Small proportions of actively-smoking patrons and high PM2.5 levels in southern California tribal casinos: support for smoking bans or designated smoking areas

BMC Public Health

Narinder Dhaliwal²  Harmeena Sahota Omoto²  Seow Ling Ong²  Jason Omoto²  Neil E Klepeis¹ 

[1]Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

[2]Education, Training, and Research, Inc, Scotts Valley, CA, USA

关键词: Nonsmoking gaming;    Active smoker counts;    Fine particles;    Secondhand smoke;   

Others  :  1163044
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-12-819

 received in 2012-06-05, accepted in 2012-09-19,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Nearly all California casinos currently allow smoking, which leads to potentially high patron exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke pollutants. Some argue that smoking restrictions or bans would result in a business drop, assuming > 50% of patrons smoke. Evidence in Nevada and responses from the 2008 California tobacco survey refute this assertion. The present study investigates the proportion of active smokers in southern California tribal casinos, as well as occupancy and PM_2.5 levels in smoking and nonsmoking sections.

Methods

We measured active-smoker and total-patron counts during Friday or Saturday night visits (two per casino) to smoking and nonsmoking gaming areas inside 11 southern California casinos. We counted slot machines and table games in each section, deriving theoretical maximum capacities and occupancy rates. We also measured PM_2.5 concentrations (or used published levels) in both nonsmoking and smoking areas.

Results

Excluding one casino visit with extremely high occupancy, we counted 24,970 patrons during 21 casino visits of whom 1,737 were actively smoking, for an overall active- smoker proportion of 7.0% and a small range of ~5% across casino visits (minimum of 5% and maximum of 10%). The differences in mean inter-casinoactive-smoker proportions were not statistically significant. Derived occupancy rates were 24% to 215% in the main (low-stakes) smoking-allowed slot or table areas. No relationship was found between observed active-smoker proportions and occupancy rate. The derived maximum capacities of nonsmoking areas were 1% to 29% of the overall casino capacity (most under 10%) and their observed occupancies were 0.1 to over 3 times that of the main smoking-allowed casino areas. Seven of twelve visits to nonsmoking areas with no separation had occupancy rates greater than main smoking areas. Unenclosed nonsmoking areas don’t substantially protect occupants from PM_2.5 exposure. Nonsmoking areas encapsulated inside smoking areas or in a separate, but unenclosed, area had PM_2.5 levels that were 10 to 60 μg/m³ and 6 to 23 μg/m³ higher than outdoor levels, respectively, indicating contamination from smoking.

