Addressing the policy cacophony does not require more evidence: an argument for reframing obesity as caloric overconsumption

BMC Public Health

Jacob J Shelley¹ 

[1] Doctor of Juridical Science Candidate, Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, 84 Queen’s Park, Toronto, ON M5S 2C5, Canada

关键词: Public health policy;    Food environment;    Framing;    Caloric overconsumption;    Obesity;   

Others  :  1162766
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-12-1042

 received in 2012-07-25, accepted in 2012-11-23,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Numerous policies have been proposed to address the public health problem of obesity, resulting in a policy cacophony. The noise of so many policy options renders it difficult for policymakers to determine which policies warrant implementation. This has resulted in calls for more and better evidence to support obesity policy. However, it is not clear that evidence is the solution. This paper argues that to address the policy cacophony it is necessary to rethink the problem of obesity, and more specifically, how the problem of obesity is framed. This paper argues that the frame “obesity” be replaced by the frame “caloric overconsumption”, concluding that the frame caloric overconsumption can overcome the obesity policy cacophony.

Discussion

Frames are important because they influence public policy. Understood as packages that define issues, frames influence how best to approach a problem. Consequently, debates over public policy are considered battles over framing, with small shifts in how an issue is framed resulting in significant changes to the policy environment. This paper presents a rationale for reframing the problem of obesity as caloric overconsumption. The frame “obesity” contributes to the policy cacophony by including policies aimed at both energy output and energy input. However, research increasingly demonstrates that energy input is the primary cause of obesity, and that increases in energy input are largely attributable to the food environment. By focusing on policies that aim to prevent increases in energy input, the frame caloric overconsumption will reduce the noise of the obesity policy cacophony. While the proposed frame will face some challenges, particularly industry opposition, policies aimed at preventing caloric overconsumption have a clearer focus, and can be more politically palatable if caloric overconsumption is seen as an involuntary risk resulting from the food environment.

