期刊论文详细信息
BMC Medical Education
The influences of background on beginning medical students’ perceptions of rural medical practice
Daniel B Lindsay1  Louise Young2  Robin A Ray2 
[1]Department of Psychology, College of Health Care Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville 4811, Australia
[2]College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville 4811, Australia
关键词: Selection;    Communication;    Medical students;    Perceptions;    Urban background;    Rural background;    Rural medical practice;   
Others  :  1164934
DOI  :  10.1186/s12909-015-0339-9
 received in 2014-04-08, accepted in 2015-03-09,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Access to health care is an ongoing problem for underserved populations in rural and remote regions of Australia and North America. Despite medical schools educating more medical doctors, this maldistribution continues. While students entering medical programs with a rural focus purport to have an interest in rural medicine, their understanding of possible future rural practice is unclear. This study explored the differences in perception of rural practice between beginning medical students from rural and urban backgrounds to gain an indication of the usefulness of our selection process to meet the rural workforce mandate.

Methods

Beginning medical students completed a writing exercise about the life and work of a rural medical doctor as a test of their academic writing skills. After completing the task and receiving feedback, students were invited to submit their work for analysis. Template analysis using themes from a study of rural medical registrars was used to analyse 103 scripts.

Results

Students demonstrated foundational insight into some of the realities of rural life and practice. However, differences were noted in perspectives between rural background students and urban background students. Rural background students used everyday language to describe the practicalities of rural life, medical practice and the implications for families and communities. Urban background students generally used complex language and more negative descriptors.

