The effects of house moves during early childhood on child mental health at age 9 years

BMC Public Health

Vivienne M Moore³  Michael J Davies²  Christopher E Davies³  Emily J Steele³  Melissa J Whitrow³  Lynne C Giles³  Alice R Rumbold¹ 

[1]Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, NT, 0811, Australia

[2]Discipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia

[3]Discipline of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia

关键词: Longitudinal studies;    Housing;    Child development;    Child behaviour;    Residential mobility;   

Others  :  1163392
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-12-583

 received in 2011-10-19, accepted in 2012-07-17,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Residential mobility is common in families with young children; however, its impact on the social development of children is unclear. We examined associations between the number, timing and type of house moves in childhood and child behaviour problems using data from an ongoing longitudinal study.

Methods

Complete data on residential mobility and child behaviour was available for 403 families. Three aspects of mobility were considered: (a) number of house moves from birth to <2 years, 2 to <5 years and 5 to 9 years; (b) lifetime number of house moves; and (c) moves associated with different housing trajectories characterized by changes in housing tenure. The primary outcomes were internalizing and externalizing behaviour problems at 9 years derived from Achenbach’s Child Behaviour Checklist. Linear regression analyses were used to investigate the effect of the housing variables on internalizing and externalizing behaviour problem scores with adjustment for a range of sociodemographic and household covariates.

Results

Moving house ≥2 times before 2 years of age was associated with an increased internalizing behaviour score at age 9 years. This association remained after adjustment for sociodemographic and household factors. There was no association between increased residential mobility in other time periods and internalizing behaviour, or mobility in any period and externalizing behaviour. There was no effect of lifetime number of moves, or of an upwardly or downwardly mobile housing trajectory. However, a housing trajectory characterized by continuous rental occupancy was associated with an increased externalizing behaviour score.

