期刊论文详细信息
BMC Medical Education
Optimisation of simulated team training through the application of learning theories: a debate for a conceptual framework
Meredith Allen3  Margarita Burmester2  Martin Stocker1 
[1] Neonatal and Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Hospital Lucerne, Spitalstrasse, Lucerne 16 CH-6000, Switzerland;Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK;The Royal Children's Hospital, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3052, Australia
关键词: Conceptual framework;    Socio-cultural learning theories;    Experiential learning theory;    In-situ simulation;    Team training;    Teamwork;   
Others  :  1118087
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6920-14-69
 received in 2013-12-08, accepted in 2014-03-28,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

As a conceptual review, this paper will debate relevant learning theories to inform the development, design and delivery of an effective educational programme for simulated team training relevant to health professionals.

Discussion

Kolb’s experiential learning theory is used as the main conceptual framework to define the sequence of activities. Dewey’s theory of reflective thought and action, Jarvis modification of Kolb’s learning cycle and Schön’s reflection-on-action serve as a model to design scenarios for optimal concrete experience and debriefing for challenging participants’ beliefs and habits. Bandura’s theory of self-efficacy and newer socio-cultural learning models outline that for efficient team training, it is mandatory to introduce the social-cultural context of a team.

Summary

The ideal simulated team training programme needs a scenario for concrete experience, followed by a debriefing with a critical reflexive observation and abstract conceptualisation phase, and ending with a second scenario for active experimentation. Let them re-experiment to optimise the effect of a simulated training session. Challenge them to the edge: The scenario needs to challenge participants to generate failures and feelings of inadequacy to drive and motivate team members to critical reflect and learn. Not experience itself but the inadequacy and contradictions of habitual experience serve as basis for reflection. Facilitate critical reflection: Facilitators and group members must guide and motivate individual participants through the debriefing session, inciting and empowering learners to challenge their own beliefs and habits. To do this, learners need to feel psychological safe. Let the group talk and critical explore. Motivate with reality and context: Training with multidisciplinary team members, with different levels of expertise, acting in their usual environment (in-situ simulation) on physiological variables is mandatory to introduce cultural context and social conditions to the learning experience. Embedding in situ team training sessions into a teaching programme to enable repeated training and to assess regularly team performance is mandatory for a cultural change of sustained improvement of team performance and patient safety.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Stocker et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150206020634813.pdf 676KB PDF download
Figure 3. 50KB Image download
Figure 2. 30KB Image download
Figure 1. 36KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Common program requirements: General competencies 2007. [http://www.acgme.org webcite]
  • [2]Frank JR (Ed): The CanMEDS 2005 physician competency framework. Better standards. Better physicians. Better care. Ottawa,ON: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2005.
  • [3]General Medical Council: Tomorrow’s Doctors. Outcomes and standards for undergraduate medical education. London: General Medical Council; 2009.
  • [4]Salas E, Rosen MA: Building high reliability teams: progress and some reflections on teamwork training. BMJ Qual Saf 2013, 22:369-73.
  • [5]Anderson PO, Jensen MK, Lippert A, Ostergaard D: Identifying non-technical skills and barriers for improvement of teamwork in cardiac arrest teams. Resuscitation 2010, 81:695-702.
  • [6]Hunziker S, Tschan F, Semmer NK, Zobrist R, Spychiger M, Breuer M, Hunziker PR, Marsch SC: Hands-on time during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is affected by the process of teambuilding: a prospective randomised simulator-based trial. BMC Emerg Med 2009, 9:3.
  • [7]Marsch SC, Müller C, Marquardt K, Conrad G, Tschan F, Hunziker PR: Human factors affect the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in simulated cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2004, 60:51-6.
  • [8]Morey JC, Simon R, Jay GD, Wears PL, Salisbury M, Dukes KA, Berns SD: Errors reduction and performance improvement in the emergency department through formal teamwork training. Evaluation results of the MedTeams project. Health Serv Res 2002, 37:553-61.
  • [9]Stockwell DC, Slonim AD, Pollack MM: Physician team management affects goal achievement in the intensive care unit. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2007, 8:540-5.
  • [10]Hunziker S, Bühlmann C, Tschan F, Balestra G, Legeret C, Schumacher C, Semmer NK, Hunziker P, Marsch S: Brief leadership instructions improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a high-fidelity simulation: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med 2010, 38:1086-91.
  • [11]Kahn K, Pattison T, Sherwood M: Simulation in medical education. Med Teach 2011, 33:1-3.
  • [12]Marshall SD, Flanagan B: Simulation-based education for building clinical teams. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2010, 3(4):360-8.
  • [13]Motola I, Devine LA, Chung HS, Sullivan JE, Issenberg B: Simulation in healthcare education: A best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82. Med Teach 2013, 35:e1511-30.
  • [14]Patterson MD, Geis GL, LeMaster T, Wears RL: Impact of multidisciplinary simulation-based training on patient safety in a paediatric emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf 2013, 22:383-93.
  • [15]Sissakos D, Fox R, Crofts JF, Hunt LP, Winter C, Draycott TJ: The management of a simulated emergency: Better teamwork, better performance. Resuscitation 2011, 82:203-6.
