Effectiveness of guideline-based care by occupational physicians on the return-to-work of workers with common mental disorders: design of a cluster-randomised controlled trial

BMC Public Health

Jaap van Weeghel²  Jac J L van der Klink³  Berend Terluin¹  Margot C W Joosen²  Evelien P M Brouwers²  Karlijn M van Beurden² 

[1] EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Department General Practice, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, Amsterdam, 1007 MB, The Netherlands;Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tranzo Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, Tilburg, 5000 LE, The Netherlands;Department of Health Sciences, Work & Health, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, A. Dreusinglaan 1, Groningen, 9713 AV, The Netherlands

关键词: Guideline-based care;    Guideline adherence;    Occupational physicians;    Occupational health service;    Return-to-work;    Sick leave;    Common mental disorders;   

Others  :  1162486
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-13-193

 received in 2013-01-16, accepted in 2013-02-21,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Sickness absence due to common mental disorders (such as depression, anxiety disorder, adjustment disorder) is a problem in many Western countries. Long-term sickness absence leads to substantial societal and financial costs. In workers with common mental disorders, sickness absence costs are much higher than medical costs. In the Netherlands, a practice guideline was developed that promotes an activating approach of the occupational physician to establish faster return-to-work by enhancing the problem-solving capacity of workers, especially in relation to their work environment. Studies on this guideline indicate a promising association between guideline adherence and a shortened sick leave duration, but also minimal adherence to the guideline by occupational physicians. Therefore, this study evaluates the effect of guideline-based care on the full return-to-work of workers who are sick listed due to common mental disorders.

Methods/design

This is a two-armed cluster-randomised controlled trial with randomisation at the occupational physician level. During one year, occupational physicians in the intervention group receive innovative training to improve their guideline-based care whereas occupational physicians in the control group provide care as usual. A total of 232 workers, sick listed due to common mental disorders and counselled by participating occupational physicians, will be included. Data are collected via the registration system of the occupational health service, and by questionnaires at baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome is time to full return-to-work. Secondary outcomes are partial return-to-work, total number of sick leave days, symptoms, and workability. Personal and work characteristics are the prognostic measures. Additional measures are coping, self-efficacy, remoralization, personal experiences, satisfaction with consultations with the occupational physician and with contact with the supervisor, experiences and behaviour of the supervisor, and the extent of guideline adherence.

Discussion

If the results show that guideline-based care in fact leads to faster and sustainable return-to-work, this study will contribute to lowering personal, societal and financial costs.

