Learning styles and approaches to learning among medical undergraduates and postgraduates

BMC Medical Education

Senaka Rajapakse¹  Chaturaka Rodrigo¹  Tharanga Fernando¹  Lasitha Samarakoon² 

[1] Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka;National Hospital, Colombo, Sri Lanka

关键词: Undergraduate curriculum evaluation;    Post graduate;    Medicine;    Learning methods;   

Others  :  1138973
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6920-13-42

 received in 2012-09-23, accepted in 2013-03-19,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

The challenge of imparting a large amount of knowledge within a limited time period in a way it is retained, remembered and effectively interpreted by a student is considerable. This has resulted in crucial changes in the field of medical education, with a shift from didactic teacher centered and subject based teaching to the use of interactive, problem based, student centered learning. This study tested the hypothesis that learning styles (visual, auditory, read/write and kinesthetic) and approaches to learning (deep, strategic and superficial) differ among first and final year undergraduate medical students, and postgraduates medical trainees.

Methods

We used self administered VARK and ASSIST questionnaires to assess the differences in learning styles and approaches to learning among medical undergraduates of the University of Colombo and postgraduate trainees of the Postgraduate Institute of Medicine, Colombo.

Results

A total of 147 participated: 73 (49.7%) first year students, 40 (27.2%) final year students and 34(23.1%) postgraduate students. The majority (69.9%) of first year students had multimodal learning styles. Among final year students, the majority (67.5%) had multimodal learning styles, and among postgraduates, the majority were unimodal (52.9%) learners.

Among all three groups, the predominant approach to learning was strategic. Postgraduates had significant higher mean scores for deep and strategic approaches than first years or final years (p < 0.05). Mean scores for the superficial approach did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusions

The learning approaches suggest a positive shift towards deep and strategic learning in postgraduate students. However a similar difference was not observed in undergraduate students from first year to final year, suggesting that their curriculum may not have influenced learning methodology over a five year period.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Samarakoon et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Koh GC, Khoo HE, Wong ML, Koh D: The effects of problem-based learning during medical school on physician competency: a systematic review. CMAJ 2008, 178(1):34-41.
• [2]Newble DI, Entwistle NJ: Learning styles and approaches: implications for medical education. Med Educ 1986, 20(3):162-175.
• [3]Lubawy WC: Evaluating teaching using the best practices model. Am J Pharm Educ 2003, 67(3):87.
• [4]Dunn R, Giannitti MC, Murray JB, Rossi I, Geisert G, Quinn P: Grouping students for instruction: effects of learning style on achievement and attitudes. J Soc Psychol 1990, 130(4):485-494.
• [5]Peers IS, Johnston M: Influence of learning context on the relationship between A-level attainment and final degree performance: a meta-analytic review. Br J Educ Psychol 1994, 64:1-17.
• [6]Tait H, Entwistle NJ, McCune V: ASSIST: a reconceptualisation of the Approaches to Studying Inventory. In Improving Student Learning. Edited by Rust C. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development; 1998:262-271.
• [7]Marton F, Saljo R: On qualitative differences in learning: I- outcome and process. Br J Educ Psychol 1976, 46(1):4-11.
• [8]Leite WL, Svinicki M, Shi Y: Attempted Validation of the Scores of the VARK: Learning Styles Inventory With Multitrait–Multimethod Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models. Ed & Psych Measure 2010, 70:323-339.
• [9]Kleijn WC, van der Ploeg HM, Topman RM: Cognition, study habits, test anxiety, and academic performance. Psychol Rep 1994, 75(3 Pt 1):1219-1226.
• [10]Lujan HL, DiCarlo SE: First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles. Adv Physiol Educ 2006, 30(1):13-16.
• [11]Baykan Z, Nacar M: Learning styles of first-year medical students attending Erciyes University in Kayseri Turkey. Adv Physiol Educ 2007, 31(2):158-160.
• [12]D’Amore A, James S, Mitchell EK: Learning styles of first-year undergraduate nursing and midwifery students: A cross-sectional survey utilising the Kolb Learning Style Inventory. Nurse Educ Today 2012, 32(5):506-515.
• [13]Alkhasawneh IM, Mrayyan MT, Docherty C, Alashram S, Yousef HY: Problem-based learning (PBL): assessing students’ learning preferences using VARK. Nurse Educ Today 2008, 28(5):572-579.
• [14]Stiernborg M, Bandaranayake RC: Medical students’ approaches to studying. Med Teach 1996, 18(3):229-236.
• [15]Emilia O, Mulholland H: Approaches to learning of students in an Indonesian medical school. Med Educ 1991, 25(6):462-470.
• [16]Wickramasinghe DP, Samarasekera DN: Factors influencing the approaches to studying of preclinical and clinical students and postgraduate trainees. BMC Med Educ 2011, 11:22. BioMed Central Full Text
• [17]Aaron S, Skakun E: Correlation of students’ characteristics with their learning styles as they begin medical school. Acad Med 1999, 74(3):260-262.
• [18]Naqvi Z, Ahmed R: Learning approaches and academic performance of undergraduate medical students in Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc 2000, 50(1):20-25.
• [19]Ferguson E, James D, Madeley L: Factors associated with success in medical school: systematic review of the literature. BMJ 2002, 324(7343):952-957.
• [20]Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. http://sxills.nl/lerenlerennu/bronnen/Learning%20styles%20by%20Coffield%20e.a..pdf webcite