Saudi dental students’ perceptions of pediatric behavior guidance techniques

BMC Medical Education

Manal A. Al-Mutairi¹  Asma M. Al-Jobair¹ 

[1] Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia

关键词: Dental education;    Pediatric dentistry;    Behavior guidance techniques;    Saudi dental students;   

Others  :  1225417
DOI  :  10.1186/s12909-015-0382-6

 received in 2014-12-04, accepted in 2015-05-19,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Dental students receive theoretical and clinical training in pediatric behavioral guidance techniques at university. Therefore, the content of the educational course and the degree of training in behavioral techniques may have an impact on the students’ perceptions and practice of such techniques. The purpose of this study was to evaluate Saudi dental students’ perceptions of behavior guidance techniques used in pediatric dentistry, and to assess the changes in their perceptions after 1 academic year of a didactic and clinical educational course.

Methods

This longitudinal study was carried out once at the beginning and once at the end of the 2013/2014 academic year at the College of Dentistry, King Saud University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A questionnaire measuring the perceived acceptability of behavior guidance techniques was completed by 78 fourth-year dental students before and after a pediatric dental course. Acceptability ratings were scored on a 5-point Likert scale and compared and evaluated in relation to demographic data. Paired t-test and one-way analysis of variance were used for the statistical analyses.

Results

Before the course, the highest scores were for reinforcement and desensitizing techniques and the lowest were for aversive and communicative techniques. After the course, statistically significant increases were found in the acceptability of aversive techniques (voice control and hand-over-mouth), all pharmacological techniques, and modeling. Most communicative techniques and clinical situations were also rated as significantly more acceptable. Statistically significant decreases in acceptability ratings were found in promising a toy, and immobilization by staff or a parent. Immobilization using a papoose board, modeling, the presence of parents during the child’s treatment, and most communicative techniques were rated as significantly more acceptable by male students than female students.

Conclusions

In general, Saudi dental students rated most basic behavior guidance techniques as acceptable. An educational course, including didactic and clinical components, improved their acceptability ratings, and had a considerable influence on their perceptions of behavior guidance in pediatric dentistry.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Al-Jobair and Al-Mutairi.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Feigal RJ. Guiding and managing the child dental patient: a fresh look at old pedagogy. J Dent Educ. 2001; 65:1369-77.
• [2]Guideline on behavior guidance for the pediatric dental patient. Pediatr Dent. 2014; 36:179-91.
• [3]Adair SM. Behavior management conference panel I report: rationale for behavior management techniques in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent. 2004; 26:167-70.
• [4]Lewis A. The issue of perception: some educational implications. Educare. 2001; 30:272-88.
• [5]Guideline on behavior guidance for the pediatric dental patient. Pediatr Dent. 2006; 28:132-40.
• [6]Sotto JJ, Azari AF, Riley J, Bimstein E. First-year students’ perceptions about pediatric dental behavior guidance techniques: the effect of education. J Dent Educ. 2008; 72:1029-41.
• [7]Bimstein E, Azari AF, Sotto JJ, Riley JL. Students’ perceptions about pediatric dental behavior guidance in an undergraduate four-year dental curriculum. J Dent Educ. 2009; 73:1366-71.
• [8]Adair SM, Schafer TE, Rockman RA, Waller JL. Survey of behavior management teaching in predoctoral pediatric dentistry programs. Pediatr Dent. 2004; 26:143-50.
• [9]Abushal MS, Adenubi JO. Attitudes of Saudi parents toward behavior management techniques in pediatric dentistry. J Dent Child. 2003; 70:104-10.
• [10]Abushal M, Adenubi J. Attitudes of Saudi parents toward separation from their children during dental treatment. Saudi Dent J. 2009; 21:63-7.
• [11]Abushal M, Adenubi J. The use of behavior management techniques by dentists in Saudi Arabia: a survey. Saudi Dent J. 2000; 12:129-34.
• [12]York KM, Mlinac ME, Deibler MW, Creed TA, Ganem I. Pediatric behavior management techniques: a survey of predoctoral students. J Dent Educ. 2007; 71:532-9.
• [13]Crossley ML, Joshi G. An investigation of paediatric dentists’ attitudes towards parental accompaniment and behavioural management techniques in the UK. Br Dent J. 2002; 192:517-21.
• [14]Eaton JJ, McTigue DJ, Fields HW, Beck M. Attitudes of contemporary parents toward behavior management techniques used in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent. 2005; 27:107-13.
• [15]Peretz B, Glaicher H, Ram D. Child-management techniques. Are there differences in the way female and male pediatric dentists in Israel practice? Braz Dent J. 2003; 14:82-6.