Trial registration

ISRCTN86605310

【 授权许可】

   
2013 van Beurden et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Vaez M, Rylander G, Nygren A, Asberg M, Alexanderson K: Sickness absence and disability pension in a cohort of employees initially on long-term sick leave due to psychiatric disorders in Sweden. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2007, 42:381-388.
• [2]Dekkers-Sánchez PM, Hoving JL, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH: Factors associated with long-term sick leave in sick-listed employees: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med 2008, 65:153-157.
• [3]Henderson M, Glozier N, Holland Elliot K: Long-term sickness absence is caused by common conditions and needs managing. BMJ 2005, 330(7495):802-803.
• [4]Blank L, Peters J, Pickvance S, Wilford J, MacDonald E: A systematic review of the factors which predict return to work for people suffering episodes of poor mental health. J Occup Rehabil 2008, 18:27-34.
• [5]Brouwers EP, de Bruijne MC, Terluin B, Tiemens BG, Verhaak P: Cost-effectiveness of an activating intervention by social workers for patients with minor mental disorders on sick leave: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Public Health 2006, 17(2):214-220.
• [6]Rebergen DS, Bruinvels DJ, van Tulder MW, van der Beek AJ, van Mechelen W: Cost effectiveness of guideline based care for workers with mental health problems. J Occup Environ Med 2009, 51(3):313-322.
• [7]van der Klink J, Blonk R, Schene A, van Dijk F: Reducing long-term sickness absence by an activating intervention in adjustment disorders: a cluster randomised design. Occup Environ Med 2003, 60:429-437.
• [8]van CH G, Groothoff JW: Nationaal Kompas Volksgezondheid. Wat is de relatie met ziekten en aandoeningen?. http://www.nationaalkompas.nl/gezondheid-en-ziekte/functioneren-en-kwaliteit-van-leven/ziekteverzuim-en-arbeidsongeschiktheid/wat-is-de-relatie-met-ziekten-en-aandoeningen/ webcite
• [9]De Graaf R, Tuithof M, van Dorsselaer S, ten Have M: Verzuim door psychische en somatische aandoeningen bij werkenden. Resultaten van de ‘Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2’ (NEMESIS-2). [Sick leave due to mental and physical disorders among workers. The results of the ‘Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2’ (NEMESIS-2)]. Utrecht: Trimbos Instituut; 2011.
• [10]van der Klink JJL: Richtlijn: Handelen van de bedrijfsarts bij werkenden met psychische problemen. [Guideline: The management of mental health problems of workers by occupational physicians]. Eindhoven: NVAB [Netherlands Society of Occupational Medicine]; 2000.
• [11]van der Klink JJL, Ausems CMM, Beijderwellen BD, Blonk R, Bruinvels DJ, Dogger J, Hoedeman R, Janssen J, Loo M, Nieuwenhuijsen K, Oeij TS, van Rees E, van Rhenen W, de Roos L: Richtlijn: Handelen van de bedrijfsarts bij werkenden met psychische problemen, herziene uitgave. [Guideline: The management of mental health problems of workers by occupational physicians; revised version]. Utrecht: NVAB [Netherlands Society of Occupational Medicine]; 2007.
• [12]Nieuwenhuijsen K, Verbeek JHAM, Siemerink JCMJ, Tummers-Nijsen D: Quality of rehabilitation among workers with adjustment disorders according to practice guidelines; a retrospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med 2003, 60(Suppl I):i21-i25.
• [13]Rebergen D, Hoenen J, Heinemans A, Bruinvels D, Bakker A, van Mechelen W: Adherence to mental health guidelines by Dutch occupational physicians. Occup Med 2006, 56:461-468.
• [14]Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, for the CONSORT Group CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Med 2010, 7(3):e1000251.
• [15]Grol R: Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ 1997, 315:418-421.
• [16]Grol R, Grimshaw J: From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet 2003, 362:1225-1230.
• [17]Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PC, Robin HR: Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for Improvement. JAMA 1999, 282(15):1489.
• [18]Terluin B, van Marwijk HWJ, Adèr HJ, de Vet HCW, Penninx BWJH, Hermens MLM, van Boeijen CA, van Balkom AJLM, van der Klink JJL, Stalman WAB: The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ): a validation study of a multidimensional self-report questionnaire to assess distress, depression, anxiety and somatization. BMC Psychiatry 2006, 6:34. BioMed Central Full Text
• [19]Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Hoogduin K, Schaap C, Kladler A: On the clinical validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory and the burnout measure. Psychol Health 2001, 16:565-582.
• [20]Taris TW, Schreurs PJG, Schaufeli WB: Construct validity of the maslach burnout inventory-general survey: a two-sample examination of its factor structure and correlates. Work Stress 1999, 13:223-337.
• [21]Ilmarinen J, Tuomi K: Work ability index for aging workers. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; 1993.
• [22]Ahlstrom L, Grimby-Ekman A, Hagberg M, Dellve L: The work ability index and single-item question: associations with sick leave, symptoms, and health – a prospective study of women on long-term sick leave. Scand J Work Environ Health 2010, 36(5):404-412.
• [23]De Zwart BC, Frings-Dresen MH, Van Duivenbooden JC: Test-retest reliability of the work ability Index questionnaire. Occup Med 2002, 52:177-181.
• [24]Nygard CH, Eskelinen L, Suvanto S: Associations between functional capacity and work ability among elderly municipal employees. Scand J Work Environ Health 1991, 17(suppl1):122-127.
• [25]Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B: An instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol 1998, 3(4):322-355.
• [26]Schreurs PJG, van de Willige G, Brosschot JF, Tellegen B, Gruas GMH: De Utrechtse Copinglijst: UCL. [The Utrecht Coping List: UCL]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger; 1993.
• [27]Lagerveld SE, Blonk RWB, Brenninkmeijer V, Schaufeli WB: Return to work among employees with mental health problems: development and validation of a self-efficacy questionnaire. Work Stress 2012, 24(4):359-375.
• [28]Vissers W, Keijsers GPJ, van der Veld WM, de Jong CAJ, Hutschemaekers GJM: Development of the remoralization scale. An extension of contemporary psychotherapy outcome measurement. Eur J Psychol Assessment 2010, 26(4):293-301.
• [29]Verbeek JH, de Boer AG, van der Weide WE, Piirainen H, Anema JR, van Amstel RJ, Hartog F: Patient satisfaction with occupational health physicians, development of a questionnaire. Occup Environ Med 2005, 62:119-123.
• [30]Brouwers EPM, Tiemens BG, Terluin B, Verhaak PFM: Effectiveness of an intervention to reduce sickness absence in patients with emotional distress or minor mental disorders: a randomized controlled effectiveness trial. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2006, 28:223-229.