Effect of telemedicine follow-up care of leg and foot ulcers: a systematic review

BMC Health Services Research

Marjolein M Iversen¹  Marianne Tveit Haavind²  Lena Victoria Nordheim² 

[1] Department of Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway;Centre for Evidence-Based Practice, Bergen University College, Bergen, N-5020, Norway

关键词: Telemedicine;    Leg ulcers;    Foot ulcers;    Systematic review;   

Others  :  1092257
DOI  :  10.1186/s12913-014-0565-6

 received in 2013-07-16, accepted in 2014-10-24,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Leg ulcers and diabetes-related foot ulcers are frequent and costly complications of their underlying diseases and thus represent a critical issue for public health. Since the population is aging, the prevalence of these conditions will probably increase considerably and require more resources. Treatment of leg and foot ulcers often demands frequent contact with the health care system, may pose great burden on the patient, and involves follow-up in both primary and specialist care. Telemedicine provides potential for more effective care management of leg and foot ulcers. The objective of this systematic review of the literature was to assess the effect of telemedicine follow-up care on clinical, behavioral or organizational outcomes among patients with leg and foot ulcers.

Methods

We searched Ovid MEDLINE (1980–), Ovid EMBASE (1980–), Clinical Trials in the Cochrane Library (via Wiley), Ebsco CINAHL with Fulltext (1981–) and SveMed + (1977–) up to May 2014 for relevant articles. We considered randomized controlled trials, non-randomized trials, controlled before-after studies and prospective cohort studies for inclusion and selected studies according to predefined criteria. Three reviewers independently assessed the included studies using the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool. We performed a narrative synthesis of results and assessed the strength of evidence for each outcome using GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation).

Results

Only one non-randomized study was included. The study (n = 140) measured the effect of real-time interactive video consultation compared with face-to-face follow-up on healing time, adjusted healing ratio and the number of ulcers at 12 weeks among patients with neuropathic forefoot ulcerations. There were no statistically significant differences in results of the different outcomes between patients receiving telemedicine and traditional follow-up. We assessed the study to have a high risk of bias.