  • [16]Thomas EJ, Williams AL, Reichman EF, Lasky RE, Crandell S, Taggart WR: Team training in the neonatal resuscitation program for interns: teamwork and quality of resuscitations. Pediatrics 2010, 125:539-46.
  • [17]Bleakley A, Bligh J, Browne J: Learning by simulation and the simulation of learning. In Medical education for the future: Identity, power and Location. 1st edition. Edited by Bleakley A, Bligh J, Browne J. Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media B.V; 2011:153-171.
  • [18]Cheng A, Donoghue A, Gilfoyle E, Eppich W: Simulation-based crisis resource management training for pediatric critical care medicine: A review for instructors. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2012, 13:197-203.
  • [19]Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ: Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005, 27(1):10-28.
  • [20]McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ: A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009. Med Edu 2010, 44:50-63.
  • [21]Rosen MA, Hunt EA, Pronovost PJ, Federowicz MA, Weaver SJ: In situ simulation in continuing education for the health care professions: A systematic review. J cont Edu Health Prof 2012, 32:243-54.
  • [22]Bordage G: Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify. Med Educ 2009, 43:312-9.
  • [23]Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Bordage G: Quality of reporting experimental studies in medical education: a systemic review. Med Educ 2007, 41:735-45.
  • [24]Stocker M, Allen M, Pool N, De Costa K, Combes J, West N, Burmester M: Impact of an embedded simulation team training programme in a paediatric intensive care unit: a prospective, single-centre, longitudinal study. Int Care Med 2012, 38:99-104.
  • [25]Hodges BD, Kuper A: Theory and practice in the design and conduct of graduate medical education. Acad Med 2012, 87:25-33.
  • [26]Rudolph JW, Simon R, Raemer DB, Eppich WJ: Debriefing as formative assessment: Closing performance gaps in medical education. Acad Emerg Med 2008, 15:1010-6.
  • [27]Sandars J: The use of reflection in medical education. AMEE guide No. 44. Med Teach 2009, 31:685-95.
  • [28]Yardley S, Teunissen PW, Dornan T: Experiential learning: AMEE guide No. 63. Med Teach 2012, 34:e102-15.
  • [29]Zigmont JJ, Kappus LJ, Sudikoff SN: The 3D model of debriefing: Defusing, discovering, and deepening. Semin Perinatol 2011, 35:52-8.
  • [30]Zigmont JJ, Kappus LJ, Sudikoff SN: Theoretical foundations of learning through simulation. Semin Perinatol 2011, 35:47-51.
  • [31]Kolb DA: Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1984.
  • [32]Rudolph JW, Simon R, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB: There’s no such thing as “nonjudgmental” debriefing: A theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simul Healthcare 2006, 1:49-55.
  • [33]Knowles M: Andragogy in action. London: Jossey-Bass; 1985.
  • [34]Miettinen R: The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey’s theory of reflective thought and action. Int J lifelong Edu 2000, 19(1):54-72.
  • [35]Jarvis P: Adults as learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1981.
  • [36]Schön DA: Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the prefessions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1987.
  • [37]Mamede S, Schmidt HG: The structure of reflective practice in medicine. Med Educ 2004, 38:1302-8.
  • [38]Bandura A: Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
  • [39]Maibach EW, Schieber RA, Carroll MF: Self-efficacy in pediatric resuscitation: Implications for education and performance. Pediatrics 1996, 97:94-9.
  • [40]Schaik SM, Plant J, Diane S, Tsang L, O‘Sullivan P: Interprofessional team training in pediatric resuscitation: A low-cost, in situ simulation program that enhances self-efficacy among participants. Clin Ped 2011, 50(9):807-15.
  • [41]Turner NB, Dieselhuis MP, Draaisma JM, Ten Cate OT: The effect of the advanced paediatric life support course on perceived self-efficacy and use of resuscitation skills. Resuscitation 2007, 73:430-6.
  • [42]Turner NM, Lukkassen I, Bakker N, Draaisma J, Ten Cate OT: The effect of the ALPS-course on self-efficacy and its relationship to behavioural decisions in paediatric resuscitation. Resuscitation 2009, 80:913-8.
  • [43]Bleakley A, Bligh J, Browne J: Socio-cultural learning theories. In Medical education for the future: Identity, power and Location. 1st edition. Edited by Bleakley A, Bligh J, Browne J. Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media B.V; 2011:43-60.
  • [44]Bleakley A: Broadening conceptions of learning in medical education: the message from teamworking. Med Educ 2006, 40:150-7.
  • [45]Engeström Y: From teams to knots. Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
  • [46]Berragan L: Conceptualising learning through simulation: an expansive approach for professional and personal learning. Nurs Educ Pract 2013, 13:250-5.
  • [47]Kneebone R: Evaluating clinical simulations for learning procedural skills: A theory-based approach. Acad Med 2005, 80:549-53.
  • [48]Holzinger A, Kickmeier-Rust MD, Wassertheurer S, Hessinger M: Learning performance with interactive simulations in medical education: Lessons learned from results of learning complex physiology models with the HAEMOdynamics SIMulator. Computers Educ 2009, 52:292-301.
  • [49]Edmundson AC: Teaming: How organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2012.
  • [50]Rosen MA, Salas E, Wilson KA, King HB, Salisbury M, Augenstein JS, Robinson DW, Birnbach DJ: Measuring team performance in simulation-based training: adopting best practises for healthcare. Sim Healthcare 2008, 3:33-41.
  • [51]Kardong-Edgren S, Adamson KA, Fitzgerald C: A review of currently published evaluation instruments for human patient simulation. Clin Sim Nurs 2010, 6:e25-35.
  • [52]Stocker M, Menadue L, Kakat S, De Costa K, Combes J, Banya W, Lane M, Desai A, Burmester M: Reliability of team-based self-monitoring in critical events: a pilot study. BMC Emergency Med 2013, 13:22. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [53]Van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW, Driessen EW, Dijkstra J, Tigelaar D, Baartman LK, Van Tartwijk J: A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Med Teach 2012, 34:205-14.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:25次 浏览次数:16次