Summary

The paper concludes that policymakers will be able to make better sense of the obesity policy cacophony if the problem of obesity is reframed as caloric overconsumption. By focusing on a specific cause of obesity, energy input, the frame caloric overconsumption allows policymakers to focus on the most promising obesity prevention policies.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Shelley; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Novak NL, Brownell KD: Obesity: a public health approach. Psychiatr Clin N Am 2011, 34(4):895-909.
• [2]Brownell KD: The chronicling of obesity: growing awareness of its social, economic, and political contexts. Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law 2005, 30(5):955-964.
• [3]Saguy A, Riley KW: Weighing both sides. Morality, mortality and framing contests over obesity. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2005, 30(5):869-921.
• [4]Finucane MM, Stevens GA, Cowan MJ, Danaei G, Lin JK, Paciorek CJ, Singh GM, Gutierrez HR, Lu YA, Bahalim AN, et al.: National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9.1 Million participants. Lancet 2011, 377(9765):557-567.
• [5]Lavie CJ, Milani RV, Ventura HO: Obesity and cardiovascular disease risk factor, paradox, and impact of weight loss. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 53(21):1925-1932.
• [6]Brownell KD, Horgen KB: Food fight: the inside story of the food industry, America's obesity crisis, and what we can do about it. New York: McGraw-Hill, Contemporary Books; 2004.
• [7]Gaesser GA: Big fat lies: the truth about your weight and your health. New York: Fawcett Columbine; 2002.
• [8]Wann M: Fat! So? because you don't have to apologize for your size. Berkeley, CA: Ten Speed; 1999.
• [9]Epstein RA: What (not) to do about obesity: a moderate aristotelian answer. Georgetown Law Journal 2005, 93(4):1361-1386.
• [10]Hall MA: The scope and limits of public health law. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 2003, 46(3):S199-S209.
• [11]Epstein RA: Let the shoemaker stick to his last - a defense of the "old" public health. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 2003, 46(3):S138-S159.
• [12]Gostin LO, Bloche MG: The politics of public health: a response to Epstein. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 2002, 46(3Suppl):S160-S175.
• [13]Gostin LO, Gostin KG: A broader liberty: JS mill, paternalism and the public's health. Public Health 2009, 123(3):214-221.
• [14]Jochelson K: Nanny or steward? the role of government in public health. London: King's Fund; 2005.
• [15]Bridging the evidence gap in obesity prevention: [http:/ / www.iom.edu/ Reports/ 2010/ Bridging-the-Evidence-Gap-in-Obesit y-Prevention-A-Framework-to-Inform- Decision-Making.aspx] webciteA framework to inform decision making.
• [16]Lang T, Rayner G: Overcoming policy cacophony on obesity: an ecological public health framework for policymakers. Obes Rev 2007, 8:165-181.
• [17]Caulfield T, Alfonso V, Shelley J: Deterministic? newspaper representation of obesity and genetics. Open Obesity Journal 2009, 1:38-40.
• [18]Kim SH, Willis LA: Talking about obesity: news framing of who is responsible for causing and fixing the problem. J Heal Commun 2007, 12(4):359-376.
• [19]Lawrence R: Framing obesity: the evolution of news discourse on a public health issue. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 2004, 9(3):56-75.
• [20]Saguy AC, Almeling R: Fat in the fire? science, the news media, and the "obesity epidemic''. Sociological Forum 2008, 23(1):53-83.
• [21]Kwan S: Framing the fat body: contested meanings between government, activists, and industry. Sociol Inq 2009, 79(1):25-50.
• [22]Jenkin GL, Signal L, Thomson G: Framing obesity: the framing contest between industry and public health at the New zealand inquiry into obesity. Obes Rev 2011, 12(12):1022-1030.
• [23]Entman RM: Framing - toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J Commun 1993, 43(4):51-58.
• [24]Hallahan K: Seven models of framing: implications for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research 1999, 11(3):205-242.
• [25]Chong D, Druckman JN: Framing theory. Annual review of political science 2007, 10:103-126.
• [26]Siegel M, Lotenberg LD: Marketing public health. 2nd edition. Boston, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2007.
• [27]Schlesinger M: Weighting for godot. Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law 2005, 30(5):785-801.
• [28]Nathanson CA: Social movements as a catalyst for policy change: the case of smoking and guns. Journal of Health Politics and Law 1999, 24(3):421-488.
• [29]Apanovitch AM, McCarthy D, Salovey P: Using message framing to motivate HIV testing among low-income ethnic minority women. Heal Psychol 2003, 22(1):60-67.
• [30]Korn D, Givvins R, Azmier J: Framing public policy towards a public health paradigm for gambling. J Gambl Stud 2003, 19(2):235-256.
• [31]Oliver JE: Fat politics: the real story behind America's obesity epidemic. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
• [32]Campos P: The obesity myth. New York: Gotham Books; 2004.
• [33]Campos P, Saguy A, Ernsberger P, Oliver E, Gaesser G: The epidemiology of overweight and obesity: public health crisis or moral panic? International Journal of Epidemiology 2006, 35(1):55-60.
• [34]Gard M, Wright J: The obesity epidemic: science, morality, and ideology. New York: Routledge; 2005.
• [35]McKay B: Obese America - who you calling fat? - Government's standard lumps Hollywood hunks, athletes together with truly obese. In The wall street journal. New York: Dow Jones & Company Inc; 2002.
• [36]Center for Consumer Freedom: An epidemic of obesity myths. Washington, D.C: Center for Consumer Freedom; 2005.
• [37]Mann S: Framing obesity in economic theory and policy. Rev Soc Econ 2008, 66(2):163-179.
• [38]Barry CL, Brescoll VL, Brownell KD, Schlesinger M: Obesity metaphors: how beliefs about the causes of obesity affect support for public policy. Milbank Quarterly 2009, 87(1):7-47.
• [39]Hill JO: Understanding and addressing the epidemic of obesity: an energy balance perspective. Endocrinology Reviews 2006, 27:750-761.
• [40]Rutter H: Where next for obesity? Lancet 2011, 378(9793):746-747.
• [41]Hall K, Sacks G, Chandramohan D, Chow C, et al.: Quantification of the effect of energy imbalance on bodyweight. Lancet 2011, 378:826-837.
• [42]Popkin B: The world is fat: the fads, trends, policies and products that are fattening the human race. New York: Penguin; 2009.
