Towards making efficient use of household resources for appropriate prevention of malaria: investigating households’ ownership, use and expenditures on ITNs and other preventive tools in Southeast Nigeria

BMC Public Health

Alex Adjagba³  Benjamin Uzochukwu¹  Nkoli Uguru²  Enyi Etiaba⁴  Obinna Onwujekwe⁴ 

[1] Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu-Campus, Enugu, Nigeria;Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu-Campus, Enugu, Nigeria;SIVAC Initiative, Agence de Medecine preventive (AMP), Paris, France;Department of Health, Administration and Management, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu-Campus, Enugu, Nigeria

关键词: Equity;    Other preventive tools;    ITNs;    Socioeconomic status;    Malaria;   

Others  :  1131660
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-14-315

 received in 2013-12-20, accepted in 2014-03-28,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Many households own, use and spend money on many malaria preventive tools, some of which are inappropriate and ineffective in preventing malaria. This is despite the promotion of use of effective preventive methods such as Insecticide treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual house spraying (IRHS). The use of these ineffective methods imposes some economic burden on households with no resultant reduction in the risk of developing malaria. Hence, global and national targets in use of various effective malaria preventive toools are yet to be achieved in Nigeria. This paper presents new evidence on the differential use and expenditures on effective and non-effective malaria preventive methods in Nigeria.

Methods

Semi-structured interviewer administered pre-tested questionnaire were used to collect data from 500 households from two communities in Enugu state, Nigeria. The two study communities were selected randomly while the households were selected systematically. Information was collected on demography, malaria status of children under 5 within the past month, types of malaria preventive tools used by households and how much was spent on these, the per capita household food expenditure and assets ownership of respondents to determine their socio-economic status.

Results

There was high level of ownership of ITNs (73%) and utilization (71.2%), with 40% utilization by children under 5. There were also appreciable high levels of use of other malaria preventive tools such as window and door nets, indoor spray, aerosol spray and cleaning the environment. No significant inequity was found in ownership and utilization of ITNs and in use of other preventive methods across socioeconomic groups. However, households spent a lot of money on other preventive tools and average expenditures were between N0.83-N172 ($0.005-$1.2) The richest households spent the most on window and door nets (P = 0.04).

