An integrated health sector response to violence against women in Malaysia: lessons for supporting scale up

BMC Public Health

Charlotte Watts³  Rashidah Shuib²  Siti Hawa Ali¹  Susannah H Mayhew³  Manuela Colombini³ 

[1] School of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Penang, Malaysia;Women's Development Research Centre (KANITA), Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Penang, Malaysia;Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

关键词: Malaysia;    Intimate partner violence;    Integration;    Scale up;    Gender-based violence;   

Others  :  1163427
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-12-548

 received in 2012-04-03, accepted in 2012-07-24,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Malaysia has been at the forefront of the development and scale up of One-Stop Crisis Centres (OSCC) - an integrated health sector model that provides comprehensive care to women and children experiencing physical, emotional and sexual abuse. This study explored the strengths and challenges faced during the scaling up of the OSCC model to two States in Malaysia in order to identify lessons for supporting successful scale-up.

Methods

In-depth interviews were conducted with health care providers, policy makers and key informants in 7 hospital facilities. This was complemented by a document analysis of hospital records and protocols. Data were coded and analysed using NVivo 7.

Results

The implementation of the OSCC model differed between hospital settings, with practise being influenced by organisational systems and constraints. Health providers generally tried to offer care to abused women, but they are not fully supported within their facility due to lack of training, time constraints, limited allocated budget, or lack of referral system to external support services. Non-specialised hospitals in both States struggled with a scarcity of specialised staff and limited referral options for abused women. Despite these challenges, even in more resource-constrained settings staff who took the initiative found it was possible to adapt to provide some level of OSCC services, such as referring women to local NGOs or community support groups, or training nurses to offer basic counselling.

