Nationwide survey to evaluate the decision-making process in euthanasia requests in Belgium: do specifically trained 2nd physicians improve quality of consultation?

BMC Health Services Research

Luc Deliens¹  Wim Distelmans²  Bregje Onwuteaka-Philipsen¹  Johan Bilsen⁴  Tinne Smets³  Yanna Van Wesemael³  Joachim Cohen³ 

[1] VU University Medical Center, Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Expertise Center for Palliative Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Supportive & Palliative Care, Brussels, Belgium;End-of Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium;Department of Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium

关键词: Terminal care;    Referral practice;    Consultation;    Euthanasia;   

Others  :  1127054
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6963-14-307

 received in 2013-06-28, accepted in 2014-07-11,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Following the 2002 enactment of the Belgian law on euthanasia, which requires the consultation of an independent second physician before proceeding with euthanasia, the Life End Information Forum (LEIF) was founded which provides specifically trained physicians who can act as mandatory consultants in euthanasia requests. This study assesses quality of consultations in Flanders and Brussels and compares these between LEIF and non-LEIF consultants.

Methods

A questionnaire was sent in 2009 to a random sample of 3,006 physicians in Belgium from specialties likely involved in the care of dying patients. Several questions about the last euthanasia request of one of their patients were asked. As LEIF serves the Flemish speaking community (i.e. region of Flanders and the bilingual Brussels Capital Region) and no similar counterpart is present in Wallonia, analyses were limited to Flemish speaking physicians in Flanders and Brussels.

Results

Response was 34%. Of the 244 physicians who indicated having received a euthanasia request seventy percent consulted a second physician in their last request; in 30% this was with a LEIF physician. Compared to non-LEIF physicians, LEIF physicians were more often not a colleague (69% vs 42%) and not a co-attending physician (89% vs 66%). They tended to more often discuss the request with the attending physician (100% vs 95%) and with the family (76% vs 69%), and also more frequently helped the attending physician with performing euthanasia (44% vs 24%). No significant differences were found in the extent to which they talked to the patient (96% vs 93%) and examined the patient file (94% vs 97%).

