A comparison of two treatments for childhood apraxia of speech: methods and treatment protocol for a parallel group randomised control trial

BMC Pediatrics

Kirrie J Ballard¹  Patricia McCabe¹  Elizabeth Murray¹ 

[1] Speech Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, PO Box 170, Lidcombe, 1825, Sydney, Australia

关键词: Nuffield dyspraxia programme;    Rapid syllable transition treatment;    Intervention;    Randomised control trial;    Effectiveness;    Treatment;    Childhood apraxia of speech;   

Others  :  1170715
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2431-12-112

 received in 2012-07-18, accepted in 2012-07-25,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Childhood Apraxia of Speech is an impairment of speech motor planning that manifests as difficulty producing the sounds (articulation) and melody (prosody) of speech. These difficulties may persist through life and are detrimental to academic, social, and vocational development. A number of published single subject and case series studies of speech treatments are available. There are currently no randomised control trials or other well designed group trials available to guide clinical practice.

Methods/Design

A parallel group, fixed size randomised control trial will be conducted in Sydney, Australia to determine the efficacy of two treatments for Childhood Apraxia of Speech: 1) Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment and the 2) Nuffield Dyspraxia Programme – Third edition. Eligible children will be English speaking, aged 4–12 years with a diagnosis of suspected CAS, normal or adjusted hearing and vision, and no comprehension difficulties or other developmental diagnoses. At least 20 children will be randomised to receive one of the two treatments in parallel. Treatments will be delivered by trained and supervised speech pathology clinicians using operationalised manuals. Treatment will be administered in 1-hour sessions, 4 times per week for 3 weeks. The primary outcomes are speech sound and prosodic accuracy on a customised 292 item probe and the Diagnostic Evaluation of Articulation and Phonology inconsistency subtest administered prior to treatment and 1 week, 1 month and 4 months post-treatment. All post assessments will be completed by blinded assessors. Our hypotheses are: 1) treatment effects at 1 week post will be similar for both treatments, 2) maintenance of treatment effects at 1 and 4 months post will be greater for Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment than Nuffield Dyspraxia Programme treatment, and 3) generalisation of treatment effects to untrained related speech behaviours will be greater for Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment than Nuffield Dyspraxia Programme treatment. This protocol was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee, University of Sydney (#12924).

Discussion

This will be the first randomised control trial to test treatment for CAS. It will be valuable for clinical decision-making and providing evidence-based services for children with CAS.

