A qualitative examination of the impact of microgrants to promote physical activity among adolescents

BMC Public Health

John C Spence¹  Chad S G Witcher³  Guy Faulkner²  Katherine A Tamminen² 

[1] Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, W1-34 Van Vliet Centre, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H9, Canada;Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, 55 Harbord St, Toronto, ON M5S 2W6, Canada;Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Lethbridge, 4401 University Drive, Lethbridge, Alberta T1K 3M4, Canada

关键词: Qualitative;    Sport;    Physical activity;    Adolescent;    Case study;    Microgrants;   

Others  :  1122909
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-14-1206

 received in 2014-03-07, accepted in 2014-11-07,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Microgrants are a mechanism for providing funding to community organizations or groups to support health initiatives. Little research to date has examined the use of microgrants in promoting physical activity (PA), and no studies have explored how microgrants may support PA promotion among adolescents. The purpose of this study was to explore the role of microgrants in enhancing PA opportunities for Canadian adolescents.

Methods

Employing a case study approach, nine community organizations from across Canada were selected as cases providing sports and physical activities with the support of microgrant funding. Researchers visited each organization and conducted semi-structured interviews with 40 program participants (12–25 years of age, M = 16.3, SD = 2.6) and 17 adult organizers/instructors (23–57 years of age, M = 37.4, SD = 10.0). Interview transcripts were inductively and deductively coded to identify concepts and create a hierarchy of themes.

Results

Analysis produced themes regarding participants’ perceptions of the Funding, Running Programs and Events, the Impact of Program (for the Organization, Teen Participants, and the Community). Opportunities for PA programming would not have been possible without the microgrant funding. Microgrant funding was valuable in promoting PA for adolescents, and they afforded opportunities for adolescents to engage in new and/or nontraditional activities. In addition to promoting PA, the microgrants had benefits for participants and the community organizations including improved organizational capacity.

