期刊论文详细信息
BMC Public Health
The context of violent disagreements between parents: a qualitative analysis from parents’ reports
Deanna Kerrigan3  Carol A Werlinich4  Norman B Epstein4  Mahua Mandal2  Megan H Bair-Merritt1 
[1] Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, 88 East Newton Street, Vose 305, Boston, MA 02118, USA;Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA;Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA;Department of Family Science, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
关键词: Substance use;    Parenting;    Household labor;    Children exposed to intimate partner violence;    Qualitative study;    Intimate partner violence;   
Others  :  1091159
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-14-1324
 received in 2014-02-19, accepted in 2014-12-16,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a prevalent public health problem that affects millions of families. Much of what is known about IPV comes from quantitative studies that often "count" acts of IPV without exploring in depth the circumstances surrounding the violence, thereby leaving critical questions unanswered; existing qualitative studies tend to focus solely on women’s perspectives. There is a dearth of dyadic qualitative research exploring the context of IPV in families with children, thus hindering the development of effective interventions for families experiencing IPV.

Methods

Seven heterosexual couples were recruited from a University-based family therapy clinic to participate in qualitative interviews. Couples were eligible if they had experienced severe verbal or any physical aggression during the past 4 months; had ≥ one child living in the household; were English-speaking; and were ≥ 18. Each individual was interviewed separately. Key topics explored included specific types of violence used by men and women; primary triggers and the context surrounding aggressive disagreements; degree to which the child(ren) were exposed; and perceived consequences for adults and children.

Results

All couples listed household responsibilities and parenting as key IPV triggers. Couples with infants reported that parenting disagreements were particularly heated, with women using aggression due to frustration about their partners’ lack of support. Couples also described substance use, wanting to be heard, and prior violence histories as triggers or as the background context for IPV episodes. Children were present during IPV and often intervened in conflicts involving severe violence. Parents’ perceptions of the effects of IPV on their children ranged from minimal to major emotional distress, with men describing more significant impact than women.

Conclusions

When describing acute triggers, parents most commonly mentioned that arguments were instigated by concerns about the division of household labor and parenting, a finding that may have significant implications for intervention development; this was particularly notable for parents of infants. Our findings emphasize the need for innovative programs that help parents cope with the stresses of raising a family as well as programs that directly address the consequences of IPV for children.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Bair-Merritt et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150128170020306.pdf 249KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]National Centers for Injury Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Costs of intimate partner violence against women in the United States. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2003.
  • [2]Archer J: Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review. Psych Bull 2000, 126:651-680.
  • [3]Archer J, Graham-Kevan N: Do beliefs about aggression predict physical aggression to partners? Aggr Behav 2003, 29:41-54.
  • [4]Dasgupta S: A framework for understanding women’s use of nonlethal violence in intimate heterosexual relationships. Viol Against Women 2002, 8:1364-1389.
  • [5]Dobash R, Dobash R: Women’s violence to men in intimate relationships. Br J Criminol 2004, 44:324-349.
  • [6]Swan S, Snow D: The development of a theory of women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. Viol Against Women 2006, 12:1026-1045.
  • [7]Boonzaier F: If the man says you must sit, then you must sit: the relational construction of woman abuse: gender, subjectivity, and violence. Fem Psychol 2008, 18:183-206.
  • [8]Nemeth J, Bonomi A, Lee M, Ludwin J: Sexual infidelity as trigger for intimate partner violence. J Women’s Health 2012, 21:942-949.
  • [9]Boonzaier F, de la Rey C: Woman abuse: the construction of gender in women and men’s narratives of violence. South Af J Psychol 2004, 34:443-463.
  • [10]Fantuzzo J, Boruch R, Beriama A, Atkins M, Marcus S: Domestic violence and children: prevalence and risk in five major US cities. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997, 36(1):116-122.
  • [11]Kitzmann KM, Gaylord NK, Holt AR, Kenny ED: Child witnesses to domestic violence: a meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol 2003, 71(2):339-352.
  • [12]Twenge J, Campbell W, Foster C: Parenthood and marital satisfaction: a meta-analytic review. J Marr Fam 2003, 65:574-583.
  • [13]Wathen C, MacMillan H: Interventions for violence against women: scientific review. JAMA 2003, 289:589-600.
  • [14]Cho H: Examining gender differences in the nature and context of intimate partner violence. J Int Viol 2012, 27:2665-2684.
  • [15]Palinkas L, Horwitz S, Green C, Wisdom J, Duan N, Hoagwood K: Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed methods implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health 2013.
  • [16]Straus M, Hamby S, Boney-McCoy S, Sugarman D: The revised conflict tactics scale (CTS2): development and preliminary psychometric data. J Fam Issues 1996, 17:283-316.
  • [17]Murphy CM, Hoover SA, Murphy CM, Hoover SA, Taft C: Multidimensional measure of emotional abuse. In Measuring intimate partner violence and victimization and perpetration: a compendium of assessment tools. Edited by Thompson MPBKC, Hertz MF, Sitterle D. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2006:48-49. 64-47
  • [18]Miles M, Huberman A: Qualitative data analysis. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994.
  • [19]McGovern J, Meyers S: Relationships between sex-role attitudes, division of household tasks and marital adjustment. Contem Fam Ther 2002, 24:601-618.
  • [20]Gross K, Wells C, Radigan-Garcia A, Dietz P: Correlates of self-reports of being very depressed in the months after delivery: results from the pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system. Mat Child Health J 2002, 6:247-253.
  • [21]Bernazzani O, Saucier J, David H, Borgeat F: Psychosocial predictors of depressive symptomatology level in postpartum women. J Affect Dis 1997, 46:39-49.
  • [22]Fisher J, Feekery C, Rowe-Murray H: Nature, severity and correlates of psychological distress in women admitted to a private mother-baby unit. J Paediatr Child Health 2002, 38:140-145.
  • [23]Bair-Merritt M, Jennings J, Chen R, Burrell L, McFarlane E, Fuddy L, Duggan A: Reducing maternal intimate partner violence after the birth of a child: a randomized controlled trial of the Hawaii Healthy Start home visitation program. Arch Ped Adolesc Med 2010, 164:16-23.
  • [24]Avellar S, Paulsell D, Sama-Miller E, Del Grosso P, Akers L, Kleinman R: Home visiting evidence of effectiveness review: executive summary. In Office of planning RaE, administration for children and families. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2014.
  • [25]Ansara D, Hindin M: Psychosocial consequence of intimate partner violence for women and men in Canada. J Int Violence 2011, 26:1628-1638.
  • [26]Kamimura A, Christensen N, Tabler J, Ashby J, Olson J: Prevalence of intimate partner violence and its impact on health: female and male patients using a free clinic. J Health Care Poor Unders 2014, 25:731-745.
  • [27]Davies P, Cummings E: Marital conflict and child adjustment: an emotional security hypothesis. Psychol Bull 1994, 116:387-411.
  • [28]Davies P, Forman E: Children’s patterns of preserving emotional security in the interparental subsystem. Child Dev 2002, 73:1880-1903.
  • [29]Davies P, Woitach M: Children’s emotional security in the interparental relationship. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2008, 17:269-274.
  • [30]Peled E, Gil I: The mothering perceptions of women abused by their partner. Viol Against Women 2011, 17(4):457-479.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:7次 浏览次数:15次