Conclusion

In cases of explicit euthanasia requests in Belgium, the consultation procedure of another physician by the attending physician is not optimal and can be improved. Training and putting at disposal consultants through forums such as LEIF seems able to improve this situation. Adding stipulations in the law about the necessary competencies and tasks of consulting physicians may additionally incite improvement. Irrespective of whether euthanasia is a legal practice within a country, similar services may prove useful to also improve quality of consultations in various other difficult end-of-life decision-making situations.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Cohen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Law concerning euthanasia May 28 2002 [in Dutch] Belgian Official Journal 2002, 22:28515. http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/cgi/article_body.pl?language=nl&pub_date=2002-06-22&numac=2002009590&caller=summary webcite
• [2]Chambaere K, Bilsen J, Cohen J, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, Mortier F, Delien L: Physician-assisted deaths under the euthanasia law in Belgium: a population-based survey. Can Med Assoc J 2010, 182:895-901.
• [3]FC-eE Euthanasie: Vierde verslag aan de wetgevenede kamer. 2010, 66:66. http://www.leif.be/images/stories/FCEEC_-_Rapport_2008-2009.pdf; webcite 2010:66
• [4]Smets T, Bilsen J, Cohen J, Rurup M, Mortier F, Deliens L: Reporting of euthanasia in medical practice in Flanders, Belgium: cross sectional analysis of reported and unreported cases. Br Med J 2010, 341:c5174.
• [5]Cohen-Almagor R: First do no harm: pressing concerns regarding euthanasia in Belgium. Int J Law Psychiatry 2013, 36:515-521.
• [6]Van Wesemael Y, Cohen J, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, Bilsen J, Deliens L: Establishing specialized health services for professional consultation in euthanasia: experiences in the Netherlands and Belgium. BMC Health Services Res 2009, 9:220.
• [7]Van Wesemael Y, Cohen J, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, Bilsen J, Distelmans W, Deliens L: Role and Involvement of Life End Information Forum Physicians in Euthanasia and Other End-of-Life Care Decisions in Flanders, Belgium. Health Services Res 2009, 44:2180-2192.
• [8]Distelmans W: Een Waardig Levenseinde. Houtekiet: Amsterdam/Antwerpen; 2010.
• [9]Van Wesemael Y, Cohen J, Bilsen J, Smets T, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, Distelmans W, Deliens L: Implementation of a service for physicians’ consultation and information in euthanasia requests in Belgium. Health Policy 2012, 104:272-278.
• [10]Lloyd-Williams M, MacLeod RD: A systematic review of teaching and learning in palliative care within the medical undergraduate curriculum. Med Teach 2004, 26:683-690.
• [11]Hesselink BA, Pasman HR, van der Wal G, Soethout MB, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD: Education on end-of-life care in the medical curriculum: students’ opinions and knowledge. J Palliat Med 2010, 13:381-387.
• [12]Sullivan AM, Lakoma MD, Block SD: The status of medical education in end-of-life care: a national report. J Gen Intern Med 2003, 18:685-695.
• [13]Löfmark R, Mortier F, Nilstun T, Bosshard G, Cartwright C, Van Der Heide A, Norup M, Simonato L, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, Consortium E: Palliative care training: a survey of physicians in Australia and Europe. J Palliat Care 2006, 22:105-110.
• [14]Buss MK, Lessen DS, Sullivan AM, Von Roenn J, Arnold RM, Block SD: A study of oncology fellows’ training in end-of-life care. J Support Oncol 2007, 5:237-242.
• [15]Van Wesemael Y, Cohen J, Bilsen J, Smets T, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, Deliens L: Process and Outcomes of Euthanasia Requests Under the Belgian Act on Euthanasia: A Nationwide Survey. J Pain Symptom Manag 2011, 42:721-733.
• [16]Dillman D: The design and administration of mail surveys. Annu Rev Sociol 1991, 17:225-249.
• [17]Smets T, Cohen J, Bilsen J, Van Wesemael Y, Rurup M, Deliens L: Attitudes and Experiences of Belgian Physicians Regarding Euthanasia Practice and the Euthanasia Law. J Pain Symptom Manag 2011, 41:580-593.
• [18]Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, Gevers JKM, Van Der Heide A, Van Delden JJM, Pasman HRW, Rietjens JAC, Rurup ML, Buiting HM, Hanssen-de Wolf JE, Janssen AGJM, Van der Maas PJ: Evaluation of Law Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide (in Dutch) [Evaluatie Wet toetsing levensbeeindiging op verzoek en hulp bij zelfdoding]. In Programma evaluatie regelgeving. Edited by Zon MW. Den Haag: Zon MW; 2007.
• [19]Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, van der Wal G: A protocol for consultation of another physician in cases of euthanasia and assisted suicide. J Med Ethics 2001, 27:331-337.
• [20]Cohen J, Van Wesemael Y, Smets T, Bilsen J, Deliens L: Cultural differences affecting euthanasia practice in Belgium: One law but different attitudes and practices in Flanders and Wallonia. Soc Sci Med 2012, 75:845-853.
• [21]Jansen-Van Der Weide MC, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, Van Der Wal G: Granted, undecided, withdrawn, and refused requests for euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Arch Intern Med 2005, 165:1698-1704.
• [22]Smets T, Bilsen J, Van Den Block L, Cohen J, Van Casteren V, Deliens L: Euthanasia in patients dying at home in Belgium: interview study on adherence to legal safeguards. Br J Gen Pract 2010, 60:268-274.
• [23]Billings JA, Block S: Palliative care in undergraduate medical education. Status report and future directions. JAMA 1997, 278:733-738.
• [24]Paice E, Heard S, Moss F: How important are role models in making good doctors? BMJ 2002, 325:707-710.
• [25]Meier D, Isaacs S, Hughes R: Palliative Care: Transforming the Care of Serious Illness. Princeton: John Wiley and Sons; 2009.
• [26]Hayes RP, Stoudemire AS, Kinlaw K, Dell ML, Loomis A: Changing attitudes about end-of-life decision making of medical students during third-year clinical clerkships. Psychosomatics 1999, 40:205-211.
• [27]Wear D: “Face-to-face with It”: medical students’ narratives about their end-of-life education. Acad Med 2002, 77:271-277.
• [28]Almagor-Cohen R: Euthanasia in the Netherlands: The Policy and Practice of Mercy Killing. Dordrecht: Springer-Kluwer; 2004.
• [29]Jansen-Van Der Weide MC, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, Van Der Wal G: Quality of consultation and the project ‘Support and Consultation on Euthanasia in the Netherlands’ (SCEN). Health Policy 2007, 80:97-106.
• [30]Dan B, Fonteyne C, de Cléty SC: Self-requested euthanasia for children in Belgium. Lancet 2014, 383:671-672.
• [31]Pousset G, Bilsen J, Cohen J, Chambaere K, Deliens L, Mortier F: Medical End-of-Life Decisions in Children in Flanders, Belgium A Population-Based Postmortem Survey. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010, 164:547-553.