Conclusions

These findings may suggest that there is a sensitive period, in the first few years of life, in which exposure to increased residential mobility has a detrimental effect on mental health in later childhood.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Rumbold et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Geist C, McManus PA: Geographic mobility over the life course: motivations and implications. Popul Space Place 2008, 14:283-303.
• [2]Long LH: International perspectives on the residential mobility of America's children. J Marriage Fam 1992, 54:861-869.
• [3]Australian Bureau of Statistics: Moving house. In Australian Social Trends. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2010.
• [4]Schafft KA: Poverty, residential mobility, and student transciency within a rural New York school district. Rural Sociol 2006, 71(2):212-231.
• [5]Wilkins R, Warren D, Hahn M: How often do people move house? In Families, Incomes and Jobs, Volume 4: A statistical report on Waves 1 to 6 of the HILDA Survey. Melbourne: University of Melbourne; 2009:140-144.
• [6]Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI): Housing insecurity and its link to the social inclusion agenda Volume 113. Melbourne: AHURI Research and Policy Bulletin; 2009.
• [7]Black D, Morris J, Smith C, Townsend P: Inequalities in health: report of a research working group. London: Department of Health and Social Security; 1980.
• [8]Acheson D, Barker D, Chambers J, Graham H, Marmot M, Whitehead M: Independent inquiry into inequalities in health. London: The Stationery Office; 1998.
• [9]Marmot M, Allen J, Goldblatt P, Boyce T, McNeish D, Grady M, Geddes I: Fair Society, Healthy Lives: The Marmot Review, Strategic Review of Health Inequalities in England post-2010. London: Department of Health; 2010.
• [10]Jelleyman T, Spencer N: Residential mobility in childhood and health outcomes: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health 2008, 62(7):584-592.
• [11]DeWit DJ, Offord D, Braun K: The relationship between geographic relocation and childhood problem behaviour. Quebec: Applied Research Branch, Strategic Policy, Human Resources Development Canada; 1998:1-61.
• [12]Wood D, Halfon N, Scarlata D, Newacheck P, Nessim S: Impact of family relocation on children's growth, development, school function, and behavior. JAMA 1993, 270(11):1334-1338.
• [13]Verripoulou G, Joshi HW RD: Migration, family structure and children's well-being: a multi-level analysis of the second generation of the 1958 birth cohort study. Children & Society 2002, 16:219-231.
• [14]Beyers JM, Bates JE, Pettit GS, Dodge KA: Neighborhood structure, parenting processes, and the development of youths' externalizing behaviors: a multilevel analysis. Am J Community Psychol 2003, 31(1–2):35-53.
• [15]Gasper JM, DeLuca S, Estacion A: Coming and going: explaining the effects of residential and school mobility on adolescent delinquency. Soc Sci Res 2010, 39:459-476.
• [16]Boon HJ: School moves, coping, and achievement: models of possible interactions. J Educ Res 2011, 104:54-70.
• [17]Moore VM, Davies MJ, Willson KJ, Worsley A, Robinson JS: Dietary composition of pregnant women is related to size of the baby at birth. J Nutr 2004, 134(7):1820-1826.
• [18]Whitrow MJ, Moore VM, Rumbold AR, Davies MJ: Effect of supplemental folic acid in pregnancy on childhood asthma: a prospective birth cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 2009, 170(12):1486-1493.
• [19]Walker RB, Conn JA, Davies MJ, Moore VM: Mothers' views on feeding infants around the time of weaning. Public Health Nutr 2006, 9(6):707-713.
• [20]Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA: Manual for the school-age forms and profiles: An integrated system of multi-informant assessment. Burlington, Vermont: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families; 2001.
• [21]Drotar D, Stein REK, Perrin EC: Methodological issues in using the Child Behavior Checklist and its related instruments in clinical child psychology research. J Clin Child Psychol 1995, 24(2):184-192.
• [22]Egeland B, Sroufe LA, Erickson M: The developmental consequence of different patterns of maltreatment. Child Abuse Negl 1983, 7(4):459-469.
• [23]Thompson R, Tabone JK: The impact of early alleged maltreatment on behavioural trajectories. Child Abuse Negl 2010, 34:907-916.
• [24]Johnson MH: Functional brain development in humans. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001, 2:475-483.
• [25]Johnston MV, Ishida A, Ishida WN, Matsushita HB, Nishimura A, Tsuji M: Plasticity and injury in the developing brain. Brain Dev 2009, 31(1):1-10.
• [26]Heim C, Nemeroff CB: The role of childhood trauma in the neurobiology of mood and anxiety disorders: preclinical and clinical studies. Biol Psychiatry 2001, 49(12):1023-1039.
• [27]de Kloet ER, Sibug RM, Helmerhorst FM, Schmidt MV: Stress, genes and the mechanism of programming the brain for later life. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2005, 29(2):271-281.
• [28]Holmes TH, Rahe RH: The social readjustment rating scale. J Psychosom Res 1967, 11:213-218.
• [29]Cummings EM, Kouros CD: In Encyclopedia of Infant and Early Childhood Development. In Stress and Coping. Edited by Haith MM, Benson JB. Oxford: Elsevier Inc; 2008.
• [30]Jackson Y, Warren JS: Appraisal, social support and life events: predicting outcome behaviour in school-age children. Child Dev 2000, 71(5):1441-1457.
• [31]Mathiesen KS, Sanson A, Stoolmiller M, Karevold E: The nature and predictors of undercontrolled and internalizing problem trajectories across early childhood. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2009, 37(2):209-222.
• [32]Sanchez C, Andrews D: To move or not to move: what drives residential mobility rates in the OECD? In OECD Economics Department Working Papers. Volume No. 846. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2011.
• [33]Bayer JK, Hiscock H, Ukoumunne OC, Price A, Wake M: Early childhood aetiology of mental health problems: a longitudinal population-based study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2008, 49(11):1166-1174.
• [34]Australian Bureau of Statistics: Housing mobility and conditions. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2009.
• [35]Cox W, Pavletich H: 6th Annual Demographia International Housing Affordability Survey: 2010 Rating for Metropolitan Markets. Illinois: Demographia; 2010.
• [36]Wood G, Ong R: The dynamics of housing affordability: movements in and out of housing affordability stress 2001–2006. In AHURI Final Report No 133. Melbourne. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, RMIT Research Centre, Western Australia Research Centre; 2009.