Stress and stability comparison between different systems for high tibial osteotomies

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Ching-Shiow Tseng²  Chun-Ming Chen²  Shang-Chih Lin³  Shi-Yuan Hua¹  Chu-An Luo² 

[1] Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan;Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan, Taiwan;Graduate Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, No. 43, Sec. 4, Keelung Road, Taipei, 106, Taiwan

关键词: Tibial plate;    Locking screw;    Finite-element analysis;    High tibial osteotomy;    Knee;   

Others  :  1133198
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2474-14-110

 received in 2012-10-16, accepted in 2013-03-14,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) with a medial opening wedge has been used to treat medial compartment osteoarthritis. However, this makes the proximal tibia a highly unstable structure and causes plate and screws to be the potentials sources for mechanical failure. Consequently, proper design and use of the fixation device are essential to the HTO especially for overweight or full weight-bearing patients.

Methods

Based on the CT-based images, a tibial finite-element model with medial opening was simulated and instrumented with one-leg and two-leg plate systems. The construct was subjected to physiological and surgical loads. Construct stresses and wedge micromotions were chosen as the comparison indices.

Results

The use of locking screws can stabilize the construct and decrease the implant and bone stresses. Comparatively, the two-leg design provides a wider load-sharing base to form a force-couple mechanism that effectively reduces construct stresses and wedge micromotions. However, the incision size, muscular stripping, and structural rigidity are the major concerns of using the two-leg systems. The one-leg plates behave as the fulcrum of the leverage system and make the wedge tip the zone of tension and thus have been reported to negatively affect the callus formation.