Conclusions

There is insufficient evidence available to unambiguously determine whether telemedicine consultation of leg and foot ulcers is as effective as traditional follow-up.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Nordheim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Armstrong DG, Kanda VA, Lavery LA, Marston W, Mills JL, Boulton AJM: Mind the Gap: disparity between research funding and costs of care for diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care 2013, 36:1815-1817.
• [2]St. Meld. nr. 47 (2008–2009) Samhandlingsreformen. Rett Behandling – på Rett Sted – til Rett tid. [in Norwegian] [Report to the Storting White Paper No. 47 (2008–2009) The Coordination Reform. Right Treatment – at the Right Place - at the Right Time]. Ministry, Oslo; 2009.
• [3]Graham I, Harrison M, Nelson E, Lorimer K, Fisher A: Prevalence of lower-limb ulceration: a systematic review of prevalence studies. Advances in Skin & Wound Care 2003, 16:305-316.
• [4]Abbott CA, Carrington AL, Ashe H, Bath S, Every LC, Griffiths J, Hann AW, Hussein A, Jackson N, Johnson KE, Ryder CH, Torkington R, Van Ross ER, Whalley AM, Widdows P, Williamson S, Boulton AJ: The North-West diabetes foot care study: incidence of, and risk factors for, new diabetic foot ulceration in a community-based patient cohort. Diabetic Medicine 2002, 19:377-384.
• [5]Muller IS, de Grauw WJC, van Gerwen WHEM, Bartelink ML, van Den Hoogen HJM, Rutten GEHM: Foot ulceration and lower limb amputation in type 2 diabetic patients in dutch primary health care. Diabetes Care 2002, 25:570-574.
• [6]Ramsey S, Newton K, Blough D, McCulloch D, Sandhu N, Reiber G, Wagner E: Incidence, outcomes, and cost of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999, 22:382-387.
• [7]St. Meld. nr. 16 (2010–2011) Nasjonal Helse- og Omsorgsplan (2011–2015). [in Norwegian] [Report to the Storting White Paper No. 16 (2010–2011) National Health and Care Plan (2011–2015)]. Ministry, Oslo; 2011.
• [8]Ekeland AG, Bowes A, Flottorp S: Effectiveness of telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews. International Journal of Medical Informas 2010, 79:736-771.
• [9]A Guide to Assessing Telecommunication in Health Care. National Acadamy Press, Washington D.C; 1996.
• [10]Prompers L, Huijberts M, Apelqvist J, Jude E, Piaggesi A, Bakker K, Edmonds M, Holstein P, Jirkovska A, Mauricio D, Tennvall GR, Reike H, Spraul M, Uccioli L, Urbancic V, Van Acker K, Van Baal J, Van Merode F, Schaper N: Delivery of care to diabetic patients with foot ulcers in daily practice: results of the Eurodiale Study, a prospective cohort study. Diabetic Medicine 2008, 25:700-707.
• [11]Ribu L, Wahl A: How patients with diabetes who have foot and leg ulcers perceive the nursing care they receive. Journal of Wound Care 2004, 13:65-68.
• [12]Van Battum P, Schaper N, Prompers L, Apelqvist J, Jude E, Piaggesi A, Bakker K, Edmonds M, Holstein P, Jirkovska A, Mauricio D, Ragnarson Tennvall G, Reike H, Spraul M, Uccioli L, Urbancic V, van Acker K, van Baal J, Ferreira I, Huijberts M: Differences in minor amputation rate in diabetic foot disease throughout Europe are in part explained by differences in disease severity at presentation. Diabetic Medicine 2011, 28:199-205.
• [13]Ylönen M, Stolt M, Leino-Kilpi H, Suhonen R: Nurses’ knowledge about venous leg ulcer care: a literature review. International Nursing Review 2014, 61:194-202.
• [14]Boulton AJ, Armstrong DG, Albert SF, Frykberg RG, Hellman R, Kirkman MS, Lavery LA, Lemaster JW, Mills JL Sr, Mueller MJ, Sheehan P, Wukich DK: Comprehensive foot examination and risk assessment: a report of the task force of the foot care interest group of the AmericanDiabetes Association, with endorsement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. Diabetes Care 2008, 31:1679-1685.
• [15]Clemensen J, Larsen SB, Kirkevold M, Ejskjaer N: Treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in the home: video consultations as an alternative to outpatient hospital care.International J Telemedicine and Applications; 2008: doi:10.1155/2008/132890.
• [16][http:/ / www.innomed.no/ media/ media/ prosjekter/ rapporter/ 59_-_Telemedisinsk_oppfolging_av_di abetes_fotsar.pdf] webcite Iversen MM, Hausken MF, Katrine Vetlesen: Diabetes fotsår. Utvikling av nye telemedisinske systemer/ produkter [in Norwegian]. Diabetes foot ulcers. Development of new telemedicine systems/ products; 2012. []
• [17]McGill M, Constantino M, Yue DK: Integrating telemedicine into a national diabetes footcare network. Practical Diabetes International 2000, 17:235-238.
• [18]Currell R, Urquhart C, Wainwright P, Lewis R: Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000, (2). Art. No.: CD002098. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002098.
• [19]Ekeland A, Bowes A, Flottorp S: Methodologies for assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2012, 81:1-11.
• [20]Hersh WR, Hickam DH, Severance SM, Dana TL, Krages KP, Helfand M: Diagnosis, access and outcomes: update of a systematic review of telemedicine services. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2006, 12(Suppl 2):S3-S31.
• [21]Jackson CL, Bolen S, Brancati FL, Batts-Turner ML, Gary TL: A systematic review of interactive computer-assisted technology in diabetes care. Interactive information technology in diabetes care. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2006, 21:105-110.
• [22]Jaana M, Paré G: Home telemonitoring of patients with diabetes: a systematic assessment of observed effects. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2007, 13:242-253.
• [23]McLean S, Chandler D, Nurmatov U, Liu J, Pagliari C, Car J, Sheikh A: Telehealthcare for asthma.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, (10). Art. No.: CD007717. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007717.pub2.
• [24]Paré G, Jaana M, Sicotte C: Systematic review of home telemonitoring for chronic diseases: the evidence base. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2007, 14:269-277.
• [25]Verhoeven F, van Gemert-Pijnen L, Dijkstra K, Nijland N, Seydel E, Steehouder M: The contribution of teleconsultation and videoconferencing to diabetes care: a systematic literature review.Journal of Medical Internet Research 2007, 9:e37.
