期刊论文详细信息
BMC Public Health
Design and validation of a self-administered test to assess bullying (bull-M) in high school Mexicans: a pilot study
Rosa P Hernández-Torres1  Oscar Esparza-Del Villar2  Abraham Wall-Medrano2  Arnulfo Ramos-Jimenez2 
[1] Escuela de Educación Física y Ciencias del Deporte, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico;Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Av. Plutarco Elías Calles y Hermanos Escobar s/n, Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua, Mexico
关键词: Validation;    Mexico;    Bullying;    School violence;   
Others  :  1162347
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-13-334
 received in 2012-09-27, accepted in 2013-04-02,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Bullying (Bull) is a public health problem worldwide, and Mexico is not exempt. However, its epidemiology and early detection in our country is limited, in part, by the lack of validated tests to ensure the respondents’ anonymity. The aim of this study was to validate a self-administered test (Bull-M) for assessing Bull among high-school Mexicans.

Methods

Experts and school teachers from highly violent areas of Ciudad Juarez (Chihuahua, México), reported common Bull behaviors. Then, a 10-item test was developed based on twelve of these behaviors; the students’ and peers’ participation in Bull acts and in some somatic consequences in Bull victims with a 5-point Likert frequency scale. Validation criteria were: content (CV, judges); reliability [Cronbach’s alpha (CA), test-retest (spearman correlation, rs)]; construct [principal component (PCA), confirmatory factor (CFA), goodness-of-fit (GF) analysis]; and convergent (Bull-M vs. Bull-S test) validity.

Results

Bull-M showed good reliability (CA = 0.75, rs = 0.91; p < 0.001). Two factors were identified (PCA) and confirmed (CFA): “bullying me (victim)” and “bullying others (aggressor)”. GF indices were: Root mean square error of approximation (0.031), GF index (0.97), and normalized fit index (0.92). Bull-M was as good as Bull-S for measuring Bull prevalence.