Conclusions

The choice of the HTO plates involved the trade-off between surgical convenience, construct stability, and stress-shielding effect. If the stability of the medial opening is the major concern, the two-leg system is suggested for the patients with heavy load demands and greater proximal tibial size. The one-leg system with locking screws can be used for the majority of the patients without heavy bodyweight and poor bone quality.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Luo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Ryohei T, Hiroyuki I, Masato A, Haruhiko B, Izumi S, Ken K, Yasuhsi A, Tomoyuki S: Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy with early full weight bearing. J Arth Rel Surg 2009, 25:46-53.
• [2]Blecha LD, Zambelli PY, Ramaniraka NA, Bourban PE, Manson JA, Pioletti DP: How plate positioning impacts the biomechanics of the open wedge tibial osteotomy: A finite element analysis. Comp Meth Biomech Biomed Eng 2005, 8:307-313.
• [3]Coventry MB: Osteotomy of the upper portion of the tibia for degenerative arthritis of the knee: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1965, 47:984-990.
• [4]Jackson JP, Waugh W, Green JP, Wood H: High tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1969, 51:88-94.
• [5]Su CL, Kwang AJ, Chang HN, Soong HJ, Seung HH: The short-term follow-up results of open wedge high tibial osteotomy with using an aescula open wedge plate and an allogenic bone graft: the minimum 1-year follow-up results. Clin Orthop Surg 2010, 2:47-54.
• [6]Staubli AE, Simoni CD, Babst R, Lobenhoffer P: TomoFix: a new LCP-concept for open wedge osteotomy of the medial proximal tibia – early results in 92 cases. Injury 2003, 34:55-62.
• [7]Spahn G, Wittig R: Primary stability of various implants in tibial opening wedge osteotomy: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Sci 2002, 7:683-687.
• [8]Amendola A, Bonasia DE: Results of high tibial osteotomy: review of the literature. Int Orthop 2010, 34:115-160.
• [9]Agneskirchner JD, Freiling D, Hurschler C, Lobenhoffer P: Primary stability of four different implants for opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006, 14:291-300.
• [10]Stoffel K, Stachowiak G, Kuster M: Open wedge high tibial osteotomy biomechanical investigation of the modified Arthrex Osteotomy Plate and the TomoFix Plate. Clin Biomech 2004, 19:944-950.
• [11]Nelissen EM, Langelaan EJ, Nelissen RGHH: Stability of medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a failure analysis. Int Orthop 2010, 34:217-223.
• [12]Spahn G: Complications in high tibial (medial opening wedge) osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004, 124:649-653.
• [13]Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner JD: Improvements in surgical technique of valgus high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2003, 11:132-138.
• [14]Kolb W, Guhlmann H, Windisch C, Kolb K, Koller H, Grützner P: Opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy with a locked low-profile plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91:2581-2588.
• [15]Zaki SH, Rae PJ: High tibial valgus osteotomy using the Tomofix plate-medium-term results in young patients. Acta Orthop Belq 2009, 75:360-367.
• [16]Valkering KP, van den Bekerom MP, Kappelhoff FM, Albers GH: Complications after tomofix medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. J Knee Surg 2009, 22:218-225.
• [17]Brosset T, Pasquierb G, Migaudb H, Gougeon F: Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy performed without filling the defect but with locking plate fixation (TomoFix™) and early weight-bearing: Prospective evaluation of bone union, precision and maintenance of correction in 51 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2011, 97:705-711.
• [18]Noyes FR, Mayfield W, Barber-Westin SD, Albright JC, Heckmann TP: Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: an operative technique and rehabilitation program to decrease complications and promote early union and function. Am J Sports Med 2006, 34:1262-1273.
• [19]Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD, Hewett TE: High tibial osteotomy and ligament reconstruction for varus angulated anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Am J Sports Med 2000, 28:282-296.
• [20]Hankemeier S, Hufner T, Wang G, Kendoff D, Zeichen J, Zheng G, Krettek C: Navigated open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: advantages and disadvantages compared to the conventional technique in a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006, 14:917-921.
• [21]Hoffler CE, Moore KE, Kozloff K, Zysset PK, Goldstein SA: Age, gender, and bone lamellae elastic moduli. J Orthop Res 2000, 18:432-437.
• [22]Reillya DT, Burstein AH: The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J Biomech 1975, 8:393-396.
• [23]Taylor WR, Heller MO, Bergmann G, Duda GN: Tibio-femoral loading during human gait and stair climbing. J Orthopaedic Res 2004, 22:625-632.
• [24]Johnson F, Scarrow P, Waugh W: Assessments of loads in the knee joint. Med Biol Eng Comp 1981, 19:237-243.
• [25]Gueorguiev B, Ockert B, Schwieger K, Wähnert D, Lawson SM, Windolf M, Stoffel K: Angular stability potentially permits fewer locking screws compared with conventional locking in intramedullary nailed distal tibia fractures: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Trauma 2011, 25:340-346.
• [26]Eric JS, Ran S, Frederick K, Kenneth AE: The current status of locked plating: the good, the Bad, and the ugly. J Orthop Trauma 2008, 22:479-486.
• [27]Joseph BC, Casey D, David MW, John MK, Susan PJ, Ross HP: Comparison of the mechanical behaviors of locked and nonlocked plate/screw fixation applied to experimentally induced rotational osteotomies in canine ilia. Vet Surg 2012, 41:103-113.
• [28]Seide K, Zierold W, Wolter D, Kortmann HR: The effect of an angle-stable plate-screw connection and various screw diameters on the stability of plate osteosynthesis. An FE model study. Unfallchirurg 1990, 93:552-558.
• [29]Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C: Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986, 208:108-113.
• [30]Benli S, Aksoy S, HavItcIoglu H, Kucuk M: Evaluation of bone plate with low-stiffness material in terms of stress distribution. J Biomech 2008, 41:3229-3235.
• [31]Fan Y, Xiu K, Duan H, Zhang M: Biomechanical and histological evaluation of the application of biodegradable poly-L-lactic cushion to the plate internal fixation for bone fracture healing. Clin Biochem 2008, 23:S7-16.
• [32]Augat P, Burger J, Schorlemmer S, Henke T, Peraus M, Claes L: Shear movement at the fracture site delays healing in a diaphyseal fracture model. J Orthop Res 2003, 21:1011-1017.
• [33]Noordeen MH, Lavy CB, Shergill NS, Tuite JD, Jackson AM: Cyclical micromovement and fracture healing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995, 77:645-648.
• [34]Raja Izaham RM, Abdul Kadir MR, Abdul Rashid AH, Hossain MG, Kamarul T: Finite element analysis of Puddu and Tomofix plate fixation for open wedge high tibial osteotomy. Injury 2012, 43:898-902.
• [35]KazImoglu C, Akdogan Y, Sener M, Kurtulmus A, KarapInar H, Uzun B: Which is the best fixation method for lateral cortex disruption in the medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy? A biomechanical study. Knee 2008, 15:305-308.
• [36]Sato H, Morishita S: Effect of quadriceps exercise on synostosis following tibial osteotomy with internal fixation: a finite element simulation. Clin Biomech 1999, 14:1-6.
• [37]Koshino T, Murase T, Saito T: Medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy with use of porous hydroxyapatite to treat medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85A:78-85.
• [38]Rodner CM, Adams DJ, Diaz-Doran V, Tate JP, Santangelo SA, Mazzocca AD, Arciero RA: Medial opening wedge tibial osteotomy and the sagittal plane: the effect of increasing tibial slope on tibiofemoral contact pressure. Am J Sports Med 2006, 34:1431-1441.
• [39]Christoph BM, Emanuel G, Stefan WW, Roland PJ: Accuracy of frontal and sagittal plane correction in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. J Arthros Rel Surg 2004, 20:366-372.
• [40]Kim SH, Chang SH, Jung HJ: The finite element analysis of a fractured tibia applied by composite bone plates considering contact conditions and time-varying properties of curing tissues. Compos Struct 2010, 92:2109-2118.