Non-degree allopathic practitioners as first contact points for acute illness episodes: insights from a qualitative study in rural northern India

BMC Health Services Research

Pradeep Panda²  Katja Roth¹  Christina May¹ 

[1]Department for Cooperative Studies, University of Cologne, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923 Cologne, Germany

[2]Micro Insurance Academy, 52-B, Okhla Industrial Estate, Phase III, 110020 New Delhi, India

关键词: India;    Non-degree allopathic practitioners;    Informal health providers;    Access to health care;    Rural health care;   

Others  :  1132681
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6963-14-182

 received in 2013-12-10, accepted in 2014-04-15,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

In 2005, the Indian government launched the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) to improve the quality of and access to rural public health care. Despite these efforts, recent evidence shows that the rural poor continue to primarily consult private non-degree allopathic practitioners (NDAPs) for acute illness episodes. To examine this phenomenon, we explore the rural poor’s perception and utilization of the rural health care system and the role and accessibility of NDAPs therein.

Methods

Our study is based on qualitative data from focus group discussions conducted in three rural districts in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, two high-focus states of the NRHM in northern India, in 2009/2010. Our study population consists of female micro-credit self-help group members and their male household heads. We apply a directed content analysis and use a theoretical framework to differentiate between physical, financial and cultural access to care.

Results

Our study population distinguishes between “home treatment” (informal self-care), “local treatment” (formally unqualified care) and “outside treatment” (formally qualified care). Because of their proximity, flexible payment options and familiarity with patients’ belief systems, among other things, local NDAPs are physically, financially and culturally accessible. They are usually the first contact points for patients before turning to qualified practitioners, and treat minor illnesses, provide first relief, refer patients to other providers and administer formally prescribed treatments.

