期刊论文详细信息
BMC Infectious Diseases
Microbiological characteristics of sepsis in a University hospital
Carlos Emilio Levy3  Fernando Augusto de Lima Marson3  Angela von Nowakonski1  Adriana Valderez Reis Vendemiato2 
[1] Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Clinical Hospital, State University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil;Methodist University of Piracicaba, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil;Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Tessália Vieira de Camargo 126, “Zeferino Vaz”, Barão Geraldo, Campinas CEP 13083-887, São Paulo, Brazil
关键词: Etiological agent;    Blood cultures;    Antimicrobial resistance;    Sepsis;   
Others  :  1127134
DOI  :  10.1186/s12879-015-0798-y
 received in 2013-12-06, accepted in 2015-02-03,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Microbiological characteristics of sepsis and antimicrobial resistance are well studied, although in State University of Campinas, no data has been published yet.

Methods

The main agents related to sepsis and antimicrobial resistance were analyzed. The blood culture records requested from 4,793 hospitalized patients were analyzed. The samples were processed using the Bact/Alert® system for agent identification and antimicrobial susceptibility.

Results

A total of 1,017 patients met the inclusion criteria for a sepsis diagnosis, with 2,309 samples tested (2.27 samples/patient). There were 489 positive samples (21% positive) isolated from 337 patients (33.13%), but more rigorous criteria excluding potential contaminants resulted in analysis being restricted to 266 patients (315 agents). The prevalent microorganisms were coagulase negative Staphylococcus (CNS) (15.87%), Escherichia coli (13.0%), Staphylococcus aureus (11.7%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (9.8%), Enterobacter sp (9.5%), Acinetobacter baumannii (9.2%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5.7%) and Candida sp (5.1%). Examining antimicrobial resistance in the agents revealed that 51% of the S. aureus isolates were methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and 80% of the CNS isolates were oxacillin-resistant. For A. baumannii, the ideal profile drugs were ampicillin sulbactam and piperacillin/tazobactam, and for P. aeruginosa, they were piperacillin/tazobactam and ceftazidime. Enterobacteria showed on average 32.5% and 35.7% resistance to beta-lactams and ciprofloxacin, respectively. When all Gram-negative bacteria were considered, the resistance to beta-lactams rose to 40.5%, and the resistance to ciprofloxacin rose to 42.3%.

