The feasibility of rapid baseline objective physical activity measurement in a natural experimental study of a commuting population

BMC Public Health

David Ogilvie²  Cheryl Chapman¹  Simon Griffin²  Lin Yang² 

[1]MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, Box 285, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom

[2]UKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), Institute of Public Health, Box 296, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0SR, United Kingdom

关键词: Transport;    Physical activity;    Natural experiment;    Accelerometer;   

Others  :  1163022
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-12-841

 received in 2012-07-20, accepted in 2012-09-27,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Studies of the effects of environmental interventions on physical activity should include valid measures of physical activity before and after the intervention. Baseline data collection can be difficult when the timetable for introduction of an intervention is outside researchers’ control. This paper reports and reflects on the practical issues, challenges and results of rapid baseline objective physical activity measurement using accelerometers distributed by post in a natural experimental study.

Methods

A sample of working adults enrolling for the Commuting and Health in Cambridge study and expressing willingness to wear an activity monitor was selected to undertake baseline accelerometer assessment. Each selected participant received a study pack by post containing the core study questionnaire and an accelerometer to wear for seven consecutive days, and was asked to return their accelerometer and completed questionnaire in person or by post using the prepaid special delivery envelope provided. If a pack was not returned within two weeks of issue, a reminder was sent to the participant. Each participant received up to five reminders by various methods including letter, email, telephone and letter sent by recorded delivery.

Results

95% of participants registering for the study were willing in principle to undertake accelerometer assessment. Using a pool of 221 accelerometers, we achieved a total of 714 issues of accelerometers to participants during a six month period. 116 (16%) participants declined to use the accelerometer after receiving it. Three accelerometers failed, 45 (6% of 714) were lost and many were returned with insufficient data recorded, resulted in 109 (15%) participants re-wearing their accelerometer for a second week of measurement. 550 (77%) participants completed data collection, 478 (87% of 550) to the required standard. A total of 694 reminders were issued to retrieve unreturned accelerometers. More than 90% of accelerometers were retrieved after a maximum of two reminders.

