Cheating on examinations and its predictors among undergraduate students at Hawassa University College of Medicine and Health Science, Hawassa, Ethiopia

BMC Medical Education

Asres Berhan¹  Anteneh Assefa Desalegn¹ 

[1] Pharmacology Unit, School of Medicine, Hawassa University, Hawassa, P.O Box-1560, Ethiopia

关键词: Higher institutions;    Academic dishonesty;    Lecture;    Cheating;   

Others  :  866719
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6920-14-89

 received in 2013-12-02, accepted in 2014-04-25,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Cheating on examinations in academic institutions is a worldwide issue. When cheating occurs in medical schools, it has serious consequences for human life, social values, and the economy. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of cheating and identify factors that influence cheating among students of Hawassa University College of medicine and health science.

Methods

A cross sectional study was conducted from May through June 2013. A pre-tested self-administered, structured questionnaire was used to collect self-reported data regarding cheating. Data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 20. Descriptive statistics were used for data summarization and presentation. Degree of association was measured by Chi Square test, with significance level set at p = 0.05. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess associations.

Results

The prevalence of self-reported cheating was found to be 19.8% (95% CI = 17.4-21.9). About 12.1% (95% CI = 10.2-13.9) of students disclosed cheating on the entrance examination. The majority of students (80.1% (95% CI = 77.9-82.3) disclosed that they would not report cheating to invigilators even if they had witnessed cheating. Analysis by multiple regression models showed that students who cheated in high school were more likely to cheat (adjusted OR = 1. 80, 95% CI = 1. 01–3.19) and that cheating was less likely among students who didn’t cheat on entrance examinations (adjusted OR = 0. 25, 95% CI = 0. 14–0.45). Dining outside the university cafeteria and receiving pocket money of Birr 300 or more were strongly associated with cheating (adjusted OR = 3.08, 95% CI = 1.54-6.16 and adjusted OR = 1.69 (95% CI = 1.05-2.72), respectively. The odds of cheating among students were significantly higher for those who went to private high school, were substance users, and didn’t attend lectures than for those who attended government schools, were not substance abusers, and attended lectures.

Conclusion

Our findings have important implications for development of an institution’s policies on academic integrity. By extension, they affect the policies of high schools. Increased levels of supervision during entrance examination, mandated attendance at lectures, and reduction of substance use are likely to reduce cheating. No significant association was found with background, level of parental education, grade point average, and interest in field of study.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Desalegn and Berhan; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Antonio M-G, María José A-H: Effects of academic dishonesty on dimensions of spiritual well-being and satisfaction: a comparative study of secondary school and university students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2014, 39(3):349-363.
• [2]Henning MA, Ram S, Malpas P, Shulruf B, Kelly F, Hawken SJ: Academic dishonesty and ethical reasoning: pharmacy and medical students in New Zealand. Medical Teaching 2013, 35(6):1211-7.
• [3]Hawassa University: Violations of Examination Regulations. Hawassa University senate legislation 2011, Article 82:94-97. http://www.hu.edu.et/hu//images/pdf/senatelegis.pdf webcite.
• [4]McCabe DL, Trevino LK, Butterfield KD: Cheating in academic institutions: a decade of research ethics & behavior. Ethics & Behavior 2001, 11(3):219-232.
• [5]Austin Z, Collins D, Remillard A, Kelcher S, Chui S: Influence of attitudes toward curriculum on dishonest academic behavior. Am J Pharm Educ 2006, 70(3):50.
• [6]Baldwin DC, Daugherty SR, Rowley BD, Schwarz MD: Cheating in medical school: a survey of second-year students at 31 schools. Acad Med 1996, 71(3):267-273.
• [7]Bazoukis G, Dimoliatis IDK: Cheating in medical schools in Greece: quantitative evaluation and recommendations for resolving the problem. Arch Hell Med 2011, 28(3):390-399.
• [8]Glick SM: Cheating at Medical School. BMJ 2001, 322(7281):250-251.
• [9]Nonis S, Swift CO: An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: a Multicampus investigation. Journal Educational Business 2001, 77(2):69-77.
• [10]Whitley BE: Factors associated with cheating among college students: a review. Research Higher Education 1998, 39(3):235-274.
• [11]Diekhoff GM, LaBeff EE, Shinohara K, Yasukawa H: College cheating in Japan and the United States. Research Higher Education 1999, 40(3):343-353.
• [12]Pulvers K, Diekhoff GM: The relationship between academic dishonesty and college classroom environment. Research Higher Education 1999, 40(4):487-498.
• [13]Klein HA, Levenburg NM, McKendall M, Mothersell W: Cheating during the college years: How do business School students compare? Journal Business Ethics 2007, 72(2):197-206.
• [14]Tolkin L, Glick S: Ethical behavioral standards of medical students on examinations and studies. Harefuah 2007, 146(6):429-34.
• [15]Kusnoor AV, Falik R: Cheating in medical school: the unacknowledged ailment. South Med J 2013, 106(8):479-83.
• [16]Mayhew MJ, Hubbard SM, Finelli CJ, Harding TS, Carpenter DD: Using structural modeling to validate the theory of planned behavior as a model for predicting student cheating. Review Higher Education 2009, 32(4):441-468.
• [17]Newstead SE, Stephen E, Franklyn-Stokes A, Armstead P: Individual difference in student cheating. Journal Education Psychology 1996, 88(2):229-241.
• [18]Harper MG: High tech cheating. Nurse Education Today 2006, 26(8):672-679.
• [19]Arhin AO, Jones KA: A multidiscipline exploration of college students’ perceptions of academic dishonesty: are nursing students different from other college students? Nurse Educ Today 2009, 29(7):710-714.
• [20]Muhney KA, Gutmann ME, Schneiderman E, DeWald JP, McCann A, Campbell PR: The prevalence of academic dishonesty in Texas dental hygiene programs. J Dent Educ 2008, 72(11):1247-1260.
• [21]Taradi SK, Taradi M, Dogaš Z: Croatian medical students see academic dishonesty as an acceptable behavior: A cross-sectional multicampus study. J Med Ethics 2012, 38(6):376-379.
• [22]Scheers NJ, Dayton CM: Improved estimation of academic cheating behavior using the randomized response technique. Research Higher Education 1987, 26(1):61-69.
• [23]Eisenberg J: To cheat or not to cheat: effects of moral perspective and situational variables on students’ attitudes. J Moral Educ 2004, 33(2):163-178.
• [24]Lim VKG, See SKB: Attitudes Toward, and Intentions to Report, Academic Cheating Among Students in Singapore. Ethics & Behavior 2001, 11(3):261-274.
• [25]Rabi SM, Patton LR, Fjortofit N, Zagarrick DP: Characteristics, prevalence, attitudes, and perception of academic dishonesty among pharmacy students. Am J Pharm Educ 2006, 70(4):73.
• [26]Ashworth P, Bannister P, Thorne P: Guilty in whose eyes? University students’ perception of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies Higher Education 2006, 22(2):187-203.
• [27]Christakis DA, Feudtner C: Ethics in a short white coat: the ethical dilemmas that medical students confront. Acad Med 1993, 68:249-254.