| BMC Cancer | |
| Study protocol: a randomised controlled trial of a theory-based online intervention to improve sun safety among Australian adults | |
| Cathy M Cleary3  Katherine M White3  Ross McD Young2  Anna L Hawkes1  Stuart Leske3  Louise C Starfelt3  Kylie Wihardjo3  | |
| [1] School of Public Health, Tropical Medicine, and Rehabilitation Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville 4811, Australia | |
| [2] Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane 4059, Australia | |
| [3] School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane 4059, Australia | |
| 关键词: Skin cancer; Oncology; Adult; Sun-protective behaviour; Online intervention; Theory of planned behaviour; Sun protection; | |
| Others : 858994 DOI : 10.1186/1471-2407-14-162 |
|
| received in 2013-12-20, accepted in 2014-02-27, 发布年份 2014 | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
Background
The effects of exposure to ultraviolet radiation are a significant concern in Australia which has one of the highest incidences of skin cancer in the world. Despite most skin cancers being preventable by encouraging consistent adoption of sun-protective behaviours, incidence rates are not decreasing. There is a dearth of research examining the factors involved in engaging in sun-protective behaviours. Further, online multi-behavioural theory-based interventions have yet to be explored fully as a medium for improving sun-protective behaviour in adults. This paper presents the study protocol of a randomised controlled trial of an online intervention based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) that aims to improve sun safety among Australian adults.
Methods/Design
Approximately 420 adults aged 18 and over and predominantly from Queensland, Australia, will be recruited and randomised to the intervention (n = 200), information only (n = 200) or the control group (n = 20). The intervention focuses on encouraging supportive attitudes and beliefs toward sun-protective behaviour, fostering perceptions of normative support for sun protection, and increasing perceptions of control/self-efficacy over sun protection. The intervention will be delivered online over a single session. Data will be collected immediately prior to the intervention (Time 1), immediately following the intervention (Time 1b), and one week (Time 2) and one month (Time 3) post-intervention. Primary outcomes are intentions to sun protect and sun-protective behaviour. Secondary outcomes are the participants’ attitudes toward sun protection, perceptions of normative support for sun protection (i.e. subjective norms, group norms, personal norms and image norms) and perceptions of control/self-efficacy toward sun protection.
Discussion
The study will contribute to an understanding of the effectiveness of a TPB-based online intervention to improve Australian adults’ sun-protective behaviour.
Trials registry
Australian and New Zealand Trials Registry number ACTRN12613000470796
【 授权许可】
2014 Cleary et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140724062746714.pdf | 290KB | ||
| 22KB | Image |
【 图 表 】
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Australian Institute of Health and Welfare & Australasian Association of Cancer Registries: Cancer in Australia: An overview, 2012. Canberra: AIHW; 2012. Cancer series no. 74. Cat. no. CAN 70
- [2]Staples MP, Elwood M, Burton RC, Williams JL, Marks R, Giles GG: Non-melanoma skin cancer in Australia: the 2002 national survey and trends since 1985. Med J Aust 2006, 184(1):6-10.
- [3]Cancer Council Australia: Skin cancer. http://www.cancer.org.au/about-cancer/types-of-cancer/skin-cancer.html webcite
- [4]Australian Institute of Health and Welfare & Australasian Association of Cancer Registries: Cancer in Australia: An overview. Canberra: AIHW; 2008. Cancer series no. 46. Cat. no. CAN 42
- [5]Ayala F, Palla M, Di Trolio R, Mozzillo N, Ascierto PA: The role of optical radiations in skin cancer. ISRN Dermatology 2013, 2013:1-8.
- [6]Armstrong BK, Kricker A: The epidemiology of UV induced skin cancer. J Photochem Photobiol B 2001, 63(1–3):8-18.
- [7]Cancer Council Australia: National Cancer Prevention Policy: ultraviolet radiation. http://wiki.cancer.org.au/prevention/UV webcite
- [8]Stanton WR, Moffatt J, Clavarino A: Community perceptions of adequate levels and reasons for skin protection. Behav Med 2005, 31(1):5-15.
- [9]Stanton WR, Janda M, Baade PD, Anderson P: Primary prevention of skin cancer: a review of sun protection in Australia and internationally. Health Promot Int 2004, 19(3):369-378.
- [10]Dobbinson S, Jamsen KM, Francis K, Dunlop S, Wakefield M: 2006-2007 National Sun Protection Survey Report 1. Skin Cancer Prevention Knowledge, Attitudes and Beliefs among Australians in Summer 2006-07 and Comparison with 2003-04 in the Context of the First National Mass Media Campaign (unpublished). Melbourne: Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria; 2007.
- [11]Volkov A, Dobbinson S, Wakefield M, Slevin T: Seven-year trends in sun protection and sunburn among Australian adolescents and adults. Aust N Z J Public Health 2013, 37(1):63-69.
