang L, Murillo-Sauca O, Kim J, Kohrt HEK, Bui JD, Sunwoo JB: Modulation of natural killer cell antitumor activity by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013, 110:12391-12396.
  • [91]Smith BW, Rozelle SS, Leung A, Ubellacker J, Parks A, Nah SK, French D, Gadue P, Monti S, Chui DHK, Steinberg MH, Frelinger AL, Michelson AD, Theberge R, McComb ME, Costello CE, Kotton DN, Mostoslavsky G, Sherr DH, Murphy GJ: The aryl hydrocarbon receptor directs hematopoietic progenitor cell expansion and differentiation. Blood 2013, 122:376-385.
  • [92]Moffat ID, Boutros PC, Chen H, Okey AB, Pohjanvirta R: Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)-regulated transcriptomic changes in rats sensitive or resistant to major dioxin toxicities. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:263. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [93]Yao CQ, Prokopec SD, Watson JD, Pang R, P’ng C, Chong LC, Harding NJ, Pohjanvirta R, Okey AB, Boutros PC: Inter-strain heterogeneity in rat hepatic transcriptomic responses to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2012, 260:135-145.
  • [94]Safe S, Wang F, Porter W, Duan R, McDougal A: Ah receptor agonists as endocrine disruptors: antiestrogenic activity and mechanisms. Toxicol Lett 1998, 102–103:343-347.
  • [95]Duan R, Porter W, Samudio I, Vyhlidal C, Kladde M, Safe S: Transcriptional activation of c-fos protooncogene by 17beta-estradiol: mechanism of aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated inhibition. Mol Endocrinol Baltim Md 1999, 13:1511-1521.
  • [96]Gillesby BE, Stanostefano M, Porter W, Safe S, Wu ZF, Zacharewski TR: Identification of a motif within the 5′ regulatory region of pS2 which is responsible for AP-1 binding and TCDD-mediated suppression. Biochemistry (Mosc) 1997, 36:6080-6089.
  • [97]Beischlag TV, Luis Morales J, Hollingshead BD, Perdew GH: The aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex and the control of gene expression. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 2008, 18:207-250.
  • [98]Mimura J, Fujii-Kuriyama Y: Functional role of AhR in the expression of toxic effects by TCDD. Biochim Biophys Acta 2003, 1619:263-268.
  • [99]Geurts AM, Cost GJ, Freyvert Y, Zeitler B, Miller JC, Choi VM, Jenkins SS, Wood A, Cui X, Meng X, Vincent A, Lam S, Michalkiewicz M, Schilling R, Foeckler J, Kalloway S, Weiler H, Ménoret S, Anegon I, Davis GD, Zhang L, Rebar EJ, Gregory PD, Urnov FD, Jacob HJ, Buelow R: Knockout rats via embryo microinjection of zinc-finger nucleases. Science 2009, 325:433. A list of significantly enriched GO terms (FDR < 0.01) with reported enrichment, statistical significance, GO term definition, list of changed genes and parent GO term information
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:6次 浏览次数:3次