• [26]Verhoeven F, Tanja-Dijkstra K, Nijland N, Eysenbach G, van Gemert-Pijnen L: Asynchronous and synchronous teleconsultation for diabetes care: a systematic literature review. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology 2010, 4:666-684.
• [27]Larsen SB: Diabetes og telemedicin. Ugeskrift for Læger 2010, 172:2034-2040.
• [28]Bowles KH, Dansky KH: Teaching self-management of diabetes. Home Healthcare Nurse 2002, 20:36-42.
• [29]Santamaria N, Carville K, Ellis I, Prentice J: The effectiveness of digital imaging and remote expert wound consultation on healing rates in chronic lower leg ulcers in the Kimberley region of Western Australia. Primary Intention: The Australian Journal of Wound Management 2011, 12:62-70.
• [30]Dobke MK, Bhavsar D, Gosman A, De Neve J, De Neve B: Pilot trial of telemedicine as a decision aid for patients with chronic wounds. Telemedicine and e-Health 2008, 14:245-249.
• [31]Hands LJ, Clarke M, Mahaffey W, Francis H, Jones RW: An e-health approach to managing vascular surgical patients. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health 2006, 12:672-680.
• [32]Kim HM, Lowery JC, Hamill JB, Wilkins EG: Patient attitudes toward a web-based system for monitoring chronic wounds. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health 2004, 10(Suppl. 2):S-26-S-34.
• [33]Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC: Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In Cochrane handbook of systematic reviews of interventions Version 510 [updated March 2011]. Edited by Higgins JPT, Green S. The Cochrane Collaboration, London; 2011.
• [34]Standards of medical care in diabetes—2012 Diabetes Care 2012, 35(Suppl.1):S11-S63.
• [35]Claudi T, Abramhamsen R, Andersen S, Basharat F, Birkeland K, Cooper J, Furuseth K, Hanssen K, Hausken M, Jenum A, Dahl Jørgensen K, Lorentsen N, Midthjell K, Næbb H: Nasjonale Faglige Retningslinjer Diabetes, Forebygging, Diagnostikk og Behandling [in Norwegian] National Guidelines Diabetes. Prevention, Diagnostics and Treatment. Helsedirektoratet, Oslo; 2009.
• [36]Prompers L, Huijberts M, Apelqvist J, Jude E, Piaggesi A, Bakker K, Edmonds M, Holstein P, Jirkovska A, Mauricio D, Tennvall GR, Reike H, Spraul M, Uccioli L, Urbancic V, Van Acker K, Van Baal J, Van Merode F, Schaper N: Optimal organization of health care in diabetic foot disease: introduction to the Eurodiale study. International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds 2007, 6:11-17.
• [37]Margolis D, Allen-Taylor L, Hoffstad O, Berlin J: Diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers: predicting which ones will not heal. American Journal of Medicine 2003, 115:627-631.
• [38]Position Document. Hard-to-Heal Wounds: A Holistic Approach. MEP Ltd, London; 2008.
• [39]Williams LH, Rutter CM, Katon WJ, Reiber GE, Ciechanowski P, Heckbert SR, Lin EHB, Ludman EJ, Oliver MM, Young BA, Von Korff M: Depression and incident diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective cohort study. American Journal of Medicine 2010, 123:748-754. e743
• [40][Computer program on www.grade.org]. Version June 2014. McMaster University, Hamilton; 2014.
• [41]Edmondson M, Prentice J, Fielder K, Mulligan S: WoundsWest advisory service pilot: an innovative delivery of wound management. Wound Practice & Research 2010, 18:180-188.
• [42]Edwards H, Courtney M, Finlayson K, Shuter P, Lindsay E: A randomised controlled trial of a community nursing intervention: improved quality of life and healing for clients with chronic leg ulcers. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2009, 18:1541-1549.
• [43]Lazzarini PA, Clark D, Mann RD, Perry RD, Thomas CJ, Kuys SS: Does the use of store-and-forward telehealth systems improve outcomes for clinicians managing diabetic foot ulcers? A pilot study. Wound Practice & Research 2010, 18:164-172.
• [44]Manuel P: A prospective, interventional study of the effectiveness of digital wound imaging, remote consultation and podiatry offloading devices on the healing rates of chronic lower extremity wounds in remote regions of Western Australia. Wound Practice & Research 2012, 20:103-109.
• [45]Nagykaldi Z, Mold JW: Diabetes patient tracker, a personal digital assistant-based diabetes management system for primary care practices in Oklahoma. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics 2003, 5:997-1001.
• [46]Nyheim B, Lotherington AT, Steen A: Nettbasert sårveiledning. Kunnskapsutvukling og bedre mestring av leggsårbehandling i hjemmetjenesten [in Norwegian]. [Online wound guidance. Knowledge development and better management of leg wound treatment in home care]. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Helseforskning 2010, 6:40-55.
• [47]Wilbright WA, Birke JA, Patout CA, Varnado M, Horswell R: The Use of telemedicine in the management of diabetic-related foot ulceration: a pilot study. Advances in Skin and Wound Care 2004, 17:232-238.
• [48]Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Mitchie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M: Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance.BMJ 2008, 337:a1655. doi:10.1136/bmj.a1655.
• [49]Gottrup F, Apelqvist J, Price P: Outcomes in controlled and comparative studies on non-healing wounds: recommendations to improve the quality of evidence in wound management. Journal of Wound Care 2010, 19:237-268.
• [50]Iversen MM, Tell GS, Riise T, Hanestad BR, Østbye T, Graue M, Midthjell K: History of foot ulcer increases mortality among individuals with diabetes: a ten year follow-up of the Nord-Trøndelag health study, Norway. Diabetes Care 2009, 32:2193-2199.
• [51]Fayers PM, Jordhoy MS, Kaasa S: Cluster-randomized trials. Palliative Medicine 2002, 16:69-70.
• [52]Matusitz J, Breen GM: Telemedicine: its effects on health communication. Health Communun 2007, 21:73-83.
• [53]Brown P, Brunnhuber K, Chalkidou K, Chalmers I, Clarke M, Fenton M, Forbes C, Glanville J, Hicks NJ, Moody J, Twaddle S, Timimi H, Young P: How to formulate research recommendations. BMJ 2006, 333:804-806. doi:10.1136/bmj.38987.492014.94