- [12]Green AC, Marquart L, Clemens SL, Harper CM, O’Rourke PK: Frequency of sunburn in Queensland adults: still a burning issue. Med J Aust 2013, 198(8):431-434.
- [13]Baum A, Cohen L: Successful behavioral interventions to prevent cancer: the example of skin cancer. Annu Rev Public Health 1998, 19:319-333.
- [14]Dobbinson S, Wakefield M, Hill D, Girgis A, Aitken JF, Beckmann K, Reeder AI, Herd N, Fairthorne A, Bowles K-A: Prevalence and determinants of Australian adolescents’ and adults’ weekend sun protection and sunburn, summer 2003-2004. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008, 59(4):602-614.
- [15]Ajzen I: The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991, 50(2):179-211.
- [16]Jackson KM, Aiken LS: A psychosocial model of sun protection and sunbathing in young women: the impact of health beliefs, attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy for sun protection. Health Psychol 2000, 19(5):469-478.
- [17]Myers LB, Horswill MS: Social cognitive predictors of sun protection intention and behavior. Behav Med 2006, 32(2):57-63.
- [18]Steen DM, Peay MY, Owen N: Predicting Australian adolescents’ intentions to minimize sun exposure. Psychol Health 1998, 13(1):111-119.
- [19]Bränström R, Ullén H, Brandberg Y: Attitudes, subjective norms and perception of behavioural control as predictors of sun-related behaviour in Swedish adults. Prev Med 2004, 39(5):992-999.
- [20]White KM, Robinson NG, Young RM, Anderson PJ, Hyde MK, Greenbank S, Rolfe T, Keane J, Vardon P, Baskerville D: Testing an extended theory of planned behaviour to predict young people’s sun safety in a high risk area. Br J Health Psychol 2008, 13(3):435-448.
- [21]Hillhouse J, Adler C, Drinnon J, Turrisi R: Application of Azjen’s Theory of planned behavior to predict sunbathing, tanning salon use, and sunscreen use intentions and behaviors. J Behav Med 1997, 20(4):365-378.
- [22]Jones F, Abraham C, Harris P, Schulz J, Chrispin C: From knowledge to action regulation: modeling the cognitive prerequisites of sun screen use in Australian and UK samples. Psychol Health 2001, 16(2):191-206.
- [23]Terry DJ, Hogg MA: Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: a role for group identification. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1996, 22(8):776-793.
- [24]Hamilton K, White KM, Young RM, Hawkes AL, Starfelt LC, Leske S: Identifying critical sun-protective beliefs among Australian adults. Health Educ Res 2012, 27(5):834-843.
- [25]Armitage CJ, Conner M: Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol 2001, 40(4):471.
- [26]White KM, Hogg MA, Terry DJ: Improving attitude-behavior correspondence through exposure to normative support from a salient ingroup. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 2002, 24(2):91-103.
- [27]Cialdini RB, Kallgren CA, Reno RR: A focus theory of normative conduct: a theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In Advances in Experimental and Social Psychology. 24th edition. Edited by Zanna M. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1991:201-234.
- [28]Tajfel H, Turner JC: The social identity of intergroup relations. In Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Edited by Worchel S, Austin WG. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hal; 1986:7-24.
- [29]Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS: Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Cambridge, MA US: Basil Blackwell; 1987.
- [30]Hamilton K, White KM: Extending the theory of planned behavior: The role of self and social influences in predicting adolescent regular moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. J Sport Exercise Psychol 2008, 30(1):56-74.
- [31]Johnston KJ, White KM: Binge-drinking: a test of the role of group norms in the theory of planned behaviour. Psychol Health 2003, 18(1):63-77.
- [32]Jackson KM, Aiken LS: Evaluation of a multicomponent appearance-based sun-protective intervention for young women: uncovering the mechanisms of program efficacy. Health Psychol 2006, 25(1):34-46.
- [33]Conner M, Armitage CJ: Extending the theory of planned behavior: a review and avenues for further research. J Appl Soc Psychol 1998, 28(15):1429-1464.
- [34]Cugelman B, Thelwall M, Dawes P: Online interventions for social marketing health behavior change campaigns: a meta-analysis of psychological architectures and adherence factors. J Med Internet Res 2011, 13(1):88-112.
- [35]Webb TL, Joseph J, Yardley L, Michie S: Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res 2010, 12(1):97-114.
- [36]Craciun C, Schüz N, Lippke S, Schwarzer R: Facilitating sunscreen use in women by a theory-based online intervention: A randomized controlled trial. J Health Psychol 2012, 17(2):207-216.
- [37]Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG: Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 2009, 41(4):1149-1160.
- [38]Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A: G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007, 39(2):175-191.
- [39]Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials G: CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2010, 63(8):e1-e37.
PDF