Cervical radiculopathy: Study protocol of a randomised clinical trial evaluating the effect of mobilisations and exercises targeting the opening of intervertebral foramen [NCT01500044]

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

François Desmeules²  Jean-Sébastien Roy¹  Pierre Langevin³ 

[1] Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec Rehabilitation Institute, 525, Boulevard Wilfrid Hamel, Quebec City (QC), Canada, G1M 2S8;Orthopaedic Clinical Research Unit, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, 5415, Boulevard l'Assomption, Montreal (QC), Canada, H1T 2M4;Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, 1050, avenue de la Médecine, Quebec City (QC), Canada, G1R 1P5

关键词: Intervertebral foramen;    Mobilisations;    Exercises;    Neck pain;    Radiculopathy;    Cervical;   

Others  :  1150718
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2474-13-10

 received in 2012-01-09, accepted in 2012-01-31,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Cervical radiculopathy is a common form of neck pain and has been shown to lead to severe disability. Clinical rehabilitation approaches for cervical radiculopathies commonly include exercise and manual therapy interventions targeting the opening of intervertebral foramen, but evidence regarding their effectiveness is scarce. The primary objective of this randomised clinical trial is to compare, in terms of pain and disability, a rehabilitation program targeting the opening of intervertebral foramen to a conventional rehabilitation program, for patients presenting acute or subacute cervical radiculopathies. The hypothesis is that the rehabilitation program targeting the opening of intervertebral foramen will be significantly more effective in reducing pain and disability than the conventional rehabilitation program.

Methods/Design

This study is a double-blind (participants and evaluators blinded) randomised clinical trial that will allow the comparison of patients with a cervical radiculopathy randomly assigned to one of two groups: one group will receive a 4-week rehabilitation program targeting the opening of intervertebral foramen, and the second group will receive a 4-week conventional rehabilitation program. Thirty-six subjects with cervical radiculopathy will be recruited from participating medical and physiotherapy clinics and will be evaluated at baseline, at the end of the 4-week program and four weeks following the end of the program. The primary outcome measure will be the validated Neck Disability Index questionnaire. Secondary outcome measures will include the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, a numerical pain rating scale, cervicothoracic mobility and patients' perceived global rating of change. During the 4-week rehabilitation program, each participant will take part in eight physiotherapy treatment sessions (2 session/week) and will perform a home exercise program. A mixed-model, 2-way ANOVA will be used to analyze the effects of the rehabilitation programs.

Discussion

Control trials are needed to define ideal intervention approaches in rehabilitation for this population. This randomised clinical trial will be the first study that directly compares a rehabilitation program targeting the opening of intervertebral foramen to a conventional rehabilitation program for patients with cervical radiculopathy. The results of this study may help to establish best clinical practice guidelines for this patient population.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01500044