Conclusions

Beginning medical students from urban and rural backgrounds differ in their perceptions and expression of rural practice. These outcomes are important for medical schools that use interviews in their selection process. Rural background applicants’ suitability may be overlooked because of the interviewer’s expectations of language, while urban background applicants may score higher related to complex language and use of key phrases. Interviewer training should address this likely bias thereby increasing the potential to recruit rural background students.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Ray et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150416020641563.pdf 497KB PDF download
Figure 1. 26KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Hays R, Stokes J, Veitch J: A new socially responsible medical school for regional Australia. Education Health 2003, 16(1):14-21.
  • [2]Rolfe IE, Pearson SA, O’Connell DL, Dickinson JA: Finding solutions to the rural doctor shortage: the roles of selection versus undergraduate medical education at Newcastle. Aust N Z J Med 1995, 25(5):512-7.
  • [3]Henry JA, Edwards BJ, Crotty B: Why do medical graduates choose rural careers? Rural Remote Health 2009, 9:1083. [online]
  • [4]Walker JH, DeWitt DE, Pallant JF, Cunningham CE. Rural origin plus a rural clinical school placement is a significant predictor of medical students’ intentions to practice rurally: a multi-university study. Rural Rem Health. 2012;12. [online]
  • [5]Tolhurst HM, Adams J, Stewart SM: An exploration of when urban background medical students become interested in rural practice. Rural Rem Health. 2006;6. [online]
  • [6]Australian Bureau of Statistics: 3235.0 population by age and sex, regions of Australia. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra; 2012.
  • [7]National Rural Health Alliance: Measuring the metropolitan-rural inequity. Fact sheet 23. National Rural Health Alliance, Canberra; 2010.
  • [8]Rosenblatt RA, Chen FM, Lishner DM, Doescher MP: The future of family medicine and implications for rural primary care physician supply. Final report 125. WWAMI Rural Health Research Center, Seattle; 2010.
  • [9]Murray R: Do available predictions of future medical workforce requirements provide a sensible basis for planning? Med J Aust 2012, 197(5):267-8.
  • [10]Laven G, Wilkinson D, Beilby J, McElroy H: Empiric validation of the rural Australian medical under-graduate scholarship’ rural background’ criterion. Australian J Rural Health 2005, 13:137-41.
  • [11]Medical Training Review Panel: Thirteenth report. Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra; 2010.
  • [12]Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Medical workforce 2012 National health workforce series no. 8. Cat. no. HWL 54. AIHW, Canberra; 2014.
  • [13]Rural Health Workforce Australia: Medical practice in rural and remote Australia: combined rural workforce agencies national minimum data set report as at 30th November 2013. Melbourne, RHWA; 2014.
  • [14]Laven G, Beilby J, McElroy H, Wilkinson D: Factors associated with rural practice among Australian-trained general practitioners. Med J Aust 2003, 179(2):75-9.
  • [15]Roseamelia C, Greenwald JL, Bush T, Pratte M, Wilcox J, Morley CP: A qualitative study of medical students in a rural track: views on eventual rural practice. Fam Med 2014, 46(4):259-66.
  • [16]Barrett FA, Lipsky MS, Nawal Lutfiyya M: The impact of rural training experiences on medical students: a critical review. Acad Med 2011, 86(2):263. 210.1097/ACM.1090b1013e3182046387
  • [17]Lee Y, Barnard A, Owen C: Initial evaluation of rural programs at the Australian National University: understanding the effects of rural programs on intentions for rural and remote medical practice. Rural Remote Health 2011, 11:1602. [online]
  • [18]Bore M, Munro D, Powis D: A comprehensive model for the selection of medical students. Med Teach 2009, 31(12):1066-72.
  • [19]Adam J, Bore M, McKendree J, Munro D, Powis D: Can personal qualities of medical students predict in-course examination success and professional behaviour? An exploratory prospective cohort study. BMC Med Educ 2012, 12(1):69.
  • [20]Murray RB, Larkins S, Russell H, Ewen S, Prideaux D: Medical schools as agents of change: socially accountable medical education. Med J Aust 2012, 196(10):653. [online]
  • [21]Laurence CM, Zajac IT, Turnbull DA, Sumner KE, Fleming J: Applicants to the University of Adelaide medical school: influences, motivation and alternative career choices. Focus Health Professional education: A Multidisciplinary J 2013, 14(2):81-91.
  • [22]Wilson IG, Roberts C, Flynn EM, Griffin B: Only the best: medical student selection in Australia. Med J Aust 2012, 196(5):357. [online]
  • [23]King N: Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In Essential guide to qualitative methods in organisational research. Edited by Cassell C, Symon G. Sage Publications, London; 2004:256-70.
  • [24]Crabtree BF, Miller WL: Using codes and code manuals. In Doing qualitative research. 2nd edition. Edited by Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks; 1999.
  • [25]Ray RA: General practice registrars’ intentions to pursue a rural general practice career: a retrospective study. In Project report. James Cook University, Townsville; 2012.
  • [26]Brooks J, King N: Qualitative psychology in the real world: the utility of template analysis. [http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/13656/] webciteBritish Psychological Society Annual Conference, 18th - 20th April 2012 London 2012. Available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/13656/
  • [27]Australian Standard Geographical Classification - Remoteness Area (ASGC-RA) http://www.health.gov.au/internet/otd/Publishing.nsf/Content/RA-intro
  • [28]Sarantakos S: Quality of family life on the farm. J Family Studies 2000, 6(2):182-98.
  • [29]Emmitt M, Komesaroff L, Pollock J: Zbaracki: Language and learning. 5th edition. Oxford University Press, South Melbourne; 2010.
  • [30]Jones M, Humphreys J, Prideaux D: Predicting medical students’ intentions to take up rural practice after graduation. Med Educ 2009, 43(10):1001-9.
  • [31]Hegazi I, Wilson I: Medical education and moral segmentation in medical students. Med Educ 2013, 47(10):1022-8.
  • [32]Chen DCR, Kirshenbaum DS, Yan J, Kirshenbaum E, Aseltine RH: Characterizing changes in student empathy throughout medical school. Med Teach 2012, 34(4):305-11.
  • [33]Coria A, McKelvey TG, Charlton P, Woodworth M, Lahey T: The design of a medical school social justice curriculum. Acad Med 2013, 88(10):1442-9.
  • [34]Lambe P, Bristow D: Predicting medical student performance from attributes at entry: a latent class analysis. Med Educ 2011, 45(3):308-16.
  • [35]Laurence CO, Turnbull DA, Briggs NE, Robinson JS: Applicant characteristics and their influence on success: results from an analysis of applicants to the University of Adelaide Medical School, 2004–2007. Med J Aust 2010, 192(4):212-6.
  • [36]Max BA, Gelfand B, Brooks MR, Beckerly R, Segal S: Have personal statements become impersonal? An evaluation of personal statements in anesthesiology residency applications. J Clin Anesth 2010, 22(5):346-51.
  • [37]Prideaux D, Roberts C, Eva K, Centeno A, Mccrorie P, Mcmanus C, et al.: Assessment for selection for the health care professions and specialty training: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 conference. Med Teach 2011, 33(3):215-23.
  • [38]Govaerts MJB, Schuwirth LWT, Van der Vleuten CPM, Muijtjens AMM: Work-based assessment: effects of rater expertise. Advances Health Sci Educ 2011, 16:151-65.
  • [39]Plous S: The psychology of judgement and decision making. McGraw-Hill, New York; 1993.
  • [40]Bernstein B: Class, codes and control: applied studies towards a sociology of language. Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd, London; 2003.
  • [41]Chowdry H, Crawford C, Dearden L, Goodman A, Vignoles A: Widening participation in higher education: analysis using linked administrative data. Discussion paper No 4991. Institute for the Study of Labour, Bonn; 2010.
  • [42]Prowis D: Personality testing in the context of selecting health professionals. Med Teach 2009, 31(12):1045-6.
  • [43]Royston PJ, Mathieson K, Leafman J, Ojan-Sheehan O: Medical student characteristics predictive of intent for rural practice. Rural Rem Health. 2012;12. Available: http://www.rrh.org.au
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:12次 浏览次数:12次