Can negative life events and coping style help explain socioeconomic differences in perceived stress among adolescents? A cross-sectional study based on the West Jutland cohort study

BMC Public Health

Claus D Hansen¹  Kurt Rasmussen³  Merete Labriola²  Johan H Andersen³  David J Glasscock³ 

[1] Department of Sociology and Social Work, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark;Department of Clinical Social Medicine, Public Health and Quality Management, Central Denmark Region and Section of Clinical Social Medicine & Rehabilitation, School of Public Health, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark;Danish Ramazzini Centre, Department of Occupational Medicine, Regional Hospital Herning, Herning, Denmark

关键词: Adolescence;    Coping;    Life events;    Perceived stress;    Social gradient;   

Others  :  1162149
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-13-532

 received in 2012-12-22, accepted in 2013-05-29,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Previous research suggests that perceived stress in adolescence is socially patterned, but that this relationship may depend on the measure of socioeconomic status (SES) used. This study examines if social gradients in perceived stress, negative life events, and coping exist amongst Danish adolescents, and, if life events and coping strategies can partly account for an association between SES and perceived stress. These relationships are studied separately for two different measures of SES.

Methods

Questionnaire data were collected from 3054 14–15 year old youths (83% response rate) during baseline measurement in the West Jutland birth cohort study. Parents were identified via the Central Office of Civil Registration in which the respondents are linked to their parents or guardians via their CPR-number, a personal identification number given to everyone in Denmark. The study employs data from two independent sources, adolescent self-report data (stress, life events and coping) and national registers (parental educational level, household income and confounder variables). Ordinary Least Squares regression estimated the effects of parental SES, negative life events and coping on perceived stress. Analyses were stratified by gender.

Results

Girls reported more perceived stress than boys. SES accounted for a small but significant amount of the variance in perceived stress. Lower parental education and lower household income were associated with higher stress levels irrespective of gender, but the social gradient was strongest amongst girls when parents’ education was used to measure SES, and strongest for boys when income was used. Life events and coping were also found to be associated with SES and both mediated part of the SES-perceived stress relationship. In general, the social gradient in perceived stress was accounted for by the study variables to a higher degree among girls than among boys.

