期刊论文详细信息
BMC Medicine
Why does society accept a higher risk for alcohol than for other voluntary or involuntary risks?
Robin Room3  Dirk W Lachenmeier1  Jürgen Rehm2 
[1] Chemisches und Veterinäruntersuchungsamt Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany;Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany;Centre for Social Research on Alcohol & Drugs, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词: Voluntary versus involuntary risk;    Risk;    Patterns of drinking;    Mortality;    Alcohol;    Acceptable risk;   
Others  :  1118433
DOI  :  10.1186/s12916-014-0189-z
 received in 2014-08-19, accepted in 2014-09-18,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Societies tend to accept much higher risks for voluntary behaviours, those based on individual decisions (for example, to smoke, to consume alcohol, or to ski), than for involuntary exposure such as exposure to risks in soil, drinking water or air. In high-income societies, an acceptable risk to those voluntarily engaging in a risky behaviour seems to be about one death in 1,000 on a lifetime basis. However, drinking more than 20 g pure alcohol per day over an adult lifetime exceeds a threshold of one in 100 deaths, based on a calculation from World Health Organization data of the odds in six European countries of dying from alcohol-attributable causes at different levels of drinking.

Discussion

The voluntary mortality risk of alcohol consumption exceeds the risks of other lifestyle risk factors. In addition, evidence shows that the involuntary risks resulting from customary alcohol consumption far exceed the acceptable threshold for other involuntary risks (such as those established by the World Health Organization or national environmental agencies), and would be judged as not acceptable. Alcohol’s exceptional status reflects vagaries of history, which have so far resulted in alcohol being exempted from key food legislation (no labelling of ingredients and nutritional information) and from international conventions governing all other psychoactive substances (both legal and illegal). This is along with special treatment of alcohol in the public health field, in part reflecting overestimation of its beneficial effect on ischaemic disease when consumed in moderation.