Conclusions

Microgrants appear to be an effective mechanism for enhancing community capacity to provide PA opportunities for Canadian adolescents by helping to reduce financial barriers and empowering adolescents to take an active role in identifying and hosting new and creative PA events within their communities.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Tamminen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I, Craig CL, Clark J, Tremblay MS: Physical activity of Canadian children and youth: accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Rep 2011, 22:1-9.
• [2]Craig CL, Cameron C, Griffiths JM, Tudor-Locke C: Descriptive epidemiology of youth pedometer-determined physical activity: CANPLAY. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010, 42:1639-1643.
• [3]van der Horst K, Paw MJ, Twisk JW, Van Mechelen W: A brief review on correlates of physical activity and sedentariness in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007, 39:1241-1250.
• [4]Welk GJ: The youth physical activity promotion model: a conceptual bridge between theory and practice. Quest 1999, 51:5-23.
• [5]Holt NL, Cunningham CT, Sehn ZL, Spence JC, Newton AS, Ball GD: Neighborhood physical activity opportunities for inner-city children and youth. Health Place 2009, 15:1022-1028.
• [6]Janssen I, Boyce WF, Simpson K, Pickett W: Influence of individual- and area-level measures of socioeconomic status on obesity, unhealthy eating, and physical inactivity in Canadian adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr 2006, 83:139-145.
• [7]Brockman R, Jago R, Fox KR, Thompson JL, Cartwright K, Page AS: “Get off the sofa and go and play”: family and socioeconomic influences on the physical activity of 10–11 year old children. BMC Public Health 2009, 9:253. BioMed Central Full Text
• [8]Hyman M: The Most Expensive Game in Town: The Rising Cost of Youth Sports and The Toll on Today’s Families. Boston, MA: Beacon Press; 2012.
• [9]Shikako-Thomas K, Majnemer A, Law M, Lach L: Activities in children and youth with cerebral palsy: systematic review. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2008, 28:155-169.
• [10]Global Advocacy Council for Physical Activity: Toronto Charter for Physical Activity. 2010. http://www.interamericanheart.org/images/PHYSICALACTIVITY/TorontoCharterPhysicalActivityENG.pdf webcite
• [11]Cawley J: An economic framework for understanding physical activity and eating behaviors. Am J Prev Med 2004, 27(3 Suppl):117-125.
• [12]Pratt M, Macera CA, Sallis JF, O’Donnell M, Frank LD: Economic interventions to promote physical activity: application of the SLOTH model. Am J Prev Med 2004, 27(3 Suppl):136-145.
• [13]Reach DM: Fitness tax credits: costs, benefits, and validity. Northwest J Law Soc Policy 2012, 7:352-371.
• [14]Steenhuis IH, Nooy SB, Moes MJ, Schuit AJ: Financial barriers and pricing strategies related to participation in sports activities: the perceptions of people of low income. J Phys Act Health 2009, 6:716-721.
• [15]Fisher KL, Mawani A, von Tigerstrom B, Larre T, Tremblay MS, Chad KE, Reeder B, Tremblay MS: Awareness and use of Canada’s Children’s Fitness Tax Credit. Can Tax J 2013, 61:599-632.
• [16]Spence JC, Holt NL, Sprysak CJ, Spencer-Cavaliere N, Caulfield T: Non-refundable tax credits are an inequitable policy instrument for promoting physical activity among Canadian children. Can J Public Health 2012, 103:175-177.
• [17]Spence JC, Holt NL, Dutove JK, Carson V: Uptake and effectiveness of the Children’s Fitness Tax Credit in Canada: The rich get richer. BMC Public Health 2010, 10(1):356. BioMed Central Full Text
• [18]von Tigerstrom B, Larre T, Sauder J: Using the tax system to promote physical activity: critical analysis of Canadian initiatives. Am J Prev Med 2011, 101:e10-e16.
• [19]Faulkner G, Grootendorst P, Nguyen VH, Ferrence R, Mendelson R, Donnelly P, Drewnowski A, Dubé L, Ferrence R, Janssen I, LaFrance J, Darius Lakdawalla D, Mendelsen R, Powell LM, Traill WB, Windmeijer F: Economic Policy, Obesity and Health: A Scoping Review. Obesity and Health: University of Toronto; 2010.
• [20]Meyerhoefer CD: Economic Principles. In Youth Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior: Challenges and Solutions. Edited by Biddle S, Smith A. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2008:403-428.
• [21]Johnson HH, Bobbitt-Cooke M, Schwarz M, White D: Creative partnerships for community health improvement: a qualitative evaluation of the Healthy Carolinians Community Micro-Grant Project. Health Promot Pract 2006, 7:162-169.
• [22]Caperchione C, Mummery WK, Joyner K: WALK Community Grants Scheme: Lessons learned in developing and administering a health promotion microgrants program. Health Promot Pract 2010, 11:637-644.
• [23]Collie-Akers V, Schultz JA, Carson V, Fawcett SB, Ronan M: Evaluating mobilization strategies with neighborhood and faith organizations to reduce risk for health disparities. Health Promot Pract 2009, 10(2 Suppl):118S-127S.
• [24]Hartwig KA, Dunville RL, Kim MH, Levy B, Zaharek MM, Njike VY, Katz DL: Promoting healthy people 2010 through small grants. Health Promot Pract 2009, 10(1):24-33.
• [25]Honeycutt S, Carvalho M, Glanz K, Daniel SD, Kegler MC: Research to reality: a process evaluation of a mini-grants program to disseminate evidence-based nutrition programs to rural churches and worksites. J Public Health Manage Pract 2012, 18:431-439.
• [26]Schmidt M, Plochg T, Harting J, Klazinga NS, Stronks K: Micro grants as a stimulus for community action in residential health programmes: a case study. Health Promot Int 2009, 24(3):234-242.
• [27]Latimer AE, Murumets K, Faulkner G: ParticipACTION: The National voice of Physical Activity and Sport Participation in Canada. In The American National Physical Activity Plan Champaign. Edited by Marcus B. IL: Human Kinetics; 2012.
• [28]Stake RE: Qualitative Case Studies. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3rd edition. Edited by Denzin NK, Lincoln YK. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005:443-466.
• [29]Patton MQ: Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 3rd edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 2002.
• [30]Miles MB, Huberman AM: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994.
• [31]Eakin L: We Can’t Afford to do Business this way: A Study of the Administrative Burden Resulting from Funder Accountability and Compliance Practices. Wellesley Institute: Toronto, ON; 2007.
• [32]Faulkner G, McCloy C, Plotnikoff RC, Bauman A, Brawley LR, Chad K, Spence JC, Tremblay M, Craig CL, Bauman A, Brawley L, Gauvin L: ParticipACTION: Baseline assessment of the capacity available to the ‘New ParticipACTION’: A qualitative study of Canadian organizations. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2009, 6:87. BioMed Central Full Text
• [33]Spence JC, Lee RE: Toward a comprehensive model of physical activity. Psychol Sport Exerc 2003, 4:7-24.
• [34]Smith C, Raine K, Anderson D, Dyck R, Plotnikoff R, Ness K, McLaughlin KK: A preliminary examination of organizational capacity of heart health promotion in Alberta’s Regional Health Authorities. IUHPE – Promot Educ Suppl 2001, 1:40-43.
• [35]Capel S, Blair R: Moving beyond physical education subject knowledge to develop knowledgeable teachers of the subject. Curriculum J 2007, 18:493-507.
• [36]Whitelaw S, Teuton J, Swift J, Scobie G: The physical activity – mental wellbeing association in young people: a case study in dealing with a complex public health topic using a ‘realistic evaluation’ framework. Mental Health Phys Act 2010, 3:61-66.