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Langevin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Côté P, Cassidy JD, Carroll L: The Saskatchewan Health and Back Pain Survey. The prevalence of neck pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults. Spine 1998, 23:1689-1698.
• [2]Côté P, Kristman V, Vidmar M, Van Eerd D, Hogg-Johnson S, Beaton D, Smith PM: The prevalence and incidence of work absenteeism involving neck pain: a cohort of Ontario lost-time claimants. Spine 2008, 33:S192-198.
• [3]Hogg-Johnson S, van der Velde G, Carroll LJ, Holm LW, Cassidy JD, Guzman J, Cote P, Haldeman S, Ammendolia C, Carragee E, Hurwitz E, Nordin M, Peloso P, Bone and joint decade 2000-2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders: The burden and determinants of neck pain in the general population: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine 2008, 33:S39-51.
• [4]Rubinstein SM, Pool JJ, van Tulder MW, Riphagen II, de Vet HC: A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy. Eur Spine J 2007, 16:307-319.
• [5]Childs JD, Cleland JA, Elliott JM, Teyhen DS, Wainner RS, Whitman JM, Sopky BJ, Godges JJ, Flynn TW: Neck pain: Clinical practice guidelines linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health from the Orthopedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2008, 38:A1-A34.
• [6]Tsakitzidis G, Remmen R, Peremans L, Van Royen P, Duchesnes C, Paulus D, Eyssen M: Non-specific neck pain: diagnosis and treatment. KCE reports 119C 2009.
• [7]Manchikanti L, Boswell MV, Singh V, Benyamin RM, Fellows B, Abdi S, Buenaventura RM, Conn A, Datta S, Derby R, Falco FJ, Erhart S, Diwan S, Hayek SM, Helm S, Parr AT, Schultz DM, Smith HS, Wolfer LR, Hirsch JA: Comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician 2009, 12:699-802.
• [8]Daffner SD, Hilibrand AS, Hanscom BS, Brislin BT, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ: Impact of neck and arm pain on overall health status. Spine 2003, 28:2030-2035.
• [9]Haldeman S, Carroll L, Cassidy JD, Schubert J, Nygren A: The Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders: executive summary. Spine 2008, 33:S5-7.
• [10]Radhakrishnan K, Litchy WJ, O'Fallon WM, Kurland LT: Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990. Brain 1994, 117(Pt 2):325-335.
• [11]Autio RA, Karppinen J, Niinimaki J, Ojala R, Veeger N, Korhonen T, Hurri H, Tervonen O: The effect of infliximab, a monoclonal antibody against TNF-alpha, on disc herniation resorption: a randomized controlled study. Spine 2006, 31:2641-2645.
• [12]Carette S, Fehlings MG: Clinical practice. Cervical radiculopathy. N Engl J Med 2005, 353:392-399.
• [13]Cyteval C, Fescquet N, Thomas E, Decoux E, Blotman F, Taourel P: Predictive factors of efficacy of periradicular corticosteroid injections for lumbar radiculopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006, 27:978-982.
• [14]Bogduk N: The anatomy and patho-physiology of neck pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2003, 14:455-472.
• [15]Wainner RS, Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ, Boninger ML, Delitto A, Allison S: Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination and patient self-report measures for cervical radiculopathy. Spine 2003, 28:52-62.
• [16]Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB: Evidence-Based Medicine. How to Practice and Teach EBM. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, Toronto; 2005.
• [17]Miller J, Gross AR, D'Sylva J, Burnie SJ, Goldsmith CH, Graham N, Haines T, Bronfort G, Hoving JL: Manual therapy and exercise for neck pain: A systematic review. Man Ther 2010.
• [18]Gross A, Miller J, D'Sylva J, Burnie SJ, Goldsmith CH, Graham N, Haines T, Bronfort G, Hoving JL: Manipulation or mobilisation for neck pain: a Cochrane Review. Man Ther 2010, 15:315-333.
• [19]Hurwitz EL, Carragee EJ, van der Velde G, Carroll LJ, Nordin M, Guzman J, Peloso PM, Holm LW, Cote P, Hogg-Johnson S, Cassidy JD, Haldeman S: Treatment of neck pain: noninvasive interventions: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine 2008, 33:S123-152.
• [20]Kay TM, Gross AR, Goldsmith CH, Hoving JL, Brønfort G: Exercises for mechanical neck disorders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005.
• [21]Kuijper B, Tans JT, Beelen A, Nollet F, de Visser M: Cervical collar or physiotherapy versus wait and see policy for recent onset cervical radiculopathy: randomised trial. BMJ 2009, 339:b3883.
• [22]Young IA, Michener LA, Cleland JA, Aguilera AJ, Snyder AR: Manual therapy, exercise, and traction for patients with cervical radiculopathy: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther 2009, 89:632-642.
