Exploring changes in open defecation prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa based on national level indices

BMC Public Health

Jay P Graham¹  Seung-Sup Kim²  Deise I Galan³ 

[1] Department of Global Health, School of Public Health and Health Services, The George Washington University, 2175 K St. NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20037, USA;Department of Healthcare Management, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea;Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health and Health Services, The George Washington University, 2100 M St. NW, Suite 203M, Washington, DC 20037, USA

关键词: Total sanitation;    Economic development;    Sanitation policy;    Sub-Saharan Africa;    Sanitation;    Open defecation;   

Others  :  1162154
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-13-527

 received in 2012-10-23, accepted in 2013-05-23,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

In sub-Saharan Africa, it is estimated that 215 million people continue to engage in open defecation. This practice facilitates the transmission of diarrheal diseases – one of the leading causes of mortality in children under 5 in sub-Saharan Africa. The main purpose of this study is to: estimate changes in open defecation prevalence between 2005 and 2010 across countries in sub-Saharan Africa; examine the association between national level indices and changes in open defecation prevalence; and assess how many countries can achieve ‘open defecation free status’ by 2015.

Methods

After applying selection criteria, this study analyzed country-level data for 34 sub-Saharan African countries. Seven country-level indices were collected: 1) presence of a national sanitation policy; 2) budget line for sanitation; 3) budget allocated to sanitation; 4) annual per capita GDP; 5) GDP growth; 6) implementation of total sanitation approaches; and 7) per capita aid disbursement for water supply and sanitation. The relationships between these country-level indices and the change in open defecation from 2005 to 2010 were investigated using Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test and Spearman's rank correlation test.

Results

Only 3 countries (i.e. Ethiopia, Angola and Sao Tome and Principe) decreased open defecation by 10% or more between 2005 and 2010. No significant associations were observed between the change in open defecation prevalence and all of national level indices except per capita aid disbursement. Per capita aid disbursement for water and sanitation was positively associated with a reduction in open defecation (p-value = 0.02) for a subset of 29 low-income countries from 2005 to 2010. Only one country in our analysis, Angola, is on track to end open defecation by 2015 based on their performance between 2000 and 2010.

Conclusions

Most of the national level indices, including a country’s economic status, were not associated with the change in the open defecation prevalence. Based on current trends, the goal of ending open defecation in the majority of sub-Saharan African countries by 2015 will not be achieved. Our findings may be limited by the exploratory nature of this analysis, and future research is required to identify and characterize national level factors specific to reducing open defecation in sub-Saharan Africa.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Galan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]WHO: The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
• [2]Clasen TF, Bostoen K, Schmidt W-P, Boisson S, Fung IC-H, Jenkins MW, Scott B, Sugden S, Cairncross S: Interventions to improve disposal of human excreta for preventing diarrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010., 6
• [3]Aziz KMA, Hoque BA, Hasan KZ, Patwary MY, Huttly SRA, Rahaman MM, Feachem RG: Reduction in diarrhoeal diseases in children in rural Bangladesh by environmental and behavioural modifications. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1990, 84:433-438.
• [4]Garrett V, Ogutu P, Mabonga P, Ombeki S, Mwaki A, Aluoch G, Phelan M, Quick RE: Diarrhoea prevention in a high-risk rural Kenyan population through point-of-use chlorination, safe water storage, sanitation, and rainwater harvesting. Epidemiol Infect 2008, 136:1463-1471.
• [5]WHO: The World health report: 2005: make every mother and child count. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.
• [6]UNICEF: Pneumonia and diarrhoea - Tackling the deadliest diseases for the world’s poorest children. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund; 2012.
• [7]WHO/UNICEF: Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation Report 2012. New York: WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation (JMP); 2012.
• [8]WHO: UN-Water Global Analysis and Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water (GLASS) 2012 report: the challenge of extending and sustaining services. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.
• [9]Jenkins MW, Curtis V: Achieving the 'good life': why some people want latrines in rural Benin. Soc Sci Med 2005, 61:2446-2459.
• [10]Kar K, Milward K: Digging in, Spreading out and Growing up: Introducing CLTS in Africa. IDS Practice Papers 2011, 2011:01-64.
• [11]Chambers R: Going to Scale with Community-Led Total Sanitation: Reflections on Experience, Issues and Ways Forward. IDS Practice Papers 2009, 2009:01-50.
• [12]Hickling S, Bevan J: Scaling up CLTS in sub-Saharan Africa. In Participatory Learning & Action (PLA) 61 – Tales of Shit: Community-Led Total Sanitation in Africa. London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED); 2010.
• [13]Harvey PA: Zero subsidy strategies for accelerating access to rural water and sanitation services. Water Sci Technol 2011, 63:1037-1043.
• [14]WHO/UNICEF: Estimates for the Use of Improved Sanitation Facilities. Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation (JMP). 2012. http://www.wssinfo.org/documents-links/documents/?tx_displaycontroller webcite[type]=country_files, July 23, 2012
• [15]Morella E, Foster V, Ghosh Banerjee S: Climbing the Ladder: The State of Sanitation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2008.
• [16]Perez E, Cardosi J, Coombes Y, Devine J, Grossman A, Kullmann C, Kumar CA, Mukherjee N, Prakash M, Robiarto A: What Does It Take to Scale Up Rural Sanitation. Washington, D.C: The World Bank, Water and Sanitation Program; 2012.
• [17]AMCOW, WSP, UNICEF, WaterAid, CREPA: Sanitation and Hygiene in Africa at a Glance - A synthesis of country priority actions. Abuja, Nigeria: African Minister's Council on Water; 2011.
• [18]World Bank Database - GDP per capita. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD webcite, 23 July, 2012
• [19]Official Development Assitance: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2012. http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=CRS1 webcite, July 23, 2012
• [20]WHO/UNICEF: Population Estimates. Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation (JMP). 2012. http://www.wssinfo.org/data-estimates/table/ webcite, July 23, 2012
• [21]Tayler K, Scott R: Sanitation policy: making it work. Waterlines 2006, 25:25-26.
• [22]WSP: The eThekwini Declaration and AfricaSan Action Plan. Africa: Water and Sanitation Program; 2008.
• [23]Kalimuthu A, Hossain Y: Crossfire: 'Community-led total sanitation is the best method of achieving sustainable sanitation for all in rural areas'. Waterlines 2008, 27:177-183.
• [24]Community-Led Total Sanitation: Ethiopia. http://www.communityledtotalsanitation.org/country/ethiopia webcite, 23 July 2012
• [25]World B: World Development Report 2011: Conflict, security and development. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2011.
• [26]OECD-DAC: Ensuring Fragile States Are Not Left Behind - 2011 Factsheet on Resource Flows in Fragile States. Paris, France: OECD-DAC International Network on Conflict and Fragility; 2011.
• [27]Liu L, Johnson HL, Cousens S, Perin J, Scott S, Lawn JE, Rudan I, Campbell H, Cibulskis R, Li M: Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet 379:2151-2161.