Understanding CBHI hospitalisation patterns: a comparison of insured and uninsured women in Gujarat, India

BMC Health Services Research

Simon Cousens¹  Ajay Mahal²  Tara Sinha³  Sapna Desai³ 

[1] Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK;School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia;Self Employed Women’s Association, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

关键词: Hospitalization;    Female;    Hysterectomy;    India;    Health insurance;    Treatment-seeking behaviour;    Community-based health insurance;   

Others  :  1126918
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6963-14-320

 received in 2013-06-12, accepted in 2014-07-14,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Community-based health insurance has been associated with increased hospitalisation in low-income settings, but with limited analysis of the illnesses for which claims are submitted. A review of claims submitted to VimoSEWA, an inpatient insurance scheme in Gujarat, India, found that fever, diarrhoea and hysterectomy, the latter at a mean age of 37 years, were the leading reasons for claims by adult women. We compared the morbidity, outpatient treatment-seeking and hospitalisation patterns of VimoSEWA-insured women with uninsured women.

Methods

We utilised data from a cross-sectional survey of 1,934 insured and uninsured women in Gujarat, India. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of insurance coverage and the association of insurance with hospitalisation. Self-reported data on morbidity, outpatient care and hospitalisation were compared between insured and uninsured women.

Results

Age, marital status and occupation of adult women were associated with insurance status. Reported recent morbidity, type of illness and outpatient treatment were similar among insured and uninsured women. Multivariable analysis revealed strong evidence of a higher odds of hospitalisation amongst the insured (OR = 2.7; 95% ci. 1.6, 4.7). The leading reason for hospitalisation for uninsured and insured women was hysterectomy, at a similar mean age of 36, followed by common ailments such as fever and diarrhoea. Insured women appeared to have a higher probability of being hospitalised than uninsured women for all causes, rather than specifically for fever, diarrhoea or hysterectomy. Length of stay was similar while choice of hospital differed between insured and uninsured women.

