期刊论文详细信息
BMC Health Services Research
One size does not fit all: a qualitative content analysis of the importance of existing quality improvement capacity in the implementation of Releasing Time to Care: the Productive Ward™ in Saskatchewan, Canada
Gary Teare1  G Ross Baker2  Kyla Avis1  Peter Griffiths4  Jill Maben3  Tanya Verrall1  Jessica Hamilton1 
[1] Health Quality Council, Saskatchewan, 241-111 Research Drive, Saskatoon S7N 3R2, Saskatchewan, Canada;University of Toronto, Suite 425, 155 College St, Toronto M5T 3M6, ON, Canada;King’s College London, 57 Waterloo Road, London SE1 8WA, UK;University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
关键词: Change mechanisms;    Quality improvement capacity;    Qualitative methodology;    Nursing;    Organizing for quality;    Releasing time to care;    Productive ward;   
Others  :  1090004
DOI  :  10.1186/s12913-014-0642-x
 received in 2014-02-20, accepted in 2014-12-09,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Releasing Time to Care: The Productive Ward™ (RTC) is a method for conducting continuous quality improvement (QI). The Saskatchewan Ministry of Health mandated its implementation in Saskatchewan, Canada between 2008 and 2012. Subsequently, a research team was developed to evaluate its impact on the nursing unit environment. We sought to explore the influence of the unit’s existing QI capacity on their ability to engage with RTC as a program for continuous QI.

Methods

We conducted interviews with staff from 8 nursing units and asked them to speak about their experience doing RTC. Using qualitative content analysis, and guided by the Organizing for Quality framework, we describe the existing QI capacity and impact of RTC on the unit environment.

Results

The results focus on 2 units chosen to highlight extreme variation in existing QI capacity. Unit B was characterized by a strong existing environment. RTC was implemented in an environment with a motivated manager and collaborative culture. Aided by the structural support provided by the organization, the QI capacity on this unit was strengthened through RTC. Staff recognized the potential of using the RTC processes to support QI work. Staff on unit E did not have the same experience with RTC. Like unit B, they had similar structural supports provided by their organization but they did not have the same existing cultural or political environment to facilitate the implementation of RTC. They did not have internal motivation and felt they were only doing RTC because they had to. Though they had some success with RTC activities, the staff did not have the same understanding of the methods that RTC could provide for continuous QI work.

