How to locate and appraise qualitative research in complementary and alternative medicine

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Bettina Berger¹  Peter Heusser¹  Martina Schwiegershausen¹  Brigitte Franzel¹ 

[1] Center for Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Witten/Herdecke, Gerhard Kienle Weg 4, Herdecke D-58313, Germany

关键词: Quality appraisal;    Meta-Ethnography;    Qualitative studies;    CAM;   

Others  :  1229898
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6882-13-125

 received in 2012-06-18, accepted in 2013-04-19,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

The aim of this publication is to present a case study of how to locate and appraise qualitative studies for the conduct of a meta-ethnography in the field of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). CAM is commonly associated with individualized medicine. However, one established scientific approach to the individual, qualitative research, thus far has been explicitly used very rarely. This article demonstrates a case example of how qualitative research in the field of CAM studies was identified and critically appraised.

Methods

Several search terms and techniques were tested for the identification and appraisal of qualitative CAM research in the conduct of a meta-ethnography. Sixty-seven electronic databases were searched for the identification of qualitative CAM trials, including CAM databases, nursing, nutrition, psychological, social, medical databases, the Cochrane Library and DIMDI.

Results

9578 citations were screened, 223 articles met the pre-specified inclusion criteria, 63 full text publications were reviewed, 38 articles were appraised qualitatively and 30 articles were included. The search began with PubMed, yielding 87% of the included publications of all databases with few additional relevant findings in the specific databases. CINHAL and DIMDI also revealed a high number of precise hits. Although CAMbase and CAM-QUEST® focus on CAM research only, almost no hits of qualitative trials were found there. Searching with broad text terms was the most effective search strategy in all databases.