Conclusions

It is feasible to use accelerometers to collect baseline objective physical activity data by post from a large number of participants in a limited time period. However, a substantial pool of devices is required and researchers need to be prepared to make significant efforts to recover some of the devices.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Yang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Department of Health: Start active, stay active: a report on physical activity from the four home countries' Chief Medical Officers. London: Department of Health; 2011.
• [2]Bauman A, Armstrong T, Davies J, Owen N, Brown W, Bellew B, Vita P: Trends in physical activity participation and the impact of integrated campaigns among Australian adults, 1997–99. Aust N Z J Public Health 2003, 27(1):76-79.
• [3]Brownson RC, Boehmer TK, Luke DA: Declining rates of physical activity in the United States: what are the contributors? Annu Rev Public Health 2005, 26:421-443.
• [4]Orsini N, Bellocco R, Bottai M, Pagano M, Wolk A: Age and temporal trends of total physical activity among Swedish women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006, 38(2):240-245.
• [5]Sallis JF, Story M, Lou D: Study designs and analytic strategies for environmental and policy research on obesity, physical activity, and diet: recommendations from a meeting of experts. Am J Prev Med 2009, 36(2 Suppl):S72-77.
• [6]McCormack GR, Shiell A: In search of causality: a systematic review of the relationship between the built environment and physical activity among adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011, 8:125. BioMed Central Full Text
• [7]Yang L, Sahlqvist S, McMinn A, Griffin SJ, Ogilvie D: Interventions to promote cycling: systematic review. BMJ 2010, 341:c5293.
• [8]National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Physical activity and the environment: guidance on the promotion and creation of physical environments that support increased levels of physical activity. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2008.
• [9]Craig P, Cooper C, Gunnell D, Haw S, Lawson K, Macintyre S, Ogilvie D, Petticrew M, Reeves B, Sutton M, et al.: Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: guidance for producers and users of evidence. London: Medical Research Council; 2011.
• [10]Ward DS, Evenson KR, Vaughn A, Rodgers AB, Troiano RP: Accelerometer use in physical activity: best practices and research recommendations. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005, 37(11 Suppl):S582-588.
• [11]Craig R, Mindell J, Hirani V: (Eds): Health Survey for England 2008. London: The Information Centre; 2009.
• [12]Golding J, Pembrey M, Jones R: ALSPAC–the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children I. Study methodology. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2001, 15(1):74-87.
• [13]van Sluijs E, Fearne V, Mattocks C, Riddoch C, Griffin S, Ness A: The contribution of active travel to children's physical activity levels: cross-sectional results from the ALSPAC study. Prev Med 2009, 48:519-524.
• [14]van Sluijs EM, Skidmore PM, Mwanza K, Jones AP, Callaghan AM, Ekelund U, Harrison F, Harvey I, Panter J, Wareham NJ, et al.: Physical activity and dietary behaviour in a population-based sample of British 10-year old children: the SPEEDY study (Sport, Physical activity and Eating behaviour: environmental Determinants in Young people). BMC Public Health 2008, 8:388. BioMed Central Full Text
• [15]Aoyagi Y, Park H, Watanabe E, Park S, Shephard RJ: Habitual physical activity and physical fitness in older Japanese adults: the Nakanojo Study. Gerontology 2009, 55(5):523-531.
• [16]Tucker JM, Welk GJ, Beyler NK: Physical activity in U.S.: adults compliance with the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Am J Prev Med 2011, 40(4):454-461.
• [17]Marcus C, Nyberg G, Nordenfelt A, Karpmyr M, Kowalski J, Ekelund U: A 4-year, cluster-randomized, controlled childhood obesity prevention study: STOPP. Int J Obes 2009, 33(4):408-417.
• [18]Keyserling TC, Samuel Hodge CD, Jilcott SB, Johnston LF, Carcia BA, Gizlice Z, Gross MD, Savinon CE, Bangdiwala SI, Will JC, et al.: Randomized trial of a clinic-based, community-supported, lifestyle intervention to improve physical activity and diet: the North Carolina enhanced WISEWOMAN project. Prev Med 2008, 46(6):499-510.
• [19]Trost SG, McIver KL, Pate RR: Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005, 37(11 Suppl):S531-543.
• [20]Giles-Corti B, Knuiman M, Timperio A, Van Niel K, Pikora T, Bull F, Shilton T, Bulsara M: Evaluation of the implementation of a state government community design policy aimed at increasing local walking: design issues and baseline results from RESIDE, Perth Western Australia. Prev Med 2008, 46:46-54.
• [21]Ogilvie D, Mitchell R, Mutrie N, Petticrew M, Platt S: Personal and environmental correlates of active travel and physical activity in a deprived urban population. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2008, 5:43. BioMed Central Full Text
• [22]Ogilvie D, Mitchell R, Mutrie N, Petticrew M, Platt S: Evaluating health effects of transport interventions methodologic case study. Am J Prev Med 2006, 31(2):118-126.
• [23]Ogilvie D, Bull F, Cooper A, Rutter H, Adams E, Brand C, Ghali K, Jones T, Mutrie N, Powell J, et al.: Evaluating the travel, physical activity and carbon impacts of a 'natural experiment' in the provision of new walking and cycling infrastructure: methods for the core module of the iConnect study. BMJ Open 2012, 2(1):e000694.
• [24]Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, et al.: International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003, 35(8):1381-1395.
• [25]Census: Key Statistics - Local Authorities KS01 Usual resident population, accessible at. [http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference-tables.html?edition=tcm%3A77-211026 webcite]
• [26]Ogilvie D, Griffin S, Jones A, Mackett R, Guell C, Panter J, Jones N, Cohn S, Yang L, Chapman C: Commuting and health in Cambridge: a study of a 'natural experiment' in the provision of new transport infrastructure. BMC Public Health 2010, 10:703. BioMed Central Full Text
• [27]Wardle J, Steptoe A: Socioeconomic differences in attitudes and beliefs about healthy lifestyles. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003, 57(6):440-443.
• [28]Panter J, Griffin S, Jones A, Mackett R, Ogilvie D: Correlates of time spent walking and cycling to and from work: baseline results from the commuting and health in Cambridge study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011, 8:124. BioMed Central Full Text
• [29]Census: Key Statistics - Urban areas in England and Wales KS13 Qualifications and students. [http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference-tables.html?edition=tcm%3A77-211059 webcite]