Conclusions

Eighty percent of the agents identified in blood cultures from patients with sepsis belonged to a group of eight different agents. For empirical treatment, carbapenems and vancomycin unfortunately still remain the best therapeutic choice, except for A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa, for which piperacillin/tazobactan is the best option.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Vendemiato et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150220022005670.pdf 365KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R, Osborn TM, Nunnally ME, Townsend SR, Reinhart K, Kleinpell RM, Angus DC, Deutschman CS, Machado FR, Rubenfeld GD, Webb SA, Beale RJ, Vincent JL, Moreno R: Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including the Pediatric Subgroup: Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med 2013, 41(Suppl 2):580-637.
  • [2]Angus DC, Wax RS: Epidemiology of sepsis: an update. Crit Care Med 2001, 29(Suppl 7):S109-16.
  • [3]Bearmen GML, Wenzel RP: Bacteremias: a leading cause of death. Arch Med Res 2005, 36:646-59.
  • [4]Opal SM, LaRosa SP: Year in review 2008: critical care - sepsis. Crit Care 2009, 13(Suppl 5):224. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [5]Dark PM, Dean P, Warhurst G: Review bench-to-bedside review: the promise of rapid infection diagnosis during sepsis using polymerase chain reaction-based pathogen detection. Crit Care 2009, 13(Suppl 4):217. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [6]Dierkes C, Ehrenstein B, Siebig S, Linde HJ, Reischl U, Salzberger B: Clinical impact of a commercially available multiplex PCR system for rapid detection of pathogens in patients with presumed sepsis. BMC Infect Dis 2009, 9:126. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [7]Shapiro NI, Schuetz P, Yano K, Sorasaki M, Parikh SM, Jones AE, et al.: The association of endothelial cell signaling, severity of illness, and organ dysfunction in sepsis. Crit Care 2010, 14:R182. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [8]Pierrakos C, Vincent JL: Sepsis biomarkers: a review. Crit Care 2010, 14:R15. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [9]Reinhart K, Bauer M, Riedemann NC, Hartog CS: New approaches to sepsis: molecular diagnostics and biomarkers. Clinical Microbiol Rev 2012, 25(4):609-34.
  • [10]Murray PR, Masur H: Current approaches to the diagnosis of bacterial and fungal bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2012, 40(Suppl 12):3277-82.
  • [11]Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, et al.: The pediatric subgroup surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med 2013, 39(Suppl 2):165-228.
  • [12]Weinstein MP, Towns ML, Quartey SM, Mirrett S, Reimer LG, Parmigiani G, et al.: The clinical significance of positive blood cultures in the 1990’s; a prospective. Comprehensive evaluation of the microbiology, epidemiology and fungemia in adults. Clin Infect Dis 1997, 24:584-602.
  • [13]Barenfanger J, Graham DR, Kolluri L, Sangwan G, Lawhorn J, Drake CA, et al.: Decreased mortality associated with prompt gram staining of blood cultures. Am J Clin Pathol 2008, 130(Suppl 6):870-6.
  • [14]Mancini N, Carletti S, Ghidoli N, Cichero P, Burioni R, Clementi M: The era of molecular and other non-culture-based methods in diagnosis of sepsis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2010, 23(Suppl 1):235-51.
  • [15]Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, Seifert H, Wenzel RP, Edmond M: Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis 2004, 39:309-17.
  • [16]Cockerill FR 3rd, Wilson JW, Vetter EA, Goodman KM, Torgerson CA, Harmsen WS, et al.: Optimal test parameters for blood cultures. Clin Infect Dis 2004, 38:1724-30.
  • [17]Baron EJ, Weinstein Dunne WM Jr, Yagupsky P, Welch DF, Wilson DM: Cumitech 1C. In Blood cultures IV. Edited by Baron EJ. ASM Press, Washington D.C; 2005.
  • [18]Hall KK, Lyman JA: Updated review of blood culture contamination. Clin Microbiol Rev 2006, 19(Suppl 4):788-802.
  • [19]Silva E, Pedro MA, Sogayar AC, Mohovic T, Silva CL, Janiszewski M, et al.: Brazilian sepsis epidemiological study (BASES study). Crit Care 2004, 8(Suppl 4):R251-60. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [20]Diekema DJ, Pfaller MA, Jones RN, Doern GV, Winokur PL, Gales AC, et al.: Survey of bloodstream infections due to gram-negatives bacilli: frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected in the United States, Canada and Latin America for the Sentry Antimicrobial Surveillance program. Clin Infect Dis 1999, 29(Suppl 3):595-607.
  • [21]Biedenbach DJ, Moet GJ, Jones RN: Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance pattern comparison among bloodstream infection isolates from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. (1977–2002). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2004, 50:59-69.
  • [22]Weinstein MP: Blood culture contamination: persisting problems and partial progress. J Clin Microbiol 2003, 41(Suppl 6):2275-8.
  • [23]Marra AR, Wey SB, Castelo A, Gales AC, Cal RG, Filho JR, et al.: Nosocomial bloodstream infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae: impact of extended-spectrum β lactamase (ESBL) production on clinical outcome in a hospital with high ESBL prevalence. BMC Infect Dis 2006, 6(Suppl 24):1-8.
  • [24]Tumbarello M, Spanu T, Sanguinetti M, Citton R, Montuori E, Leone F, et al.: Bloodstream infections caused by extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing klebsiella pneumoniae: risk factors, molecular epidemiology, and clinical outcome. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006, 50(Suppl 2):498-504.
  • [25]Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute: Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twentieth informational supplement; update M100-S20-U. CLSI, Wayne (PA); 2010.
  • [26]Versalovic J, Carroll KC, Funke G, Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Warnock DW: Manual of clinical microbiology. 10th edition. ASM press, Washington DC; 2011.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:5次 浏览次数:30次