• [23]Jellad A, Ben Salah Z, Boudokhane S, Migaou H, Bahri I, Rejeb N: The value of intermittent cervical traction in recent cervical radiculopathy. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2009, 52:638-652.
• [24]Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, Cassidy JD, Duranceau J, Suissa S, Zeiss E: Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining "whiplash" and its management. Spine 1995, 20:1S-73S.
• [25]Muzin S, Isaac Z, Walker J, Abd OE, Baima J: When should a cervical collar be used to treat neck pain? Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2008, 1:114-119.
• [26]Sueki D, Brechter J: Orthopedic Rehabilitation Clinical Advisor. Mosby, Elsevier 2010.
• [27]White AA, Panjabi MM: Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. New York, Lippincott; 1990.
• [28]Nuckley DJ, Konodi MA, Raynak GC, Ching RP, Mirza SK: Neural space integrity of the lower cervical spine: effect of normal range of motion. Spine 2002, 27:587-595.
• [29]Yoo JU, Zou D, Edwards WT, Bayley J, Yuan HA: Effect of cervical spine motion on the neuroforaminal dimensions of human cervical spine. Spine 1992, 17:1131-1136.
• [30]Humphreys SC, Hodges SD, Patwardhan A, Eck JC, Covington LA, Sartori M: The natural history of the cervical foramen in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals aged 20-60 years as measured by magnetic resonance imaging. A descriptive approach. Spine 1998, 23:2180-2184.
• [31]Humphreys SC, Chase J, Patwardhan A, Shuster J, Lomasney L, Hodges SD: Flexion and traction effect on C5-C6 foraminal space. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998, 79:1105-1109.
• [32]MacDermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, McAlpine C, Goldsmith CH: Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009, 39:400-417.
• [33]Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Palmer JA: The reliability and construct validity of the Neck Disability Index and patient specific functional scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Spine 2006, 31:598-602.
• [34]Wlodyka-Demaille S, Poiraudeau S, Catanzariti JF, Rannou F, Fermanian J, Revel M: French translation and validation of 3 functional disability scales for neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002, 83:376-382.
• [35]McConnell S, Beaton D, Bombardier C: The DASH Outcome Measure User's Manual. Toronto, Ontario 1999, 1-95.
• [36]Roy JS, MacDermid JC, Woodhouse LJ: Measuring shoulder function: a systematic review of four questionnaires. Arthritis Rheum 2009, 61:623-632.
• [37]Mehta S, Macdermid JC, Carlesso LC, McPhee C: Concurrent validation of the DASH and the QuickDASH in comparison to neck-specific scales in patients with neck pain. Spine 2010, 35:2150-2156.
• [38]Durand MJ, Vachon B, Hong QN, Loisel P: The cross-cultural adaptation of the DASH questionnaire in Canadian French. J Hand Ther 2005, 18:34-39.
• [39]Cleland JA, Childs JD, Whitman JM: Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with mechanical neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008, 89:69-74.
• [40]Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM: Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine 2005, 30:1331-1334.
• [41]Audette I, Dumas JP, Cote JN, De Serres SJ: Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010, 40:318-323.
• [42]Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH: Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 1989, 10:407-415.
• [43]Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay GJ: Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip ther 2009, 17:163-170.
• [44]Sandmark H, Nisell R: Validity of five common manual neck pain provoking tests. Scand J Rehabil Med 1995, 27:131-136.
• [45]Rey-Eiriz G, Alburquerque-Sendin F, Barrera-Mellado I, Martin-Vallejo FJ, Fernandez-de-las-Penas C: Validity of the posterior-anterior middle cervical spine gliding test for the examination of intervertebral joint hypomobility in mechanical neck pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2010, 33:279-285.
• [46]Maitland GD, Hengeveld E, Banks K, Anglaise K: Vertebral Manipulation. Butterworth-Heinemann, Elsevier seventh edition. 2005.
• [47]Walker MJ, Boyles RE, Young BA, Strunce JB, Garber MB, Whitman JM, Deyle G, Wainner RS: The effectiveness of manual physical therapy and exercise for mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. Spine 2008, 33:2371-2378.
• [48]Jull G, Sterling M, Falla D, Treleaven J, O'Leary S: Whiplash, headache, and neck pain: research-based directions for physical therapies. Churchill Levingston, Elsevier 2008.
• [49]Tate AR, McClure PW, Young IA, Salvatori R, Michener LA: Comprehensive impairment-based exercise and manual therapy intervention for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a case series. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010, 40:474-493.