Conclusions

RTC has the potential to be a strong tool for engaging units to do QI. This occurs best when RTC is implemented in a supporting environment. One size does not fit all and administrative bodies must consider the unique context of each environment prior to implementing large-scale QI projects. Use of an established framework, like Organizing for Quality, could highlight the distinctive supports needed in particular care environments to increase the likelihood of successful engagement.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Hamilton et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150128153501367.pdf 338KB PDF download
Figure 1. 15KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Coutts J: Accelerating excellence report: releasing time to care. Healthc Q 2010, 13(2):21.
  • [2]Avis K: Releasing Time to Care in Saskatchewan: Promising Signs that the Programme Engages Clinicians. 2009.
  • [3]Chassin M, Loeb J: The ongoing quality improvement journey: next stop. High Reliability Health Aff 2011, 30(4):559.
  • [4]Massoud M, Nielsen G, Nolan K, Schall M, Sevin C: A Framework for Spread: From Local Improvements to System-Wide Change. IHI Innovation Series White Paper 2006.
  • [5]Government of Saskatchewan: Ministry of Health Annual Report, 2009–2010. 2010.
  • [6]White M, Wells J, Butterworth T: Leadership, A key element of quality improvement in healthcare. Results from a literature review of ‘lean healthcare’ and the productive ward: releasing time to care initiative.Int J Leadersh Public Services 2013, 9(3/4).
  • [7]Womack J, Jones D, Roos D: The Machine That Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production - Toyota’s Secret Weapon in the Global Car Wars That is Now Revolutionizing World Industry. 1st edition. Free Press, New York, NY; 2007.
  • [8]Wright S, McSherry W: A systematic literature review of releasing time to care: the productive ward. J Clin Nurs 2013, 22(9–10):1361.
  • [9]Morrow E, Robert G, Maben J, Griffiths P: Implementing large-scale quality improvement - lessons from the Productive Ward Releasing time to careTM. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2012, 25(4):237.
  • [10]Robert G, Morrow E, Maben J, Griffiths P, Callard L: The adoption, local implementation and assimilation into routine nursing practice of a national quality improvement programme: the Productive Ward in England. J Clin Nurs 2011, 20(7–8):1196.
  • [11]White M, Wells J, Butterworth T: The Productive Ward: Releasing Time to care™TM- What can we learn from the literature for implementation.J Nurs Manag 2013. doi10.1111/jonm.12069.
  • [12]Brennan S, Bosch M, Buchan H, Green S: Measuring organization and individual factors thought to influence the success of quality improvement in primary care: A systematic review of instruments. Implement Sci 2012, 7(1):121. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [13]Damschroder L, Aron D, Keith R, Kirsh S, Alexander J, Lowery J: Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009, 4(1):50. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [14]Dixon-Woods M, McNicol S, Martin G: Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation’s programme evaluations and relevant literature. BMJ Qual Saf 2012, 21(10):876-884.
  • [15]Kaplan H, Provost L, Forehle CM, Margolis PA: The Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ): Building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf 2012, 21(1):13-20.
  • [16]Lukas CV, Holmes SK, Cohen AB, Restuccia J, Shwartz M, Carns MP: Transformational change in health care systems: An organizational model. Health Care Manage Rev 2007, 32(4):309-320.
  • [17]Rycroft-Malone J: The PARIHS Framework - A framework for guiding the implementation of evidence-based practice. J Nurs Care Qual 2004, 19(4):297-304.
  • [18]Taylor EF, Genevro J, Peikes D, Geonnotti K, Wang W, Myers D: Building Quality Improvement Capacity in Primary Care: Supports and Resources. 2013.
  • [19]Bate P, Mendel P, Robert G: Organizing for Quality: The Improvement Journeys of Leading Hospitals in Europe and the United States. Radcliffe Publishing, UK; 2008.
  • [20]Krein SL, Damschroder LJ, Kowalski CP, Forman J, Hofer TP, Saint S: The influence of organizational context on quality improvement and patient safety efforts in infection prevention: A multi-center qualitative study. Soc Sci Med 2010, 71(9):1692-1701.
  • [21]Bate P: Context is Everything. In Perspectives on Context. Health Foundation, London; 2014:1-30.
  • [22]Rycroft-Malone J, Dopson S, Degner L, Hutchinson A, Morgan D, Stewart N, Estabrooks C: Study protocol for the translating research in elder care (TREC): building context through case studies in long-term care project (project two). Implement Sci 2009, 4(1):53. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [23]Robert G, Anderson J, Burnett S, Aase K, Andersson-Gare B, Bal R, Calltorp J, Nunes F, Weggelaar AM, Vincent C, Fulop N: QUASER team: A longitudinal, multi-level comparative study of quality and safety in European hospitals: the QUASER study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res 2011, 11(1):285. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [24]Wilson G: Implementation of releasing time to care - the productive ward. J Nurs Manag 2009, 17(5):647-654.
  • [25]Marchildon G: Implementing Lean Health Reforms in Saskatchewan.Health Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de Santé 2013, 1(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.13162/hro-ors.01.01.01
  • [26]Green J, Thorogood N: Qualitative Methods for Health Research. Second edition. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA; 2009.
  • [27]ATLAS.ti. Version 7.0.72. [Computer software]. (2012). Berlin: Scientific Software Development.
  • [28]Hsieh H, Shannon S: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005, 15(9):1277.
  • [29]Elo S, Kyngas H: The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 2008, 62(1):107-115.
  • [30]Armenakis A, Harris S: Crafting a change message to create transformational readiness. J Organ Change Manage 2002, 15(2):169.
  • [31]Burnett S, Benn J, Pinto A, Parand A, Iskander S, Vincent C: Organizational readiness: Exploring the pre-conditions for success in organization-wide patient safety improvement programmes. Qual Saf Health Care 2010, 19(4):313.
  • [32]Hays RB, Jolly BC, Caldon LJM, McCrorie P, McAvoy PA, McManus IC, Rethans JJ: Is insight important? Measuring capacity to change performance. Med Educ 2002, 36(10):965-971.
  • [33]NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement, National Nursing Research Unit: The Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care Learning and Impact Review. 2010.
  • [34]Blakemore S: How Productive Wards can improve patient care. Nurs Manag 2009, 16:15-18.
  • [35]Smith J, Rudd C: Implementing The Productive Ward management programme. Nurs Stand 2010, 24:45-48.
  • [36]Morrow E, Robert G, Maben J: Exploring the nature and impact of leadership on the local implementation of The Productive Ward Releasing Time to Care. J Health Organ Manag 2014, 28(2):154-176.
  • [37]Murphy L: Transformational leadership: a cascading chain reaction. J Nurs Manag 2005, 13(2):128-136.
  • [38]Davis J, Adams J: The Releasing Time to Care - the Productive Ward programme: participants perspectives. J Nurs Manag 2012, 20(3):354-360.
  • [39]Quality and Safety in European Union Hospitals (QUASER) team: QUASER The Hospital Guide - A research-based tool to reflect on and develop your quality improvement strategies. University College London. Retrieved from http://www.bmg.eur.nl/fileadmin/ASSETS/bmg/Quaser/QUASER-GuideForHospitals
  • [40]Naslund D: Lean, six sigma and lean sigma: fads or reall process improvement methods? Bus Process Manage J 2008, 14(3):269-287.
  • [41]Burgess N, Radnor Z: Evaluating Lean in Healthcare. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2013, 26(3):220.
  • [42]Radnor Z, Holweg M, Waring J: Lean in healthcare? The unfilled promise? Soc Sci Med 2011, 74(2012):364-371.
  • [43]Kinsman L, Rotter T, Stevenson K, Bath B, Goodridge D, Harrison L, Dobson R, Sari N, Jeffery C, Bourassa C, Westhorp G: “The largest Lean transformation in the world”: the implementation and evaluation of Lean in Saskatchewan healthcare. Healthc Q 2014, 17(2):29-32.
  • [44]Kim CS, Spahlinger DA, Kin JM, Coffey RJ, Billi JE: Implementation of lean thinking: one health systems journey. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2009, 35(8):406.
  • [45]NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement: Releasing Time to Care: The Productive Ward Tool Kit. 2008.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:8次 浏览次数:16次