Gender differences in prevalence and associations for use of CAM in a large population study

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Katarina Hamberg²  Frauke Musial¹  Anita Salamonsen¹  Trine Stub¹  Agnete E Kristoffersen¹ 

[1] The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway;Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Family Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

关键词: Prevalence;    Population study;    Gender differences;    Norway;    CAM use;   

Others  :  1085223
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6882-14-463

 received in 2014-06-18, accepted in 2014-11-13,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Self-reported use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) varies widely from 10% to 75% in the general populations worldwide. When limited to use of a CAM provider 2% to 49% reported use is found. CAM use is believed to be closely associated with socio demographic variables such as gender, age, education, income and health complaints. However, studies have only occasionally differentiated CAM use according to gender. Therefore, the aim of the study presented here is to describe the prevalence of CAM use on the background of gender and to describe the specific characteristics of male and female users in the total Tromsø 6 population.

Methods

A total of 12,982 men and women aged 30–87 in the municipality of Tromsø, Norway went through a health screening program and completed two self-administered questionnaires in 2007/2008. The questionnaires were developed specifically for the Tromsø study and included questions about life style and health issues in addition to socio demographic variables.

Results

A total of 33% of the participants reported use of any CAM within the last 12 months, women more often than men (42% and 24%, respectively). When limited to visits to a CAM provider, we found 17% use among women and 8% among men. The relationship between the demographic variables and being a CAM user differed significantly between men and women with regard to age, household income, and marital status. We did not find significant differences between men and women concerning education and self-reported health.