Conclusions

Although fewer than roughly 10% of casino patrons are actively smoking on average, these individuals substantially increase PM_2.5 exposure for all patrons in smoking and unenclosed nonsmoking areas. Nonsmoking areas may be too inconvenient, small, or undesirable to serve a substantial number of nonsmoking patrons. Imposing indoor smoking bans, or contained smoking areas with a maximum capacity of up to 10% of the total patronage, would offer protection from PM_2.5 exposures for nonsmoking patrons and reduce employee exposures.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Klepeis et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]500 Nations Indian Casino Super Site, 2009. 2012. http://500nations.com/Indian_Casinos.asp webcite
• [2]AGA – American Gaming Association: State of the states: The AGA survey of casino entertainment. The American Gaming Association (AGA); 2011. http://www.americangaming.org/industry-resources/research/state-states webcite
• [3]Jaakkola MS, Jaakkola JJ: Assessment of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Eur Respir J 1997, 10(10):2384-2397.
• [4]Dockery DW: Epidemiologic evidence of cardiovascular effects of particulate air pollution. Environ Health Perspectives 2001, 109(Suppl 4):483-486.
• [5]Pope CA, Burnett RT, Krewski D, Jerrett M, Shi Y, Calle EE, Thun MJ: Cardiovascular mortality and exposure to airborne fine particulate matter and cigarette smoke: Shape of the exposure-response relationship. Circulation 2009, 120(11):941-948.
• [6]Jiang RT, Cheng KC, Acevedo-Bolton V, Klepeis NE, Repace JL, Ott WR, Hildemann LA: Measurement of fine particle concentrations and smoking activity in a statewide survey of 36 California Indian casinos. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2010.
• [7]York NL, Lee K: A Baseline evaluation of casino air quality after enactment of Nevada’s Clean Indoor Air Act. Public Health Nurs 2010, 27(2):158-163.
• [8]Repace JL: Respirable particles and carcinogens in the air of Delaware hospitality venues before and after a smoking ban. J Occup Environ Med 2004, 46:887-905.
• [9]Repace JL, Cheng KC, Jiang RT, Acevedo-Bolton V, Klepeis NE, Ott WR, Hildemann LA: Fine particle and secondhand smoke air pollution exposures and risks inside 66 US casinos. Environ Res 2011, 111:473-484.
• [10]Repace JL: Secondhand smoke in Pennsylvania casinos: A study of nonsmokers’ exposure, dose, and risk. Am J Public Health 2009, 99:1478-1485.
• [11]Cains T, Cannata S, Poulos R, Ferson MJ, Stewart BW: Designated “No Smoking” areas provide from partial to no protection from environmental tobacco smoke. Tob Control 2004, 13:17-22.
• [12]Goniewicz ML, Eisner MD, Lazcano-Ponce E, Zielinska-Danch W, Koszowski B, Sobczak A, Havel C, Jacob P, Benowitz NL: Comparison of urine cotinine and the tobacco-specific nitrosamine metabolite 4-methylnitrosamino-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) and their ratio to discriminate active from passive smoking. Nicotine Tob Res 2011, 13(3):202-208.
• [13]Trout D, Decker J, Mueller C, Bernert J, Pirkle J: Exposure of casino employees to environmental tobacco smoke. J Occup Environ Med 1998, 40(3):270-276.
• [14]Achutan C, West C, Mueller C, Bernert JT, Bernard B: Environmental tobacco smoke exposure among casino dealers. J Occup Environ Med 2011, 53(4):346-51.
• [15]Anderson KE, Kliris J, Murphy L, Carmella SG, Han S, Link C, Bliss RL, Puumala S, Murphy SE, Hecht SS: Metabolites of a tobacco-specific lung carcinogen in nonsmoking casino patrons. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003, 12:1544-1546.
• [16]Pristos CA, Pristos KL, Spears KE: Smoking rates among gamblers at Nevada casinos mirror US smoking rate. Tob Control 2008, 17:82-85.
• [17]Repace JL, Lowrey AH: Indoor air pollution, tobacco smoke, and public health. Science 1980, 208:464-472.
• [18]CDC - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Tobacco use among adults—United States, 2005. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2006, 55:1145-1148.
• [19]Timberlake DS, Wu J, Al-Delaimy WK: Tribal casinos in California: The last vestige of indoor smoking. BMC Public Health 2012, 12:144. BioMed Central Full Text
• [20]Jiang RT, Acevedo-Bolton V, Cheng KC, Klepeis NE, Ott WR, Hildemann LA: Determination of response of real-time SidePak AM510 monitor to secondhand smoke, other common indoor aerosols, and outdoor aerosol. J Environ Monit 2011, 13:1695-702.
• [21]Zhu K, Zhang J, Lioy PJ: Evaluation and comparison of continuous fine particulate matter monitors for measurement of ambient aerosols. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 2007, 57:1499-1506.
• [22]U.S. EPA 24-hour standard for outdoor PM2.5 levels. http://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.html webcite
• [23]Repace JL: Exposure to secondhand smoke. In Exposure Analysis. Edited by Ott WR, Steinemann AC. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Wallace LA; 2006:Chapter 9.
• [24]California Department of Public Health (CDPH): California adult smoking prevalence. 2009. http://www.cdph.ca.gov/Documents/Data%20Charts.pdf webcite
• [25]Wagner J, Sullivan DP, Faulkner D, Fisk WJ, Alevantis LE, Dod RL, Gundel LA, Waldman JM: Environmental tobacco smoke leakage from smoking rooms. J Occup Environ Hyg 2004, 1:110-118.