Conclusions

Bull-M has a good reliability and convergent validity and a bi-modal factor structure for detecting Bull victims and aggressors; however, its external validity and sensitivity should be analyzed on a wider and different population.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Ramos-Jimenez et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150413062809434.pdf 260KB PDF download
Figure 1. 69KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Olweus D: Bullying at school. Reading, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers; 1993.
  • [2]Craig W, Harel-Fisch Y, Fogel-Grinvald H, Dostaler S, Hetland J, Simons-Morton B, Molcho M, de Mato MG, Overpeck M, Due P, Pickett W, HBSC Violence & Injuries Prevention Focus Group; HBSC Bullying Writing Group: A cross-national profile of bullying and victimization among adolescents in 40 countries. Int J Public Health 2009, 54(Suppl 2):216-224.
  • [3]Del Barrio C, Martín E, Montero I, Gutiérrez H, Barrios A, de Dios MJ: Bullying and social exclusion in Spanish secondary schools: National trends from 1999 to 2006. International J Clin Health Psych 2008 2008, 8(3):657-667.
  • [4]Olaiz F, Rivera D, Shamah L, Rojas R, Villalpando H: Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición. Cuernavaca, México: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública; 2006.
  • [5]Abramovay M: Victimización en las escuelas. Ambiente escolar, robos y agresiones físicas. Revista Mex Invest Educ 2005, 10:833-864.
  • [6]Aviles-Dorantes DS, ZOnana-Nacach A, Anzaldo-Campos MC: Prevalencia de acoso escolar (bullying) en estudiantes de una secundaria pública. Salud pública Méx 2012, 54(4):362-363.
  • [7]Leiner M, Puertas H, Caratachea R, Avila C, Atluru A, Briones D, de Vargas C: Children’s mental health and collective violence: a binational study on the United States–Mexico border. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2012, 31(5):411-416.
  • [8]Joffre-Velazquez VM, Garcia-Maldonado G, Saldivar-Gonzalez AH, Martinez-Perales G, Lin-Ochoa D, Quintanar-Martinez S, Villasana-Guerra A: Bullying in junior high school students: general characteristics and associated risk factors. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex 2011, 68(3):177-185.
  • [9]Albores-Gallo L, Sauceda-García JM, Ruiz-Velasco S, Roque-Santiago E: Bullying and its association with psychiatric disorders in a Mexican students sample. Salud Publica Mex 2011, 53:220-227.
  • [10]Due P, Damsgaard MT, Lund R, Holstein BE: Is bullying equally harmful for rich and poor children?: a study of bullying and depression from age 15 to 27. Eur J Public Health 2009, 19(Suppl 5):464-469.
  • [11]Fleming LC, Jacobsen KH: Bullying and symptoms of depression in chilean middle school students. J Sch Health 2009, 79(Suppl 3):130-137.
  • [12]Salmon G, James A, Smith DM: Bullying in schools: self-reported anxiety, depression, and self-esteem in secondary school children. BMJ 1998, 317:924-925.
  • [13]Hanley AJ, Gibb BE: Verbal victimization and changes in hopelessness among elementary school children. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2011, 40(Suppl 5):772-776.
  • [14]Gilmartin BG: Peer group antecedents of severe love-shyness in males. J Persy 1987, 55:467-489.
  • [15]Kim MJ, Catalano RF, Haggerty KP, Abbott RD: Bullying at elementary school and problem behavior in young adulthood: a study of bullying, violence and substance use from age 11 to age 21. Crim Behav Ment Health 2011, 21(2):136-144.
  • [16]Kim YS, Leventhal B: Bullying and suicide. A review. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2008, 20(2):19-33.
  • [17]Domínguez LF, Manzo CMC: Las manifestaciones del bullying en adolescentes. Uaricha Rev Psicol (Nueva época) 2011, 8(17):19-33.
  • [18]Espelage DL, De la Rue L: School bullying: its nature and ecology. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2012, 24(1):3-10.
  • [19]Shapiro ES, Heick P: School psychologist assessment practices in the evaluation of students referred for social/behavioral/emotional problems. Psychol Sch 2004, 41:551-561.
  • [20]Casey-Cannon S, Hayward C, Gowen K: Middle-school girls’ reports of peer victimization: Concerns, consequences, and implications. Sch Couns 2001, 5(Suppl 2):138-147.
  • [21]Glover D, Gough G, Johnson M, Cartwright N: Bullying in 25 secondary schools: incidence, impact, and intervention. Educ Res 2000, 42(Suppl 2):141-156.
  • [22]Power JL, Brotheridge CM, Blenkinsopp J, Bowes-Sperry L, Bozionelos N, Buzády Z, Chuang A, Drnevich D, Garzon-Vico A, Leighton C, Madero SM, Mak W, Mathew R, Monserrat SI, Mujtaba BG, Olivas-Lujan MR, Polycroniou P, Sprigg CA, Axtell C, Holman D, Ruiz-Gutiérrez JA, Nnedumm AUO: Acceptability of workplace bullying: a comparative study on six continents. J Bus Res07342. In press
  • [23]Pellegrini AD, Bartini M: An empirical comparison of methods of sampling aggression and victimization in school settings. J Educ Psych 2000, 92:360-366.
  • [24]Buelga S, Cava MJ, Musitu G: Validation of the adolescent victimization trough mobile phone and internet scale. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2012, 32(1):36-42.
  • [25]Crothers LM, Levinson EM: Assessment of bullying: a review of methods and instruments. J Couns Devel 2004, 82(Suppl 4):496-503.
  • [26]Cerezo F: Violencia y victimización entre escolares. El Bullying: estrategias de identificación y elementos para la intervención a través del test Bull-S. Rev Elect Inv Psicoeduc 2006, 9(4):333-352.
  • [27]Kumpulainen K, Räsänen E, Henttonen I, Almqvist F, Kresanov K, Linna SL, Moilanen I, Piha J, Puura K, Tamminen T: Bullying and psychiatric symptoms among elementary school-age children. Child Abuse Negl 1998, 22:705-717.
  • [28]Cortina JM: What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol 1993, 78:98-104.
  • [29]Cuadras CM: Nuevos Métodos de análisis multivariante. Barcelona: CMC Editions; 2010.
  • [30]Kaiser HF: A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika 1970, 35(Suppl 4):401-415.
  • [31]Zwick WR, Velicer WF: Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychol Bull 1986, 99(Suppl 3):432-442.
  • [32]Méndez I, Cerezo F: Test Bull-s: programa informático de evaluación de la agresividad entre escolares. In 25 Años de Integración Escolar en España: Tecnología e Inclusión en el ámbito educativo, laboral y comunitario. Edited by En A, Hurtado MD P, Soto FJ. Murcia: Consejería de Educación, Formación y Empleo; 2010.
  • [33]Szekely M: 1ª Encuesta Nacional Exclusión, Intolerancia y Violencia en Escuelas Públicas de Educación Media Superior. México: SEP; 2008.
  • [34]Notimex: Cuatro de cada 10 alumnos sufren bullying. México: El Universal; 2012.
  • [35]Mendez JJ, Bauma S, Guillory RM: Bullying of Mexican inmigrant Studies: An examination of intracultural bullying. Hisp J Behav Sci 2012, 34(2):279-304.
  • [36]Calderón D: Contradicción en mayúsculas. México Social 2013, 30:44-47.
  • [37]Baldry AC: Bullying in schools and exposure to domestic violence. Child Abuse Negl 2003, 27:713-732.
  • [38]Otter ME, Mellenbergh GJ, Glopper KD: The relation between information processing variables and test-retest stability for questionnaire items. J Educ Meas 1995, 32(Suppl 2):199-216.
  • [39]Batista-Foguet JM, Coenders G, Alonso J: Análisis factorial confirmatorio. Su utilidad en la validación de cuestionarios relacionados con la salud. Med Clin (Barc) 2004, 122:21-27.
  • [40]Smith PK, Cowie H, Olafsson RF, Liefooghe AP, Almeida A, Araki H, del Barrio C, Costabile A: Definitions of bullying: a comparison of terms used, and age and gender differences, in a fourteen-country international comparison. Child Dev 2002, 73(4):1119-1133.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:11次 浏览次数:16次