Conclusion

High levels of use and expenditure on ITNs and other malaria preventive tools exist. A programmatic challenge will involve designing ways and means of converting some of the inefficient and inappropriate expenditures on many ineffective malaria preventive tools to proven cost-effective methods such as ITNs and IRHS. This will help to achieve universal coverage with malaria preventive tools.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Onwujekwe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]U.S Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Health: Understanding Malaria-Prevention and Control. 2011. [cited 2013 6/12/2013]
• [2]Federal Ministry of Health, National Malaria Control Programme Nigeria Annual Report. FMOH: Abuja; 2005.
• [3]National Population Commission, Nigeria, N.P.C: Nigeria's over 167 Million Population: Implications and Challenges. Abuja; 2011. 23/05/2012
• [4]Africa Fighting Malaria: Malaria Vector Control. 2013. [cited 2013 6/12/13]; Available from: http://www.africafightingmalaria.org webcite
• [5]USAID: President’s Malaria Initiative, Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Nigeria FYI 2012 Malaria Operational Plan (MOP). 2011.
• [6]Onwujekwe OE, Hanson K, Uzochukwu B: Are the poor differentially benefitting from provision of priority health services? A Benefit Incidence analysis in Nigeria. Int J Equity Health 2012, 11(1):70. BioMed Central Full Text
• [7]Uguru NP, Onwujekwe OE, Uzochukwu B, Igiliegbe G, Eze S: Inequities in incidence, morbidity and expenditures on prevention and treatment of malaria in southeast Nigeria. BMC Int Health Human Rights 2009., 9(21) doi:10.1186/1472-698X-9-21
• [8]Chuma JM, Thiede M, Molyneux CS: Rethinking the economic costs of malaria at the household level.Evidence from applying a new analytical framework in rural Kenya. Malar J 2006., 5(76) doi:10.1186/1475-2875-5-76
• [9]Nuwaha F: Factors influencing the use of bednets in Mbarara municipality of Uganda. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2001, 65:877-882.
• [10]Uzochukwu BS, Onwujekwe OE: Socio-economic differences and health seeking behaviour for the diagnosis and treatment of malaria: a case study of four local government areas operating the Bamako initiative programme in south-east Nigeria. Int J Equity Health 2004, 3(1):6. BioMed Central Full Text
• [11]Oluka GP: A presentation on roll out of IMCNH strategy in Enugu state, Nigeria. M.o.H.E. State 2008. June 10
• [12]Jimoh A, Sofola O, Petu A, Okorosobo T: Quantifying the economic burden of malaria in Nigeria using the willingness to pay approach. Cost Effect Resour Allocation 2007., 5(6) doi:10.1186/1478-7547-5-6
• [13]Victora CG, Vaughan JP, Barros FC, Silva AC, Tomasi E: Explaining trends in inequities: evidence from Brazilian health studies. Lancet 2000, 356:1093-1098.
• [14]Netmark: Baseline Survey of the Use of Insecticide Treated Materials in Nigeria. Abuja: NetMark; 2001.
• [15]Oresanya OB, Hoshen M, Sofola OT: Utilization of insecticide-treated nets by under-five children in Nigeria: Assessing progress towards the Abuja targets. Malar J 2008, 7:145. BioMed Central Full Text
• [16]Binka FN, Adongo P: Acceptability and use of insecticide impregnated bednets in Northern Ghana. Tropical Med Int Health 1997, 2:499-507.
• [17]Galvin KT, Pertford N, Ajose F, Davies D: An exploratory qualitative study on perceptions about mosquito bednets in the Niger Delta:what are the barriers to sustained use? J Multidiscip Healthc 2011, 4:73-83.
• [18]Onwujekwe O, Hanson K, Fox-Rushby JA: Who buys insecticide-treated nets? Implications for increasing coverage in Nigeria. Health Policy Plan 2003, 18:279-289.
• [19]Onwujekwe O, Uzochukwu B, Ezumah N, Shu E: Increasing coverage of insecticide-treated nets in rural Nigeria: implications of consumer knowledge, preferences and expenditures for malaria prevention. Malar J 2005, 4(1):29-30. BioMed Central Full Text
• [20]Baume CA, Marin MC: Gains in awareness, ownership and use of insecticide-treated nets in Nigeria, Senegal,Uganda and Zambia. Malar J 2008., 7(153) doi:10.1186/1475-2875-7-153
• [21]Howard N, Ahmad S, Jones C, Rowland M: Malaria control under the Taliban regime:insecticide- treated net purchasing, coverage, usage among men and women in eastern Afghanistan. Malar J 2010., 9(7) doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-0037
• [22]Webster J, Lines J, Bruce J, Schellenberg JR, Hanson K: Which delivery systems reach the poor? A review of the equity of coverage of ever-treated nets, never-treated nets, and immunisation to reduce child mortality in Africa. Lancet Infect Dis 2005, 5:709-17.
• [23]Ruhago GM, Mujinja PGM, Norheim OF: Equity implications of coverage and use of insecticide treated nets distributed for free or with co-payment in two districts in Tanzania: A cross-sectional comparative survey. Int J Equity Health 2011., 10(29) doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-10-29
• [24]Bernard J, Mtove G, Maxwell C, Mandika R: Equity and coverage of insecticide treated bed nets in area of intense transmission of plasmodium falciparum in Tanzania. Malar J 2009., 8(65) doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-65
• [25]Onwujekwe O, Malik E, Mustafa SH, Mnzavaa A: Do malaria preventive interventions reach the poor? Socioeconomic inequities in expenditure on and use of mosquito control tools in Sudan. Health Policy and Planning 21(1):10-6.
• [26]Carme B, Plassart H, Senga P, Nzingoula S: Cerebral malaria in African children: Socioeconomic risk factors in Brazaville, Congo. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1994, 50:131-6.
• [27]Asenso-Okyere: Socioeconomic factors in malaria control. World Health Forum 1994, 15(3):265-268.