Conclusion

Our findings are similar for all three study sites and reinforce recent findings from southern and eastern India. The poor’s understanding and utilization of the rural health system deviates from governmental ideas. Because of their embeddedness in the community, private NDAPs are the most accessible medical providers and first contact points for acute illness episodes. Thus, they de-facto fulfill the role envisaged by the Indian government for accredited social health activists introduced as part of the NRHM. We conclude that instead of trying to replace NDAPs with public initiatives, the Indian government should regulate, qualify and integrate them as part of the existing public health care system. This way, we argue, India can improve the rural poor’s access to formally qualified practitioners.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 May et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Bajpai N, Sachs JD, Dholakia RH: Improving access and efficiency in public health services: mid-term evaluation of India’s National Rural Health Mission. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications; 2010.
• [2]Prasad AM, Chakraborty G, Yadav SS, Bhatia S: Addressing the social determinants of health through health system strengthening and inter-sectoral convergence: the case of the Indian National Rural Health Mission. Glob Health Action 2013., 6doi:10.3402/gha.v6i0.20135
• [3]Singh SK, Kaur R, Gupta M, Kumar R: Impact of National Rural Health Mission on perinatal mortality in rural India. Indian Pediatr 2012, 49:136-138.
• [4]MoHFW: Minutes of the 10th meeting of the International Advisory Panel (IAP) on NRHM. New Delhi: Ministry of Health & Family Welfare; 2012.
• [5]Planning Commission: Report of the working group on National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) for the Twelfth Five Year Plan (2012-2017). New Delhi: Government of India; 2011.
• [6]Gautham M, Binnendijk E, Koren R, Dror DM: “First we go to the small doctor”: first contact for curative health care sought by rural communities in Andhra Pradesh & Orissa, India. Indian J Med Res 2011, 134:627-638.
• [7]Raza W, Van de Poel E, Panda P, Dror DM, Bedi AS: Healthcare seeking behaviour among self-help group households in rural Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, India. ISS Working Paper Series/General Series No. 575.. The Hague: International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University (ISS); 2013:1-32.
• [8]Rohde JE, Viswanathan H: The rural private practitioner. Delhi: Oxford University Press; 1995.
• [9]Kumar R, Jaiswal V, Tripathi S, Kumar A, Idris MZ: Inequity in health care delivery in India: the problem of rural medical practitioners. Health Care Anal 2007, 15:223-233.
• [10]Viswanathan H: The rural private practitioner. In Serv. Provis. Poor Public Priv. Sect. Coop. Edited by Kochendörfer-Lucius G, Plesković B. Washington D.C: Inwent; World Bank; 2004:59-65.
• [11]Abraham L: Indian System of Medicine (ISM) and public health care in India. In Rev. Healthc. India. Edited by Gangolli LV, Duggal R, Shukla A. Mumbai: Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes; 2005:187-223.
• [12]Rao PH: Profile and practice of private medical practitioner in rural India. Health Popul Perspect Issues 2005, 28:40-49.
• [13]Sabde YD, Diwan V, Saraf VS, Mahadik VK, Diwan VK, De Costa A: Mapping private pharmacies and their characteristics in Ujjain district, Central India. BMC Health Serv Res 2011, 11:351-359. BioMed Central Full Text
• [14]George A, Iyer A: Unfree markets: socially embedded informal health providers in northern Karnataka, India. Soc Sci Med 2013, 96:297-304.
• [15]Aitken M, Backliwal A, Chang M, Udeshi A: Understanding healthcare access in India. What is the current state?. Parsippany: IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics; 2013.
• [16]Penchansky R, Thomas JW: The concept of access: definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Med Care 1981, 19:127-140.
• [17]McIntyre D, Thiede M, Birch S: Access as a policy-relevant concept in low-and middle-income countries. Health Econ Pol Law 2009, 4:179-193.
• [18]Peters DH, Garg A, Bloom G, Walker DG, Brieger WR, Rahman MH: Poverty and access to health care in developing countries. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008, 1136:161-171.
• [19]MoHFW: Rural health statistics in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Health & Family Welfare; 2012.
• [20]About Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA). [http://nrhm.gov.in/communitisation/asha/about-asha.html webcite]
• [21]Bajpai V, Saraya A: User charges as a feature of health policy in India: a perspective. Natl Med J India 2010, 23:163-170.
• [22]Prinja S, Aggarwal AK, Kumar R, Kanavos P: User charges in health care: evidence of effect on service utilization & equity from north India. Indian J Med Res 2012, 136:868-876.
• [23]Planning Commission: High level expert group report on universal health coverage in India. New Delhi: Planning Commission of India; 2011.
• [24]MoHFW: Rural health statistics in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Health & Family Welfare; 2010.
• [25]Naryana KV: The unqualified medical practitioners: methods of practice and nexus with the qualified doctors. Hyderabad: Centre for Economic and Social Studies; 2006.
• [26]Banerjee A, Deaton A, Duflo E: Health, health care and economic development–wealth, health, and health services in rural Rajasthan. Am Econ Rev 2004, 94:326-330.
• [27]Jarhyan P, Singh (The Late) B, Rai SK, Nongkynrih B: Private rural health providers in Haryana, India: profile and practices. Rural Remote Health 2012, 12:1953.
• [28]Kanjilal B, Mondal S, Samanta T, Mondal A, Singh S: A parallel health care market: Rural medical practitioners in West Bengal, India. Jaipur: Indian Institute of Health Management Research; 2007.
• [29]Dharmaraj D, Duttagupta KK: Perspectives of the community and PHC doctors from three southern states in India on community preference for health services provided by rural medical practitioners. Indian Med Gaz 2013, 147:49-53.
• [30]Banerjee AV, Duflo E: Poor economics: a radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. 1st edition. New York: PublicAffairs; 2011.
• [31]Yadav K, Jarhyan P, Gupta V, Pandav CS: Revitalizing rural health care delivery: can rural health practitioners be the answer? Indian J Community Med 2009, 34:3-5.
• [32]Sudhinaraset M, Ingram M, Kinlaw Lofthouse H, Montagu D: What is the role of informal healthcare providers in developing countries? A systematic review. PLoS One 2013, 8:e54978.
• [33]Andersen RM: Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav 1995, 36:1-10.
• [34]Culyer AJ, van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A: Utilisation as a measure of equity by Mooney, Hall, Donaldson and Gerard. J Health Econ 1992, 11:93-98.
• [35]Culyer AJ, van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A: Access, utilisation and equity: a further comment. J Health Econ 1992, 11:207-210.
• [36]Mooney G, Hall J, Donaldson C, Gerard K: Reweighing heat: response to Culyer, van Doorslaer and Wagstaff. J Health Econ 1992, 11:199-205.
• [37]Doyle C, Panda P, Van de Poel E, Radermacher R, Dror DM: Reconciling research and implementation in micro health insurance experiments in India: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2011, 12:224. BioMed Central Full Text
• [38]Dixit S, Panda P: Spatial research methodology supplementing cluster randomized controlled trials: learning from a study of community-based health insurance schemes in India. Int J Geoinformatics 2013, 9:31-38.
• [39]Panda P, Chakraborty A, Dror DM, Bedi AS: Enrolment in community-based health insurance schemes in rural Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, India. Health Pol Pla 2013. doi:10.1093/heapol/czt077
• [40]Morse JM: Determining sample size. Qual Health Res 2000, 10:3-5.
• [41]Indian Council of Medical Research: Ethical guidelines for biomedical research on human participants. New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research; 2006.
• [42]Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005, 15:1277-1288.
• [43]Patton MQ: Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2002.
• [44]Shivaranjini S: Ayush doctors want recognition on par with their selfless service. Deccan Her 2012. 18.07.