Conclusions

This publication presents a case study on how to locate and appraise qualitative studies in the field of CAM. The example shows that the literature search for qualitative studies in the field of CAM is most effective when the search is begun in PubMed followed by CINHAL or DIMDI using broad text terms. Exclusive CAM databases delivered no additional findings to locate qualitative CAM studies.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Franzel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]About The Cochrane Library: The Cochrane Collaboration: [cited 2011 Aug 26]. http://www.cochrane.org/cochrane-reviews/about-cochrane-library webcite
• [2]Barbour RS: Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ 2001, 322(7294):1115-1117.
• [3]Reis S, Hermoni D, Van-Raalte R, Dahan R, Borkan JM: Aggregation of qualitative studies–From theory to practice: Patient priorities and family medicine/general practice evaluations. Patient Educ Couns 2007, 65(2):214-222.
• [4]Giacomini MK, Cook DJ: Users’ guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 2000, 284(3):357-362.
• [5]Broom A: Using qualitative interviews in CAM research: a guide to study design, data collection and data analysis. Complement Ther Med 2005, 13(1):65-73.
• [6]Morse JM: A review committee’s guide for evaluating qualitative proposals. Qual Health Res 2003, 13(6):833-851.
• [7]Malterud K: Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet 2001, 358(9280):483-488.
• [8]Denzin N, Lincoln Y: Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Incorporated; 2000.
• [9]Guba E, Lincoln Y: Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Denzin N, Lincoln Y. (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Incorporated; 2000.
• [10]Flick U: Qualitative Sozialforschung: eine Einführung. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag; 2007.
• [11]Mayring P: Einführung in die qualitative. Eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken. Beltz: Sozialforschung; 2002.
• [12]Lamnek S: Qualitative. Lehrbuch. Beltz: Sozialforschung; 2005.
• [13]Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, Tyrer P: Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 2000, 321(7262):694-696.
• [14]Dixon-Woods M, Fitzpatrick R: Qualitative research in systematic reviews. Has established a place for itself. BMJ 2001, 323(7316):765-6.
• [15]Kania A, Porcino A, Vehoef MJ: Value of qualitative research in the study of massage therapy. Int J Ther Massage Bodywork 2008, 1(2):6-10.
• [16]Heusser P: Whole Systems Research. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Onkologie 2011, 42:153-156.
• [17]Pilkington K, Kirkwood G, Rampes H, Fisher P, Richardson J: Homeopathy for anxiety and anxiety disorders: a systematic review of the research. Homeopathy 2006, 95(3):151-162.
• [18]Ritenbaugh C, Verhoef M, Fleishman S, Boon H, Leis A: Whole systems research: a discipline for studying complementary and alternative medicine. Altern Ther Health Med 2003, 9(4):32-36.
• [19]Pilkington K: Searching for CAM evidence: an evaluation of therapy-specific search strategies. J Altern Complement Med 2007, 13(4):451-459.
• [20]Bardia A, Wahner-Roedler DL, Erwin PL, Sood A: Search strategies for retrieving complementary and alternative medicine clinical trials in oncology. Integr Cancer Ther 2006, 5(3):202-205.
• [21]Wilczynski NL, Marks S, Haynes RB: Search strategies for identifying qualitative studies in CINAHL. Qual Health Res 2007, 17(5):705-710.
• [22]Flemming K, Briggs M: Electronic searching to locate qualitative research: evaluation of three strategies. J Adv Nurs 2007, 57(1):95-100.
• [23]Flick U, Kardoff E: Steinke I (Hrsg.): Qualitative Forschung. Ein Handbuch. Reinbek b. Rowohlt Taschenbuch: Hamburg; 2007.
• [24]Finfgeld DL: Metasynthesis: the state of the art–so far. Qual Health Res 2003, 13(7):893-904.
• [25]Finfgeld-Connett D, Johnson ED: Literature search strategies for conducting knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews. J Adv Nurs 2013, 69(1):194-204.
• [26]Behrens J, Langer G: Evidence-based nursing and caring. Huber, Hans: Bern; 2006.
• [27]Cohen DJ, Crabtree BF: Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: controversies and recommendations. Ann Fam Med 2008, 6(4):331-339.
• [28]Greenhalgh T, Taylor R: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). BMJ 1997, 315(7110):740-743.
• [29]JBI: CQRMG: [cited 2011 Sep 16]. http://connect.jbiconnectplus.org/Appraise.aspx webcite
• [30]Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur A, Harvey J, Hsu R, Katbamna S, Olsen R, Smith L, Riley R, Sutton AJ: Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006, 6:35. BioMed Central Full Text
• [31]Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J: Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007, 19(6):349-357.
• [32]Reichertz-Qualitative-Sozialforschung.pdf: [cited 2012 März 14]. https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:EneDWjonMR8J:www.biat.uni-flensburg.de/datenbank/Materialien/Reichertz-Qualitative-Sozialforschung.pdf+reichertz,+zur+G%C3%BCltigkeit&hl=de&gl=de&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESha_XYkfkT6eMjcZMZD49OsNSPBZcbvj8harkWRfR51WoKfszHmQRWkT_9Kmkapgr0VT9Z0ep-fqTDwsV0mPBva3C_em2bPfdWcpNfCXC1Hqg-PkXwTfBNs0b9Q-A8IuETP2fU4&sig=AHIEtbQke7uoYeaTRjVN78ddc2X5-MzX3A webcite
• [33]Steinke I: Gütekriterien qualitativer Forschung. In Qualitative Forschung. Ein Handbuch, S. 319–331. Edited by Flick U, von Kardorff E, Steinke I. Reinbek b. Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch; 2000.
• [34]Prakke H, Wurster J: Gütekriterien für Qualitative Forschung. Plege 1999, 12:183-186.
• [35]McClean S, Shaw A: From schism to continuum? The problematic relationship between expert and lay knowledge--an exploratory conceptual synthesis of two qualitative studies. Qual Health Res 2005, 15(6):729-749.
• [36]Smithson J, Paterson C, Britten N, Evans M, Lewith G: Cancer patients’ experiences of using complementary therapies: polarization and integration. J Health Serv Res Policy 2010, 15(Suppl 2):54-61.
• [37]Lin W-C, Gau M-L, Lin H-C, Lin H-R: Spiritual well-being in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Nurs Res 2011, 19(1):1-12.
• [38]Littlewood R, Vanable P: Complementary and alternative medicine use among HIV-positive people: research synthesis and implications for HIV care. CAIC 2008, 20(8):1002-1018.
• [39]Noblit GW, Hare RD: Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Incorporated: Newbury Park Sage Publications; 1988.
• [40]de Vet HCW, Eisinga A, Riphagen II, Aertgeerts B, Pewsner D: Chapter 7: Searching for Studies. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Version 0.4 [updated September 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration 2008.
• [41]Hannes K: Chapter 4: Critical appraisal of qualitative research. In Supplementary Guidance for Inclusion of Qualitative Research in Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Edited by Noyes J, Booth A, Hannes K, Harden A, Harris J, Lewin S, Lockwood C. Version 1 (updated August 2011), Cochrane Collaboration Qualitative Methods Group; 2011. Available from URL http://cqrmg.cochrane.org/supplemental-handbook-guidance webcite
• [42]qualitativ.pdf: [cited 2011 Okt 19]. http://www.medizin.uni-halle.de/fileadmin/Bereichsordner/Institute/GesundheitsPflegewissenschaften/Hallesche_Beitr%C3%A4ge_und_EBN/QualitativeStudie.pdf webcite
• [43]Malterud K: Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet 2001, 358(9280):483-488.
• [44]CAMbase - complementary and alternative medicine: [cited 2011 Okt 19]. http://cambase.dmz.uni-wh.de/opencam/index_en.html webcite
• [45]CAM QUEST - Home: [cited 2011 Sep 19]. http://www.cam-quest.org/ webcite
• [46]GREENPILOT - Einfache Suche: [cited 2011 Okt 19]. http://www.greenpilot.de/beta2/app webcite
• [47]MEDPILOT - Einfache Suche [Internet]. [cited 2011 Okt 19]. http://www.medpilot.de/ webcite
• [48]Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B, Sutton A: Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005, 10(1):45-53.
• [49]Hopewell S, Clarke MJ, Lefebvre C, Scherer RW: Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials. [cited 2011 Sep 14]. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.MR000001.pub2/abstract webcite
• [50]Evans D: Database searches for qualitative research. J Med Libr Assoc 2002, 90(3):290-293.
• [51]Shaw RL, Booth A, Sutton AJ, Miller T, Smith JA, Young B, Jones DR, Dixon-Woods M: Finding qualitative research: an evaluation of search strategies. BMC Med Res Methodol 2004, 4:5-5. BioMed Central Full Text
• [52]Barroso J, Gollop CJ, Sandelowski M, Meynell J, Pearce PF, Collins LJ: The challenges of searching for and retrieving qualitative studies. West J Nurs Res 2003, 25(2):153-178.
• [53]Mays N, Pope C, Popay J: Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005, 10(1):6-20.
• [54]Murphy LS, Reinsch S, Najm WI, Dickerson VM, Seffinger MA, Adams A, Mishra SI: Searching biomedical databases on complementary medicine: the use of controlled vocabulary among authors, indexers and investigators. BMC Complement Altern Med 2003, 3:3. BioMed Central Full Text