期刊论文详细信息
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
The influence of women’s fear, attitudes and beliefs of childbirth on mode and experience of birth
Ingegerd Hildingsson1  Julie F Pallant2  Christine Rubertsson4  Helen M Haines3 
[1] Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Division of Reproductive and Perinatal Healthcare, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden;Rural Health Academic Centre, University of Melbourne, 49 Graham St, Shepparton, Victoria, Australia;Northeast Health, Green St., 3677, Wangaratta, Victoria, Australia;Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Uppsala University, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden
关键词: Scale;    Cluster analysis;    Childbirth fear;    Attitudes;    Pregnancy;   
Others  :  1152728
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2393-12-55
 received in 2011-12-23, accepted in 2012-06-14,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Women’s fears and attitudes to childbirth may influence the maternity care they receive and the outcomes of birth. This study aimed to develop profiles of women according to their attitudes regarding birth and their levels of childbirth related fear. The association of these profiles with mode and outcomes of birth was explored.

Methods

Prospective longitudinal cohort design with self report questionnaires containing a set of attitudinal statements regarding birth (Birth Attitudes Profile Scale) and a fear of birth scale (FOBS). Pregnant women responded at 18-20 weeks gestation and two months after birth from a regional area of Sweden (n = 386) and a regional area of Australia (n = 123). Cluster analysis was used to identify a set of profiles. Odds ratios (95% CI) were calculated, comparing cluster membership for country of care, pregnancy characteristics, birth experience and outcomes.

Results

Three clusters were identified – ‘Self determiners’ (clear attitudes about birth including seeing it as a natural process and no childbirth fear), ‘Take it as it comes’ (no fear of birth and low levels of agreement with any of the attitude statements) and ‘Fearful’ (afraid of birth, with concerns for the personal impact of birth including pain and control, safety concerns and low levels of agreement with attitudes relating to women’s freedom of choice or birth as a natural process). At 18 -20 weeks gestation, when compared to the ‘Self determiners’, women in the ‘Fearful’ cluster were more likely to: prefer a caesarean (OR = 3.3 CI: 1.6-6.8), hold less than positive feelings about being pregnant (OR = 3.6 CI: 1.4-9.0), report less than positive feelings about the approaching birth (OR = 7.2 CI: 4.4-12.0) and less than positive feelings about the first weeks with a newborn (OR = 2.0 CI 1.2-3.6). At two months post partum the ‘Fearful’ cluster had a greater likelihood of having had an elective caesarean (OR = 5.4 CI 2.1-14.2); they were more likely to have had an epidural if they laboured (OR = 1.9 CI 1.1-3.2) and to experience their labour pain as more intense than women in the other clusters. The ‘Fearful’ cluster were more likely to report a negative experience of birth (OR = 1.7 CI 1.02- 2.9). The ‘Take it as it comes’ cluster had a higher likelihood of an elective caesarean (OR 3.0 CI 1.1-8.0).