Conclusions

Despite similar reported morbidity patterns and initial treatment-seeking behaviour, VimoSEWA members were more likely to be hospitalised. The data did not provide strong evidence that inpatient hospitalisation replaced outpatient treatment for common illnesses or that insurance was the primary inducement for hysterectomy in the population. Rather, it appears that VimoSEWA members behaved differently in deciding if, and where, to be hospitalised for any condition. Further research is required to explore this decision-making process and roles, if any, played by adverse selection and moral hazard. Lastly, these hospitalisation patterns raise concerns regarding population health needs and access to quality preventive and outpatient services.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Desai et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Soors W, Devadasan N, Durairaj V, Criel B: Community Health Insurance and Universal Coverage: Multiple paths, many rivers to cross. In World Health Report Background Report. Volume 48. Geneva: WHO; 2010.
• [2]Radermacher R, Ashok S, Zabel K, Dror I: What do we know about the impact of microinsurance?. New Delhi, India: Microinsurance Academy; 2010.
• [3]Ekman B: Community-based health insurance in low-income countries: a systematic review of the evidence. Health Policy Plan 2004, 19(5):249.
• [4]Carrin G, Waelkens MP, Criel B: Community based health insurance in developing countries: a study of its contribution to the performance of health financing systems. Trop Med Int Health 2005, 10(8):799-811.
• [5]Aggarwal A: Impact Evaluation of India’s Yeshasvini Community-Based Health Insurance Scheme. Health Econ 2010, 19:5-25.
• [6]Gnawali DP, Pokhrel S, Sie A, Sanon M, De Allegri M, Souares A, Dong H, Sauerborn R: The effect of community-based health insurance on the utilisation of modern health care services: Evidence from Burkina Faso. Health Policy 2009, 90:214-222.
• [7]Rao KD, Waters H, Steinhardt L, Alam S, Hansen P, Naeem JA: An experiment with community health funds in Afghanistan. Health Policy Plan 2009, 24:301-311.
• [8]Chankova S, Sulzbach S, Diop F: Impact of mutual health organizations: evidence from West Africa. Health Policy Plan 2008, 23(4):264.
• [9]Franco LM, Diop FP, Burgert CR, Kelley AG, Makinen M, Hamed C, Simparae T: Effects of mutual health organizations on use of priority health-care services in urban and rural Mali: a case–control study. Bull World Health Organ 2008, 86(11):830-838.
• [10]Robyn PJ, Fink G, Sie A, Sauerborn R: Health insurance and health-seeking behaviour: Evidence from a randomized community-based inusrance rollout in rural Burkina Faso. Soc Sci Med 2012, 75:595-603.
• [11]Michielsen J, Criel B, Devadasan N, Soors W, Wouters E, Mueulemans H: Can health insurance improve access to quality care for the Indian poor? Int J Qual Health Care 2011, 23(4):471-486.
• [12]Acharya A, Vellakkal S, Taylor F, Masset E, Satija A, Burke M, Ebrahim S: The Impact of Health Insurance Schemes for the Informal Sector in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. World Bank Res Obser 2012, 28(2):236-266.
• [13]Devadasan N, Criel B, Van Damme W, Manoharan S, Sarma PS, Van der Stuyft P: Community health insurance in Gudalur, India, increases access to hospital care. Health Policy Plan 2010, 25(2):145.
• [14]Dror DM, Soriano ES, Lorenzo ME, Sarol JN: Field based evidence of enhanced healthcare utilization among persons insured by micro health insurance units in Philippines. Health Policy 2005, 73(3):263-271.
• [15]Criel B, Van der Stuyft P, Van Lerberghe W: The Bwamanda hospital insurance scheme: effective for whom? A study of its impact on hospital utilization. Soc Sci Med 1999, 48(7):897-911.
• [16]Desai S: Keeping the ‘health’ in health insurance. Econ Pol Wkly 2009, 44(38):18-21.
• [17]SEWA: Annual Report. Ahmedabad, India: SEWA; 2012.
• [18]Devadasan N, Ranson K, Van Damme W, Acharya A, Criel B: The landscape of community health insurance in India: An overview based on 10 case studies. Health Policy 2006, 78(2–3):224-234.
• [19]VimoSEWA: Key Performance Indicators.Ahmedabad. 2012.
• [20]Ahmedabad District Enrolment Details. [http://www.rsby.gov.in/statewise.aspx?state=2 webcite]. Accessed 6 January, 2012
• [21]Ranson MK: Reduction of catastrophic health care expenditures by a community-based health insurance scheme in Gujarat, India: current experiences and challenges. Bull World Health Organ 2002, 80(8):613-621.
• [22]Devadasan N, Criel B, Van Damme W, Ranson K, Van der Stuyft P: Indian community health insurance schemes provide partial protection against catastrophic health expenditure. BMC Health Serv Res 2007, 7(1):43. BioMed Central Full Text
• [23]Ranson MK, Tara S, Mirai C, Akash A, Ami B, Morris SS, Mills AJ: Making health insurance work for the poor: learning from the Self-Employed Women’s Association’s (SEWA) community-based health insurance scheme in India. Soc Sci Med 2006, 62(3):707-720.
• [24]Sinha T, Ranson MK, Chatterjee M, Acharya A, Mills AJ: Barriers to accessing benefits in a community-based insurance scheme: lessons learnt from SEWA Insurance, Gujarat. Health Policy Plan 2006, 21(2):132.
• [25]Spilsbury K, Semmens JB, Hammond I, Bolck A: Persistent high rates of hysterectomy in Western Australia: a population-based study of 83 000 procedures over 23 years. BJOG 2006, 113(7):804-809.
• [26]Vessey MP, Villard-Mackintosh L, McPherson K, Coulter A, Yeates D: The epidemiology of hysterectomy: findings in a large cohort study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992, 99(5):402-407.
• [27]Ong S, Codd MB, Coughlan M, O’Herlihy C: Prevalence of hysterectomy in Ireland. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2000, 69(3):243-247.
• [28]Whiteman MK, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, Morrow B, Podgornik MN, Brett KM, Marchbanks PA: Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000–2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008, 198(1):34 e31-37.
• [29]Ranson K: The Impact of SEWA’s Medical Insurance Fund on Hospital Utilization and Expenditure in India. In Health Nutrition and Population Discussion Paper. Washington, D.C: World Bank; 2001.
• [30]Bhatt E: We are Poor but So Many. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
• [31]Gumber A, Kulkarni V: Health insurance for informal sector: case study of Gujarat. Economic and Political Weekly 2000, 3607-3613.
• [32]Devadasan N, Ranson K, Van Damme W, Criel B: Community health insurance in India: an overview. Economic and Political Weekly 2004, 3179-3183.
• [33]Wang H, Zhang L, Yip W, Hsiao W: Adverse selection in a voluntary Rural Mutual Health Care health insurance scheme in China. Soc Sci Med 2006, 63(5):1236-1245.
• [34]Dercon S, Kirchberger M: Literature review on microinsurance. In Microinsurance Papers. Geneva: International Labor Organization; 2008.
• [35]Sen A: Health: perception versus observation. BMJ 2002, 324(7342):860-861.
• [36]Subramanian SV, Subramanyam MA, Selvaraj S, Kawachi I: Are self-reports of health and morbidities in developing countries misleading? Evidence from India. Soc Sci Med 2009, 68(2):260-265.
• [37]Jütting JP: Do community-based health insurance schemes improve poor people’s access to health care? Evidence from rural Senegal. World Dev 2004, 32(2):273-288.
• [38]Devadasan N, Manoharan S, Menon N, Menon S, Thekaekara M, Thekaekara S, Team A: ACCORD community health insurance: Increasing access to hospital care. Economic and Political Weekly 2004, 3189-3194.
• [39]Gumber A: Hedging the health of poor: the case for community financing. In. Washington DC: The World Bank; 2001.
• [40]Sinha T, Desai S, Mahal A: Hospitalized for fever? Understanding hospitalization for common illnesses among insured women in a low income setting. Health Policy Plan 2013. epub ahead of print, doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt032
• [41]Desai S, Sinha T, Mahal A: Prevalence of hysterectomy among rural and urban women with and without health insurance in Gujarat, India. Reprod Health Matters 2011, 19(37):42-51.
• [42]Ranson MK, John KR: Quality of hysterectomy care in rural Gujarat: the role of community-based health insurance. Reprod Health Matters 2002, 10(20):70-81.
• [43]Ranson MK, Sinha T, Chatterjee M, Gandhi F, Jayswal R, Patel F, Morris SS, Mills AJ: Equitable utilisation of Indian community based health insurance scheme among its rural membership: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2007, 334(7607):1309.
• [44]Smith KV, Sulzbach S: Community-based health insurance and access to maternal health services: evidence from three West African countries. Soc Sci Med 2008, 66(12):2460-2473.
• [45]Hounton S, Byass P, Kouyate B: Assessing effectiveness of a community based health insurance in rural Burkina Faso. BMC Health Serv Res 2012, 12:363. BioMed Central Full Text