• [43][http://www.healthyweightcommit.org] webciteJoin America's leading brands in helping families and schools reduce obesity.
• [44]Bleich S, Cutler D, Murray C, Adams A: Why is the developed world obese? Annual Review of Public Health 2008, 29:273-295.
• [45]Hall KD, Guo J, Dore M, Chow CC: The progressive increase of food waste in America and its environmental impact. PLoS One 2009, 4(11):e7940.
• [46]Swinburn B, Sacks G, Hall KD, McPherson K, Finegood DT, Moodie ML, Gortmaker SL: The global obesity pandemic: shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet 2011, 378(9793):804-814.
• [47]Swinburn B, Sacks G, Ravussin E: Increased food energy supply is more than sufficient to explain the US epidemic of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 2009, 90(6):1453-1456.
• [48]Scarborough P, Burg MR, Foster C, Swinburn B, Sacks G, Rayner M, Webster P, Allender S: Increased energy intake entirely accounts for increase in body weight in women but not men in the UK between 1986 and 2000. Br J Nutr 2011, 105(9):1399-1404.
• [49]Cutler DM, Glaeser EL, Shapiro JM: Why have americans become more obese? J Econ Perspect 2003, 17(3):93-118.
• [50]Caulfield T: The cure for everything! untangling the twisted messages about health, fitness and happiness. Toronto: Penguin; 2012.
• [51]Blundell JE, Stubbs RJ, Hughes DA, Whybrow S, King NA: Cross talk between physical activity and appetite control: does physical activity stimulate appetite? Proc Nutr Soc 2003, 62:651-661.
• [52]Brownell KD, Kersh R, Ludwig DS, Post RC, Puhl RM, Schwartz MB, Willett WC: Personal responsibility and obesity: a constructive approach to a controversial issue. Heal Aff 2010, 29(3):379-387.
• [53]Cohen DA, Farley TA: Eating as an automatic behavior. Preventing Chronic Disease 2008, 5(1):A23.
• [54]Baranowski T, Cullen KW, Baranowski J: Psychosocial correlates of dietary intake: advancing dietary intervention. Annu Rev Nutr 1999, 19:17-40.
• [55]Raine KD: Determinants of healthy eating in canada - an overview and synthesis. Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique 2005, 96:S8-S14.
• [56]Sallis JF, Glanz K: Physical activity and food environments: solutions to the obesity epidemic. Milbank Quarterly 2009, 87(1):123-154.
• [57]Garriguet D: Diet quality in Canada. Health Reports 2009, 20(3):1-12.
• [58]French SA, Story M, Jeffery RW: Environmental influences on eating and physical activity. Annual Review of Public Health 2001, 22:309-335.
• [59]Hill JO, Peters JC, Wyatt HR: Using the energy gap to address obesity: a commentary. J Am Diet Assoc 2009, 109(11):1848-1853.
• [60]Hill JO, Peters JC, Catenacci VA, Wyatt HR: International strategies to address obesity. Obes Rev 2008, 9:41-47.
• [61]Elbel B: Consumer estimation of recommended and actual calories at fast food restaurants. Obesity 2011, 19(10):1971-1978.
• [62]Chandon P, Wansink B: Is obesity caused by calorie underestimation? a psychophysical model of meal size estimation. J Mark Res 2007, 44(1):84-99.
• [63]Wansink B, Chandon P: Meal size, not body size, explains errors in estimating the calorie content of meals. Ann Intern Med 2006, 145(5):326-332.
• [64]Wansink B, Sobal J: Mindless eating - the 200 daily food decisions we overlook. Environ Behav 2007, 39(1):106-123.
• [65]Drewnowski A: Obesity and the food environment - dietary energy density and diet costs. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2004, 27(3):154-162.
• [66]Drewnowski A, Darmon N: Food choices and diet costs: an economic analysis. J Nutr 2005, 135(4):900-904.
• [67]Diliberti N, Bordi PL, Conklin MT, Roe LS, Rolls BJ: Increased portion size leads to increased energy intake in a restaurant meal. Obes Res 2004, 12(3):562-568.
• [68]Caspi CE, Sorensen G, Subramanian SV, Kawachi I: The local food enviornment and diet: a systematic review. Health & Place 2012, 18:1172-1187.
• [69]Feng J, Glass TA, Curriero FC, Stewart WF, Schwartz BS: The built environment and obesity: a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence. Health & Place 2010, 16:175-190.
• [70]Giskes K, van Lenthe F, Avendano-Pabon M, Brug J: A systematic review of environmental factors and obesogenic dietary intakes among adults: are we getting closer to understanding obesogenic environments? Obes Rev 2011, 12:e95-e106.
• [71]Wansink B: Environmental factors that increase the food intake and consumption volume of unknowing consumers. Annu Rev Nutr 2004, 24:455-479.
• [72]Glanz K, Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Frank LD: Healthy nutrition environments: concepts and measures. Am J Heal Promot 2005, 19(5):330-333.
• [73]Urban LE, McCrory MA, Dallal GE, Das SK, Saltzman E, Weber JL, Roberts SB: Accuracy of stated energy contents of restaurant foods. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association 2011, 306(3):287-293.
• [74]Story M, Neumark-Sztainer D, French S: Individual and environmental influences on adolescent eating behaviors. J Am Diet Assoc 2002, 102(3):S40-S51.
• [75]Cohen DA: Neurophysiolocial pathways to obesity: below awareness and beyond individual control. Diabetes 2008, 57(7):1768-1773.
• [76]Reversing the epidemic: [http://www.nyc.gov/html/om/pdf/2012/otf_report.pdf] webciteThe New York city obesity task force plan to prevent and control obesity.
• [77]Lustig RH, Schmidt LA, Brindis CD: Public health: the toxic truth about sugar. Nature 2012, 482:27-29.
• [78]Campbell NR, Raine KD, McLaren L: "Junk foods," "treats," or "pathogenic foods"? a call for changing nomenclature to fit the risk of today's diets. Can J Cardiol 2012, 28(4):403-404.
• [79]Gortmaker SL, Swinburn B, Levy D, Carter R, Mabry PL, Finegood DT, Huang T, Marsh T, Moodie ML: Changing the future of obesity: science, policy, and action. Lancet 2011, 378:838-847.
• [80]Michaels D, Monforton C: Manufacturing uncertainty: contested science and the protection of the public's health and environment. Am J Public Health 2005, 95:S39-S48.
• [81]Epstein S: Impure science: AIDS. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1996.
• [82]Puhl R, Brownell KD: Bias, discrimination, and obesity. Obes Res 2001, 9(12):788-805.
• [83]Benjamin E: Public health approaches to obesity: litigation, legislation, and lessons learned. Pittsburgh Journal of Environmental and Public Health Law 2006, 1:127-149.
• [84]Oliver JE, Lee T: Public opinion and the politics of obesity in america. Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law 2005, 30(5):923-954.