Conclusions

In this study three clusters of women were identified. Belonging to the ‘Fearful’ cluster had a negative effect on women’s emotional health during pregnancy and increased the likelihood of a negative birth experience. Both women in the ‘Take it as it comes’ and the ‘Fearful’ cluster had higher odds of having an elective caesarean compared to women in the ‘Self determiners’. Understanding women’s attitudes and level of fear may help midwives and doctors to tailor their interactions with women.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Haines et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150406215009164.pdf 379KB PDF download
Figure 2. 30KB Image download
Figure 1. 60KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Banta D: What is the efficacy/effectiveness of antenatal care and the financial and organizational implications? Regional Office for Europe (Health Evidence Network Report). WHO, Copenhagen; 2003. http://www.euro.who.int/Document/E82996.pdf webcite, accessed [December 1 2011]
  • [2]Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists: Perinatal Anxiety and Depression(C-Gen 18) College Statement C-Gen 18: Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. 2012.
  • [3]Potts S, Shields SG: The experience of normal pregnancy: an overview. In Women-Centered Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth. Edited by Shields SG, Candib LM. Radcliffe Publishing, Oxford; 2010.
  • [4]Rosenberg MJ, Hovland CI (Eds): Cognitive, affective, and behavioural components of attitudes. Attitude Organisation and Change: An Analysis of Consistency Among Attitude Components. Yale University Press, New Haven; 1960:1-14.
  • [5]Fishbein M, Raven B: The AB scales: An operational definition of belief and attitude. Human Relat 1962, 15(1):35-44.
  • [6]Harsanyi J: Games with incomplete information played by Bayesian players. Manag Sci 1967-68, 14:159-182. 320 - 34, 486-502
  • [7]Bonanno GF: Information, Knowledge and Belief. Bull Econ Res 2002, 54:47-67.
  • [8]Science Daily: University of British Columbia Trio of studies reveals attitudes of women, obstetricians and family physicians on use of technology in childbirth. 2011. 13 June [cited 2011 Retrieved July 13, 2011, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/06/110613103815.htm webcite]
  • [9]Klein MC, Janusz K, Hearps SJC, Tomkinson J, Baradaran N, Hall WA, McNiven P, Brant R, Grant J, Dore S, Brasset-Latulippe A, Fraser WD: Birth Technology and Maternal Roles in Birth: Knowledge and Attitudes of Canadian Women Approaching Childbirth for the First Time. J Obstetrics Gynaecol Can 2011, 33(6):598-608.
  • [10]Nettleton S: The Sociology of Health and Ilness. Polity Press, Cambridge; 2006.
  • [11]Green J, Baston HA, Easton S, McCormick F: Greater Expectations ? In Sunmmary Report. Inter-relationships between women’s expectations and experiences of decision making, continuity, choice and control in labour,and psychological outcomes. Mother & Infant Research Unit, Leeds; 2003. Availablefrom:http://www.york.ac.uk/media/healthsciences/documents/miru/GreaterExpdf.pdf webcite [accessed December 1 2011]
  • [12]Green J, Coupland V, Kitzinger S: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence : Intrapartum care care of healthy women and their babies dur ing childbirth. Expectations, experiences, and psychological outcomes of childbirth: a prospective study of 825 women. Birth 1990, 17(1):15-24.
  • [13]Green JM, Baston HA: Have Women Become More Willing to Accept Obstetric Interventions and Does This Relate to Mode of Birth? Data from a Prospective Study. Birth: Issues Perinatal Care 2007, 34(1):6-13.
  • [14]Thomas J, Paranjothy S: The National Sentinal Caesarean Section Audit Report. In Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. RCOG Press, London; 2001.
  • [15]National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE): Antenatal and postnatal mental health: Clinical management and service guidance. In Clinical Guideline No. 47. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE, London; 2007.
  • [16]Austin MP, Highet N, and the Guidelines Expert Advisory Committee: Clinical practice guidelines for depression and related disorders – anxiety, bipolar disorder and puerperal psychosis – in the perinatal period. A guideline for primary care health professionals. beyondblue: the national depression initiative, Melbourne; 2011.
  • [17]Stapleton H: The use of evidenced-based leaflets in materntiy care. In Informed choice in Maternity Care. Edited by Kirkham M. Palgrove McMillan, New York; 2005.
  • [18]Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, SIGN: Postnatal Depression and Puerperal Psychosis: A National Clinical Guideline. 2002. http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/60/index.html webcite.[Accessed December 20]
  • [19]SFOG and SBF (The Swedish Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and The Swedish Association of Midwives): Antenatal care, sexual and reproductive health. Report No. 59 from the expert panel (In Swe) [Mödrahälsovård, Sexuell och Reproduktiv Hälsa]. SFOG, Stockholm, Sweden; 2008.
  • [20]Karlström A, Nystedt A, Johansson M, Hildingsson I: Behind the myth - few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors. Midwifery 2011, 27(5):620-627.
  • [21]Sutherland G, Yelland J, Brown S: Social Inequalities in the Organization of Pregnancy Care in a Universally Funded Public Health Care System. Maternal Child Health J 2011, 16(2):288-296.
  • [22]Huizink AC, Mulder EJH, Robles de Medina PG, Visser GHA, Buitelaar JK: Is pregnancy anxiety a distinctive syndrome? Early Human Dev 2004, 79(2):81-91.
  • [23]Hall WA, Hauck YL, Carty EM, Hutton EK, Fenwick J, Stoll K: Childbirth Fear, Anxiety, Fatigue, and Sleep Deprivation in Pregnant Women. J Obstetric Gynecol Neonatal Nursing 2009, 38(5):567-576.