Conclusions

The national implementation of OSCC provides a potentially important source of support for women experiencing violence. Our findings confirm that pilot interventions for health sector responses to gender based violence can be scaled up only when there is a sound health infrastructure in place – in other words a supportive health system. Furthermore, the successful replication of the OSCC model in other similar settings requires that the model – and the system supporting it – needs to be flexible enough to allow adaptation of the service model to different types of facilities and levels of care, and to available resources and thus better support providers committed to delivering care to abused women.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Colombini et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Campbell JC: Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet 2002, 359(9314):1331-1336.
• [2]Heise L, Ellsberg M, Gottemoeller M: Ending Violence Against Women. Popul Rep 1999, 1-44. Series L(No.11)
• [3]UNFPA Asia Pacific Office: Health-sector responses to Gender-Based Violence. UNFPA, Bangkok; 2010.
• [4]Colombini M, et al.: Background paper for the WHO Expert meeting on Health Sector Responses to IPV and SV 10-12 March 2009, WHO. Geneva; Unpublished
• [5]World Health Organization: Guidelines for medico-legal care for victims of sexual violence. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2003.
• [6]Hanson K, et al.: Scaling up health policies and services in low- and middle-income settings. BMC Health Serv Res 2010, 10(Suppl 1):I1. BioMed Central Full Text
• [7]Hanson K, et al.: Expanding access to priority health interventions: a framework for understanding the constraints to scaling-up. J Int Dev 2003, 15(1):1-14.
• [8]Dickinson C, Attawell K, Druce N: Progress on scaling up integrated services for sexual and reproductive health and HIV. Bull World Health Organ 2009, 87:846-851.
• [9]Bott S, Morrison A, Ellsberg M: Preventing and responding to gender-based violence in middle and low-income countries: a global review and analysis, in World Bank Policy Research Working Paper2005. World Bank, Washington; 2005:61.
• [10]Colombini M, Mayhew S, Watts C: Health-sector responses to intimate partner violence in low and middle-income settings: a review of current models, challenges and opportunities. Bull World Health Organ 2008, 86(8):635-642.
• [11]Guedes A: Addressing gender-based violence from the reproductive health HIV sector: a literature review and analysis, 2004, D.C. LTG Associates Population Technical Assistance Project POPTECH. Washington, DC; 2004.
• [12]UNFPA Asia Pacific Office: Health sector response to Gender-Based Violence. UNFPA, Bangkok; 2010.
• [13]Tiwari A, et al.: A randomised controlled trial of empowerment training for Chinese abused pregnant women in Hong Kong. BJOG. An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2005, 112:1249-1256.
• [14]Feder G, et al.: Identification and Referral to Improve Safety (IRIS) of women experiencing domestic violence with a primary care training and support programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011, 378(9805):1788-1795.
• [15]Nelson HD: Screening for domestic violence–bridging the evidence gaps. Lancet 2004, 364(Suppl 1):S22-S23.
• [16]Hegarty KL, Feder G, Ramsay J: Identification of intimate partner abuse in health care settings: should health professionals be screening? In Intimate partner abuse and health professionals: new approaches to domestic violence. Edited by Roberts G, Feder G, Ramsay J. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh; 2005:79-92.
• [17]Taket A, et al.: Routinely asking women about domestic violence in health settings. Br Med J 2003, 327(7416):673-676.
• [18]Feder G, et al.: How far does screening women for domestic (partner) violence in different health-care settings meet the UK National Screening Committee criteria for a screening programme? Systematic reviews of nine UK National Screening Committee criteria. Health Technol Assess 2009, 13(16):iii-iv-xi-xiii. 1-113, 137-347
• [19]Ramsay J, Carter Y, Davidson L, Dunne D, Eldridge S, Feder G, Hegarty K, Rivas C, Taft A, Warburton A: Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well-being of women who experience intimate partner abuse. Campbell Systematic Reviews; 2009:5.
• [20]World Health Organization: Expert meeting on Health-sector responses to violence against women, 17-19 March 2009. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2010.
• [21]Hawa Ali S: The Women's Centre for Change, Penang: empowering the women of Malaysia. In Improving people’s lives: lessons in empowerment from Asia. Edited by Sharma M. Sage, New Delhi; 2003:56-100.
• [22]Hassan A: Medical services for the management of survivors of violence women and children. KL Hospital, Kuala Lumpur; 1994:88.
• [23]Colombini M, et al.: One Stop Crisis Centres: A Policy Analysis of the Malaysian Response to intimate partner violence. Health Res Policy Sys 2011, 9(25):1-8.
• [24]Wong YL: Hospital Based One Stop Crisis Centre - health sector response to gender based violence in Peninsular Malaysia. UNFPA, Kuala Lumpur; 2011.
• [25]Bacchus L, Mezey G, Bewley S: Experiences of seeking help from health professionals in a sample of women who experienced domestic violence. Health Soc Care Community 2003, 11(1):10-18.
• [26]Bott S, Guedes A, Guezmes A: The health service response to sexual violence: lessons from IPPF/WHR member associations in Latin America. In Non-consensual sex and young people: perspectives from the developing world. Edited by Jejeebhoy S, Shah I, Thapa S. Zed Books, New York; 2005:251-68.
• [27]d'Oliveira AF, Schraiber LB: Violence against women: overview, gaps and challenges, in "Violence against women: a statistical overview, challenges and gaps in data collection and methodologies and approaches for overcoming them". Expert Group MeetingApril 2005. UN Division for the Advancement of Women, Geneva; 2005.
• [28]Garimella R, et al.: Physician beliefs about victims of spouse abuse and about the physician role. J Women's Health Gend Based Med 2000, 9(4):405-411.
• [29]Taft A, Broom DH, Legge D: General practitioner management of intimate partner abuse and the whole family: qualitative study. Br Med J 2004, 328(7440):618.
• [30]Ramsden C, Bonner M: A realistic view of domestic violence screening in an Emergency Department. Accid Emerg Nurs 2002, 10(1):31-39.
• [31]Wiist WH, McFarlane J: The effectiveness of an abuse assessment protocol in public health prenatal clinics. Am J Publ Health 1999, 89(8):1217-1221.
• [32]Fanslow JL, et al.: Outcome evaluation of an emergency department protocol of care on partner abuse. Aust N Z J Public Health 1998, 22(5):598-603.
• [33]Fanslow JL, Norton RN, Robinson EM: One year follow-up of an emergency department protocol for abused women. Aust N Z J Public Health 1999, 23(4):418-420.
• [34]Shepard MF, et al.: Public Health Nurses' Responses to Domestic Violence: A Report from the Enhanced Domestic Abuse Intervention Project. Public Health Nurs 1999, 16:359-366.
• [35]Mayhew S, et al.: Implementing the integration of component services for reproductive health. Stud Fam Plann 2000, 31(2):151-162.
• [36]Tower M: Intimate partner violence and the health care response: a postmodern critique. Health Care Women Int 2007, 28(5):438-452.
• [37]Ramsay J, et al.: Should health professionals screen women for domestic violence? Systematic review. Br Med J 2002, 325(7359):314.
• [38]Wathen CN, MacMillan HL: Interventions for violence against women - Scientific review. J Am Med Assoc 2003, 289(5):589-600.
• [39]Mangham LJ, Hanson K: Scaling up in international health: what are the key issues? Health Policy Plan 2010, 25(2):85-96.