Conclusions

Lower parental education and household income are associated with higher levels of perceived stress amongst Danish adolescents. Furthermore, both life events and coping appear to mediate this relation. Gender differences in the ways SES and stress are related may exist.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Glasscock et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Mackenbach JP, Kunst AE, Cavelaars AEJM, Groenhof F, Geurts JJM, and the EU Working Group on Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health: Socioeconomic inequalities in morbidity and mortality in Western Europe. Lancet 1997, 349:1655-1659.
• [2]Evans RG, Barer ML, Marmor TR (Eds): Why Are Some People Healthy and Others Not? The Determinants of Health in Populations. New York: Gruyter; 1994.
• [3]Marmot MG, Wilkinson RG (Eds): Social Determinants of Health. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.
• [4]Kjøller M, Rasmussen NK, Keiding LM, Petersen HC, Nielsen GA: Sundhed og Sygelighed i Danmark 1994, og Udviklingen Siden 1987. Copenhagen: Dansk Institut for Klinisk Epidemiologi; 1997.
• [5]Brønnum-Hansen H, Andersen O, Kjøller M, Rasmussen NK: Social Gradient in Life Expectancy and Health Expectancy in Denmark. Soz Praventivmed 2004, 49:36-41.
• [6]Brønnum-Hansen H: Sociale forskelle I udviklingen I danskernes dødelighed. UgeskrLæger 2006, 168:2066-2069.
• [7]Christiansen M, Hansen CD, Glasscock D, Andersen JH: Social ulighed og helbred blandt unge. UgeskrLæger 2010, 17211:857-863.
• [8]Marmot M: Status Syndrome – How Your Social Standing Directly Affects Your Health and Life Expectancy. London: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2004.
• [9]Adler NE, Boyce T, Chesney MA, Cohen S, Folkman S, Kahn RL, Syme SL: Socioeconomic status and health: the challenge of the gradient. Am Psychol 1994, 49:15-24.
• [10]Stansfeld SA, Marmot MG (Eds): Stress and the Heart: Psychosocial Pathways to Coronary Heart Disease. London: BMJ Books; 2002.
• [11]Baum A, Garofalo JP, Yali AM: Socioeconomic status and chronic stress: does stress account for SES effects on health? Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999, 896:131-144.
• [12]Gallo LC, Mathews KA: Do negative emotions mediate the association between socioeconomic status and health? Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999, 896:226-245.
• [13]Gallo LC, Mathews KA: Understanding the association between socioeconomic status and physical health: do negative emotions play a role? Psychol Bull 2003, 129:10-51.
• [14]McEwen BS, Seeman T: Protective and damaging effects of mediators of stress: elaborating and testing the concepts of allostasis and allostatic load. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999, 896:30-47.
• [15]Kessler RC: Stress, social status, and psychological distress. J Health Soc Behav 1979, 20:259-272.
• [16]Dohrenwend BS: Social class and stressful life events. J Pers Soc Psychol 1973, 28:225-235.
• [17]Marmot MG, Davey-Smith G, Stansfeld S, Patel C, North F, Head J, White I, Brunner E, Feeney A: Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. Lancet 1991, 337:1387-1393.
• [18]Stronks K, Van De Mheen H, Looman CWN, Mackenbach JP: The importance of psychosocial stressors for socioeconomic inequalities in perceived health. Soc Sci Med 1998, 46:611-623.
• [19]Orpana HM, Lemyre L: Explaining the social gradient in health in Canada: using the national population survey to examine the role of stressors. Int J Beh Med 2004, 11:143-151.
• [20]Lantz PM, House JS, Mero RP, Williams DR: Stress, life events, and socioeconomic disparities in health: results from the Americans’ changing lives study. J Health Soc Behav 2005, 46:274-288.
• [21]Cohen S, Kaplan GA, Salonen JT: The role of psychological characteristics in the relation between socioeconomic status and perceived health. J Appl Soc Psychol 1999, 29:23-45.
• [22]Lachman ME, Weaver SL: The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998, 74:763-773.
• [23]Pearlin LI, Menaghan EG, Lieberman MA, Mullan JT: The stress process. J Health Soc Psychol 1981, 22:337-356.
• [24]Taylor SE, Seeman TE: Psychosocial resources and the SES-Health relationship. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999, 896:201-225.
• [25]Marmot MG, Bosma H, Brunner E, Stansfeld S: Contribution of job control and other risk factors to social variations in coronary heart disease incidence. Lancet 1997, 350:235-239.
• [26]Holohan CJ, Moos RH: Risk, resistance, and psychological distress: a longitudinal analysis with adults and children. J Abnormal Psychol 1987, 96:3-13.
• [27]Due P, Lynch J, Holstein B, Modvig J: Socioeconomic health inequalities among a nationally representative sample of danish adolescents: the role of different types of social relations. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003, 57:692-698.
• [28]Goodman E: The role of socioeconomic status gradients in explaining differences in US adolescents’ health. Am J Public Health 1999, 89:1522-1528.
• [29]Starfield B, Riley AW, Witt WP, Robertson J: Social class gradients in health during adolescence. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002, 56:354-361.
• [30]Jackson B, Goodman E: Low social status markers: do they predict depressive symptoms in adolescence? Race Soc Probl 2011, 3:119-128.
• [31]West P: Inequalities? Social class differentials in health in British youth. Soc Sci Med 1988, 27:291-296.
• [32]MacIntyre S, West P: Lack of class variation in health in adolescence: an artefact of an occupational measure of social class? Soc Sci Med 1991, 32:395-402.
• [33]Spencer NJ: Social equalization in youth: evidence from a cross-sectional British survey. Eur J Public Health 2006, 16:368-375.
• [34]Goodman E, McEwen B, Dolan LM, Schafer-Kalkhoff T, Adler NE: Social disadvantage and adolescent stress. J Adolesc Health 2005, 37:484-492.
• [35]Finkelstein DM, Kubzansky LD, Capitman J, Goodman E: Socioeconomic differences in adolescent stress: the role of psychological resources. J Adolesc Health 2007, 40:127-134.
• [36]Wills TA, McNamara G, Vaccaro D: Parental education related to adolescent stress-coping and substance use: development of a mediational model. Health Psychol 1995, 14:464-478.
• [37]Gore S, Aseltine RH, Colton ME: Social structure, life stress and depressive symptoms in a high school-aged population. J Health Soc Behav 1992, 33:97-113.
• [38]Nielsen L, Vinther-Larsen M, Nielsen NR, Grønbæk M: Stress Blandt Unge. Copenhagen: Sundhedsstyrelsen; 2007.
• [39]Boyce W, Torsheim T, Currie C, Zambon A: The family affluence scale as a measure of national wealth: validation of an adolescent self-report measure. Soc Indicators Res 2007, 78:473-487.
• [40]Libratos P, Link BG, Kelsey JL: The measurement of social class in epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev 1988, 10:87-121.
• [41]Krieger N, Williams RD, Moss NE: Measuring social class in US Public Health Research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Ann Rev Public Health 1997, 18:341-378.
• [42]Oakes JM, Rossi PH: The measurement of SES in health research: current practice and steps toward a new approach. Soc Sci Med 2002, 56:769-784.
• [43]Schmeelk-Cone KH, Zimmerman MA, Abelson JL: The buffering effects of active coping on the relationship between SES and cortisol among African American young adults. Behav Med 2003, 29:85-94.
• [44]Chen E, Langer DA, Raphaelson YE, Mathews KA: Socioeconomic status and health in adolescents: the role of stress interpretations. Child Dev 2004, 75:1039-1052.
• [45]Bourdieu P: Distinction: a social critique of judgement of taste. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1984.
• [46]Brislin RW: Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross-Cultural Psychol 1970, 1:185-216.
• [47]Cohen S, Karmarck T, Mermelstein R: A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 1983, 24:385-396.
• [48]Cohen S, Williamson G: Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In The Social Psychology of Health: Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology. Edited by Spacapan S, Oskamp S. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1988:31-67.
• [49]Newcomb MD, Huba GJ, Bentler PM: A multidimensional assessment of stressful life events among adolescents: Derivation and correlates. J Health Soc Behav 1981, 22:400-415.
• [50]Turner RJ, Wheaton B: Checklist measurement of stressful life events. In Measuring Stress: A guide for health and social scientists. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995:29-58.
• [51]Carver CS: You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med 1997, 4:91-100.
• [52]Schnider KR, Elhai JD, Gray MJ: Coping style use predicts posttraumatic stress and complicated grief symptom severity among college students reporting a traumatic loss. J Counseling Psychol 2007, 54:344-350.
• [53]Preacher KJ, Hayes AF: Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 2008, 40:879-891.
• [54]Brady SS, Matthews KA: The influence of socioeconomic status and ethnicity on adolescents’ exposure to stressful life events. J Pediatric Psychol 2002, 27(7):575-583.
• [55]Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK: Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 1989, 56:267-283.
• [56]Falci CD: Self-esteem and mastery trajectories in high school by social class and gender. Soc Sci Res 2011, 40:86-601.