Summary

A much higher mortality risk from alcohol than from other risk factors is currently accepted by high income countries.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Rehm et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150206023941323.pdf 851KB PDF download
Figure 1. 27KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Beck U: Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt, Germany, Suhrkamp; 1986.
  • [2]Lupton D: Risk. Routledge, New York; 1999.
  • [3]Starr C: Social benefit versus technological risk. Science 1969, 165:1232-1238.
  • [4][http://www.who.int/fctc/en/] webcite WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control..
  • [5]The International Drug Control Conventions. United Nations, New York; 2013.
  • [6]Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; 2014.
  • [7]Pigou AC: The Economics of Welfare. Macmillan, London, UK; 1920.
  • [8][http://www.who.int/foodsafety/areas_work/chemical-risks/jecfa/en/] webcite Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA)..
  • [9]Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, Amann M, Anderson HR, Andrews KG, Aryee M, Atkinson C, Bacchus LJ, Bahalim AN, Balakrishnan K, Balmes J, Barker-Collo S, Baxter A, Bell ML, Blore JD, Blyth F, Bonner C, Borges G, Bourne R, Boussinesq M, Brauer M, Brooks P, Bruce NG, Brunekreef B, Bryan-Hancock C, Bucello C, et al.: A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012, 380:2224-2260.
  • [10]Iontchev A: Central and Eastern Europe. In Alcohol and Emerging Markets: Patterns, Problems, and Responses. Edited by Grant M. International Center for Alcohol Policies, Washington, DC; 1998:177-201.
  • [11]Popova S, Rehm J, Patra J, Zatonski W: Comparing alcohol consumption in central and eastern Europe to other European countries. Alcohol Alcohol 2007, 42:465-473.
  • [12]Rehm J, Shield KD, Rehm MX, Gmel G Jr, Frick U: Alcohol Consumption, Alcohol Dependence, and Attributable Burden of Disease in Europe: Potential Gains From Effective Interventions For Alcohol Dependence. Toronto, Canada, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; 2012.
  • [13]Rehm J, Anderson P, Barry J, Dimitrov P, Elekes Z, Feijão F, Frick U, Gual A, Gmel GJ, Kraus L, Marmet S, Raninen J, Rehm MX, Scafato E, Shield KD, Trapencieris M, Gmel G: Prevalence and potential influencing factors of alcohol dependence in Europe.Eur Addict Res in press.
  • [14]Shield KD, Kehoe T, Gmel G, Rehm MX, Rehm J: Societal burden of alcohol. In Alcohol in the European Union Consumption, Harm And Policy Approaches. Edited by Anderson P, Møller L, Galea G. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark; 2012:10-28.
  • [15]Zatonski W, Manczuk M, Sulkowska U: Closing the Health Gap in European Union. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Division, the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland; 2008.
  • [16]Health at a Glance: Europe 2012. OECD Publishing, Paris, France; 2012.
  • [17]Shield KD, Parry C, Rehm J: Chronic diseases and conditions related to alcohol use. Alcohol Res 2013, 35:155-171.
  • [18]Rehm J, Baliunas D, Borges GLG, Graham K, Irving HM, Kehoe T, Parry CD, Patra J, Popova L, Poznyak V, Roerecke M, Room R, Samokhvalov AV, Taylor B: The relation between different dimensions of alcohol consumption and burden of disease - An overview. Addiction 2010, 105:817-843.
  • [19]Chiang CL: Competing risks in mortality analysis. Annu Rev Public Health 1991, 12:281-307.
  • [20]Australian Drinking Water Guidelines. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Canberra; 2004.
  • [21]Hunter PR, Fewtrell L: Acceptable risk. In Water Quality: Guidelines, Standards and Health. Edited by Fewtrel L, Bartram J. IWA Publishing, London, UK; 2001:207-227.
  • [22]Rifkin E, Bouwer E: The Illusion of Certainty: Health Benefits and Risks. Springer, New York; 2007.
  • [23][http:/ / www.safedriver.gr/ studies/ KINDYNOS/ THE%20MYTH%20OF%2010-6%20AS%20A%20D EFINITION%20OF%20ACCEPTABLE%20RISK. pdf] webcite The myth of 10-6as a definition of acceptable risk..
  • [24]Coleman MP, Aylin P: Death Certification and Mortality Statistics: an International Perspectives (Studies on Medical and Population Subjects # 64). London, UK, The Stationary Office; 2000.
  • [25]Rehm J, Gmel G, Rehm MX, Scafato E, Shield KD: What can alcohol do to European societies? [http://www.amphoraproject.net/] webciteIn Alcohol Policy in Europe: Evidence From AMPHORA. The AMPHORA project 2nd edition. Edited by Anderson P, Braddick F, Reynolds J, Gual A. AMPHORA project, Barcelona, Spain; 2013, 4-16. http://www.amphoraproject.net/
  • [26]Environmental Health Criteria 239 - Principles for Modelling Dose–response for the Risk Assessment of Chemicals. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; 2009.
  • [27]Lachenmeier DW, Kanteres F, Rehm J: Epidemiology-based risk assessment using the benchmark dose/margin of exposure approach: the example of ethanol and liver cirrhosis. Int J Epidemiol 2011, 40:210-218.
  • [28]Laslett AM, Room R, Ferris J, Wilkinson C, Livingston M, Mugavin J: Surveying the range and magnitude of alcohol’s harm to others in Australia. Addiction 2011, 106:1603-1611.
  • [29]Hope A: Alcohol’s Harm to Others in Ireland. Dublin, Ireland, Health Service Executive; 2014.
  • [30]Laslett AM, Catalano P, Chikritzhs T, Dale C, Doran C, Ferris J, Jainullabudeen T, Livingston M, Matthews S, Mugavin S, Room R, Schlotterlein M, Wilkinson C: The Range and Magnitude of Alcohol's Harm to Others. Fitzroy, AU, Turning Point Alcohol & Drug Centre; 2010.
  • [31]Bruun K, Pan L, Rexed I: The Gentlemen’s Club: International Control of Drugs and Alcohol. University of Chicago Press, Chicago; 1975.
  • [32]Nutt DJ, King LA, Phillips LD: Drug harms in the UK: a multicriteria decision analysis. Lancet 2010, 376:1558-1565.
  • [33]Schrad ML: The Political Power of Bad Ideas: Networks, Institutions, and the Global Prohibition Wave. Oxford University Press, New York; 2010.
  • [34]Casswell S, Thamarangsi T: Reducing the harm from alcohol: call to action. Lancet 2009, 373:2247-2257.
  • [35]WHO Expert Committee on Drug Dependence. Thirty fifth report. WHO Technical Report Series number 973. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; 2012.
  • [36]Personal Habits and Indoor Combustions. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; 2012.
  • [37]Lachenmeier DW, Przybylski MC, Rehm J: Comparative risk assessment of carcinogens in alcoholic beverages using the margin of exposure approach. Int J Cancer 2012, 131:E995-E1003.
  • [38][http://oehha.ca.gov/prop65/law/12601.html] webcite Proposition 65 of the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment of California..
  • [39]Room R: Alcohol control and public health. Annu Rev Public Health 1984, 5:293-317.
  • [40][http:/ / www.cancerview.ca/ idc/ groups/ public/ documents/ webcontent/ rl_crc_snapshot_5.pdf] webcite Alcohol use and cancer in Canada; Cancer Control Snapshot # 5..
  • [41]The AICR 2013 Cancer Risk Awareness Survey. American Institute for Cancer Research, Washington, DC; 2013.
  • [42]Sanderson SC, Waller J, Jarvis MJ, Humphries SE, Wardle J: Awareness of lifestyle risk factors for cancer and heart disease among adults in the UK. Patient Educ Couns 2009, 74:221-227.
  • [43]EU Citizens’ Attitudes Towards Alcohol, Special Eurobarometer 331. Brussels, Belgium, TNS Opinion; 2010.
  • [44]Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S, Slovic P, Derby SL, Keeney RL: Acceptable Risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 1981.
  • [45]Gigerenzer G: Risk Savvy: How to Make Good Decisions. Penguin, New York; 2013.
  • [46]Bogg T, Roberts BW: Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: a meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychol Bull 2004, 130:887-919.
  • [47]Sjöberg L: Risk perception of alcohol consumption. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1998, 22:277S-284S.
  • [48]Klingemann H, Gmel G: Mapping Social Consequences of Alcohol Consumption. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands; 2001.
  • [49]Babor T, Caetano R, Casswell S, Edwards G, Giesbrecht N, Graham K, Grube J, Gruenewald P, Hill L, Holder H, Homel R, Livingston M, Österberg E, Rehm J, Room R, Rossow I: Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity. Research and Public Policy. 2nd edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK; 2010.
  • [50]Chisholm D, Rehm J, van Ommeren M, Monteiro M: Reducing the global burden of hazardous alcohol use: a comparative cost-effectiveness analysis. J Stud Alcohol 2004, 65:782-793.
  • [51]Wilkinson C, Room R: Warnings on alcohol containers and advertisements: international experience and evidence on effects. Drug Alcohol Rev 2009, 28:426-435.
  • [52]Nutt D: Drugs Without the Hot Air. UIT Cambridge Ltd., Cambridge, UK; 2012.
  • [53]Martinic M, Leigh B: Reasonable Risk: Alcohol in Perspective. Brunner-Routledge, New York; 2004.
  • [54]Global Strategy to Reduce the Harmful Use of Alcohol. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; 2010.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:13次 浏览次数:16次