Trial Registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12612000744853

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Murray et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]American Speech-Language-Hearing Association: Childhood apraxia of speech [Technical report]. 2007. Available from www.asha.org/policy webcite.
• [2]Nijland L, Maasen B, van der Meulen S, Gabreels F, Kraaimaat FW, Schreuder R: Coarticulation patterns in children with developmental apraxia of speech. Clin Linguist Phon 2002, 16(6):461-483.
• [3]Terband H, Maassen B, van Lieshout P, Nijland L: Stability and composition of functional synergies for speech movements in children with developmental speech disorders. J Commun Disord 2011, 44(1):59-74.
• [4]Grigos MI, Kolenda N: The relationship between articulatory control and improved phonemic accuracy in childhood apraxia of speech: a longitudinal case study. Clin Linguist Phon 2010, 24(1):17-40.
• [5]Velleman SL, Shriberg LD: Metrical analysis of the speech of children with suspected developmental apraxia of speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999, 42:1444-1460.
• [6]Lewis BA, Freebairn LA, Hansen AJ, Iyengar SK, Taylor HG: School-age follow-up of children with childhood apraxia of speech. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2004, 35(2):122-140.
• [7]Gillon GT, Moriarty BC: Childhood apraxia of speech: children at risk for persistent reading and spelling disorder. Semin Speech Lang 2007, 28(1):48-57.
• [8]Lewis BA, Freebairn LA, Hansen A, Taylor HG, Iyengar S, Shriberg LD: Family pedigrees of children with suspected childhood apraxia of speech. J Commun Disord 2004, 37(2):157-175.
• [9]Felsenfeld S, Broen PA, McGue M: A 28-year follow up of adults with a history of moderate phonological disorder: educational and occupational results. J Speech Hear Res 1994, 37:1341-1353.
• [10]Forrest K: Diagnostic criteria of developmental apraxia of speech used by clinical speech-language pathologists. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2003, 12(3):376-380.
• [11]Strand EA, Stoeckel R, Baas B: Treatment of severe childhood apraxia of speech: a treatment efficacy study. J Med Speech Lang Pathol 2006, 14(4):297-307.
• [12]Ballard KJ, Robin DA, McCabe P, McDonald J: A treatment for dysprosody in childhood apraxia of speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2010, 53(5):1227-1245.
• [13]Maas E, Butalla CE, Farinella KA: Feedback frequency in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech. Am J Speech-Lang Pathol 2012.
• [14]Morgan AT, Vogel AP: Intervention for childhood apraxia of speech. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009, 1:1.
• [15]McNeill BC, Gillon GT, Dodd B: Effectiveness of an integrated phonological awareness approach for children with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Child Lang Teach Therapy 2009, 25(3):341-366.
• [16]McCabe P, Macdonald-DaSilva A, Van Rees L, Arciuli J, Ballard K: Using orthographic cues to improve speech production in children with & without childhood apraxia of speech. In Oral presentation at Motor speech conference. , Savannah, Georgia, USA; 2010.
• [17]Strand EA, Debertine P: The efficacy of integral stimulation intervention with developmental apraxia of speech. J Med Speech Lang Pathol 2000, 8(4):295-300.
• [18]Strand EA, Stoeckel R, Baas B: Treatment of severe childhood apraxia of speech: a treatment efficacy study. J Med Speech 2006, 14(4):297-307.
• [19]Belton E: Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Nuffield Dyspraxia Programme as a treatment approach for children with severe speech disorders. University College, London; 2006.
• [20]Lundeborg I, McAllister A: Treatment with a combination of intra-oral sensory stimulation and electropalatography in a child with severe developmental dyspraxia. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology 2007, 32(2):71-79.
• [21]Teal J: An investigation into classification approaches and therapy outcomes for a child with a severe persisteing speech difficulty. University of Sheffield, Sheffield; 2005.
• [22]McNeill BC, Gillon GT, Dodd B: A longitudinal case study of the effects of an integrated phonological awareness program for identical twin boys with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Int J Speech-Lang Pathol 2009, 11(6):482-495.
• [23]Moriarty BC, Gillon GT: Phonological awareness intervention for children with childhood apraxia of speech. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2006, 41(6):713-734.
• [24]Binger C, Light J: The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC. AAC: Augmentative Alternat Commun 2007, 23(1):30-43.
• [25]Cumley GD, Swanson S: Augmentative and alternative communication options for children with developmental apraxia of speech: three case studies. AAC: Augmentative Altern Commun 1999, 15(2):110-125.
• [26]Harris L, Doyle ES, Haaf R: Language treatment approach for users of AAC: experimental single-subject investigation. AAC: Augmentative Altern Commun 1996, 12(4):230-243.
• [27]Bornman J, Alant E, Meiring E: The use of a digital voice output device to facilitate language development in a child with developmental apraxia of speech: a case study. Disabil Rehabil 2001, 23(14):623-634.
• [28]Binger C, Kent-Walsh J, Berens J, Del Campo S, Rivera D: Teaching Latino parents to support the multi-symbol message productions of their children who require AAC. AAC: Augmentative Altern Commun 2008, 42(4):323-338.
• [29]Helfrich-Miller KR: A clinical perspective: melodic intonation therapy for developmental apraxia. Clin Commun Disor 1994, 4(3):175-182.