Conclusions

Findings from this study suggest that the prevalence and associations for use of CAM differ between men and women concerning several socio demographic variables (age, education and household income). Neglect of women’s health care needs in public health care may contribute to the fact that women to a higher degree than men turn to CAM and CAM products.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Kristoffersen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Hanssen B, Grimsgaard S, Launso L, Fønnebø V, Falkenberg T, Rasmussen NK: Use of complementary and alternative medicine in the Scandinavian countries. Scand J Prim Health Care 2005, 23(1):57-62.
• [2]Frass M, Strassl RP, Friehs H, Mullner M, Kundi M, Kaye AD: Use and acceptance of complementary and alternative medicine among the general population and medical personnel: a systematic review. The Ochsner J 2012, 12(1):45-56.
• [3]NAFKAM-undersøkelsen. 2012. [http://nifab.no/om_alternativ_behandling/alternativ_behandling_i_norge/nafkam_undersoekelsen_2012 webcite]
• [4]Johannessen H, Ostenfeld-Rosenthal A: Alternative treatment. Practice and facts. [Alternativ behandling. Praksis og fakta.]. København: Munksgaard; 2012.
• [5]Harris PE, Cooper KL, Relton C, Thomas KJ: Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use by the general population: a systematic review and update. Int J Clin Pract 2012, 66(10):924-939.
• [6]Kristoffersen AE, Norheim AJ, Fonnebo VM: Complementary and alternative medicine use among Norwegian cancer survivors: gender-specific prevalence and associations for use. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013, 2013:318781.
• [7]Kristoffersen AE, Fønnebø VM, Norheim AJ: Use of complementary and alternative medicine among patients: classification criteria determine level of use. J Altern Complement Med 2008, 14(8):911-919.
• [8]Health - More People Choose CAM Helse - flere velger alternativt]. [https://www.ssb.no/helse/artikler-og-publikasjoner/helse-flere-velger-alternativt webcite]
• [9]Steinsbekk A, Rise MB, Johnsen R: Changes among male and female visitors to practitioners of complementary and alternative medicine in a large adult Norwegian population from 1997 to 2008 (The HUNT studies). BMC Complement Altern Med 2011, 11:61. BioMed Central Full Text
• [10]Kristoffersen AE, Norheim AJ, Fonnebo VM: Any difference? Use of a CAM provider among cancer patients, coronary heart disease (CHD) patients and individuals with no cancer/CHD. BMC Complement Altern Med 2012, 12(1):1. BioMed Central Full Text
• [11]Molassiotis A, Scott JA, Kearney N, Pud D, Magri M, Selvekerova S, Bruyns I, Fernadez-Ortega P, Panteli V, Margulies A, Gudmundsdottir G, Milovics L, Ozden G, Platin N, Patiraki E: Complementary and alternative medicine use in breast cancer patients in Europe. Support Care Cancer 2006, 14(3):260-267.
• [12]Bishop FL, Yardley L, Lewith GT: A systematic review of beliefs involved in the use of complementary and alternative medicine. J Health Psychol 2007, 12(6):851-867.
• [13]Lorber J: Gender and the Social Construction of Illness. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1997.
• [14]Doyal L: Sex, gender, and health: the need for a new approach. BMJ 2001, 323(7320):1061-1063.
• [15]McLay JS, Stewart D, George J, Rore C, Heys SD: Complementary and alternative medicines use by Scottish women with breast cancer: what, why and the potential for drug interactions? Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2012, 68(5):811-819.
• [16]Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, Association AM: Gender disparities in clinical decision making. JAMA 1991, 266(4):559-562.
• [17]Hamberg K: Gender bias in medicine. Womens Health (Lond Engl) 2008, 4(3):237-243.
• [18]Hariz GM, Nakajima T, Limousin P, Foltynie T, Zrinzo L, Jahanshahi M, Hamberg K: Gender distribution of patients with Parkinson’s disease treated with subthalamic deep brain stimulation; a review of the 2000–2009 literature. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2011, 17(3):146-149.
• [19]Jacobsen BK, Eggen AE, Mathiesen EB, Wilsgaard T, Njolstad I: Cohort profile: the Tromso study. Int J Epidemiol 2011, 41(4):961-967.
• [20]Emaus A, Degerstrom J, Wilsgaard T, Hansen BH, Dieli-Conwright CM, Furberg AS, Pettersen SA, Andersen LB, Eggen AE, Bernstein L, Thune I: Does a variation in self-reported physical activity reflect variation in objectively measured physical activity, resting heart rate, and physical fitness? Results from the Tromso study. Scand J Public Health 2010, 38(5 Suppl):105-118.
• [21]Kiil MA, Salamonsen A: Embodied health practices: The use of Traditional Healing and Conventional Medicine in a North Norwegian Community. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 2013., 2(3). ISSN 2281-3993.s 483-488.s doi:10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n3p483
• [22]WHO/EDM/TRM: General Guidelines for Methodologies on Research and Evaluation of Traditional Medicine. 2000. http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/traditional/definitions/en/ webcite
• [23]Fønnebø V, Launsø L: Use of alternative treatment in Norway [Bruk av alternativ behandling i Norge]. http://nifab.no/hva_er_alternativ_behandling/tall_og_fakta/nifab_undersoekelsen_2007 webcite
• [24]Barnes PM, Bloom B, Nahin RL: Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States, 2007. Natl Health Stat Rep 2008, 12:1-23.
• [25]Steinsbekk A, Adams J, Sibbritt D, Jacobsen G, Johnsen R: Socio-demographic characteristics and health perceptions among male and female visitors to CAM practitioners in a total population study. Forsch Komplementmed 2008, 15(3):146-151.
• [26]Bishop FL, Lewith GT: Who uses CAM? A narrative review of demographic characteristics and health factors associated with CAM use. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2010, 7(1):11-28.
• [27]Courtenay WH: Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men’s well-being: a theory of gender and health. Soc Sci Med 2000, 50(10):1385-1401.
• [28]Hansen AH, Halvorsen PA, Ringberg U, Forde OH: Socio-economic inequalities in health care utilisation in Norway: a population based cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2012, 12:336. BioMed Central Full Text
• [29]Vikum E, Krokstad S, Holst D, Westin S: Socioeconomic inequalities in dental services utilisation in a Norwegian county: the third Nord-Trondelag Health Survey. Scand J Public Health 2012, 40(7):648-655.
• [30]Blackwell DL, Lucas JW, Clarke TC: Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: national health interview survey, 2012. Vital Health Stat Series 10, Data from the National Health Survey 2012, 2014(260):1-171.
• [31]Berglund G, Bolund C, Gustafsson UL, Sjoden PO: Is the wish to participate in a cancer rehabilitation program an indicator of the need? Comparisons of participants and non-participants in a randomized study. Psychooncology 1997, 6(1):35-46.
• [32]Krizek C, Roberts C, Ragan R, Ferrara JJ, Lord B: Gender and cancer support group participation. Cancer Pract 1999, 7(2):86-92.
• [33]Umefjord G, Hamberg K, Malker H, Petersson G: The use of an internet-based ask the doctor service involving family physicians: evaluation by a web survey. Fam Pract 2006, 23(2):159-166.
• [34]Salamonsen A, Kruse T, Eriksen SH: Modes of embodiment in breast cancer patients using complementary and alternative medicine. Qual Health Res 2012, 22(11):1497-1512.
• [35]Salamonsen A, Launso L, Kruse TE, Eriksen SH: Understanding unexpected courses of multiple sclerosis among patients using complementary and alternative medicine: a travel from recipient to explorer. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-Being 2010., 5doi:10.3402/qhw.v5i2.5032
• [36]Bakketeig L, Bergsjø P, Dahl S, Gram T, Haugland S, Jacobsen B, Mfl: Kvinner lider - menn dør. Folkehelse i et kjønnsperspektiv. [Women suffer - men die. Public health from a gender perspective]. Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal Akademisk, Norway; 2007.
• [37]Christie VM: Den andre medisinen [The other medicine]. Oslo: Univeristetsforlaget, Norway; 1991.
• [38]Schei B, Bakketeig LS: Kvinner lider - menn dør: folkehelse i et kjønnsperspektiv. Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk; 2007.
• [39]Boon H, Westlake K, Stewart M, Gray R, Fleshner N, Gavin A, Brown JB, Goel V: Use of complementary/alternative medicine by men diagnosed with prostate cancer: prevalence and characteristics. Urology 2003, 62(5):849-853.
• [40]Kristoffersen AE, Fønnebø VM, Norheim AJ: Do cancer patients with a poor prognosis use complementary and alternative medicine more often than others? J Altern Complement Med 2009, 15(1):35-40.