  • [24]Zar M, Wijma K, Wijma B: Pre – and postpartum fear of childbirth in nulliparous and parous women. Scand J Behav Ther 2001, 30(30):75-84.
  • [25]Alehagen S, Wijma B, Wijma K: Fear of childbirth before, during, and after childbirth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006, 85:56-62.
  • [26]Kjærgaard H, Wijma K, Dykes AK, Alehagen S: Cross-national comparisons of psychosocial aspects of childbirth. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2008, 26(4):340-350. Special Issue
  • [27]Rouhe H, Salmela-Aro K, Halmesmaki E, Saisto T: Fear of childbirth according to parity, gestational age, and obstetric history. BJOG, Br J Obstetrics Gynaecol 2009, 116:67-73.
  • [28]Fenwick J, Gamble J, Nathan E, Bayes S, Hauck Y: Pre- and postpartum levels of childbirth fear and the relationship to birth outcomes in a cohort of Australian women. J Clin Nurs 2009, 18(5):667-677.
  • [29]Haines H, Pallant J, Karlström A, Hildingsson I: Cross-cultural comparison of levels of childbirth-related fear in an Australian and Swedish sample. Midwifery 2011, 27:560-567.
  • [30]Johnson R, Slade P: Does fear of childbirth during pregnancy predict emergency caesarean section? BJOG: Int J Obstetrics Gynaecol 2002, 109(11):1213-1221.
  • [31]Geissbuehler V, Eberhard J: Fear of childbirth during pregnancy: A study of more than 8000 pregnant women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 2002., 23(4)
  • [32]Lowe NK: Self-efficacy for labor and childbirth fears in nulliparous pregnant women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 2000, 21(4):219-224.
  • [33]Raphael-Leff J: Psychological Processes of Childbearing. 4th edition. Anna Freud Centre, London; 2009.
  • [34]Wiklund I, Edman G, Larsson C, Andolf E: Personality and mode of delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006, 85(10):1225-1230.
  • [35]Raphael-Leff J: Healthy Maternal Ambivalence. Stud Maternal 2010., 2I(I)SSN 1759-0434 2009
  • [36]van Bussel JB, Spitz , Demyttenaere K: Childbirth expectations and experiences and associations with mothers’ attitudes to pregnancy, the child and motherhood. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2010, 28(2):143-160.
  • [37]Georgsson Öhman S, Waldenström U: Second-trimester routine ultrasound screening: expectations and experiences in a nationwide Swedish sample. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008, 32:15-22.
  • [38]Kingdon C, Neilson J, Singleton V, Gyte G, Hart A, Gabbay M, Lavender T: Choice and birth method: mixed-method study of caesarean delivery for maternal request. BJOG: Int J Obstetrics Gynaecol 2009, 116(7):886-895.
  • [39]Haines H, Rubertsson C, Pallant J, Hildingsson I: Womens' attitudes and beliefs of childbirth and association with birth preference: A comparison of a Swedish and an Australian sample in mid-pregnancy. Midwiferyin press. corrected proof
  • [40]Briggs SR, Cheek JM: The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. J Personal 1986, 54:106-148.
  • [41]Brown S, Lumley J: The 1993 Survey of Recent Mothers:Issues in survey design, analysis and influencing policy. Int J Qual Health Care 1997, 9:265-277.
  • [42]Waldenström U, Hildingsson I, Ryding EL: Antenatal fear of childbirth and its association with subsequent caesarean section and experience of childbirth. BJOG: Int J Obstetrics Gynaecol 2006, 113(6):638-646.
  • [43]Shannon WD: Cluster analysis. In Handbook of statistics 27: Epidemiology and Medical Statistics. Edited by Rao CR, Miller JP, Rao DC. Elsevier, New York; 2008:342-366.
  • [44]Rothman KJ, Greenland S: Modern Epidemiology. 2nd edition. Lippincott- Raven Publishers, Hagerstown; 1998.
  • [45]Raphael-Leff J: Facilitators and Regulators, Participators and Renouncers: Mothers’and fathers’ orientations towards pregnancy and parenthood. J Psychosomatic Obstetrics Gynaecol 1985, 4:169-184.
  • [46]Nilsson C, Lundgren I, Karlström A, Hildingsson I: Self reported fear of childbirth and its association with women's birth experience and mode of delivery: A longitudinal population-based study. Women Birth 2011, 16(7):16.
  • [47]Melender HL: Experiences of fears associated with pregnancy and childbirth. Birth 2002, 29:101-111.
  • [48]Schytt E, Hildingsson I: Physical and emotional self-rated health among Swedish women and men during pregnancy and the first year of parenthood. Sexual Reprod Healthcare 2011, 2:57-64.
  • [49]Waldenstrom U, Bergman V, Vasell G: The complexity of labor pain: Experiences of 278 women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 1996, 17:215-228.
  • [50]Waldenstrom U, Schytt E: A longitudinal study of women's memory of labour pain--from 2 months to 5 years after the birth. BJOG: Int J Obstetrics Gynaecol 2009, 116(4):577-583.
  • [51]Adams S: Middle-class mothers should be talked out of caesareans. The Telegraph 2012. Thursday March 22 2012
  • [52]Green JM, Kitzinger JV, Coupland VA: Stereotypes of childbearing women: a look at some evidence. Midwifery 1990, 6(3):125-132.
  • [53]Pilley Edwards N: Why can't women just say no. In Informed choice in maternity care. 1st edition. Edited by Kirkham M. Pagrave Macmillan, New York; 2004:302.
  • [54]Lie RK: An examination and critique of Harsanyi's version of utilitarianism. Theor Dec 1986, 21(1):65-83.
  • [55]Ryding EL, Persson A, Onell C, Kvist L: An evaluation of midwives' counseling of pregnant women in fear of childbirth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003, 82(1):10-17.
  • [56]Sydsjö G, Sydsjö A, Gunnervik C, Bladh M, Josefsson A: Obstetric outcome for women who received individualized treatment for fear of childbirth during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011, 91(1):44-49.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:11次