• [30]Rosenthal JB: Rate control therapy for developmental apraxia of speech. Clin Commun Disord 1994, 4(3):190-200.
• [31]Iuzzini J, Forrest K: Evaluation of a combined treatment approach for childhood apraxia of speech. Clin Linguist Phon 2010, 24(4-5):335-345.
• [32]Martikainen A-L, Korpilahti P: Intervention for childhood apraxia of speech: a single-case study. Child Lang Teach Ther 2011, 27(1):9-20.
• [33]Hayden D, Dale P: The efficacy of PROMPT for treating Childhood Apraxia of Speech. Stem-, Spraak- en Taalpathologie 2011, 17(supplement):51.
• [34]Carter P, Edwards S: EPG therapy for children with long-standing speech disorders: predictions and outcomes. Clin Linguist Phon 2004, 18(6–8):359-372.
• [35]Kaufman N: Kaufman speech praxis treatment kit for children, basic level. Northern Speech Services; 1998. www.nss-nrs.com webcite.
• [36]Kaufman N: Kaufman speech praxis treatment kit for children, advanced level. Northern Speech Services, Gaylord, Michigan; 1998. www.nss-nrs.com webcite.
• [37]Kaufman N: Kaufman speech praxis workout book. Northern Speech Services, Gaylord, Michigan; 1998. www.nss-nrs.com webcite.
• [38]Strode Downing R, Chamberlain C: Easy does it® for apraxia school-age. Linguisystems, East Moline, IL; 1993.
• [39]Strode Downing R, Chamberlain C: Easy does it® for apraxia preschool. Linguisystems, East Moline, IL; 1994.
• [40]Connery VM: The nuffield dyspraxia programme. Second edition. The Miracle Factory, London; 1992.
• [41]Williams P, Stephens H: Nuffield dyspraxia programme. Third edition. The Miracle Factory, Windsor, England; 2004.
• [42]Schmidt RA, Lee TD: Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. Fifth edition. , Champaign, IL; 2011. Human Kinetics
• [43]Maas, Robin DA, Wright DL, Ballard KJ: Motor programming in apraxia of speech. Brain Lang 2008, 106(2):107-118.
• [44]Gierut JA, Morrisette ML, Ziemer SM: Nonwords and generalization in children with phonological disorders. Am J Speech-Lang Pathol 2010, 19(2):167-177.
• [45]Semel E, Wiig E, Secord W: Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals - fourth edition, Australian standardised edition (CELF-4 Australian). Pearson Inc, Sydney, Australia; 2006.
• [46]Wiig E, Secord W, Semel E: Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals preschool - second edition, Australian and New Zealand standardised edition (CELF P-2 Australian and New Zealand). Pearson Inc, Sydney, Australia; 2006.
• [47]Shriberg LD, Lohmeier HL, Strand EA, Jakielski KJ: Encoding, memory, and transcoding deficits in Childhood Apraxia of Speech. Clin Ling Phon 2012, 26(5):445-482.
• [48]American Speech-Language-Hearing Association: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. ASHA 1978, 20:297-301.
• [49]Dodd B, Hua Z, Crosbie S, Holm A, Ozanne A: Diagnostic evaluation of articulation and phonology (DEAP). The Psychological Corporation, London, England; 2002.
• [50]Gozzard H, Baker E, McCabe P: Single word test of polysyllables. 2004. Unpublished work
• [51]Gozzard H, Baker E, McCabe P: Requests for clarification and children’s speech responses: changing “pasghetti” to “spaghetti”. Child Lang Teach Ther 2008, 24(3):249-263.
• [52]McLeod S: Sampling consonant clusters: four procedures designed for Australian children. Aust Commun Q 1997, (Autumn):9-12.
• [53]Robbins J, Klee T: Clinical assessment of oropharyngeal motor development in young children. J Speech Hear Disord 1987, 52:271-277.
• [54]Gathercole S, Baddeley A: Children’s test of non word repetition (CNRep). The Psychological Corporation, Oxford, England; 1996.
• [55]Wagner R, Torgesen J, Rashlotte C: Comprehensive test of phonological processing (CTOPP). PRO-ED Inc., Austin TX; 1999.
• [56]Martin NA, Brownell R: Test of auditory processing skills. third edition. Academic Therapy Publications, Novato, CA; 2005.
• [57]Peppe S, McCann J, Gibbon F: Profiling elements of prosodic systems - children (Australian English) (PEPS-C). Version 19_3 edition. Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh; 2008.
• [58]Goldman R, Fristoe M: Goldman-Fristoe test of articulation 2 (GFTA-2). Pearson Inc; 2000.
• [59]Dunn LM, Dunn DM: Peabody picture vocabulary test, fourth edition (PPVT™-4). NCS Pearson Inc., Minneapolis, MN; 2007.
• [60]Dunn LM, Dunn DM: Peabody picture vocabulary test-third edition (PPVT). NCS Pearson Inc., Minneapolis, MN; 1997.
• [61]Edeal DM, Gildersleeve-Neumann CE: The importance of production frequency in therapy for childhood apraxia of speech. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2011, 20(2):95-110.
• [62]Scheffé H: The analysis of variance. Wiley, New York; 1959.
• [63]Arciuli J, Cupples L: Would you rather ‘embert a cudsert’ or ‘cudsert an embert’? How spelling patterns at the beginning of English disyllables can cue grammatical category. In Mental states: language and cognitive structure. Edited by Schalley A, Khlentzos D. John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam/ Philadelphia; 2007:213-237.
• [64]Seva N, Monaghan P, Arciuli J: Stressing what is important: orthographic cues and lexical stress assignment. J Neurolinguistics 2009, 22(3):237-249.
• [65]Maas E, Farinella KA: Random versus blocked practice in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2012, 55(2):561-578.
• [66]Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG, Group C: The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Clin Oral Investig 2003, 7(1):2-7.
• [67]Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Elkins M: Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 2003, 83(8):713-721.